civus

Property profile

130 S 18TH ST

OPA 88809569010 linked records

Different people can share a name and appear on the same profile.

About these name links

Actor profiles are grouped by kind and normalized name. Two people with the same name may appear together in this first version.

Zoned CMX-5Commercial/Commercial Mixed-Use
Owner
PECARSKY KAREN
ZIP code
19103
Year built
2009
Market value
$662,400

Historic

Designation status and decisions from the historic property record.

10 decisions
Historic address
1805-1809 WALNUT STREET (ALISON BUILDING), 132 SOUTH 18TH STREET, 130 SOUTH. 18TH STREET UNITS RC1 AND RC2, 130 SOUTH. 18TH STREET, 130 SOUTH 18TH STREET UNITS RC1 AND RC2
Year built
2009
Building description
RES CONDO 5+ STY MASONRY
Owner
PECARSKY KAREN / PECARSKY WILLIAM

Source links open full minutes. Exact passages have not been matched to these records.

  1. Alteration review

    Architectural Committee

    Recorded outcomeApproved

    Committee recommendations are not final Commission decisions.

    Recorded conditions

    Rear vents approved; sign boxes on Walnut Street facade not to project; if projection required, sign to be non-illuminated; fiber optics technology suggested as alternative

    Prior meeting reference: Previous application for signage on Walnut Street facade

    Votes and testimony

    Testimony

    • Raffaele Castellisupport, person
  2. Alteration review

    Historical Commission

    Recorded outcomeApproved

    Recorded conditions

    Rear air-intake louvers approved; signage approved only if flush to surface within two-inch recess at lintels; if sign box cannot be flush, signage cannot be illuminated

    Prior meeting reference: Architectural Committee meeting of 3 September 1996

    Vote tally
    7 to 1
    Criteria cited
    Votes and testimony

    Votes

    • Arlene Matzkinyes
    • Barbara Kaplanyes
    • Caroline Wischmannyes
    • David Brownleeyes
    • Scott Wildsyes
    • Stephanie Wolfyes
    • Wayne S. Spiloveyes

    Testimony

    • Center City Residents Associationoppose, organization
    • Judith Edenoppose, person
  3. Alteration review

    Architectural Committee

    Recorded outcomeApproved

    Committee recommendations are not final Commission decisions.

    Recorded conditions

    Original bay window on second floor must be retained and restored, not replaced. Only one post to be installed in the stone fence. Restoration of original third-floor windows encouraged.

    Criteria cited
    Retention and restoration of historic fabric (existing bay window)Reduction of number of posts in stone fence to minimize damage
    Votes and testimony

    Testimony

    • Aglio Restaurantsupport, organization
    • Bob Kauffmannsupport, person
    • Myrna Mendozasupport, person
  4. Alteration review

    Architectural Committee

    Recorded outcomeApproved

    Committee recommendations are not final Commission decisions.

    Recorded conditions

    Without the new cornice; staff to review details, including brick choice for penthouse addition.

    Prior meeting reference: Commission approval February 2004 (demolition of rear section of penthouse)

    Criteria cited
    Votes and testimony

    Testimony

    • Brian Mahonysupport, person
    • John Galleryneutral, person
    • Michael Skolnicksupport, person
    • Neil Sklaroffsupport, person
    • Patricia Matteraneutral, person
  5. Alteration review

    Architectural Committee

    Recorded outcomeNo decision

    Committee recommendations are not final Commission decisions.

    Recorded conditions

    Approved if revised storefront was previously approved by Commission; denied as incomplete if revised storefront was not previously approved; staff to confirm which storefront design was approved and whether property owner authorized the application

    Prior meeting reference: Commission approved demolition of four rowhouses and construction of 400-foot tower with storefronts in 2004

    Criteria cited
    Votes and testimony

    Testimony

    • Darwin Beauvaissupport, person
    • Joe Vastasupport, person
    • Jorge Dantaneutral, person
  6. Alteration review

    Architectural Committee

    Recorded outcomeApproved

    Committee recommendations are not final Commission decisions.

    Recorded conditions

    Signage does not project more than 2 inches beyond the face of the glass and not at all beyond the face of the transom bars; staff to review details.

    Prior meeting reference: Application reviewed and withdrawn prior to Commission meeting the previous month; storefront approved by Commission in October 2007

    Vote tally
    Unanimous (not specified)
    Criteria cited
    Votes and testimony

    Testimony

    • Darwin R. Beauvaissupport, person
    • Ken Lowthersupport, person
    • Timothy Hogansupport, person
  7. Alteration review

    Historical Commission

    Recorded outcomeApproved

    Recorded conditions

    Signage does not project more than 2 inches beyond the face of the glass and not at all beyond the face of the transom bars; staff to review details

    Prior meeting reference: Commission approved storefront design October 2007; Architectural Committee 22 September 2009

    Vote tally
    unanimous
    Votes and testimony

    Votes

    • Daniel Quinnyes
    • David Amburnyes
    • David Schaafyes
    • Joan Schlotterbeckyes
    • John Mattioniyes
    • Robert Thomasyes
    • Rosalie Leonardyes
    • Sam Shermanyes
    • Sara Merrimanyes
    • Scott Wildsyes

    Testimony

    • Darwin Beauvaissupport, person
    • Ken Lowthersupport, person
    • Timothy Hogansupport, person
  8. Alteration review

    Architectural Committee

    Recorded outcomeDenied

    Committee recommendations are not final Commission decisions.

    Recorded conditions

    Committee suggested: two vertical projecting signs installed at first story, one replacing existing blade sign; signs smaller than proposed (approx. 3-4 quoins in length, projecting roughly same distance as existing blade sign); all attachments to penetrate mortar joints only, not stone blocks.

    Criteria cited
    Votes and testimony

    Testimony

    • Meredith Kellerneutral, person
    • Michelle Tremontsupport, person
  9. Alteration review

    Historical Commission

    Recorded outcomeDenied

    Recorded conditions

    Architectural Committee suggested: two vertical projecting signs at first story (one replacing existing blade sign); new projecting signs smaller than proposed, extending ~3-4 quoins in length, projecting roughly same distance as existing first-story blade sign; all attachments penetrate mortar joints not stone blocks.

    Prior meeting reference: Architectural Committee meeting, 25 July 2017

    Vote tally
    Unanimous
    Votes and testimony

    Votes

    • Anuj Guptayes
    • Betty Turneryes
    • Bob Thomasyes
    • Dan McCoubreyyes
    • Emily Coopermanyes
    • H. Ahada Stanfordyes
    • R. David Schaafyes
    • Rachel Royeryes
    • Steven Hartneryes
    • Terrence Dillonyes

Linked public records

Records are sorted by date and cite the basis for each property link.

  1. HearingLinked by parcel number
    Philadelphia Historical Commissiondenied
    Link details

    This is the stored score for the link between this record and the property.

    Method:
    opa_exact
    Stored score:
    100% confidence
  2. HearingLinked by parcel number
    Philadelphia Historical Commissiondenied
    Link details

    This is the stored score for the link between this record and the property.

    Method:
    opa_exact
    Stored score:
    100% confidence
  3. HearingLinked by parcel number
    Philadelphia Historical Commissionapproved
    Link details

    This is the stored score for the link between this record and the property.

    Method:
    opa_exact
    Stored score:
    100% confidence
  4. HearingLinked by parcel number
    Philadelphia Historical Commissionapproved
    Link details

    This is the stored score for the link between this record and the property.

    Method:
    opa_exact
    Stored score:
    100% confidence
  5. HearingLinked by parcel number
    Philadelphia Historical Commissionno_decision
    Link details

    This is the stored score for the link between this record and the property.

    Method:
    opa_exact
    Stored score:
    100% confidence
  6. HearingLinked by parcel number
    Philadelphia Historical Commissionapproved
    Link details

    This is the stored score for the link between this record and the property.

    Method:
    opa_exact
    Stored score:
    100% confidence
  7. HearingLinked by parcel number
    Philadelphia Historical Commissionapproved
    Link details

    This is the stored score for the link between this record and the property.

    Method:
    opa_exact
    Stored score:
    100% confidence
  8. HearingLinked by parcel number
    Philadelphia Historical Commissionapproved
    Link details

    This is the stored score for the link between this record and the property.

    Method:
    opa_exact
    Stored score:
    100% confidence
  9. HearingLinked by parcel number
    Philadelphia Historical Commissionapproved
    Link details

    This is the stored score for the link between this record and the property.

    Method:
    opa_exact
    Stored score:
    100% confidence
  10. HearingLinked by parcel number
    Philadelphia Historical Commissionapproved
    Link details

    This is the stored score for the link between this record and the property.

    Method:
    opa_exact
    Stored score:
    100% confidence