Nomination
Historical Commission
Property profile
Different people can share a name and appear on the same profile.
Actor profiles are grouped by kind and normalized name. Two people with the same name may appear together in this first version.
Designation status and decisions from the historic property record.
Source links open full minutes. Exact passages have not been matched to these records.
Historical Commission
Architectural Committee
Committee recommendations are not final Commission decisions.
stoop to be made of stone or cast stone rather than concrete, signage reduced to awnings, corner plaques and one sign next to door, lighting to be improved
Historical Commission
Stoop must be made of stone or cast stone rather than concrete, Amount of signage reduced to awnings, corner plaques and one sign next to new door, Lighting to be improved
Architectural Committee
Committee recommendations are not final Commission decisions.
Historical Commission
Architectural Committee
Committee recommendations are not final Commission decisions.
Architectural Committee
Committee recommendations are not final Commission decisions.
Ten-foot projecting canopy installed within the arch; support poles set three feet out from building with large planters at each pole; burgundy canvas with gold letters on each side to match existing canopies; closed at end; light connected to existing fixture within arch to illuminate interior; no egg crate for underside
Historical Commission
Historical Commission
Architectural Committee
Committee recommendations are not final Commission decisions.
Staff recommended denial; concerns raised about weight/bulk of proposed canopies, inappropriate materials, attachment method (tie-backs into masonry), and obstruction of character-defining features
Historical Commission
Architectural Committee recommended elimination of canopies at windows and illuminated planters; applicant submitted revised drawings at meeting; review ongoing
Prior meeting reference: Architectural Committee, 23 October 2012 — recommended denial pursuant to Standard 9
Architectural Committee
Committee recommendations are not final Commission decisions.
Committee noted that approval could be recommended for: awnings installed within masonry openings anchored like existing awnings; aluminum storefronts with tripartite divided lites and slimmer mullion/frame; infill at base of center bay restored to historic height using metal, stucco, or stone matching the base (approximately 8-12 inches)
Prior meeting reference: Historical Commission previously denied similar window proposals for these openings; existing windows approved approximately 10 years prior
Records are sorted by date and cite the basis for each property link.
This is the stored score for the link between this record and the property.
This is the stored score for the link between this record and the property.
This is the stored score for the link between this record and the property.
This is the stored score for the link between this record and the property.
This is the stored score for the link between this record and the property.
This is the stored score for the link between this record and the property.
This is the stored score for the link between this record and the property.
This is the stored score for the link between this record and the property.
This is the stored score for the link between this record and the property.
This is the stored score for the link between this record and the property.
This is the stored score for the link between this record and the property.
This is the stored score for the link between this record and the property.