civus

Property profile

500-36 CHESTNUT ST

OPA 78105060018 linked recordsCouncil district 1

Different people can share a name and appear on the same profile.

About these name links

Actor profiles are grouped by kind and normalized name. Two people with the same name may appear together in this first version.

Zoned SP-PO-ASpecial Purpose
Owner
CITY OF PHILA
ZIP code
19106
Year built
1732
Market value
$34,521,300

Historic

Designation status and decisions from the historic property record.

11 decisions
Historic address
INDEPENDENCE SQUARE PHILADELPHIA, 500-36 CHESTNUT STREET INDEPENDENCE HALL, INDEPENDENCE SQUARE GROUP OF BUILDINGS, INDEPENDENCE SQUARE GROUP OF BUILDINGS INDEPENDENCE HALL OLD CITY HALL (GENERAL INDEPENDENCE SQUARE COMPLEX)
Year built
1732
Building description
MISC MUSEUM MASONRY
Owner
CITY OF PHILA / INDEPENDENCE HALL

Source links open full minutes. Exact passages have not been matched to these records.

  1. Alteration review

    Historical Commission

    Recorded outcomeApproved

    Recorded conditions

    Partial approvals granted; several items (humidity sensors, control system, drain pans, HVAC heat escape at attics, smoke detectors) denied pending resolution of Technical Sub-Committee concerns. Items approved as resolved include filtration, basement ventilation, future HVAC service to Independence Hall second floor, double wall piping, attic ventilation, contact security devices, Independence Hall basement window sash detail, structural system, lighting, alarms, Independence Hall and Old City Hall electrical outlets. Items approved in concept pending further work include consistency between submitted documents and theory behind control of temperature and humidity conditions.

    Prior meeting reference: 381st Stated Meeting (13 April 1994); 383rd Stated Meeting (3 June 1994); Technical Sub-Committee meetings of 31 May, 14 June, 3 August, and 8 August 1994

    Vote tally
    Unanimous
    Criteria cited
    Consistency of submitted documentsTemperature and humidity control theoryReduction of sensor intrusionCompliance with Philadelphia Code for drainage
    Votes and testimony

    Votes

    • Arlene Matzkinyes
    • Barbara Kaplanyes
    • Bennett Levinyes
    • David Brownleeyes
    • Peter VanderHeideyes
    • Robert Vanceyes
    • Ronald Barberyes
    • Scott Wildsyes
    • Stephanie Wolfyes
    • Susan Rabinovitchyes
    • Wayne Spiloveyes

    Testimony

    • National Park Serviceneutral, organization
    • Scott Duenowneutral, person
    • Vitetta Group, Inc.neutral, organization
  2. Informational

    Historical Commission

    Recorded outcomeNo decision

    Recorded conditions

    Committee and Sub-Committee working on final approvals; recommendation expected next month

    Votes and testimony

    Testimony

    • Arlene Matzkinneutral, person
    • National Park Servicesupport, organization
    • Vitetta Groupsupport, organization
  3. Alteration review

    Historical Commission

    Recorded outcomeDenied

    Prior meeting reference: Architectural Committee meeting, 25 October 1994

    Vote tally
    Unanimous (Ms. Pentz and Mr. Hollenberg abstained)
    Votes and testimony

    Votes

    • Arlene Matzkinyes
    • Barbara Kaplanyes
    • David Brownleeyes
    • David Hollenbergabstain
    • John Streetyes
    • Ms. Pentzabstain
    • Peter VanderHeideyes
    • Robert Vanceyes
    • Ron Barberyes
    • Scott Wildsyes
    • Stephanie Wolfyes
    • Susan Rabinovitchyes

    Testimony

    • Keast and Hoodneutral, organization
    • National Park Serviceneutral, organization
  4. Alteration review

    Architectural Committee

    Recorded outcomeDeferred

    Committee recommendations are not final Commission decisions.

    Recorded conditions

    Using last year's temperature and humidity data, adjust algorithms to guarantee that no condensation will occur, even during transitional periods, Provide an analysis of algorithms over a full year using last year's temperature and humidity data, Create a control schematic, logic diagram, or decision tree diagram, Bring Air Flow Diagram (M3-4.1, Detail #11) into conformance with system operation, Acknowledge that rate of change in specification would have to be relaxed, Provide better description of monitoring and alarm system, Provide better description of summer humidity controls and monitoring, Describe the unoccupied mode in the specification, Provide enough detail within Sequence of Operations of Control Specifications, Find a wood louver cover for 2x8 faceplates of Independence Hall stairway step lights

    Criteria cited
    Preservation of historic fabricMechanical systems compatibilityCondensation preventionInterior climate control
  5. Informational

    Historical Commission

    Recorded outcomeNo decision

    Recorded conditions

    Technical Sub-Committee recommendations regarding mechanical systems, smoke detectors, lighting, temperature/humidity controls, condensation prevention, monitoring systems, and interior faceplate finishes

    Prior meeting reference: 11 November 1994 Technical Sub-Committee meeting

  6. Alteration review

    Architectural Committee

    Recorded outcomeApproved

    Committee recommendations are not final Commission decisions.

    Recorded conditions

    Use of heat tapes reinforced as recommended

    Prior meeting reference: Initial recommendation to use heat tapes

  7. Alteration review

    Architectural Committee

    Recorded outcomeDeferred

    Committee recommendations are not final Commission decisions.

    Recorded conditions

    Tabled for up to six months to allow for additional investigation; Architectural Committee to visit site; Ms. Pentz's potential participation to be reviewed given advisory vs. regulatory capacity question

    Vote tally
    Architectural Committee voted to recommend tabling for a period not to exceed six months
    Criteria cited
    Restoration Standard 2Restoration Standard 3Restoration Standard 5Restoration Standard 6Restoration Standard 8
    Votes and testimony

    Testimony

    • Amanda Jonessupport, person
    • Charles Tonettisupport, person
    • Doris Fanellisupport, person
    • National Park Servicesupport, organization
  8. Alteration review

    Historical Commission

    Recorded outcomeDeferred

    Recorded conditions

    Tabled for a period not to exceed six months to allow for additional investigation; remanded to Architectural Committee for review with additional information gathered during site visit

    Prior meeting reference: Architectural Committee, 24 March 2009

    Vote tally
    Unanimous
    Votes and testimony

    Votes

    • Daniel Quinnyes
    • David Amburnyes
    • David Schaafyes
    • Della Clarkyes
    • Duane Bumbyes
    • Joan Schlotterbeckyes
    • John Mattioniyes
    • Leslie Benolielyes
    • Richardson Dilworthyes
    • Rosalie Leonardyes
    • Sam Shermanyes
    • Scott Wildsyes

    Testimony

    • Amanda Jonesneutral, person
    • Charles Tonettineutral, person
    • Doris Fanellineutral, person
  9. Alteration review

    Architectural Committee

    Recorded outcomeNo decision

    Committee recommendations are not final Commission decisions.

    Prior meeting reference: Architectural Committee meeting 9 April 2009; Commission meeting 24 March 2009; Commission tabled application for period not to exceed six months and remanded to Architectural Committee

    Votes and testimony

    Testimony

    • Amanda Jonessupport, person
    • Charles Tonettisupport, person
    • Doris Fanellisupport, person
  10. Alteration review

    Architectural Committee

    Recorded outcomeApproved

    Committee recommendations are not final Commission decisions.

    Recorded conditions

    Approval conditioned on results of mock-up tests supporting proposed methodology; staff to review details including samples of repair and replacement materials, pointing samples, and shop drawings of replacement trim and windows; staff to schedule regular weekly site meetings with National Park Service during construction to prevent delays

    Prior meeting reference: All work except tower recladding previously approved by Commission in April 2009

    Vote tally
    Unanimous (Pentz recused)
    Criteria cited
    Restoration Standard 2Restoration Standard 3Restoration Standard 4Restoration Standard 5Restoration Standard 6Restoration Standard 7Restoration Standard 8
    Votes and testimony

    Votes

    • Suzanne Pentzrecused

    Testimony

    • Amanda Jonessupport, person
    • Charles Tonettisupport, person
    • Doris Fanellisupport, person
  11. Alteration review

    Historical Commission

    Recorded outcomeApproved

    Recorded conditions

    Staff to review details including samples of repair and replacement materials, pointing samples, and shop drawings of replacement trim and windows; Department of Public Property to submit list of qualified subcontractors to National Park Service; City representatives and staff to participate in weekly on-site job meetings

    Prior meeting reference: Architectural Committee, 15 December 2009; previously approved by Commission in April 2009 (excluding tower recladding)

    Vote tally
    Unanimous
    Criteria cited
    Restoration Standard 2Restoration Standard 3Restoration Standard 4Restoration Standard 5Restoration Standard 6Restoration Standard 7Restoration Standard 8
    Votes and testimony

    Votes

    • Daniel Quinnyes
    • David Amburnyes
    • David Schaafyes
    • Joan Schlotterbeckyes
    • John Mattioniyes
    • Leslie Benolielyes
    • Richardson Dilworthyes
    • Rosalie Leonardyes
    • Sam Shermanyes
    • Sara Merrimanyes
    • Scott Wildsyes

    Testimony

    • Amanda Jonessupport, person
    • Charles Mottersheadsupport, person
    • Charles Tonettisupport, person
    • Department of Public Propertysupport, organization
    • Doris Fanellisupport, person
    • Gary Knappicksupport, person
    • National Park Servicesupport, organization

Linked public records

Records are sorted by date and cite the basis for each property link.

  1. Philadelphia L&I Violations
    View on Atlas
    Link details

    This is the stored score for the link between this record and the property.

    Method:
    opa_exact
    Stored score:
    100% confidence
  2. L&I permits on hearing parcelsExpired
    View on Atlas
    Link details

    This is the stored score for the link between this record and the property.

    Method:
    opa_exact
    Stored score:
    100% confidence
  3. L&I permits on hearing parcelsCompleted
    View on Atlas
    Link details

    This is the stored score for the link between this record and the property.

    Method:
    opa_exact
    Stored score:
    100% confidence
  4. Philadelphia L&I Violations
    View on Atlas
    Link details

    This is the stored score for the link between this record and the property.

    Method:
    opa_exact
    Stored score:
    100% confidence
  5. Philadelphia L&I Violations
    View on Atlas
    Link details

    This is the stored score for the link between this record and the property.

    Method:
    opa_exact
    Stored score:
    100% confidence
  6. Philadelphia L&I Violations
    View on Atlas
    Link details

    This is the stored score for the link between this record and the property.

    Method:
    opa_exact
    Stored score:
    100% confidence
  7. L&I permits on hearing parcelsCOMPLETED
    View on Atlas
    Link details

    This is the stored score for the link between this record and the property.

    Method:
    opa_exact
    Stored score:
    100% confidence
  8. HearingLinked by parcel number
    Philadelphia Historical Commissionapproved
    Link details

    This is the stored score for the link between this record and the property.

    Method:
    opa_exact
    Stored score:
    100% confidence
  9. HearingLinked by parcel number
    Philadelphia Historical Commissionapproved
    Link details

    This is the stored score for the link between this record and the property.

    Method:
    opa_exact
    Stored score:
    100% confidence
  10. HearingLinked by parcel number
    Philadelphia Historical Commissionno_decision
    Link details

    This is the stored score for the link between this record and the property.

    Method:
    opa_exact
    Stored score:
    100% confidence
  11. HearingLinked by parcel number
    Philadelphia Historical Commissiondeferred
    Link details

    This is the stored score for the link between this record and the property.

    Method:
    opa_exact
    Stored score:
    100% confidence
  12. HearingLinked by parcel number
    Philadelphia Historical Commissiondeferred
    Link details

    This is the stored score for the link between this record and the property.

    Method:
    opa_exact
    Stored score:
    100% confidence
  13. HearingLinked by parcel number
    Philadelphia Historical Commissionapproved
    Link details

    This is the stored score for the link between this record and the property.

    Method:
    opa_exact
    Stored score:
    100% confidence
  14. HearingLinked by parcel number
    Philadelphia Historical Commissionno_decision
    Link details

    This is the stored score for the link between this record and the property.

    Method:
    opa_exact
    Stored score:
    100% confidence
  15. HearingLinked by parcel number
    Philadelphia Historical Commissiondeferred
    Link details

    This is the stored score for the link between this record and the property.

    Method:
    opa_exact
    Stored score:
    100% confidence
  16. HearingLinked by parcel number
    Philadelphia Historical Commissiondenied
    Link details

    This is the stored score for the link between this record and the property.

    Method:
    opa_exact
    Stored score:
    100% confidence
  17. HearingLinked by parcel number
    Philadelphia Historical Commissionno_decision
    Link details

    This is the stored score for the link between this record and the property.

    Method:
    opa_exact
    Stored score:
    100% confidence
  18. HearingLinked by parcel number
    Philadelphia Historical Commissionapproved
    Link details

    This is the stored score for the link between this record and the property.

    Method:
    opa_exact
    Stored score:
    100% confidence