341 S CAMAC ST

Historic address

343-345 SOUTH CAMAC STREET AKA 1221 PINE STREET, 345 SOUTH CAMAC STREET (AT PINE STREET), 341 SOUTH CAMAC STREET, 345 SOUTH. CAMAC STREET, 343-345 SOUTH CAMAC STREET

Year built

1800

Building description

ROW 3 STY MASONRY

Owner

ROCKWELL JEFFREY L / ROCKWELL RONALD C

Source links open full minutes. Exact passages have not been matched to these records.

1. Sep 29, 1988

   Alteration review

   Architectural Committee

   Recorded outcomeDeferred

   Committee recommendations are not final Commission decisions.

   Recorded conditions

   Cornice must be removed and correct cornice installed before deck railing permit approved, Detailed drawings of proposed deck railing required, Additional photographs required before approval, Chairman to inspect building to evaluate cornice appropriateness

   Prior meeting reference: 1984 - permit for roofing, no record of cornice approval

   Criteria cited

   Appropriateness of corniceBuilding permit approval

   Full source minutes

   Votes and testimony

   Testimony

   • Warren Bradwaysupport, person
2. Oct 12, 1988

   Nomination

   Historical Commission

   Recorded outcomeDeferred

   Full source minutes
3. Aug 31, 1989

   Alteration review

   Architectural Committee

   Recorded outcomeApproved

   Committee recommendations are not final Commission decisions.

   Recorded conditions

   Third floor addition to be stuccoed only; glass block to be removed and single pane casement windows installed on rear facade; addition, deck, rear window enlargement, and front railing approved; Committee evenly divided on chimney rebuilding requirement — no resolution on chimney.

   Criteria cited

   Permit violation for work undertaken without approvalVisibility of rear facade facing Lantern CourtCharacter-defining elements of early 19th century buildings

   Full source minutes

   Votes and testimony

   Testimony

   • Jay Feldmanneutral, person
   • Jeff Rockwellsupport, person
   • Ronald Rockwellsupport, person
4. Sep 13, 1989

   Alteration review

   Historical Commission

   Recorded outcomeApproved

   Recorded conditions

   Third floor rear addition, deck, rear window enlargement, and front iron railing approved; stucco only third floor addition; glass block removed and replaced with single pane casement windows on rear facade; chimney reconstruction not required given small size of building, recent date of chimney, and significant cost of reconstruction

   Prior meeting reference: Architectural Committee meeting of 31 August 1989

   Vote tally

   Carried

   Criteria cited

   Stop work order issued for unpermitted workChimney was a reconstruction, not original 19th century chimneySmall size of buildingSignificant cost of reconstruction

   Full source minutes

   Votes and testimony

   Testimony

   • Jeff Rockwellsupport, person
5. Jan 12, 1994

   Alteration review

   Historical Commission

   Recorded outcomeApproved

   Recorded conditions

   Replace present storefront cornice with another wraparound cornice; replace missing bargeboard to match existing one on front slope of roof; Richard Tyler to assist applicant; final drawings must be presented for Commission review

   Prior meeting reference: Architectural Committee meeting, 30 December 1993

   Vote tally

   Motion approved; specific tally not recorded

   Criteria cited

   Demolition by neglect orderHistoric photograph evidence of heavier storefront corniceExamples of intact wraparound storefront cornices on similar contemporary buildingsNo examples found of period cornices only above windows

   Full source minutes

   Votes and testimony

   Votes

   • Wayne Spiloveyes

   Testimony

   • Arlene Matzkinneutral, person
   • Richard Tylerneutral, person
   • Warren Bradwaysupport, person
6. May 31, 1994

   Alteration review

   Architectural Committee

   Recorded outcomeApproved

   Committee recommendations are not final Commission decisions.

   Recorded conditions

   Approval conditioned on Bradway submitting profile details of current and future bargeboard and cornices, and working with Commission staff to determine original details for bargeboard and proper detail for individual storefront cornices.

   Prior meeting reference: Seen several months prior by Architectural Committee and full Commission; Commission previously rejected Committee recommendation and asked owner to retain existing cornices pending design of appropriate wraparound cornice

   Criteria cited

   Match with historic storefront cornice designEvidence from historic photographsComparable period examplesDemolition by Neglect violation context

   Full source minutes

   Votes and testimony

   Testimony

   • Warren Bradwaysupport, person
7. Jun 3, 1994

   Alteration review

   Historical Commission

   Recorded outcomeApproved

   Recorded conditions

   Applicant must submit profile details of existing and proposed bargeboards and cornices; must work with Commission staff to establish and produce original detail drawings for the bargeboard and a proper detail for the individual storefront cornices. Bargeboard drawings must receive staff approval.

   Prior meeting reference: Prior Architectural Committee and Commission meetings (several months prior); appeal to Department of Licenses and Inspections Review Board

   Vote tally

   Unanimous

   Criteria cited

   Originality of wraparound corniceAppropriate replacement of deteriorated historic elementsDemolition by Neglect violation

   Full source minutes

   Votes and testimony

   Votes

   • Arlene Matzkinyes
   • Barbara Kaplanyes
   • Bennett Levinyes
   • Jeffrey Firstyes
   • Peter VanderHeideyes
   • Ronald Barberyes
   • Scott Wildsyes
   • Susan Rabinovitchyes
   • Wayne Spiloveyes

   Testimony

   • Warren Bradwaysupport, person