Resolution 150712
Urging the Pennsylvania delegation to the United States Senate to oppose any attempt to limit the ability of States to require labeling of GMO foods.
Introduced by
From the floor
Passages in the official transcripts that cite this file number. Every quote links to its exact place in the record.
“I'm sorry. A little distracted. Thank you. Before considering these bills and resolutions on the Final Passage Calendar today, we will have our public comment session. Our public comment session will go as follows: If you are interested in testifying on a bill or resolution that is on the Final Passage Calendar today, if you have not already done so, we ask that you sign up at the table to my left. When your name is…”
Council President Clarke · Stated Meeting, October 1, 2015 · Oct 1, 2015 · official transcript, this passage
“Yes, Mr. President. I want to first salute a number of citizens who have shown up here this morning to register their voice on this important measure. It really is an extension of our interest and continued work around menu labeling, which now is a part of the national discussion. And I'm surprised but encouraged to see that we have all of those who are here to speak on Resolution 150712. But my humble appeal to thes…”
Councilwoman Brown · Stated Meeting, October 1, 2015 · Oct 1, 2015 · official transcript, this passage
“Good morning, ladies and gentlemen. I'm Robert Taylor, President of TWU Local 700 and WPEB 88.1, co-host on the Jasper Jones Show. I am commenting on the Resolution 150712, genetically modified foods. I support this resolution Stated Meeting October 1, 2015 absolutely urging the Pennsylvania delegation to the United States Senate to oppose any attempt to limit the ability of the States to require labeling of GMO food…”
Mr. Taylor · Stated Meeting, October 1, 2015 · Oct 1, 2015 · official transcript, this passage
“The ayes have it. Resolution 150712 is adopted. The Chair recognizes Councilman Johnson. (Applause.)”
Council President Clarke · Stated Meeting, October 1, 2015 · Oct 1, 2015 · official transcript, this passage
Status timeline
- Sep 17, 2015Introduced and Ordered Placed On Next Week's Final Passage Calendar · CITY COUNCIL
- Oct 1, 2015ADOPTED · CITY COUNCIL
Official documents
Documents open on the City of Philadelphia’s legislative site.
Full text
Read the full text as published
..Title Urging the Pennsylvania delegation to the United States Senate to oppose any attempt to limit the ability of States to require labeling of GMO foods. ..Body WHEREAS, Residents of Philadelphia have the right to know whether the foods they purchase were produced with genetic engineering so they can make informed purchasing decisions. Labeling is necessary to ensure that consumers are fully and reliably informed about the products they purchase and consume; and WHEREAS, Consumers overwhelmingly favor knowing whether the food they purchase and consume is produced with genetic engineering for a variety of reasons including health, economic, environmental, religious and ethical reasons. Polls consistently show that the vast majority of the public, more than 90%, wants to know if its food was produced with genetic engineering; and WHEREAS, There is currently no federal requirement that genetically engineered (GMO) foods be labeled. In contrast, over 60 countries, including Japan, South Korea, China, Australia, Russia, Malaysia, the European Union member states and other key U.S. trading partners, already have laws mandating the disclosure of GMO ingredients on food labels. In 2011, Codex Alimentarius, the food standards organization of the United Nations, stated that governments are free to decide on whether and how to label foods produced with genetic engineering; and WHEREAS, The U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) does not require or conduct safety studies of GMO foods. Instead, any safety consultations are voluntary, and GMO food developers may decide what information to provide to the agency. Market approval of genetically engineered food is based on industry research alone. There have been no long-term or epidemiological studies in the U.S. that examine the safety of human consumption of genetically engineered foods; and WHEREAS, Mandatory identification of foods produced with genetic engineering can provide a method for detecting the potential health effects of consuming such foods; and WHEREAS, Without mandatory disclosure, consumers of GE foods may unknowingly violate their dietary and religious beliefs; and WHEREAS, Foods identified as non-GMO constitute the fastest growing market segment in agriculture. However, only a small portion of the food industry participates in voluntary labeling of foods claimed not to be the product of genetic engineering. There are no consistent standards for such labeling or for enforcement of voluntary labels. Because of this, voluntary labels are insufficient to provide consumers with adequate information on whether or not the food they are purchasing was produced with genetic engineering; and WHEREAS, Because neither the FDA nor the U.S. Congress requires the labeling of food produced with genetic engineering, in order to serve the interests of their citizens some states, including Connecticut, Maine and Vermont, have passed laws to require GMO labeling in their states. Vermont's law is set to go into effect in July 2016. Other states, including Pennsylvania, have considered similar legislation in recent legislative sessions and more states will likely pass GMO labeling bills in the future to respond to public demand for this labeling; and WHEREAS, On July 23, 2015, the U.S. House of Representatives passed the "Safe and Accurate Food Labeling Act of 2015," a bill that would preempt state governments from requiring labeling of GMO foods; now, therefore be it RESOLVED, BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PHILADELPHIA, That we do hereby urge the Pennsylvania delegation to the United States Senate to oppose any attempt to limit the ability of States to require labeling of GMO foods. ..End