civus
ResolutionADOPTEDCeremonial

Resolution 170319

Urging the Pennsylvania state legislature to reject S.B. 166 due to the bills' negative impact on the ability of public sector unions to effectively advocate on behalf of their membership.

Introduced Mar 30, 2017CITY COUNCILOfficial record: City of Philadelphia via Legistar

Introduced by

Councilmember JohnsonCouncilmember HenonCouncilmember GymCouncilmember GreenCouncilmember BlackwellCouncilmember JonesCouncilmember DombCouncilmember Quiñones Sánchez

From the floor

Passages in the official transcripts that cite this file number. Every quote links to its exact place in the record.

  1. The ayes have it, and Resolution 170319 is adopted. Stated Meeting April 6, 2017 4/6/17 - STATED - 2ND READING Mr. Decker, 170320.

    Council President Clarke · Stated Meeting, April 6, 2017 · Apr 6, 2017 · official transcript, this passage

Status timeline

  1. Mar 30, 2017Introduced and Ordered Placed On Next Week's Final Passage Calendar · CITY COUNCIL
  2. Apr 6, 2017ADOPTED · CITY COUNCIL

Official documents

Documents open on the City of Philadelphia’s legislative site.

Full text

Read the full text as published

..Title Urging the Pennsylvania state legislature to reject S.B. 166 due to the bills' negative impact on the ability of public sector unions to effectively advocate on behalf of their membership. ..Body WHEREAS, Unions have played a crucial role in raising the standard of living for members and non-members alike, using the power of advocacy and collective action to transform the relationship between employers and employees. The gains accrued through union advocacy include better healthcare coverage, higher wages, improved worker safety and workplace conditions, and a more secure retirement; and WHEREAS, Unions have played a particularly prominent role in lifting up the working-class families of Philadelphia and giving back to the communities that their members call home; and WHEREAS, S.B. 166 aims to prevent public sector unions from using voluntary contributions by members to advocate. The result would be to eliminate ability of unions to advocate on behalf of members in the public sphere, effectively muting the voice of many of Pennsylvania's working families; and WHEREAS, If public sector unions are deprived the resources necessary to stand up for their members, unions will likely see a marked decline in their political and legal fortunes, as their voice in city, county and state government will be greatly diminished; and WHEREAS, Unions have historically provided workers with robust protection against unfair employment practices, and their advocacy has helped to lift the standard of living for millions of Americans. S.B. 166 will severely hamper unions' ability to effectively represent working class families and continue that mission; now, therefore, be it RESOLVED, BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PHILADELPHIA, That the Council hereby urges the Pennsylvania state legislature to reject S.B. 166 and 167 due to the bills' negative impact on the ability of public sector unions to effectively advocate on behalf of their membership. ..End