civus
ResolutionADOPTEDCeremonial

Resolution 200265

Authorizing the City Council Committee on Public Safety to hold hearings to investigate the Police Board of Inquiry’s disciplinary process within the Philadelphia Police Department.

Introduced Mar 12, 2020CITY COUNCILOfficial record: City of Philadelphia via Legistar

Introduced by

Status timeline

  1. Mar 12, 2020Introduced and Ordered Placed on This Week's Final Passage Calendar · CITY COUNCIL
  2. Mar 12, 2020ADOPTED · CITY COUNCIL

Official documents

Documents open on the City of Philadelphia’s legislative site.

Full text

Read the full text as published

..Title Authorizing the City Council Committee on Public Safety to hold hearings to investigate the Police Board of Inquiry's disciplinary process within the Philadelphia Police Department. ..Body WHEREAS, The Police Board of Inquiry (PBI) has a hearing process in place for officer discipline within the Philadelphia Police Department (PPD). All hearings follow a classification and can either be deemed as "Public" or "Internal"; and WHEREAS, In general, not much is known about the "internal" investigatory and PBI processes. These investigations are conducted in secret and the classification of "internal" seems to be given on an "ad hoc" basis. An overwhelming number of Police Investigations are classified as "internal." This classification shields these cases completely from public view; and WHEREAS, While there may be sound rationale for classifying these cases as "internal," there is no PPD policy available to the public that would guide the classification. Cases are classified as "internal" regardless of whether confidentiality is actually needed when reviewing the matter; and WHEREAS, From what has been observed of "public" PBI hearings, the system does not seem to be designed with officer accountability in mind. The PPD and the Police Union are involved in all aspects of the process as the accused, prosecutor, jury, judge and witnesses. The accused is represented by hired counsel, while the PPD is represented by a department advocate without formal legal training. Additionally, the procedure often relies on a higher criminal burden of proof as opposed to an administrative standard of preponderance of the evidence. Finally, the determination of guilt is made by a hearing board, also solely compromised of police officers, and in all cases the final decision is made by the Police Commissioner; and WHEREAS, The PPD receives thousands of citizen complaints every year, yet only 2% of these complaints result in a guilty verdict. Moreover, those receiving a guilty verdict are usually not disciplined in a manner that would deter problematic behavior in the future; and WHEREAS, In many cases, the legitimacy of the PPD has been eroded because of the disciplinary process or lack thereof. The public must have confidence in the procedures the PPD has in place to hold their own accountable. Having a stronger system in place for officer accountability will ultimately benefit the PPD and the residents of the City; now, therefore, be it RESOLVED, BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PHILADELPHIA, That it hereby authorizes the City Council Committee on Public Safety hold hearings to investigate the Police Board of Inquiry's disciplinary process within the Philadelphia Police Department. ..End