MINUTES OF THE MEETING OF THE ARCHITECTURAL COMMITTEE OF THE PHILADELPHIA HISTORICAL COMMISSION 20 August 1980 Herbert W. Levy, A.I.A., Chairman Present: Herbert W. Levy, A.I.A., Chairman, Architectural Advisor to the Commission Theodore T. Barkley, Jr., A.I.A., Preservation Committee, American Institute Of Architects, Philadelphia Chapter Henry J. Magaziner, F.A.I.A., Architect for the National Park Service Penelope H. Batcheler, Architect for the Independence National Historical Park Janet E. Klein, Vice Chairman of the Commission Patricia Siemiontkowski, Architectural Historian Also: Thomas Holloman, Architect, to present his proposal for renovations to 3212 Poselton Avenue. Hugh Matauley, Architect, to present his plans for the reconstruction of the front wall of 1821 Delancey Street. Richard Tarcara, of Matauley-Spearc Architects, to present plans for the restoration of 1220 Fanna Street. Ellen LaBrivre to present a proposal for the restoration of the front facade of 215 South 9th Street. John Kordek, Architect, to present his proposal for alterations to the side elevation of 5363 Germantown Avenue. Brian Ambusacter, Architect, to present plans for alterations to the side and rear elevations of 321 Chestnut Street. David Forker, Architect, Sean O'Shea, Developer, and Graig Blakely of the Philadelphia Historic Preservation Corporation, to present plans for the restoration of 100 Chestnut Street. Sol Catraro, Contractor, to discuss his proposal for the reconstruction of the front facade of 2102 Green Street. SUBMISSIONS FOR ALTERATIONS 3212 Poselton Avenue, Thomas Holloman, Architect. Mr. Hilloman presented to the Committee his plans for the restoration of the front facade of 3212 Poselton Avenue. Erected in 1852 from the design of G. W. and W. D. Harlick, the 2200 block of Poselton Avenue stands as a fine example of West Philadelphia speculative rowhouse development. The architect submitted, along with his plans, photographs of the restored window sash installed within the original upper floor openings and stated his intention to repair the original wooden porch and restore the first floor window sash and doors. Following a brief discussion of the project, the Committee agreed to recommend the approval of Mr. Holloman's proposal subject to the installation of an elliptical window sash on the first floor front to match the original at 3212. A revised drawing is required. 1821 Delancey Street, Hugh McSarley, Architect. Mr. McSarley presented to the Committee several proposals for the stabilization of the front facade of 1821 Delancey Street. Built c. 1830 as part of a row of four buildings, the front wall of
match the original at 3212. A revised drawing is required. 1821 Delancey Street, Hugh McSarley, Architect. Mr. McSarley presented to the Committee several proposals for the stabilization of the front facade of 1821 Delancey Street. Built c. 1830 as part of a row of four buildings, the front wall of 1821 is structurally unsound and in need of repair. ARCHITECTURAL COMMITTEE 2 20 August 1980 Two of the schemes reviewed called for the removal of the face brick, the stabilization of the back-up brick with blind plates and anchors, and the reconstruction of the bulging sections of the facade with the original face brick. Scheme three entails the complete reconstruction of the facade with new cinder block back-up and the re-erection of the original face brick. The alternate chosen will depend on the condition of the wall as determined by the architect during construction. In addition, new window sash within the upper floor window openings are proposed for installation. After some discussion, the Committee recommended the approval of Mr. McCauley's proposal and encouraged the architect to install the correct four-over-four light window sash on the fourth floor as shown in an early photograph in the Commission's file. 1220 Panama Street, Richard Parkage, McCauley-Storer, Architects. Mr. Parkage presented to the Committee for review his plans for the full restoration of the iron facade of 1220 Panama Street. Built c. 1850, this small two- and-a-half story house represents a three-back to an earlier style of con- struction with its shed dormer, plank window frames and steeply pitched roof. Subject to several changes, the Architectural Committee agreed to recommend the approval of this restoration proposal. Concerning the door, the architect was advised to correct the proportions between the panels by making all rails equal except for the heavier bottom rail. The Committee suggested that the architect examine the quoins of the dormer under the asphalt shingles and work them accordingly. Finally, the top of wider, 1 ft 6, headed boards on the cellar bulkhead door is required. 215 South 9th Street, Ellen LaRiviera, Owner. Mrs. LaRiviera presented to the Committee plans for the restoration of the stair heads of 215 South 9th Street. Built c. 1818, this three-and-a-half story house was later altered for commercial use on the ground floor. Mrs. LaRiviera's proposal called for the restoration of the ground floor to its original residential character with the installation of an arch head
restoration of the stair heads of 215 South 9th Street. Built c. 1818, this three-and-a-half story house was later altered for commercial use on the ground floor. Mrs. LaRiviera's proposal called for the restoration of the ground floor to its original residential character with the installation of an arch head doorway, two window openings and a cellar buildhead. Work on the upper floors would include the installation of new window sash and repair- work to the dormer. Several changes to the elevation were suggested by the Committee. These included the installation of a cellar window next to the basement bulkhead and centered under the first floor window; three over three light sash in the third floor window openings; leaner quoins on the cellar bulkhead and a broader style of the doorway proportions. If shutters are desired, they should be lowered on all three floors. The Committee recommended that the elevation be revised and resubmitted to the staff for a final review and approval. 5283 Germantown Avenue. John Kozioli, Architect. The Committee reviewed Mr. Koziol's proposal for the refurbishing of the exterior of this much altered early nineteenth century house and recommended its approval. Since the proposed work will not constitute a restoration, the building will not be eligible for the receipt of a plaque. ARCHITECTURAL COMMITTEE 3 20 August 1960 321 Chestnut Street, Brian Armbruster, Architect. Mr. Armbruster presented his plans for alterations to the Maritime Museum at 321 Chestnut Street for the Committee's consideration. In addition to the construction of a third and fourth floor addition at the rear of the building, the proposal called for the introduction of a handicapped access ramp along the side elevation and accompanying alterations. After a brief discussion, the Committee voted to recommend the approval of Mr. Armbruster's plans as presented. 100 Chestnut Street, David Porter, Architect, HNTB. Mr. Porter appeared with Sean O'Shea, Developer and Craig Hately of the Philadelphia Historical Preservation Corporation to present the Corporation's drawings for the restoration of 100 Chestnut Street. The Committee found the drawings, prepared by Mardama Thomas, to be acceptable and suggested only a few minor changes. On the front Street elevation it was determined that the window hoods were more worthily a Victorian addition to the facade and not original. The Committee agreed that they could be eliminated from the restoration proposal if desired. Also the Committee asked that the plans be revised to
minor changes. On the front Street elevation it was determined that the window hoods were more worthily a Victorian addition to the facade and not original. The Committee agreed that they could be eliminated from the restoration proposal if desired. Also the Committee asked that the plans be revised to include the reopening of the window at 106 North Front Street to match that within the south bay. Finally, Mrs. Batcheler agreed to contact Mardama Thomas concerning various details. An approval of this project is recommended. 2102 Green Street, Sal Udivno, Contractor. Mr. Udivno discussed with the Committee members his proposal to demolish the bulging front wall of 2102 Green Street and reconstruct it with new brick. The Committee pointed out to Mr. Udivno that the building was originally stuccoed, as recorded in an 1855 insurance survey on file in the Commission offices, to simulate brownstone. A clinker block front stuccoed and scored to simulate brownstone would be more in keeping with the original character of the structure and, if done correctly, would merit the building a plaque. The Committee recommended using 2106 as a cadet for the design of the projecting window sills and lintels. Pre-cast brownstone steps were suggested as a replacement for the existing concrete ones. The Committee recommended that the contractor consult with the staff concerning the details of the restoration and submit for review an elevation drawing. PLAQUES 209 South 3rd Street. Mr. Barkley reported on his inspection of 209 South 3rd Street to the Committee members. The following items were noted: 1) a scored water table (south end) 2) broken check walls on the stoop 3) no iron railing 4) no shutters on the third floor 5) poor condition of shutters on second floor 6) cornics not restored 7) dormer not restored 8) [text appears cut off or illegible] ARCHITECTURAL COMMITTEE 4 20 August 1980 The Committee recommended that a plaque not be issued to 309 South 3rd Street until the building has been completely and accurately restored. 941 and 943 Lombard Street. Subsequent to the Committee meeting, Mr. Barkley inspected the two buildings at 941 and 943 Lombard Street and found the restorations to be acceptable. A plaque for each of the buildings is recommended. 2123 Spruce Street. Mr. Levy, subsequent to the Committee meeting, inspected 2123 Spruce Street and recommended that a plaque not be issued at this time. To be eligible
at 941 and 943 Lombard Street and found the restorations to be acceptable. A plaque for each of the buildings is recommended. 2123 Spruce Street. Mr. Levy, subsequent to the Committee meeting, inspected 2123 Spruce Street and recommended that a plaque not be issued at this time. To be eligible for a plaque, the storm sash on the ground floor, the flower box and the screen door on the basement entrance must be removed. There being no further business, the meeting adjourned at 5:15 P. M. Respectfully submitted, Patricia Meadowcroft Architectural Historian