West Chew Avenue. I vote to dismiss. James Snell, dismiss. Ishmael Shaheed, dismiss.
Ishmael Shaheed, dismiss.
Thomas Holloman, dismiss, please.
Thank you, Tom.
That case has been dismissed.
Number five, MI 2022-002851-2328 North Natrona Street.
No exhibits, second listing.
There was a contingency request at the prior hearing.
Elijah Cupid is the listed applicant, and the listed owner is Thomas Bronson.
Is he either here?
Chair, we have Elijah Cupid listed in the audience.
I'll allow him to speak, but the answer isn't raised.
Thank you.
Mr. Cupid, please unmute yourself.
Hi, could you state your name and spell, please, for the court reporter?
My name is Elijah Cupid, E-L-I-J-A-H.
C-U-P-I-T.
You swear or affirm to tell the truth, the whole truth, and nothing but the truth?
Affirm.
Mr. Cupid, this is the second listing we have.
We do not have any exhibits from you.
The exhibits wasn't forwarded?
We do not have them, sir.
And that was the whole package.
They said they don't have the package for us over the zoning board.
Right.
Have you had your RCO meeting?
we uh we had well they we had a meeting on the 23rd um and we had somehow some malfunctions
happened we couldn't get on the meeting um and everything was submitted to the rco and everything
was submitted to the zoning board also ahead of time i'm not sure why you got well let's go back
did you ever have an rco meeting we didn't we didn't actually have a meeting um and she was
supposed to get us a letter we we scheduled twice uh well we scheduled once well we couldn't get
the meeting the first time because we that we was trying to uh meet with you guys so we couldn't get
the rco so we had to reschedule with y'all so we we scheduled one for the 23rd which me and a couple
of people who supported me couldn't get on it was just saying we was waiting for them to start the
meeting so we couldn't get on and kept trying to reboot reboot and that went on for like an hour
i emailed everybody i called everybody mr netta is in charge of the cdc down there and her
assistants we couldn't get nobody that night but it was several people that couldn't get on so
So my expedited just suggested that we just come and try to be heard from the board today because this would be the second time we postpone.
OK, so we don't have your exhibits is what I'm saying.
We did. Yeah, we did. I mean, it must have been some kind of issue.
So here's here's what we're going to do. We're going to continue the case.
The next time you come in, it must be tried. You do the best you can to have our meeting.
And if you need help with having your exhibits delivered, call the office.
They'll tell you exactly what to do.
Good enough.
So, so MI 2022 002 851 2328 North Natrona street.
The case is continued.
Mark must be tried the next time.
Thank you, sir.
Chair, we have Tyrone Williams with the hand up.
uh okay uh mr williams yes how you doing mr bergman could you state your name please and
spell for the court reporter sure tyrone williams spelled t-y-r-o-n-e the first name williams w-i-l-l-i-a-m-s
is the last name from the tell the truth the whole truth nothing but the truth yes i do sir
what case do you want to talk about i want to talk about 2328 north natrona i just heard uh
the young man on the phone just now, as he did state, we have a standard RCO meeting
every fourth Thursday of the month. We did have one in February. Mr. Tennant and Mr. Colbert
were to present on that evening. They were given our Zoom information, a timely matter.
Mr. Tender let me know that he was not going to be there.
Mr. Colbert was supposed to be there.
Our meeting did take place.
We had well over 20 people who had came in.
I don't understand why they couldn't get in.
So, Mr. Williams, so you know, I've continued the case.
I told him he has to reach out to the RCO to get in for the meeting,
do the best he can for that.
I also need some more paperwork from him.
So it's continued the next time it has to be tried.
Yes. Well, we're the coordinator of the RCO. We have been talking with you.
Okay. That's great to hear.
And so we'll try it again, but I just wanted to put this on record.
All right. Thank you so much for coming in and putting it on a record. Thank you.
Okay, we're going to start with case number two. MI 2022-003-880-5015 Cedar Avenue. Mr. Saquat is the owner applicant. It's a pro se. There is a letter of support from the Cedar Park neighbors.
Okay. We're going to start with case number two.
Mr. Sequat.
I see no hands at this time, Chair.
I'm sorry, Chair.
The hands just came up.
Okay, that's fine.
All right, I'll see who this is.
Zai, last name ended in with C, as in Charles.
Please unmute yourself.
Okay, let's see who it is.
Hello?
Hi, Kai, could you state your name and spell, please, for the court reporter?
Yes, my name is Zay Chakran. Z-A-I, first name, last name is C-H-A-K-R-A-N-E. I am the daughter of
the former owner, the current owner, who is Noelle Sakat, my mother. She can state her name for the
record as well now. Hold on one minute. Who's going to present? I'll be presenting. Okay,
so so let's stay with you first do you swear or affirm to tell the truth the whole truth and
nothing but the truth yes i affirm okay um our vice first let me read this to you this application
is for the use excuse me mr chair excuse me the chair this is this is hillary she is not the owner
of the property she cannot testify for her parents okay they need to testify about the property so
they need to be torn in okay so let let which one of your parents are here my mother is here
my father is the original property owner and he passed a few years ago okay so is your mother
prepared to testify yes excuse me chair i'm sorry i had to promote them to panels okay thank you
hi could you state your name please and spell for the court reporter
hi my name is Nawal Sekat n-a-w-a-l last name s-e-q-q-a-t
you swear or affirm to tell the truth the whole truth nothing but the truth
i do swear right so now you're the owner of the property you're the ones going to have to testify
if you if you want to show the computer you can show the computer for
but you can't testify okay all right so this application hold on this application is for the
use as a multi-family household living four dwelling units on the same lot with all other
uses as previously approved no sign on this application the proposed multi-family household
living is prohibited in the rsa 3 zoning district whereas four parking spaces are required there are
none being proposed. That's why you're here for variances. So our vice chair has just a few
questions for you. Okay. Good afternoon, ma'am. Have you emailed all the required documents
and exhibits to our offices five days in advance to this hearing for us to proceed
with this case? Yes, I did. All right. Thank you. Please proceed. You can share your screen.
One second.
Green button at the bottom.
Oh, one second. I'm just pulling this up.
okay so now what we're going to do your mother's going to say what it is she wants to do
and where i would start is if you have pictures of the property show us pictures of the property
we see all your documents that you've submitted we have them yes
I mean, I'm really in pictures.
Maybe in the last season.
I guess I think so.
do you want like a picture of the front of the property so so remember i i need for her to
testify right so what i would say is show me the front of the property first i'll take you through
show me the front of the property sure
this is the front of the property that's in front of your property yes and how many units are in
the property four it's four units and that's currently separated already as four units yes
four utilities all separated how long has it been in that situation where it's been four units it
was built since
it was built, it was
built as four unit.
How long have you lived there?
Well, we have it for over 15 years.
All right. Show me the
inside of the property now.
I'm sorry.
I'm sorry.
These are the pictures of each bathroom and each kitchen.
Is the property separated with utilities?
There's electric meters for each property?
And let me ask you this.
the rest of the block the block that this is on are there multiple other multiple unit buildings
yes uh actually the the the house next to me that we do share the next the same wall
she had it has four units still all right okay
all right so this has been existing for 15 years that you know of
okay all right questions from the board no mr chairman
No, Chair.
No, Chair.
And to be clear, you also went to the Cedar Park neighbors, right?
The RCO.
And you presented your case and they agreed, right?
They sent a letter of support.
Ma'am?
You guys freeze up?
Yes, yes.
So my question is, you guys went to the local neighborhood RCO?
Yes, we did.
And they agreed with you.
The center letter of support.
Questions from the virtual audience?
I see no handshare.
Planning Commission.
This is Ron Bednar, City Planning.
This property is indicated for residential use on a city plan or adopted district plan risk means no change to existing residential single-family zoning at this location.
the applicant's hardship is not supported with evidence of unique physical circumstances or
condition of the property that would prevent it from being used and conformity with the code
therefore we recommend rest for variance not be granted. MI 2022 003 880 5015 Cedar Avenue I vote
yes. Thomas Holloman, my vote is yes. James Snell, my vote is yes. Ishmael Shaheed, my vote is yes.
You have your votes, you have your variances. Thank you. Thank you so much. All right, thank you.
And we can go ahead and lead now. You're done, you're done. You'll receive things in the mail,
Okay. Thank you. Number six, MI 2022-002-344-400 East Allegheny Avenue. John Sotomayor is the owner.
Letter of support from IMPACT. Letter of non-opposition from Council Member Lozada.
Mr. Sotomayor.
Oh my God.
Mr. Sotomayor, how are you?
Could you state your name, please, and spell it for the court reporter?
John Sotomayor, J-O-H-N.
Last name is Sotomayor, S-O-T-O-M-A-Y-O-R.
Right.
Do you swear or affirm to tell the truth, the whole truth, and nothing but the truth?
right so this application is for a takeout restaurant at the first floor in the same
building with single family household living above there are no signs no sign this application
There are no signs, no sign this application.
there's one
There's one referral.
The proposed takeout restaurant requires special exception approval in the RSA CMX 2.5 zoning district.
Our vice chair has a few questions for you, sir.
Good afternoon, sir.
have you emailed all the documents and exhibits required to proceed with this case five days in
advance of this hearing yes thank you please proceed with and share your screen
can i um share um can i share with um badista katia present on my package as i present i know
yeah she can show the screen you're going to present okay okay all right your honor i i
have to share the screen of another computer. You have to give me access to share the package.
He's on his phone. Okay, we will. We will.