STEPHANIE KINDT
Profiles are grouped by kind and normalized name. Two people with the same name may appear together in this first version.
Granted
0
Decided cases
Denied
7
Decided cases
Continued
0
Decided cases
Properties touched
Deduped by OPA parcel.
Council districts
Linked public records
Decided and scheduled records are labeled separately. Derived RCO overlaps are labeled as overlapping, not coordinated.
- DecidedApplicantListed appeal party
2110 UPLAND WAY: YOU HAVE FILED AN APPEAL AGAINST THE DEPARTMENT OF LICENSES AND INSPECTIONS FOR THE ISSUANCE OF PERMIT # 504342. YOU STATE THE REASON FOR THE APPEAL IS THE PERMIT WAS ISSUED IN ERROR BECAUSE "THE FRONT SETBACK SHALL BE LOCATED NO CLOSER TO THE PRIMARY STREET THAT THE CLOSEST FRONT FACADE OF THE PRINCIPAL BUILDING ON EITHER OF THE TWO IMMEDIATELY ABUTTING LOTS" AND OTHER REASONS STATED IN YOUR LETTER DATED NOVEMBER 27, 2013.
- DecidedApplicantListed appeal party
6000 OVERBROOK AVE: YOU HAVE FILED AN APPEAL AGAINST THE DEPARTMENT OF LICENSES AND INSPECTIONS FOR THE ISSUANCE OF PERMIT # 504341. YOU STATE THE REASON FOR THE APPEAL IS THE PERMIT WAS ISSUED IN ERROR BECAUSE "THE FRONT SETBACK SHALL BE LOCATED NO CLOSER TO THE PRIMARY STREET THAN THE CLOSEST FRONT FACADE OF THE PRINCIPAL BUILDING ON EITHER OF THE TWO IMMEDIATELY ABUTTING LOTS" AND OTHER REASONS STATED IN YOUR LETTER DATED NOVEMBER 27, 2013.
- DecidedAttorneyListed appeal party
5135 BLEIGH AVE: YOU HAVE FILED AN APPEAL AGAINST THE DEPARTMENT OF LICENSES AND INSPECTIONS FOR THE ISSUANCE OF ZONING/USE PERMIT #444504 FOR THE SUBJECT PROPERTY. YOU STATE THE REASON FOR THE APPEAL AS FOLLOWS: MULTIPLE STRUCTURES ON LOT WITH MULTIPLE MAIN USES NOT PERMITTED. PROPOSED SIGN IS WITHIN 600 FEET OF I-76 A FEDERAL AID HIGHWAY AND DOES NOT MEET THE HEIGHT REQUIREMENTS - SEE ATTACHED LETTER.
- DecidedAttorneyListed appeal party
13 N 32ND ST: YOU HAVE FILED AN APPEAL AGAINST THE DEPARTMENT OF LICENSES AND INSPECTIONS FOR THE ISSUANCE OF ZONING/USE PERMIT #442167. YOU STATE THE REASON FOR THE APPEAL AS FOLLOWS: THE SIGN IS A NON-CONFORMING SIGN WITH NO PERMIT ON FILE. SIGN IS IN VIOLATION OF THREE SECTIONS OF PHILADELPHIA SIGN CODE - SEE ATTACHED.
- DecidedAttorneyListed appeal party
400-18 N 5TH ST: APPEAL AGAINST THE DEPARTMENT OF L&I FOR THE ISSUANCE OF ZONING/USE PERMIT #311081.
- DecidedAttorneyListed appeal party
1513 N DELAWARE AVE: YOU HAVE FILED AN APPEAL AGAINST THE DEPARTMENT OF LICENSES AND INSPECTIONS FOR THE ISSUANCE OF ZONING/USE PERMIT # 393873. REASONS FOR THIS APPEAL ARE STATED IN YOUR SEPTEMBER 14, 2012 LETTER TO CHAIRWOMAN LYNETTE BROWN-SOW.
- DecidedAttorneyListed appeal party
1113 VINE ST: APPEAL AGAINST THE DEPARTMENT OF LICENSES AND INSPECTIONS FOR THE ISSUANCE OF PERMIT #395848.
- DecidedAttorneyListed appeal party
2902 S CHRISTOPHER COLUMBUS BLVD: APPEAL AGAINST LICENSES AND INSPECTIONS FOR THE ISSUANCE OF ZONING/ USE PERMIT #350818. YOU STATED THAT THE CONVERSION OF A STATIC SIGN TO A DIGITAL SIGN INVOLVES STRUCTURAL ELECTRICAL, ENVIRONMENTAL, SAFETY AND AESTHETIC ISSUES. THE CURRENT CODE DOES NOT PERMIT FLASHING OR ROTATING SIGNS WITH A PROPER REVIEW. IT IS NOT APPROPRIATE TO ISSUE A PERMIT FOR THIS TYPE OF CONVERSION AS OF RIGHT. PROPER REVIEW OF THE AFOREMENTIONED ISSUES IS REQUIRED.
- DecidedAttorneyListed appeal party
2801 RICHMOND ST: APPEAL AGAINST THE DEPARTMENT OF LICENSES AND INSPECTIONS FOR THE ISSUANCE OF ZONING/USE PERMIT #391086.
- DecidedAttorneyListed appeal party
2801 RICHMOND ST: APPEAL AGAINST THE DEPARTMENT OF LICENSES AND INSPECTIONS FOR THE ISSUANCE OF ZONING/ PERMIT #390992.
- DecidedAttorneyListed appeal party
2801 RICHMOND ST: APPEAL AGAINST THE DEPARTMENT OF LICENSES AND INSPECTIONS FOR THE ISSUANCE OF ZONING/USE PERMIT #391085.
- DecidedApplicantListed appeal party
3144 W PASSYUNK AVE: APPEAL AGAINST LICENSES AND INSPECTIONS FOR THE ISSUANCE OF ZONING/PERMIT #378017 FOR THE SUBJECT PROPERTY. YOU STATED THAT: THE INSTALLATION OF A NEW DIGITAL FORMAT SIGN OF THIS SIZE IS INAPPROPRIATE AT THE PRESENT TIME BECAUSE THE SIGNAGE SECTION OF THE NEW ZONING CODE HAS NOT YET BEEN CREATED. THE SIGN CONTROL WORKING GROUP IS BEGINNING CIVIC ENGAGEMENT ACTIVITIES THIS MONTH. LARGE DIGITAL SIGNS INVOKE UNIQUE STRUCTURAL, ELECTRICAL ENVIRONMENTAL, SAFETY AND AESTHETIC ISSUES. BEST PRACTICES ON THESE ISSUES SHOULD BE DETERMINED BEFORE THIS NEW DOUBLE FACED 96' SIGN IS ERECTED.
- TranscriptMentionedNamed in the transcript
- TranscriptMentionedNamed in the transcript
- TranscriptMentionedNamed in the transcript