COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PHILADELPHIA COMMITTEE OF THE WHOLE - - - Room 400, City Hall Philadelphia, Pennsylvania Tuesday, April 6, 2010 10:25 a.m. - - - PRESENT: COUNCIL PRESIDENT ANNA C. VERNA COUNCILWOMAN JANNIE BLACKWELL COUNCILMAN DARRELL L. CLARKE COUNCILMAN FRANK DiCICCO COUNCILMAN W. WILSON GOODE, JR. COUNCILMAN BILL GREEN COUNCILMAN WILLIAM GREENLEE COUNCILMAN CURTIS JONES, JR. COUNCILMAN JAMES F. KENNEY COUNCILWOMAN JOAN L. KRAJEWSKI COUNCILWOMAN MARIA QUINONES-SANCHEZ COUNCILWOMAN DONNA REED MILLER COUNCILWOMAN MARIAN B. TASCO BILLS 100115, 100116, 100117, 100118, 100131 and RESOLUTION 100141 - - - 2
Good morning. This is the continued public hearing of the Committee of the Whole. The first department to testify this morning? MR. McPHERSON: Is the Fire Department.
Commissioner Ayers. (Witnesses approached witness table.)
Good morning. Welcome. Please identify yourself for the record and proceed with your testimony. COMMISSIONER AYERS: Thank you and good morning, Council President Verna and members of City Council. For the record, I am Fire Commissioner Lloyd Ayers. With me is Dave Beatrice, Deputy Commissioner for Administrative Services, and members of my executive team and staff. It is our pleasure to testify before this Committee. 3 4/6/10 - WHOLE - BILL 100115, etc. 1 million annually. Even with these reductions, the Philadelphia Fire Department has been able to continue its goal and mission of making Philadelphia the safest city in the country. In 2009, the Philadelphia Fire Department achieved its goal in reducing the number of fire incidents, reducing Fire Department accidents and injuries, maintaining fire prevention education programming for our communities and continuing to provide emergency medical services to an ever-growing demand for service. I am also proud and pleased to report today to City Council that in Calendar Year 2009, the Philadelphia Fire Department had the lowest number of fire fatalities in the Department's recorded history. We were able to achieve this reduction in fire fatalities by focusing 4 4/6/10 - WHOLE - BILL 100115, etc. on the following: Through our Freedom from Fire program, the Department used a three-pronged approach to prevent fire incidents and fire fatalities, including smoke alarms, home fire safety checklists, and home escape plans and drills. In Fiscal Year 2010, the Department was also able to initiate several innovative projects, including reduction in paperwork through the use of electronic documents. Approximately 90 percent of the Department's personnel is submitting electronic documents, and the remaining ten percent should be in compliance by the end of the fiscal year. During the fall of 2009, Northrop Grumman installed the hardware needed for the new computer-aided dispatch, or CAD. Successful migration to the new CAD hardware occurred in January of 2010. Phase of the new CAD project, when fully implemented, will deploy 4/6/10 - WHOLE - BILL 100115, etc. technologies such as GPS, or global positioning services, and AVL, which is automatic vehicle location, recommendations and mapping wireless 9-1-1 cell telephone calls. Mobile data terminals were installed in all chief officers' and specialty vehicles, which brings technology decision-making tools to the emergency scenes. In Fiscal Year 2010, the Fire Department unveiled its new HAZMAT training room located at Engine 60's location. This is a new state-of-the-art training room which will significantly increase the training capabilities for the Department's HAZMAT technicians. The Philadelphia Fire Department's total Operating Budget request for Fiscal Year 2011 is $196,484,383. This budget breaks down as follows: $188,762,383 from the General Fund, $1,519,293 from the Grants Fund, $6,203,000 from the Aviation Fund. 4/6/10 - WHOLE - BILL 100115, etc. Philadelphia Fire Department salaries and fixed costs make up 96 percent of this overall budget request with the below allocations: $175,682,934 in Class 100 funds, $6,642,983 in Class 200 funds, $7,609,883 in Class 300/400 funds, and $6,548,583 in Class 800 funding. This Fiscal Year '11 request shows a net decrease of $1,772,301 from the Fiscal Year 2010 estimated total obligation of $198,256,684. That is less than one -- a total of one percent reduction. Our proposed budget for Fiscal Year 2011 provides for a staffing level of 2,289 uniform and 114 civilian positions. The Philadelphia Fire Department's budgetary decrease is in part due to the consolidation of the Division of Technology. The Philadelphia Fire Department will absorb additional reductions through deployment strategies and also by seeking out additional grant 4/6/10 - WHOLE - BILL 100115, etc. opportunities.
Throughout the remainder of Fiscal Year 2010, the Philadelphia Fire Department will be finalizing its strategic plan and identifying the mission and future goals of the Department. If further budget reductions were made, the effects of the levels of service that the Fire Department currently provides would be significant. 5 percent, would necessitate the deactivations or brownouts of the equivalent of four engine companies, two ladder companies and five medic units. That would eliminate 144 uniform field positions. The below table -- see the below table regarding those reduction scenarios. The Fire Department is committed to supporting the Administration's goal of percent 25 minority, woman and disabled-owned 8 4/6/10 - WHOLE - BILL 100115, etc. business participation in City contracting. The overall Fire Department's Fiscal Year 2011 participation goal is percent, as set 6 by the Office of Economic Opportunity. 7 The below table indicates the information 8 regarding professional services 9 contracts. 10 Thanks to City Council's bill 11 that required all single and two-family 12 residential properties and assisted-care 13 facilities to have carbon monoxide 14 alarms, we have also made great strides 15 in reducing the number of carbon monoxide poisonings. Because more people are now aware of the carbon monoxide leaks, we have seen a threefold increase in emergency calls, 406 incidents reported in Calendar Year 2009 versus 130 incidents in 2008. However, because problems can be identified earlier, there was only a slight increase in the number of people transported to the hospital, 72 versus 69, and one less fatality. 9 4/6/10 - WHOLE - BILL 100115, etc. For your information, we have attached the following table and maps: Station location table, engine location with Council districts, ladder locations with Council districts, medic unit locations with Council districts, fire fatality locations with Council districts, emergency medical services incident density with Councilmanic districts, structure fire density with Council districts, and fire service representative locations with Council districts. This concludes my testimony, and I would like to take this opportunity to thank this Council for its continued support of the members of the Philadelphia Fire Department. I speak not only for myself but for all the members of the Philadelphia Fire Department in saying that your support is, has been and will be much appreciated. I thank you, and now I will be glad to answer any questions. 10 4/6/10 - WHOLE - BILL 100115, etc.
Thank you, Commissioner, and we members of City Council are also very grateful for the wonderful work that you and your department do. At this time, I have a few questions I would like to ask. Commissioner, on of your detail, you show a reduction of $1 million for implementation of FY09 staffing reductions. Can you explain these reductions and their service impact? COMMISSIONER AYERS: Yes. That was a reduction of 31 positions. Yes.
What was the impact, if any? COMMISSIONER AYERS: The effect? We did not reduce those numbers, those 31 positions. Those positions are still in place. DEPUTY
If I may, Everett Gillison, Deputy Mayor for Public Safety. Good morning, Council.
Good 11 4/6/10 - WHOLE - BILL 100115, etc. morning. DEPUTY
Councilwoman, those were the proposed reductions that we decided to put in place in order to save money during the crisis. After we ended up doing an analysis right after the Commissioner came to me and detailed what would happen ultimately if we put those in, it was a decision not to do that, and this Council actually -- I know that we came to Council with a transfer ordinance, and you basically ended up providing the money so that we would be able to go forward. So we did not actually take that $1 million in reduction.
So, in essence, there was no reduction of a million dollars? DEPUTY
Thank you. Commissioner, what is your 12 4/6/10 - WHOLE - BILL 100115, etc. current employee turnover rate for Fiscal 2010 and your projected rate for Fiscal 2011? COMMISSIONER AYERS: Dave will talk about the attrition rate.
Thank you. Good morning. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER BEATRICE: Good morning. Dave Beatrice, Deputy Commissioner, Administrative Services. We usually lose between 80 to 100 personnel a year. That's broken down approximately 11 or 12 paramedics, 60 other uniform -- 60 to 70 firefighters and officers and maybe five or six civilians.
Can you tell us how many vacancies do you currently have for paramedics? DEPUTY COMMISSIONER BEATRICE: There are 63 paramedic vacancies, 47 firefighter vacancies.
I'm 13 4/6/10 - WHOLE - BILL 100115, etc. sorry. I didn't hear you. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER BEATRICE: Forty-seven firefighter vacancies and 63 paramedic vacancies.
Do you have a current Civil Service list for paramedics and, if so, how many are on that list? COMMISSIONER AYERS: We do have a current Civil Service list for paramedics. We have processed preliminarily about positions. 14
So 15 you have 63 vacancies -- 16 COMMISSIONER AYERS: Correct. 17
-- 18 for paramedics and you have only 19 processed 25 -- 20 COMMISSIONER AYERS: Yes. 21 That's what's currently -- 22
-- 23 for the current Civil Service list? 24 How many do you have on the 25 Civil Service list? 14 4/6/10 - WHOLE - BILL 100115, etc. COMMISSIONER AYERS: Approximately 25. DEPUTY
That's the whole list. COMMISSIONER AYERS: That's the whole list.
That's it? COMMISSIONER AYERS: Yes. And that list is currently a continuous application process which we have from Personnel. Currently, they have not been hired off of the list because of a unit clarification issue with the fire service paramedics.
On average, how long does it take to fill a vacant paramedic position? COMMISSIONER AYERS: It varies with the list, but we are sometimes able to process within 60 days and get a class started within 60 days.
Do you presently have a class for the 25 -- 15 4/6/10 - WHOLE - BILL 100115, etc. COMMISSIONER AYERS: No, we do not.
-- that are presently available? When do you anticipate doing that? COMMISSIONER AYERS: Currently, there is some litigation. DEPUTY
We're hoping to have a class at the conclusion of trying to get the litigation resolved. I'm sure the Council is aware that there was litigation last year that has been -- that was finished, and as soon as that process is over, we look forward to getting that class in as soon as possible. Obviously we need the work, we need them.
How many advanced support units do we currently operate and where are they 16 4/6/10 - WHOLE - BILL 100115, etc. located? COMMISSIONER AYERS: We currently operate 36 advanced life support units. They are located throughout the City. We do --
What are their hours of operation? COMMISSIONER AYERS: Twenty four of those units operate for hours 11 and -- 24 of those units are operating at 12 a 24-hour period, 24/7, and we have an 13 additional 12 units that operate on a 14 12-hour system or system status. They 15 operate for 12 hours during our peak 16 demand hours. 17
Can 18 you tell us how many basic life support 19 units do you currently operate and where 20 are they located? 21 COMMISSIONER AYERS: We have 22 currently 14 basic life support units 23 that we operate in the City of 24 Philadelphia. We have nine that operate on a 24/7 basis and we have five others 17 4/6/10 - WHOLE - BILL 100115, etc. that operate on a system status basis as well, and they are located throughout the City as well, and we have locations of those in the maps.
It's very difficult to -- your map looks beautiful, but the maps that we got, if you could understand it, I'll give you -- DEPUTY
Council President, I will make sure that each of you get the maps. We actually made sure that they were color coded in order to give you the distinction between them, as well as color coding the Council districts so it would be very easy to see. So I did not know -- we will be able to provide that to you as soon as this is over. COMMISSIONER AYERS: There is a table that lists all of the locations that we supplied to you as well.
What are the hours of operation for the basic life support unit? 18 4/6/10 - WHOLE - BILL 100115, etc. COMMISSIONER AYERS: Basic life support units operate on ten-hour and 14-hour shifts.
On of your detail, you are requesting $129,000 for Emergency Medical Command. Can you tell us the services you receive from this contract? COMMISSIONER AYERS: Yes. That is Dr. Meacham's contract. He is the Emergency Medical Services Advisor for the City of Philadelphia. He works for the University of Pennsylvania, and he has oversight of all of the paramedics and emergency medical technicians that deliver services to the citizens. So he actually has oversight over all of them.
Commissioner, you are requesting almost $5 million for EMS billing services. How did you arrive at that amount? COMMISSIONER AYERS: It is the estimate that is based on the potential collections that we will collect for 19 4/6/10 - WHOLE - BILL 100115, etc. doing service in the City for EMS and advanced life support medic units. So that is the fee that is collected for those services.
Well, I'd like to know how much has been collected in the past year or two and how -- I just think that's a lot of money. Would you explain, please. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER BEATRICE: Last year and this year the fee collection is percent of collections, 14 but as we noted, the contract expires June 30th. We're in the process of sending out requests for proposals, so next year we can only estimate what the fee will be. But this year it's 14 percent of all revenue collected, is the fee, and we're in the $35 million gross collection range.
Is this a service that the Department of Technology could perform at a cheaper cost? 20 4/6/10 - WHOLE - BILL 100115, etc. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER BEATRICE: We don't think so. There's a lot more components involved than just billing, sending out a bill. You have to be HIPAA compliant. You have to know all the ins and outs of Medicare, Medicaid. It's a very complicated process and that's why we go out and do it this way.
Well, apparently we're not doing too well at it if we're only collecting percent. 13 DEPUTY COMMISSIONER BEATRICE: 14 No. 15
But even that is a very low amount, 14 percent. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER BEATRICE: We're trying to get that lower. The lower it is, the less it costs the City. DEPUTY
Thank you, Madam President. Good morning, Commissioner. COMMISSIONER AYERS: Good morning.
Just a couple questions about your Class 200 request. I notice you have two professional service contracts for Fiscal Year '10, this year, and for Fiscal Year '11 totalling the same amount of money. So I'm assuming they're the same contracts. Could you tell me what those contracts are? COMMISSIONER AYERS: Yes. The one contract is with ACS Services, who collect for our medical billing. The other contract is the contract for the University of Pennsylvania, which is our medical advisory oversight.
And there is an increase in terms of DBE participation 22 4/6/10 - WHOLE - BILL 100115, etc. from Fiscal Year '10, this year, going to next year from 14.6 percent to 24.4 percent. How will that be achieved? COMMISSIONER AYERS: As was stated, we have a request for service, an RFP that is out. One of the components of that is that we wanted to increase the participation from percent to that 10 percent, and we wrote that into the RFP 11 so that we would have compliance. 12
Are there 13 other contracts that the Department lets? 14 COMMISSIONER AYERS: Everything 15 else is through Procurement. 16
In your 17 written testimony, you say that the 18 Office of Economic Opportunity set the 19 goal at 15 percent. 20 COMMISSIONER AYERS: Yes. 21
If I 24 may, Everett Gillison, Deputy Mayor for 25 Public Safety. 23 4/6/10 - WHOLE - BILL 100115, etc. That was a -- after looking at what the ranges would be under the entire Department and for the City, that would be our slice that the Office of Economic Opportunity said that we could do. I also asked them to take a look at the number and the ability to get additional people in the pipeline to actually participate, and when we had these two and we knew we were writing a contract that would actually be let to increase, they came back and said that this would be the appropriate one that would fit into the overall City strategy of getting it up to percent as we go forward. 17
So the 18 Department goal is 15 percent or 25 19 percent? 20 DEPUTY
Well, 21 we're trying to get up to 25 percent, but 22 the goal that was set for the particular 23 Department was 15 percent. 24
I guess my 25 question is, what was OEO basing that 24 4/6/10 - WHOLE - BILL 100115, etc. goal upon? DEPUTY
The ability of getting the work to firms that are both known that are able to do it and also to be able to put additional people in the pipeline.
I guess my final question is, if you believe you can achieve the 24.4 percent -- and this is a question for, I guess, every department -- when and why is it more appropriate for OEO to set the goal rather than the Deputy Mayor for Public Safety or the Fire Commissioner or someone else within the Fire Department that knows the types of goods and services they want to procure? Why wouldn't it make more sense for the people with the professional track record that know what they want to procure to set the goal? DEPUTY
It's a collaborative process, Councilman. Bottom line from where I sit, we're 25 4/6/10 - WHOLE - BILL 100115, etc. trying by going into the subcontractors and to see what's available. We're actually pushing it down, and we're working with OEO in order to make sure that they understand what we're doing and we're trying to reflect it in what they would ask us to do.
But had the Administration not set a percent goal, 11 there would not have been a change in 12 that subcontract? 13 DEPUTY
No. 14 I've been looking at that now for a year 15 to two years, and, no, we were going to 16 go after and write this into our 17 contracting. You'll see that across the 18 board, I know in Public Safety and other 19 Deputy Mayors are doing the same thing. 20 We are really trying to drill it down 21 from the top of the general -- basically 22 as you would -- you have an awareness, 23 take it from the general contract and 24 move it down to the sub, because there's 25 still availability of participation at 4/6/10 - WHOLE - BILL 100115, etc. that sub level, and let's see if we can build participation in. And since this contract was up as of June 30th, this was the goal that we both worked together, both OEO, myself, the Commissioner, we all sat down and said this is something we're going to strive for.
You're welcome. The Chair recognizes Councilman Greenlee.
Thank you, Madam President. Good morning, everyone. (Good morning.)
First I had a question, Commissioner, on the issue of providing smoke detectors and various other fire safety, and that sounds like it's a program that certainly has worked well. I know it's helped a lot of people. Is that still in effect? 27 4/6/10 - WHOLE - BILL 100115, etc. Are you still out there doing that? COMMISSIONER AYERS: Yes, it is. It is an integral part of our Freedom from Fire program where we constantly look for opportunities, grants, et cetera, to go out, supply those who do not need -- do not have the opportunity to get smoke detectors that need smoke detectors, get them in their homes, make sure that they're safe.
Is there any rough idea or maybe more specific idea about how many properties still are lacking in smoke detectors? COMMISSIONER AYERS: As far as an exact count, we don't have it, but when we stop and we look at the rates that we find with fire deaths and most fires, it's about 70 percent of the fire deaths that we find people don't have them, and we think that that translates into approximately about another 90 percent of folks that do have them, just based on the program, based on the laws. 28 4/6/10 - WHOLE - BILL 100115, etc. But we still have a long way to go, because that ten percent is what's actually hurting the City as far as injuries, deaths, et cetera.
I understand. And do you think unfortunately it's for bad reasons, because people are either injured or killed, but the publicity that you have out of those programs, do you have any feeling that's generating people to get -- some people to get the smoke detectors on their own? COMMISSIONER AYERS: Absolutely. We've partnered with -- excuse me. I apologize. I was out late last night, and as you may have heard, we had a fire death last evening, unfortunately. We did not find smoke alarms, working smoke alarms, in that home. We found one smoke alarm in the basement that had been there for a long period of time. When Deputy Commissioner Devlin looked up and pulled the alarm 29 4/6/10 - WHOLE - BILL 100115, etc. down or off of the shelf, we turned it over, it had a battery. We tested it. We looked, the battery was in backwards. So it's that education that people need. There were no other smoke alarms, first floor, second floor, and we believe that this gentleman could have had an opportunity to escape with an early warning. So the pattern repeats itself, but impromptu surveys that we have done actually show that people are putting smoke alarms in their homes.
Well, that's good. That's very good. And you talk about the injuries and whatever. Do you have numbers that you can provide us -- I know you said about the fire deaths, and that's a great thing that they're down -- on how many the accidents and injuries have gone down, too? Do you have figures that you can give us? If not now, provide it to the Council President. COMMISSIONER AYERS: Yes, we 30 4/6/10 - WHOLE - BILL 100115, etc. do. We can provide that to you.
That's great. Thank you. I'm not going to get into the pros and cons of the whole fire company closing. I know that got controversial with a lot of people, but I know there is a Supreme Court -- or there was an appeal that's now at the Supreme Court; am I right? COMMISSIONER AYERS: I believe there is an appeal.
Given that a case went that far, are there any either concerns or, more specifically, contingency plans if that suit is successful? Because I know not all cases go to Supreme Court, so there must be something that has possibilities there, if you will. DEPUTY
Number 31 4/6/10 - WHOLE - BILL 100115, etc. one, just remember that even though we ended up closing those companies, we didn't lay off anybody.
And, therefore, we would actually plan for and have a strategy for if that were to happen. I do not anticipate that happening. But we didn't lose anyone. We still have the equipment. We still have --
So you can still spread them back over if you had to? DEPUTY
Right. It would not be in the best interest, we believe, of the City. However, if that should happen, we would be able to handle that.
I 32 4/6/10 - WHOLE - BILL 100115, etc. understand. Thank you. On the EMS issue, Mr. Beatrice, that the Council President asked about, just so I'm clear, you're saying that 6 percent of the revenue of the Fire 7 Department comes in through that? Is 8 that what you said? I wasn't real clear. 9 DEPUTY COMMISSIONER BEATRICE: 10 Revenue is in the -- it's up to, I 11 believe, $35 million a year we're 12 projecting now. The vendor that collects 13 it under the current contract, we pay him 14 14 percent of that amount.
And do you know how much of that money percent-wise is collected, like how many people respond to those? DEPUTY COMMISSIONER BEATRICE: It's various collection rates. We would have to provide that, because you have a certain rate for Medicare, certain rate for Medicaid, private pay. It varies. There's no one collection rate.
Okay. If 33 4/6/10 - WHOLE - BILL 100115, etc. you could provide that in writing, some figures, I'd appreciate it. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER BEATRICE: Right.
Lastly, I know you talked about the unfilled firefighters and paramedics. That's 63 firefighters, 47 paramedics. Is that unfilled positions? DEPUTY COMMISSIONER BEATRICE: I believe that was reversed.
I'm sorry. And how many total in the Fire Department positions are unfilled at this point? DEPUTY COMMISSIONER BEATRICE: That's the bulk of them under the tent.
Thank you, Madam President. 34 4/6/10 - WHOLE - BILL 100115, etc. As you know, recently myself, along with a number of other colleagues, introduced legislation dealing with paramedics and their representation, and we're going to have a hearing on that, so I don't necessarily want to get into the legality of the bills or illegality of the bills, the position of the Administration versus members of Council and the union. But since they've been represented by Local since 1980, could 13 you give me just a general rationale on 14 why we're even going down this road? 15 DEPUTY
I'll be 16 glad to, Council. First, I want to make 17 sure that we understand that there was a 18 decision made by at least persons that 19 were in the union to pursue litigation in 20 order to get clarification of roles and 21 for money purposes. Basically it was an 22 overtime issue and a salary issue.
Six or seven out of the 240 roughly sued in Federal Court. The City, let's be clear, fought that decision and the City lost. As a result of that, there has now been what I call the blow-back. What happens when people win, it changes the relationship, and that's now a federal law. We have to figure out what does that mean, and as a result, that now requires us to say, Well, if they're not firefighters and we can't pay them as firefighters, we have to pay them as a separate paramedic, then the reason why they're in the firefighters union is because we felt they were firefighters. 36 4/6/10 - WHOLE - BILL 100115, etc. So now we have the converse. We seek basically instruction from the Labor Relations Board how do we treat them, what are they, and as a result of that, that's where we are today.
If the overtime issue and the pay issue had been resolved, as it is I understand today, what is the benefit to the City or to the taxpayer having them segregated or removed from the union that's represented them for 30 years? DEPUTY
Well, unit clarification is actually a result of trying to figure out how you end up dealing with them in labor matters. If we cannot classify them as firefighters, they have to be classified as something and they have to belong somewhere. That's all the unit clarification issue is.
And the end result of that with the positive decision the Administration has received from the 37 4/6/10 - WHOLE - BILL 100115, etc. PLRB could eventually take them out of Act 111? DEPUTY
I don't want to get beyond -- I mean, it could. I don't know. It could, yes.
And that could also result potentially, theoretically they would have to the ability to strike? DEPUTY
Well, I wouldn't go that far. I think that there's probably things that could happen that would maybe take them out of the issue of that particular union, but they would still be able to be unionized and Act 111 still might apply. Those are questions that we're still trying to find answers to.
There's a difference between firefighter paramedics and general paramedics, correct? COMMISSIONER AYERS: Yes.
There's two different clarifications. These are 38 4/6/10 - WHOLE - BILL 100115, etc. folks who went through the Academy as a firefighter and chose to be a paramedic? COMMISSIONER AYERS: That is correct.
How many of those are there? COMMISSIONER AYERS: We have approximately to left in the City. 10
If this 11 proceeds on and the City is successful in 12 their efforts, those folks have the right 13 then to return to the firefighting rank, 14 correct? 15 DEPUTY
I'm sure that I'll get an opinion from the City Solicitor to tell me what that would be, but, yes.
If they have that ability, then they potentially, because they want to remain represented by the union, would move back in the firefighting rank, so now the paramedic rank potentially, which would give us a 12- to 15-person shortage, and we're 39 4/6/10 - WHOLE - BILL 100115, etc. pretty short now, correct? DEPUTY
All right. While I recognize the seven who took the federal lawsuit are annoying or have been annoying, I would wonder what the other bulk of the 243 others, or whatever that number is, what they feel they are. And if you're a first responder and you are on the fire ground and you are doing what firefighters have done and you wear basically the same uniform, obviously, since I introduced the bill, it's my opinion they're firefighters. I mean, obviously the legal proceedings will take on as they are. DEPUTY
But I really would like you to reconsider this. I don't think it's, in the long term, a good strategy for the City for public safety, and I would hate to be in a 40 4/6/10 - WHOLE - BILL 100115, etc. situation where 230, 240 of our public safety employees have the right to walk a picket line. I think it would be a disaster. DEPUTY
If I may, one other issue. Has the City considered -- and it occurred to me during the course of the discussion on the legislation -- that the City partner with the School District in some way to create a paramedic academy or academies in three or four comprehensive high schools that would provide the training and curriculum necessary for these young folks, who are our citizens -- we're not recruiting from other states and other municipalities -- our kids who are in need of opportunities to have a job, a very good job, that's helping people and able to sustain yourself and raise a family, to be able to hook the School District up with the Fire Department to 41 4/6/10 - WHOLE - BILL 100115, etc. create these academies so we have a feeder of schools that could send folks to our Academy and put them in fire service? DEPUTY
Councilman, I smiled because I will take that, and also I can tell you that there has been some very preliminary discussions about a public safety academy where not only we would use it for firefighting, but we'd also have it for police and also corrections officers.
I've drafted a letter to Arlene Ackerman, Dr. Ackerman, to try to discuss that issue, but I do think that that is a great use of our own resources to employ our own kids in a public service role that I think is very fulfilling for them. DEPUTY
I would love to join with you and I'll be glad to talk with you about that. I will talk to the Chairman of the SRC about that as well. 42 4/6/10 - WHOLE - BILL 100115, etc.
Councilman Kenney, I think that's an excellent idea.
There's a saying that a blind squirrel finds a nut every now and then.
Commissioner, I think we all know what the advanced life support is and the basic life support, but for the record, can you explain the difference between the two? COMMISSIONER AYERS: Yes. Advanced life support -- in our medic units we will have an advanced life support unit. We have one or two 43 4/6/10 - WHOLE - BILL 100115, etc. paramedics that actually deliver services from that unit throughout the City. They are able to do a lot more than what an EMT would be able to do, some interventions, starting of IV fluids, drugs, the reading of the different tapes that will come from electrocardiograms, things like that, a lot more advanced as far as medical services, emergency medical services.
I don't know about anybody else, but I find it very disturbing that we would have 63 vacancies for the paramedics. It's a public safety issue, A. B, tell me, what is the response time? COMMISSIONER AYERS: Well, A, we would see that as a public safety issue as well. Those 63 vacancies are filled in overtime. So it's not a time where those 63 vacancies are not covered. So I understand what you're saying. We want to make sure that we hire those people so that we can have -- 44 4/6/10 - WHOLE - BILL 100115, etc.
With paramedics. COMMISSIONER AYERS: It's projected at $4.8 million for next year.
Well, since there are on the Civil Service 12 list, when do you anticipate that you 13 would take them on? 14 DEPUTY
No. I 19 would hope that it would be done 20 tomorrow, but I think that it is more 21 realistic that all the legalisms will be 22 concluded hopefully by the end of June so 23 that we can do something in the first 24 part of the fiscal year, but that's just 25 a guess on my part. 45 4/6/10 - WHOLE - BILL 100115, etc.
So actually, Commissioner, you're covering the shifts, the vacant shifts, with overtime? COMMISSIONER AYERS: That is correct.
Can you tell me how we're recruiting for paramedics? COMMISSIONER AYERS: Yes. On the response times -- and then I'll answer that question -- we are achieving about 75 percent of the national guidelines.
Seventy-five percent? COMMISSIONER AYERS: Seventy-five percent, the nine-minute response time. And right now currently the 90 percentile is at 12 minutes and 20 seconds. Now, as far as recruiting, we have an officer, we have one of our chief officers, paramedic officers, that 46 4/6/10 - WHOLE - BILL 100115, etc. constantly monitors opportunities to recruit within the State of Pennsylvania. We monitor the schools that do paramedic training. We let them know about the opportunity to come into the Philadelphia Fire Department. We also have from Personnel continuous applications. So when a person graduates or if someone just comes into the City of Philadelphia, they can apply at Personnel and get on the paramedic list right away. We also do advertising in magazines as well, emergency medical services magazines.
Do we have many applicants from outside the City that are applying? COMMISSIONER AYERS: Now we do. Since last year we had talked about it, and one of the persons that Councilman Rizzo had encountered in the shore actually came and joined the Philadelphia Fire Department. But we are starting to see more paramedic applicants from outside of the City as well. 47 4/6/10 - WHOLE - BILL 100115, etc.
I don't know. If you're putting in that much overtime, I ask myself how much are you aware of what it is that you're supposed to be doing. COMMISSIONER AYERS: Well, one of the things that remain is a national shortage of paramedics. Philadelphia is not the only city that has to endure this.
Commissioner, I'm concerned about the citizens of Philadelphia. COMMISSIONER AYERS: As well as I am.
That's what we should be concerned about, not what's happening throughout the nation. You know, year after year we go through this at budget time about the lack of the paramedics. I think it's something that has to be corrected once and for all. I think, Councilwoman 48 4/6/10 - WHOLE - BILL 100115, etc. Krajewski, wasn't it last year that we had gone down to see the Mayor about this very issue?
I think this is a very serious problem. It really is. And I would love to know how many people wait minutes for a 11 response call, because I know that one of 12 the employees in my office last summer, I think that her mother took ill and I think they waited something like 40 minutes. Fortunately, her heart attack was not that severe. The Chair recognizes Councilwoman Miller.
Thank you, Madam President. Just a similar question along the lines of the EMS. Is the difficulty in recruiting EMS workers, or what? I did read somewhere in your testimony that you've had some classes and you plan to 49 4/6/10 - WHOLE - BILL 100115, etc. have another class. Is it hard for you to find people for this EMS training? DEPUTY
What is the problem? COMMISSIONER AYERS: It's very difficult. As stated, the universe for paramedics is very small, period, in Pennsylvania. Also, some of the paramedics within the State just don't choose to come into the City of Philadelphia in this environment and do that service. We are actively recruiting, letting people know how it's a great opportunity. Many folks look at the opportunity to come and train here. We currently train the Air Force Academy paramedics here in the City of Philadelphia. They come from Mexico to train with us because of the level of training and because of our 50 4/6/10 - WHOLE - BILL 100115, etc. professionalism. As far as people coming in to work, some folks actually choose to work in a less stressful environment. They would rather collect those dollars in the other counties. And we recruit. We constantly recruit them. We've waived the residency so that they can come in, and I have a high confidence in our chief that goes out there and does that recruiting on a regular basis.
Well, maybe you should get us some basic information. Not just information. I know you're probably listed on the Civil Service employment opportunity -- COMMISSIONER AYERS: Yes.
-- through Human Resources, but maybe we can also help with that, and I thought maybe it would be good to, if we could -- if City Council could also help with the -- I can't remember the exact name, but the fire prevention efforts -- 51 4/6/10 - WHOLE - BILL 100115, etc. COMMISSIONER AYERS: Freedom from Fire.
-- in terms of educating people. What are the most common causes of house fires? COMMISSIONER AYERS: The common causes are smoking, electrical and cooking.
Smoking in bed or just smoking in general? COMMISSIONER AYERS: Smoking in bed, smoking in general, couch fires, soft chair fires, recliners and beds.
And Councilman Greenlee did ask a question about the number of injuries have gone up. Is that a fact, that you have increased injuries now? COMMISSIONER AYERS: There was a slight increase in injuries, along with the decrease in 2007, along with the decrease in fire deaths, the steady decrease in fire deaths. We see now that 52 4/6/10 - WHOLE - BILL 100115, etc. the injuries are trending level. With the further reduction of fires, we expect that those injuries will go down. But one of the things that we see -- we don't want to see any of our citizens injured or killed, but we're happy to see that most folks are escaping those homes. The majority of people who have fires in the City of Philadelphia, they have an early warning and they get out of their houses. Sometimes there are injuries. Most of the injuries are thermal burns, smoke inhalation. Sometimes we'll get a fracture from someone unfortunately having to leap from a second floor or something like that, but for the most part, folks are now getting out of their house, thus the lower death rate.
Now, if there was an increase in people contacting you through education programs, whatever, through outreach, do you have enough smoke detectors to 53 4/6/10 - WHOLE - BILL 100115, etc. accommodate how many? You said you give those away. I'm just wondering how many can you really give away. COMMISSIONER AYERS: Well, we're going to continue to solicit the corporations, the philanthropists to give. We just got a grant, a State grant, for, gosh, I think it was close to 500,000, I think it was, that we got for smoke alarms, and we had Ed Mann, the State Director, present us with those. We just got another $2,000 for smoke alarms. So it's an ongoing process. We have our Citizens for Fire Prevention Committee, who actually -- they're a 501(c)(3), and they actually go out and they solicit as well. But that number, it's an unknown number, but we're going to continue through our Freedom from Fire program where we go block by block, we enlist the fire safety representatives to actually engage each of their neighbors so that we know who has smoke alarms, who 54 4/6/10 - WHOLE - BILL 100115, etc. does not. When we discover that, we task the local fire safety and education district company or that engine company for that local. They come out, they put the smoke alarms up, they give out the home fire safety checklist and they give out the information for having a home escape plan and a drill.
When I was reading your testimony -- thank you. When I was reading your testimony and you said you were going to eliminate the Chief Battalion Aide or Battalion Chief Aides. COMMISSIONER AYERS: Battalion Chief Aides.
What exactly is that position and what do they do? COMMISSIONER AYERS: That's a very integral part of the Philadelphia system or actually the Incident Command System. They do various duties, including communications, and one of the 55 4/6/10 - WHOLE - BILL 100115, etc. things that we looked at in going over their duties, we looked at that and we found that we did not want to eliminate that position on second consideration. Council did ask for that consideration last year when we talked about it. We did take a look at it and we made a decision -- I apologize that we didn't come directly back to you and let you know that we were not going to eliminate those positions. But, again, thank you for that transfer so that we could keep those positions this past fiscal year. Very integral part of the Incident Command System.
Great. Last year you also said if there's additional funding, those fire stations that were closed could potentially reopen. Do you see that happening over the next Five Year Plan? DEPUTY
No. 24 Good morning, Councilwoman. Everett Gillison, Deputy Mayor. 56 4/6/10 - WHOLE - BILL 100115, etc. We are more likely to look at our deployment. I think given the level of fires and the level of responses, we'll be looking once we get up to speed with our technology and everything else, I wouldn't state that we'd be looking to reopen those particular companies at this time. The answer would be no. 10
In a city our size in terms of population, geographic, what is the optimal number of firefighter facilities? DEPUTY
That's the million-dollar question. Every city because of its geography, because of its topography, because of the density and everything else, that's a term of art more than anything else. What we are trying to do is to make sure that we have sufficient data to make that call as we go forward. That's part of our strategic plan, and that's what the Commissioner has been working on, along with other members of his executive team, along with 57 4/6/10 - WHOLE - BILL 100115, etc. the entire Department. We're working on a strategic plan that will answer that. The best way we'll be able to get to that answer is to make the investment in technology, which is what we have set out to do. Last year, as the Commissioner stated in his testimony, we began that by the upgrade of the CAD system, the computer-assisted dispatch system. We are looking forward to the investment in our call prioritization where we'll be able to then not send people out for non-emergencies. All of that will have to be looked at before we can really answer the larger question that you've just asked, what would be the optimal number.
Okay. I think in your testimony you stated you raised about or you project to collect $5 million a year for EMS transportation? COMMISSIONER AYERS: That's correct.
How much 58 4/6/10 - WHOLE - BILL 100115, etc. did you actually raise last year? COMMISSIONER AYERS: We stand at the last half of the Fiscal Year '09, I think it was, $2.9 million, and we expect that we will reach our goal for Fiscal Year '10.
And is that payments through insurance companies or direct payments from individuals? COMMISSIONER AYERS: It's a combination, insurance companies, Medicare, Medicaid and private individuals.
So people are actually paying for those EMS services? COMMISSIONER AYERS: Some people are actually paying, yes.
You can come back again. Councilman Jones. 59 4/6/10 - WHOLE - BILL 100115, etc.
Thank you, Madam President. I'm Katia Rembert and I was sworn in with PAL Day at City Hall. So my first question is, what reason is there to place paramedics in their own unit? DEPUTY
Everett Gillison, Deputy Mayor for Public Safety, and good morning. Welcome. Serving as the temporary 4th Councilmanic District representative, I will say thank you, since you are my representative. The question that you asked about what's the reason, basically that's a labor issue. It is as a result of a lawsuit that was filed many years ago that was decided in December, and this is just the clarification that is coming forward, and that basically will be decided by the lawyers involved and the judges and the arbitrators, and then we will basically make our decision from there. Thank you. 60 4/6/10 - WHOLE - BILL 100115, etc. COMMISSIONER AYERS: I would also like to welcome you and thank you for your question as well.
Thank you. What would be the dangers of allowing paramedics the right to strike? DEPUTY
That would be speculative at this point, and I don't believe that we'll actually ever get to that point, so I don't think that there would be a need to even answer.
Have we improved response times for paramedics compared to the national averages? DEPUTY
The answer is yes. I think that we're working towards using technology in order to make sure that we'll be able to do that in order to get the correct deployment, and the Commissioner, working with his command staff and the strategic plan, that's part of what are going to be what our goals are. So, yes, we can.
Lastly, what were 61 4/6/10 - WHOLE - BILL 100115, etc. the costs of paramedic overtime in the last fiscal year? DEPUTY
I believe we said it was -- DEPUTY COMMISSIONER BEATRICE: Was the question what caused it or what was the cost? I didn't hear the question.
Both. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER BEATRICE: The cause is the national shortage. The various reasons why we haven't been able to put in the last class, because our manpower or womanpower, staffing issues. But the cost for the whole EMS system in overtime last year we're projecting for Fiscal '11 is 4.8 million.
Thank you. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER BEATRICE: You're welcome. DEPUTY
The Chair recognizes Councilman Green. 62 4/6/10 - WHOLE - BILL 100115, etc.
Thank you, Madam Chair. Good morning, everybody. (Good morning.)
You may have heard me do this with every department. I'm asking them to go through vacant positions or newly created positions for FY11, how long the position has been vacant, the specific job duties of the position and how those duties have been handled while the position has been vacant. The Fire Department has numerous vacant positions, which add up to significant amounts of salary, and so I'd just like to start with the Firefighting Division, Section 45, 10. There were five unfilled Fire Battalion Chief positions. How long have they been vacant? COMMISSIONER AYERS: They've been vacant for various period of time. The list expired and there was a test for 63 4/6/10 - WHOLE - BILL 100115, etc. BCDC and they won't be vacant long.
Well, what's the salary for each of those positions? COMMISSIONER AYERS: One moment.
While you're waiting for that answer, who has been performing these duties while these positions have been vacant? COMMISSIONER AYERS: They've been performed by acting-out-of-class officers, Captains for the Battalion Chiefs and Battalion Chiefs for the Division Chiefs.
So why would we not continue to do that while we're in this budget crisis? COMMISSIONER AYERS: We wouldn't continue to do that because of the fact that we need those positions, those trained positions, based on the National Incident Management System as well as the Incident Command System. You have to have that structure. 64 4/6/10 - WHOLE - BILL 100115, etc.
What negative consequences have resulted from leaving these positions unfilled as long as we have? COMMISSIONER AYERS: Being not in compliance with NIMS and the Incident Command System structure. But it's temporary.
Well, I'm perhaps suggesting it should be permanent through the next fiscal year. How much are the salaries of these five people? DEPUTY COMMISSIONER BEATRICE: A Deputy Chief on average is 93,000 a year.
Plus fringe? DEPUTY COMMISSIONER BEATRICE: Plus fringes. Battalion Chief is in the $82,000 range, plus fringes.
Okay. So is there any legal requirement to fill these positions? 65 4/6/10 - WHOLE - BILL 100115, etc. COMMISSIONER AYERS: Yes. There's a labor requirement to fill those positions.
Where? COMMISSIONER AYERS: In arbitration, from contracts, union contracts.
You're saying that our union contract requires that we have five positions. Please provide to the Chair the language from our union contract. I seriously doubt that.
Councilman, one moment, please. Mr. Gillison, did you want to respond? DEPUTY
If I could, Councilman, can I just have a second, please? We will provide that. Thank you.
Of the eight Fire Boat Engineer positions, one was 66 4/6/10 - WHOLE - BILL 100115, etc. unfilled in November. Has it been filled? COMMISSIONER AYERS: It has.
Of the eight Fireboat Pile positions, two are unfilled. Have they been filled? COMMISSIONER AYERS: They have.
Of the 29 Fire Captain positions, five are unfilled. Have they been filled? COMMISSIONER AYERS: Yes, they have been filled.
All five? COMMISSIONER AYERS: They were filled. Since that time there has become another vacancy. DEPUTY
So what's the salary of that one position? DEPUTY COMMISSIONER BEATRICE: A Captain is at 71,500.
Who has been performing these duties while it's 67 4/6/10 - WHOLE - BILL 100115, etc. vacant? COMMISSIONER AYERS: Those duties were performed by either a Captain on overtime or a Lieutenant acting out of rank.
And where is this position? COMMISSIONER AYERS: The positions are all over the City.
Well, there's one vacancy. Where is that? COMMISSIONER AYERS: I'd have to -- DEPUTY
We have to get that to you, Councilman. We'll provide that to you.
Thank you. And the job duties of that position also. DEPUTY
Of the 267 Fire Lieutenant positions, four were unfilled. Have they been filled? COMMISSIONER AYERS: Not at 68 4/6/10 - WHOLE - BILL 100115, etc. this time.
So who is performing these duties today? COMMISSIONER AYERS: They're performed by either a Lieutenant acting on overtime or a firefighter acting out of rank.
And what's the salary of these positions? DEPUTY COMMISSIONER BEATRICE: Lieutenant is 62,000.
Of the 1,338 firefighter positions, were unfilled. 15 Have they been filled? COMMISSIONER AYERS: Those positions are filled on overtime.
They're filled on overtime? COMMISSIONER AYERS: That's correct.
How much does that cost? COMMISSIONER AYERS: Time and a half. 69 4/6/10 - WHOLE - BILL 100115, etc.
So we'll 8 save money by filling these positions? 9 COMMISSIONER AYERS: Yeah. 10 Once we put a class together, we plan on 11 filling those positions. 12
Well, when 13 will the class be put together? 14 COMMISSIONER AYERS: There's a 15 test in process right now.
So when would the class start? When is the earliest the class would start? DEPUTY
Councilman, that actually depends on a number of different things. And I just want to correct one thing that the Commissioner said. Yes, if we -- there is obviously a way to save money by not hiring a particular person and filling it 70 4/6/10 - WHOLE - BILL 100115, etc. on overtime. It depends on -- right now since we don't have the person working, we are filling the position with overtime.
So I know that you said that you could automatically save money. I think you have to take a look at where that tipping point is, and I'd have to provide that to you, because it could be that it does not save us any money to hire the person and it's better to do it on overtime, but we have to look at that on a case-by-case basis when we're looking at the class.
Okay. So with respect to the class, when is the earliest we're going to have a class? DEPUTY
As it is now, we're still looking at when the earliest time would be. I have not set a time, and the Commissioner and I still have to figure out when we're -- 71 4/6/10 - WHOLE - BILL 100115, etc.
Is it likely that there will be a class in FY11? DEPUTY
I'm trying to have it so that depending on the attrition rate that we're anticipating --
But your current overtime numbers include filling these positions through overtime? DEPUTY
So if we were to eliminate these 15 positions, you didn't have a class in FY11, we could save a firefighter salary times 15? DEPUTY
The problem with that is that we're using the budgeted position numbers in order to pay the overtime.
Well, that was my question. Does your overtime in 72 4/6/10 - WHOLE - BILL 100115, etc. the budget reflect the fact that these positions are unfilled, and you said yes. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER BEATRICE: Yes, it does. I think from last year's testimony before Council and from your suggestion, we fine-tuned the way budgets are prepared. We added more money into overtime to reflect the, I believe you said, the more accurate way of reporting it. DEPUTY
That's what we're trying to do. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER BEATRICE: And that's what we tried to do in this budget. You'll see more money in overtime and you'll see a larger amount under the category Vacant Position Savings.
So how much does a firefighter make? DEPUTY COMMISSIONER BEATRICE: A firefighter is in the $50,000 average.
How about a new class? 73 4/6/10 - WHOLE - BILL 100115, etc. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER BEATRICE: They start out at 40,000.
Plus fringe? DEPUTY COMMISSIONER BEATRICE: Plus fringe.
General Support Services Division, there were three vacant civilian positions as of November that are budgeted to be filled in FY11. There is a 35,000 a year Administrative Assistant position. Has this position been filled? DEPUTY COMMISSIONER BEATRICE: No, it hasn't.
How long has it been vacant? DEPUTY COMMISSIONER BEATRICE: Since before November.
Who is performing these duties now? DEPUTY COMMISSIONER BEATRICE: They're really not being done or -- we have a two-person unit in the Management Information area. They're trying to do 74 4/6/10 - WHOLE - BILL 100115, etc. the best they can. This position here is more we're putting in our NFIRS, National Fire Incident Reporting System. This position is a vision to provide support to those two people and to all the field personnel to get the best we can out of the system. Right now, you know, things probably aren't getting done that should be.
What? DEPUTY COMMISSIONER BEATRICE: That's hard to say.
Okay. Has the $62,872 a year Executive Assistant position been filled? DEPUTY COMMISSIONER BEATRICE: No, it hasn't.
How long has this position been vacant? DEPUTY COMMISSIONER BEATRICE: This position has been vacant since before November.
Yeah, I know that. 75 4/6/10 - WHOLE - BILL 100115, etc. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER BEATRICE: It's never been filled.
Nobody has ever performed these job functions? DEPUTY COMMISSIONER BEATRICE: That's right.
There's another job we can eliminate. Has the 45,000 a year Management Analyst position been filled? DEPUTY COMMISSIONER BEATRICE: That hasn't been filled in the last year.
And who is performing these duties now? DEPUTY COMMISSIONER BEATRICE: I picked up a bunch of the duties. Deputy Commissioner Devlin has picked up a bunch of the duties. This is related to PhillyStat. This position was technically our Computer Program Supervisor position, who retired.
Except that those positions have all been transferred to the Department of Technology. 76 4/6/10 - WHOLE - BILL 100115, etc. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER BEATRICE: No. The Department of Technology took the hardware technical people, not our management analyst group. This is more on the software management reporting function side.
But it's getting done? DEPUTY COMMISSIONER BEATRICE: It's getting done.
Thank you. Emergency Medical Services Division, in the EMS Division, has the 90K a year Fire Paramedic Service Deputy Chief been filled? DEPUTY COMMISSIONER BEATRICE: No, it hasn't. This would be a new position where that level of command has never been established.
And why would we establish that level of command at $90,000 a year when they seem perfectly well supervised today? DEPUTY COMMISSIONER BEATRICE: 77 4/6/10 - WHOLE - BILL 100115, etc. Well, it would be -- the extra cost would be the difference between the Deputy Chief and the Battalion Chief. That would be the increase. We would lose --
Okay. That's a good point. So which Battalion Chief position are you eliminating in the budget to -- DEPUTY COMMISSIONER BEATRICE: We're talking Fire Service Paramedic Battalion Chief.
Right. So you're eliminating that position? DEPUTY COMMISSIONER BEATRICE: We would promote a position.
And you'd keep a Battalion Chief? DEPUTY COMMISSIONER BEATRICE: We would -- no. We would have --
You'd have both positions? DEPUTY COMMISSIONER BEATRICE: No. We'd have one less. I think it's reflected in the budget. If you looked, 78 4/6/10 - WHOLE - BILL 100115, etc. one position went down on reflects that.
. Okay. What's the difference in salary? DEPUTY COMMISSIONER BEATRICE: Fourteen percent differential.
Plus fringe? DEPUTY COMMISSIONER BEATRICE: Plus fringe.
We do want to have more paramedics and improve response times. I want to be clear about that. Of the 67 unfilled positions that are in the budget, how many are we going to actually be able to hire in FY11? DEPUTY
If we have everything, Councilman, and if everything gets cleared up, we have a class of that we would have ready to 21 go. 22
It 79 4/6/10 - WHOLE - BILL 100115, etc. would be that 25.
And you're 9 budgeting for 67? 10 DEPUTY COMMISSIONER BEATRICE: 11 Well, the 25 would be the first class we 12 would do right away. Then we would 13 attempt to hire more during the year. 14
You're not 15 going to have two classes in 2011? 16 DEPUTY COMMISSIONER BEATRICE: 17 I think if we didn't have the lawsuits, I 18 think we would have two or three classes. 19
But 22 you don't have a list, a Civil Service 23 list. So how would you hire? How would 24 you hire? 25
Council, you're absolutely correct. At this time, we have 25. We would get 25, and at that point, we would be looking, but as we've already indicated in our earlier testimony, it is very difficult to do it, but we would keep looking. If we could, we could. I think the answer to the question, the reality of it, you are absolutely right, we probably would have the 25, period.
But if we do that, Councilman, understand that we do not have the overtime built in for --
The overtime has already been testified is built in to include the current overtime for paramedics. If you hire 25, overtime should be reduced. DEPUTY
That's not the way that -- and I see that 81 4/6/10 - WHOLE - BILL 100115, etc. Mr. Agostini is on his way over, but I will state that if we just take that money and just try to say that we'll take those positions out, we are not going to be able to do it and we might be losing medic units, and we don't want to do that.
How many safely -- well, we don't lose medic units because we don't budget for positions that are unfilled. I mean, medic units aren't tied to -- what you're telling me is medic units are tied to whether or not there are positions even if they're unfilled. That wouldn't make much sense. DEPUTY
Councilmember, Steve Agostini, Budget Director. To your point, to the extent that we are budgeted for positions, 82 4/6/10 - WHOLE - BILL 100115, etc. assuming that all the EMS positions are filled, if they are not filled, they have to be filled with overtime dollars. The overtime dollars are more costly than the straight salary dollars. To the extent that they're included, they are included at a level that would suggest at some point we're going to run out of dollars, and if you were to look at the current run, either from the quarterly City Manager's report to date or I think the run that is in the budget detail in the pages that you're very familiar with, it shows that the current spend rate is about $170 million in Class 100, which is about a million one over what was budgeted both for FY10 and what's been budgeted for FY11, and I think right there is sort of evidence that we're running over in some cases. We probably should come back and disaggregate for you what we're spending in overtime for EMS versus what we would have spent if we had filled the 83 4/6/10 - WHOLE - BILL 100115, etc. positions to get more finely attuned to your question.
No. I understand. It's just that the sky is not falling and we're filling positions, some of which are $95,000 a year positions and --
Steve, while you're up there, I'd like to help the Councilman, too.
Section 45 -- this is bothering me. Section 45 we talk about to implement FY09 staffing reduction plan, a million dollars. Now, is that a reduction or is it not a reduction? We got a different -- I'm thoroughly confused on this, because it does show that it's supposed to be a reduction.
So, Madam President, to your question, if you look at the budget detail, which I believe you 84 4/6/10 - WHOLE - BILL 100115, etc. have in front of you --
-- in the summary page, for FY10 it assumed that there was an overall budget of 169 million roughly. The spending, however, for FY10, if you look at the same page, is roughly $170 million. DEPUTY
Which shows that there is a million dollars, in essence, deficit for the Fire Department budget for that period for FY10. And as I think both the Deputy Mayor and the Commissioner testified to, there was a decision made not to make the reductions in staffing both in the Battalion Chief Aides, which was part of the Plan B that this Council adopted in September of 2009, the Plan B budget that was then submitted and approved by the State and PICA, along with a number of other 85 4/6/10 - WHOLE - BILL 100115, etc. Lieutenants providing non-firefighting direct services. The expectation that we have moving forward is that -- and as you see, the budget for FY11 is again back down to $169 million -- that there will be changes in staffing levels necessary to hit the $169 million without any loss in service, without any reduction in response times for firefighting apparatuses. But you are correct and you have noted, there is a million-dollar gap there.
We are looking, both the Deputy Mayor and I, are looking to the Commissioner to ensure that that occurs and that they will manage to that $169 million without an impact on service. DEPUTY
That's exactly right. That's the challenge, and we are -- we came forward and we thought 86 4/6/10 - WHOLE - BILL 100115, etc. that we'd be able to achieve it one way. We were not able to. And now we have a better handle, especially now on our reporting and use of the communications that we're able to have, we believe that we'll be able to do that and we'll be able to manage to that level, and that's my commitment to this Council.
Thank you, Madam Chair. There are a significant variation on the level of overtime spending across the different divisions in the Fire Department. In the Firefighting Division, the average overtime spend per employee is $7,434. And in the Fire Marshal's Division -- I'm sorry; the Fire Prevention Division, it's $12,421 per employee. In the Fire Marshal Division, it's the highest of any of the divisions at $15,556 in overtime 87 4/6/10 - WHOLE - BILL 100115, etc. per employee. Could you explain what work is being done in the Fire Prevention Division, which is responsible for public education, the smoke detector program, the Fire Museum and designing signs and posters that would require overtime? COMMISSIONER AYERS: Some of the services that we do for the community, for some of the Council, also for some of the outreach programs happen on Saturdays sometimes. Sometimes they happen in the evenings where the firefighter will, after their regular duties, will extend for maybe two hours or three hours to do a program, an early evening program. That's for the Fire Prevention Division. As far as the Fire Marshal, some of that overtime is spent in court appearances where they have to testify in arson cases and other cases.
With respect to staying with Fire Prevention before we 88 4/6/10 - WHOLE - BILL 100115, etc. move on to Fire Marshal, that adds up to $12,421 per employee? What oversight of or approval of overtime is required before people schedule stuff? COMMISSIONER AYERS: I sign off on all overtime.
Before they -- COMMISSIONER AYERS: Before they do the overtime. It comes to me, a memorandum, on what the service actually is, what the need is. We make the decision as to whether or not it's going to be allowed.
Is there a way to do scheduling such that some people are always on duty at night to cover night meetings or some people are always on duty on a Saturday where they're still working the same number of hours a week? Have you looked at schedule shifting to eliminate this overtime? COMMISSIONER AYERS: Yes. One 89 4/6/10 - WHOLE - BILL 100115, etc. of the things that we do is, we allow the Battalion Chief, the Captain of the Fire Safety and Education District or that engine company or ladder company to go out and they will -- providing they're not called away on an emergency or have training, they'll actually go out and do that fire prevention activity. But one of the things you have to understand is that here in Philadelphia, when you stop and you look at the staffing that's available, we are -- we compare nowhere to what other cities staff for fire prevention on a regular ongoing basis.
Well, it just seems to me that if we have -- it's not clear that during regular shifts people are fully engaged, and then it seems to me that there is times when they're out. If truly we are this busy where we can't change schedules to cover nights and weekends such that we can avoid overtime, at $12,421 and $15,556 for the Fire Marshal's Division, it seems 90 4/6/10 - WHOLE - BILL 100115, etc. to me we're at the tipping point where a few extra people are going to save us overtime money. DEPUTY
And, Councilman, I thank you for that, and I will -- we'll actually do another analysis of it and we'll see exactly where that would take us. So thank you.
Thank you. The overtime spending in the Firefighting Division has been reduced significantly over the past few years, falling from 15.8 million in '09 to 14.6 million in FY10, and it's budgeted for an additional one million drop in FY11. Oh, the President just went through this. Thank you. Does the Department have any plans for reducing overtime spending in the other divisions, other than Firefighting Division? COMMISSIONER AYERS: We will look at it. We actually have a meeting scheduled to actually go over that now. 91 4/6/10 - WHOLE - BILL 100115, etc. So it will be looked at.
The overtime spending in each of the other four divisions has increased over this same period and totals 5.67 million for FY11. So there's real money there. Regarding the budget direction scenario we received for the Fire Department, there are six items totalling 14.2 million. Could you please describe whether the cut is already reflected in the proposed budget for each item? DEPUTY
Councilman, I didn't catch your last -- that last point. You dropped your voice. What was that again?
In the budget reduction scenarios that were prepared and provided to City Council, regarding the budget reduction scenario we received for the Fire Department, there were six items totalling $14.2 million. For each item can you tell me whether the cut is already reflected in 92 4/6/10 - WHOLE - BILL 100115, etc. the proposed budget? DEPUTY
No. 4 The answer to that would be no. If you received the information that -- the way that we would have to get to that number would be either to deactivate or brownout various numbers of engine, ladders and ALS units, and the reason why we rejected that is because we did not think that was the appropriate way to go in order to make those savings. So the answer is no. 13
Well, there's lots of -- Water Fund rate increase per Water Department. DEPUTY
Remove prior year funding of purchase of medic unit vehicles. DEPUTY
Right. As you know, the Fire Department doesn't have -- we don't have any control over the Water Department. That's the amount of the rate that we have to pay and 93 4/6/10 - WHOLE - BILL 100115, etc. that's why our Class 800, I believe it is, figure is up to $6 million, because we have to pay that to the Water Department for use of the water.
Well, how are you going to reduce -- as part of your prioritized reductions, you have Item 6, which is Water Fund rate increase per -- DEPUTY
It was an increase, so we had to reflect that in the budget.
Oh, I see. That's not a cut. You have a Water Fund 7.5 percent reduction, 461 reflected there. DEPUTY
It may be a double matter, but I can tell you that the water rate went up to us and we're --
I know, and as part of the budget impact scenario, it suggested that you can lower that amount by 7.5 percent and pay $461,000 less. 94 4/6/10 - WHOLE - BILL 100115, etc. DEPUTY
Well, I mean, that was a -- when we put this together, there was a question given to me to see whether or not I would be able to get that from the Water Department, and the reason why this reduction was not taken is because the answer to that was, no, we can't do it. So that's why we are not advocating that this is something that could be done.
What would be the impact on citizens of the cuts reflected in this six-item scenario? DEPUTY
Well, I mean, I think that to reduce or to try to seek additional at this time reductions in either engines, ladders or ALS medical units, you would have to see an increase in the various response times across the board, and I do not think that that is something that we would want to go into at this time, which is why we decided not to go into this area.
So for cuts 95 4/6/10 - WHOLE - BILL 100115, etc. involving deactivation or brownout of an engine company, ladder company or medic unit, how would you choose which companies to brown out or close? DEPUTY
Well, we're still trying to upgrade our technology capabilities so that we'd be able to do this with just the press of a button. Unfortunately, I'm still not there yet, so we'd have to do it through an internal data analysis like we did before. The good thing is is that we have the ability to do it. It takes longer. The bad thing is that it still takes longer and we can't do it by an automatic analysis feed that is part and parcel of our IT. We're getting there and we're hoping to get there soon or sooner, but it would take us some time to actually do that kind of internal study.
Okay. These questions relate to efficiency savings from the use of technology. In 96 4/6/10 - WHOLE - BILL 100115, etc. Commissioner Ayers' testimony on he testified that 90 percent of Department staff are now submitting electronic documents instead of paper documents and you expect 100 percent compliance by the end of FY10. COMMISSIONER AYERS: Yes.
I also was glad to see you testify that this has led to significant reductions in processing time. What efficiency savings in terms of reduced staffing needs or otherwise is reflected in the Department's proposed budget as a result of gaining these efficiencies, in civilian staff or otherwise? COMMISSIONER AYERS: Well, it will be process time as well as less use in paper, those types of things that we were doing before, memos.
Right. But if there were nine people performing a task and the processing time was eight 97 4/6/10 - WHOLE - BILL 100115, etc. hours a day and now we still have nine people performing that task and the processing time for them on average has moved to six hours a day, that means we could have seven people doing the task instead of nine. So what I'm looking for is, what efficiencies have you driven in your civilian staff or other staff as a result of getting these efficiencies through -- the whole point of going paperless is to create efficiencies, even if it's through attrition. COMMISSIONER AYERS: That is correct, and it's not always accomplished through attrition either. Our resources as far as utilizing paper reports, et cetera, goes throughout our entire department, civilian as well as uniform, and sometimes we've gained process time where we can plan more, be on the street more, in the field, downtown as far as administratively. We've also been able to release some of the workload and efficiencies that's needed by individuals 98 4/6/10 - WHOLE - BILL 100115, etc. to do their job, period. So as far as greening and getting rid of the paper, that's one of the things that we focused in on. DEPUTY
Councilman, can I also add, a lot of the times when we are talking about how to improve and get better efficiencies in technology, I think what we have to first recognize is that there is a deficit that started. We have a lot of -- we seem to have a number of people -- and I can tell you in Public Safety -- a number of people that do quite a lot, like beyond what they're really supposedly capable or really capable of doing, but they actually step up because we have great public servants. They step up and they do more. Then we bring in a technology improvement that allows them to do their job, which is already overburdened, to do their job better and then we actually bring and lessen the strain on them to get their job done, that's an 99 4/6/10 - WHOLE - BILL 100115, etc. improvement, but it doesn't mean that we can take that person and get rid of that person. I don't think that we're there yet. I think that what will happen as we get additional technology, I think we'll be able to meet some of the things that you're talking about, but I think that we have to recognize that in some of our systems because how old they have been in the processes, by just wiping away the processes, there's usually an improvement. I think that as we get used to seeing how much we can drive that further, I think we'll then start to look at the kind of innovative stuff that you're talking about.
Who in the Department is responsible for looking at where paper processes were gone or eliminated? Because 90 percent of them are gone, right? So who in the Department was responsible for looking at the workflow processes that changed as a 100 4/6/10 - WHOLE - BILL 100115, etc. result of this thing and then recommending where there are potential efficiencies, through redundancy or attrition or whatever? COMMISSIONER AYERS: We currently have a team that's working to actually do that.
Who is it? COMMISSIONER AYERS: A strategic plan. Well, that's our strategic plan team right now. It's the executive team led by Deputy Commissioner Beatrice as well as a new member of our team who helps to direct our strategic process. That's Ms. Eryn Santamoor.
And have they found any efficiencies? COMMISSIONER AYERS: It's a process that continues to go on --
How long have they been doing this? COMMISSIONER AYERS: They actually started the full overview April 101 4/6/10 - WHOLE - BILL 100115, etc. 1st, a couple of days ago.
This is a new initiative, Councilman, that we're trying to pull on board and it's part of the strategic plan that we're pushing out.
Would you agree with the premise that the whole point of making operating expense investments in technology or cap ex investments in technology is to get a return on that investment? DEPUTY
And that only through increasing productivity of our existing workforce can we provide better levels of service with the same number of people or the same level of service with fewer people as a result of those investments? DEPUTY
I 102 4/6/10 - WHOLE - BILL 100115, etc. believe that's the goal. I think that's the goal of public service.
So why doesn't your budget reflect anticipated savings as a result of this change to a paperless system? DEPUTY
I think what we're trying to do is to make sure that we are managing to where we are and not necessarily get into a habit of anticipating savings that may or may not materialize and then we'd be in a budget deficit situation.
If we were to lower the amount we allocate in Class 100 or Class 200, don't you think that would make it more likely that you'd work quicker to find the efficiencies? DEPUTY
I would disagree, because I think it would be hard to find a way to -- as the Commissioner said earlier in his testimony, 95, 96 percent of his entire budget is really wrapped up in personnel, 103 4/6/10 - WHOLE - BILL 100115, etc. and if we just decided to lop off Class 100 or Class 200 kind of material, we would not really be able to do the job that we're sent to do, and as the Council President has indicated, we're already strained to do the job that we're doing now.
So there's 5.67 million in overtime in non-firefighting functions. DEPUTY
Believe me, Councilman, I agree with you. I've been -- I mean, one of the things that I've been doing is to look in all of public safety. I'm looking at trying to control overtime. You'll hear about it today in Prisons. You'll hear about it 104 4/6/10 - WHOLE - BILL 100115, etc. here. You'll hear about it in Police. Overtime is what we're trying to do and that's the way we're going to get our way out of this. I think that we will -- and I agree completely with you, that that's where -- I'm zeroing in on. I'm trying to put in processes to help my departments focus on that and to eliminate it so we can return the kind of department that I believe that you want us to be, which is a leaner department that will provide the services in a way that we'll be able to do it at a savings for the City.
So what would be the consequences of us cutting a million dollars out of the non-firefighting overtime? DEPUTY
You will end up challenging us to provide the 105 4/6/10 - WHOLE - BILL 100115, etc. service that we are already strained to provide with less people because --
Well, the overtime is actually, again, structured into that in order for us to have that -- to meet that staffing level. I think that --
Thank you very much. The Chair recognizes Councilwoman Sanchez.
Thank you. Good afternoon. COMMISSIONER AYERS: Good afternoon. 106 4/6/10 - WHOLE - BILL 100115, etc. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER BEATRICE: Good afternoon. DEPUTY
Always a pleasure working with the Fire Department. I have a couple questions related to our recruitment efforts, because we talked about the limitation of recruits. So I wanted to ask, when was the last time we updated our Civil Service process and are we looking at our qualifications and our testing as one of the tools that limits our ability to recruit? Have we looked at that process? COMMISSIONER AYERS: Personnel Department is currently going through that process, and that's the department that actually works with that. We do help with professional advice, things like that, but that's Personnel's duty.
There's a few departments and clearly public safety is always one of these issues 107 4/6/10 - WHOLE - BILL 100115, etc. where we always hear about these recruitment problems, but I never get a sense that we're re-looking at our test, that we're re-looking at our qualifications, that we're re-looking at that process as a mechanism of ensuring more folks can qualify or even if -- and, again, not jeopardizing public safety, do we have a test that's years old? 11 COMMISSIONER AYERS: Well, that 12 is being looked at right now. I can 13 guarantee you that Al D'Attilio is on it. 14
And as 15 it relates to that, where is it that we 16 lose people? I mean, we recruit people. 17 People test. Where is the major 18 drop-off? Is it at the testing level? 19 Is it at the background level? Where are 20 we seeing the drop-off that leads us to a 21 smaller class or a pool? 22 COMMISSIONER AYERS: It's 23 various areas. In talking with the 24 Director, those things were discussed, to 25 actually zero in and look at the entire 108 4/6/10 - WHOLE - BILL 100115, etc. process, find out how we can recruit more, which we had an excellent recruitment, but also moving into a process, which I'm not privy to, which is that actually development, test development, all of those things that would happen in that testing process. He's assured me and I feel confident that they'll be looking at each and every process and trying to remedy any areas where we lose folks.
Because I would think the Personnel Department should be facilitating this for you, but it's a reoccurring theme and I just don't feel like we always pay attention, because it requires us to kind of go back and say, what's our test look like, what are those things. And I think it's important, because if we're really going to tackle this overtime in these public safety departments, we have to look at that. It's hard to tell folks we can't hire, I mean, given the economic times 109 4/6/10 - WHOLE - BILL 100115, etc. and these fields that you would think would have natural pipelines. I was encouraged by what Councilman Kenney said around us doing a more deliberate job with our School District, but it's an issue that continues to come up in public safety that's a grave concern. As it relates to our overtime, again, are there any -- we had this discussion. Gillison and I have had this discussion just first on the parade issues. Are there any special events where there is not a dollar-to-dollar reimbursement as it relates to emergency medical? DEPUTY
A dollar to dollar? As it is now, we are, as you know, Councilwoman, we are working on trying to find a way and a formula that is fair for all that would allow us to get significant savings to the person purchasing the service so that it would hopefully not necessarily be a dollar for 110 4/6/10 - WHOLE - BILL 100115, etc. dollar. If there is a way to do that, we're looking for it.
But right now the answer is no, it is still dollar for dollar.
So for Phillies games, Eagles games, concert providers, they reimburse us dollar for dollar for those types of services? DEPUTY
As it is now. We did change the policy this year where I have made sure that we are only reimbursing people who are coming in on overtime, to the extent that I'm able to control that, and that's for Police and Fire as well. We are trying to make sure that we do not pass those costs for straight time costs on to the parade, festival, whatever.
I guess my question is, are we doing that with everybody -- 111 4/6/10 - WHOLE - BILL 100115, etc. DEPUTY
I'd like to look at a scale as it relates to like games, concerts, and I want to ensure that we're also going to be doing the same as it relates to the casinos, and I know they have a separate deal. I want to look at that in comparison. DEPUTY
I'll be glad to sit down with you, Councilwoman, and discuss that.
As it relates to minority contracting, I noticed that you only outlined professional services. So my question is, where are we as it relates to other purchased goods, materials, supplies and why isn't that reported? DEPUTY COMMISSIONER BEATRICE: I would think with the Fire Department, a lot of the equipment purchases are very 112 4/6/10 - WHOLE - BILL 100115, etc. specialized, the apparatus, stuff like that. So we were showing what we really have control over. Plus all the other apparatus and supplies goes through the Procurement Department. Whatever their bid requirements are, we follow. DEPUTY
Procurement and Fleet, if you think about for the Fire Department, are the two departments that actually purchase all of the equipment for the Fire Department, and it is in a way that is done that has -- that there's usually only three persons that are even in the entire industry that provide the service in some respects. So that would be the better place to actually ask that question. I'll be back for that, if you'd like, but I can provide that to you and I'll be glad to do that.
So every other purchase made by the Fire Department is done through an umbrella contract? There's nothing else? Because 113 4/6/10 - WHOLE - BILL 100115, etc. you have camera services. You have other things. None of these things that are individualized for the Fire Department are part of our goals in terms of minority and Philly-based contracting? DEPUTY COMMISSIONER BEATRICE: Jack's Camera Service would be part of the overall Procurement Department's citywide contract. So the Fire Department would really have no input into it.
So where we buy our fire alarms that we raise money, none of that stuff -- it just goes through your traditional -- DEPUTY COMMISSIONER BEATRICE: Through the traditional Procurement process.
Okay. So there are no goals attached to -- DEPUTY COMMISSIONER BEATRICE: Procurement has citywide goals just like every other department.
I 114 4/6/10 - WHOLE - BILL 100115, etc. just -- again, you're purchasing millions and millions of dollars in other services, so I guess we'll have to ask that of the Procurement Department, but I'm interested to see how we ensure the specialty items that we buy at the Fire Department have a potential of being bought by Philly-based companies, let alone the other requirements. DEPUTY
As it relates to the Water Fund situation, does that mean the Water Department has meters at our stations? And who comes up with that number? DEPUTY
I want to -- I'd have to get back to you on exactly that process. I know that we are 115 4/6/10 - WHOLE - BILL 100115, etc. metered and I know that our -- but if you think about the amount of water that the Fire Department uses, I'm sure that there is a particular process. The hydrants are not metered. So whenever you're putting out the fire at the hydrant, that's not metered, but all the other matters, buildings, firehouses, that stuff is metered.
That number seems really high, and I know that we're working at breaking down these silos, but I want to make sure that the Water Department is not balancing their budget on the backs of the Fire Department with a number that's just arbitrarily -- DEPUTY
I don't think Deputy Mayor Rina Cutler would do that to me now. Come on.
I really don't think that would be a 116 4/6/10 - WHOLE - BILL 100115, etc. matter. So, no, I would not suggest that. (Witness approached witness table.)
Councilmember, Steve Agostini, Budget Director. Actually, the entire City has received increases in water rates just like everybody else in the City. As you can imagine, my initial reaction was not enthusiastic when the Water Department sent the bill, but we are subject to the same water rates and subject to the same billing --
The Water Department functions under rate guidelines that are part of bond 117 4/6/10 - WHOLE - BILL 100115, etc. indentures associated with capital improvements at the Water Department. So something we have to conform to.
And therein lies my concern. Again, you have departments that rely on a certain amount of money to be able to borrow and do those improvements. I want to ensure that we're not doing that on the backs of other departments, because it's like taking from Peter to pay Paul. So I just think that that rate, unless you can tell me it's metered and there's a mechanism for this, that they shouldn't be allowed to arbitrarily set a number like that.
Well, I certainly don't think they're arbitrary and I've certainly had more than one conversation with the Deputy Mayor and the Water Department Commissioner for the very reason that you're raising, not likely to sort of absorb a few million-dollar increase across the City very happily. 118 4/6/10 - WHOLE - BILL 100115, etc.
Okay. Well, I'll look forward to that information as to how that formula is developed. That's all. Thank you, Madam President.
You're welcome. The Chair recognizes Councilwoman Tasco.
I want to go back to a question that Councilwoman Quinones raised relative to the recruitment. Who prepares the exam for the Civil Service Department? COMMISSIONER AYERS: Personnel is in charge of that.
Do you have any input into what the content of the test might be? COMMISSIONER AYERS: 119 4/6/10 - WHOLE - BILL 100115, etc. Occasionally Personnel will call and ask us professional questions about testing, that type of thing. They will tell us that we have an opportunity to talk with other testing companies around the entire country just to let folks know that that's going to be opening up, things like that, but as far as the actual test, it's a Personnel function.
So who in the Personnel Department has the capacity or ability to draft test questions relative to the Fire Department or the functions that may be required of the person taking the test? COMMISSIONER AYERS: I believe they also look at professional services to develop the test. DEPUTY
If I may, Councilwoman, most of the time what 120 4/6/10 - WHOLE - BILL 100115, etc. happens, that there are several companies that just basically provide these kinds of technical tests for cities, and what normally happens is that the Personnel Department would engage different companies to help develop the test. There are certain national companies that actually do that. And whenever a test is about to start, you would put out an RFQ or an RFP to see who you're going to hire that would be able to develop the test, and especially when it comes to Fire because of how litigious this particular question is and has been for over 35 years, this is something that is left to that specialty, and then the City basically hires the company that helps put the test together. So that's the process.
So to follow that to the next question she proposed was, are you able to review the falloff to see why individuals might not be passing the test? We may recruit a 121 4/6/10 - WHOLE - BILL 100115, etc. number of people, but what happens in the end that you get -- maybe you recruited 200 and you end up with ten. What happened to the other 190, and are you able to review those applications or have a discussion with them as to what happens? COMMISSIONER AYERS: Yes. Well, for this year, there has been an improvement in the whole process as far as testing, where there is monitoring from the recruitment process through to the notification process that a test is being prepared, through to the actual testing, who enters the room, who exits the room, who actually makes the list, who gets hired. This whole process is being put in place for this test.
Do you have any input into that process? COMMISSIONER AYERS: For review.
For review? 122 4/6/10 - WHOLE - BILL 100115, etc. COMMISSIONER AYERS: Correct.
So do you have any idea what the drop-off is or why you have such a drop-off? DEPUTY
At this time, Councilwoman, I would just suggest that we can try and look back at you. I know -- get back to you on that issue. I can tell you that for litigious reasons or for trial reasons in this area for literally almost 40 years -- I remember when I was in law school, I actually argued the Memphis Firefighters versus Stotts decision back in 1985. This is always left to a separate company and a separate part so that the Commissioner is not seen as favoring one side or another. They give and provide a certain level of detail expertise. They then turn it over to either a company that has gone through and has been seen by the Supreme Courts in various states as being okay, the test is fine, but just as a result of the Connecticut decision that was made a 123 4/6/10 - WHOLE - BILL 100115, etc. couple of months ago, this entire process is always in change and always being refined, and the Personnel Department of the City works with whoever is going to win the contract to help put this test together. They will work that out. The Commissioner will be able to review and give some idea about these are the parameters, but this is best left to them to make sure that whatever test comes up, we will be able to withstand a challenge in court, because no matter what, whoever wins or loses, you're going to end up getting sued one way or the other, so you have to make sure that you get the best test that you can, the fairest test you can in order to fulfill the goals of the Fire Department.
You're welcome. The Chair recognizes Councilman Greenlee. 124 4/6/10 - WHOLE - BILL 100115, etc.
Thank you, Madam President. Very quickly. It's more of a statement than a question, but in one of your answers, Commissioner, to Councilman Green about overtime, you talked about how sometimes you have to -- you send personnel to events on Saturdays, at nighttime, whatever, and just for the record, I just want to say, I know I've had some of those events. I guess all Councilpeople have. And your department has always been one of the most responsive and most informative at these events. So I just want to go on record saying we appreciate that and appreciate what your department does on that. COMMISSIONER AYERS: Thank you, sir. DEPUTY
Thank you. Thank you, Madam President. 125 4/6/10 - WHOLE - BILL 100115, etc.
Thank you. Are there any further questions from members of the Committee? (No response.)
Seeing no one, thank you very much, gentlemen. DEPUTY
-- will stand in recess until 1:30. Thank you. (Luncheon recess.)
Good afternoon, everyone. This is a continued public hearing of the Committee of the Whole. We will now hear from the Department of Prisons. (Witnesses approached witness 126 4/6/10 - WHOLE - BILL 100115, etc. table.)
Kindly identify yourself for the record and proceed with your testimony. COMMISSIONER GIORLA: Good afternoon, Council President Verna and members of City Council. I am Lou Giorla, Commissioner of the Philadelphia Prison System. I am here today with several members of the Prison System senior staff to testify in support of our Fiscal 2011 Operating Budget. I am pleased to advise this body that as of March 17, 2010, the Prisons had a census of 8,439 individuals. One year ago on the same date in 2009, the number of inmates housed in all Prison facilities numbered 9,453 individuals. As a result, the Prisons' budget request for FY2011 is $9 127 4/6/10 - WHOLE - BILL 100115, etc. million less than the agency's FY2010 request of $248 million. This is the largest reduction out of any other department in the City for FY11. For Fiscal 2011, the Prison requests the following: In Class 100, $123,558,000 for salaries; in Class 200, $110,010,000 for contracted services; in Class 300 and 400, $4,768,000 for supplies and equipment; in Class 500, $1,301,000 for indemnities contributions. There are a number of reasons for a reduction in the target budget as well as the prison population. For example, recent procedural changes by the First Judicial District, which now allows defendants with several cases to appear before one judge on all matters. The same protocol was adopted for parole and probation violators who have been returned to custody. This resulted in a decreased length of stay and faster case disposition for those confined to the Prisons. 128 4/6/10 - WHOLE - BILL 100115, etc. In addition, the Philadelphia Prison System worked with the member agencies of the Criminal Justice Advisory Board and the Deputy Mayor of Public Safety's Office of Prison Population Management to transfer nearly 300 inmates with state sentences to state custody. Finally, the Prisons have seen a small but significant reduction in admissions resulting from the Police Department's success in cutting the City's crime rates. Within the Department, efficiencies have been enacted as well. Over the last months, we have reduced 17 the number of correctional officer 18 vacancies, resulting in a net savings of $2 million in Class 100 and an overall overtime reduction of $4 million. Meanwhile, sick time for correctional officers declined by nearly percent, 23 which again helps us better manage staff 24 deployment and reduce overtime costs. 25 Other changes that we have 129 4/6/10 - WHOLE - BILL 100115, etc. enacted help us to do our jobs better and lower the rates of recidivism, which will decrease our costs in the long term. For example, every Prison facility in the State Road complex is now equipped with a video station linked with video-capable courtrooms at the Criminal Justice Center. This innovation is reducing the number of inmates who must appear daily at the courthouse, reducing transportation costs and minimizing the risk to public safety. While custody and control are the two major responsibilities of the Prisons, care is the third and equally important facet of our mission. In Calendar 2009, GEDs, general equivalency diplomas, issued to inmates numbered 320, a percent increase from 2007. The 21 Prisons Horticulture program worked with 22 the Pennsylvania Horticulture Society's 23 Philadelphia Green program and produced 24 13,000 pounds of fresh produce for 25 community food banks since its inception 130 4/6/10 - WHOLE - BILL 100115, etc. in 2006. Over the last two years, the Prisons has decreased -- I'm sorry; has increased the number of sentenced inmates involved in programming from 36 percent to over 78 percent. The newly opened Office of Reintegration Services for Ex-Offenders, or RISE, is now working directly with Philadelphia Prisons inmates to provide job training, placement and community support. Programming begins while offenders are still in custody and does not wait until they are released.
Of the 480 ex-offenders enrolled in the Fiscal Year 2010, only seven have recidivated. During this fiscal year, PPS plans to institute a program of Day Reporting where offenders can access treatment while in the community. The intent is to reduce the number of technical and direct violations of probation and parole, a major driver of surging jail populations nationwide. Because of the aforementioned 131 4/6/10 - WHOLE - BILL 100115, etc. prison population reduction, the Prisons were able to withdraw from expensive, out-of-state inmate housing contracts. Many of the temporary housing areas used to accommodate the high population have been closed. Triple cells have been greatly reduced. However, we are still operating above our design capacities at most jails. However, during this fiscal year, planning will begin to renovate the former Prisons site on Torresdale Avenue to create as many as 600 new beds. When completed, the site will relieve our older facilities and create swing space needed to prepare for the replacement of our oldest jail, the House of Correction. The Prisons are also a major contractor of services. In Fiscal Year '11, the Prisons anticipated for-profit contract obligations total $71,379,000. Of those contracts, 33 percent, or over $23 million, will be disbursed to minority, women or disabled business 132 4/6/10 - WHOLE - BILL 100115, etc. enterprises, exceeding the City's goals of percent participation. Attached to 4 this testimony is a table showing the 5 Prisons expected minority, women or 6 disabled business enterprise 7 participation for Fiscal 2011. 8 In consideration of the 9 proposed seven and a half percent cuts 10 for City departments, also attached are 11 typical examples of how the Prisons' 12 proposed budget would be affected. Such 13 a reduction would force the cancellation 14 of Prison-funded reentry programs, 15 vocational training and halt preventive 16 maintenance. 17 The summer, which traditionally 18 is accompanied by a marked prison 19 population increase, is near. Upcoming 20 changes in the Municipal Court's 21 preliminary hearing process, the bail 22 system and the looming fugitive crisis in 23 Philadelphia could result in increased 24 prison population levels in the near 25 future. The coming months will provide 133 4/6/10 - WHOLE - BILL 100115, etc. proof of whether these reforms and efficiencies have indeed taken hold. In the meantime, each and every Prison staff member will be committed to providing secure detention in an environment meant to foster successful reentry. Thank you for your attention and consideration. We will be happy to answer your questions at this time.
Thank you, Commissioner. On of your testimony, you state that you will begin to renovate the former Prisons site on Torresdale Avenue. Can you tell us the name of that facility? COMMISSIONER GIORLA: We haven't named the facility as yet. It was formerly -- it's within the footprint of the old Holmesburg Prison.
Oh, Holmesburg, okay. What type of renovations will be made and can you tell us where are these costs budgeted? 134 4/6/10 - WHOLE - BILL 100115, etc. COMMISSIONER GIORLA: Currently, we're looking at dormitory-style, multi-use housing, semi-permanent structures, which are Quonset hut or tent-like in shape. They're reinforced and they have HVAC, food service and laboratory facilities, and they can be erected pretty quickly.
What do you estimate the cost will be -- COMMISSIONER GIORLA: At this point in time --
-- to do the renovation? COMMISSIONER GIORLA: -- I don't have a firm cost estimate because it's still in development. We've looked at some figures. We looked at options of 600 beds, 480 beds or 360 beds. As far as the funding, we're going to seek to use funding that was formerly allocated for a secure juvenile detention facility in our State Road complex, because we have that population in a site where 135 4/6/10 - WHOLE - BILL 100115, etc. there's available program space and housing.
Is Councilwoman Krajewski aware of what's being proposed? COMMISSIONER GIORLA: Yes, Chairwoman, she is.
We have handled -- good afternoon. Good afternoon. Here she comes.
Your ears had to be ringing. I just asked if you were --
I don't think so. As soon as I walk in, this is the reception I get.
I was asking if you're aware that the 136 4/6/10 - WHOLE - BILL 100115, etc. Holmesburg Prison is going to be renovated.
We have met one time, but nothing conclusive. DEPUTY
They had talked to me one time and I suggested they talk to the community as well. DEPUTY
But I haven't heard from them since. Would you give me a briefing on what happened? DEPUTY
Absolutely. Good afternoon and good afternoon, Councilwoman.
Could 137 4/6/10 - WHOLE - BILL 100115, etc. you speak into the microphone. DEPUTY
Not a problem. Yes, we have met with the Councilwoman. We have also met with members of her staff to make sure she is aware of what's going on. She made a request of the Administration to both go out and meet with not only two of the civic associations that are close by. We have done that. I know the Commissioner has been out on many occasions. I'll allow him to speak to that as well. We've also been able to look at other information that the Councilwoman needed and members of her staff needed, and we provided that to both of them, and as she has stated, we have kept her up to date on everything that is going on, and when things become even more finalized, as I told her, we'll be getting another briefing. So we're moving this process slowly, but definitely surely going 138 4/6/10 - WHOLE - BILL 100115, etc. forward. And I thank the Councilwoman for working with us, knowing how far we have come in this short time.
Commissioner, as I said, apparently you don't know what the cost will be for the renovations. However, is there anything in the budget that would indicate a figure, whether it would be more or less? Nobody seems to know at this point in time. COMMISSIONER GIORLA: Our capital budget has an allocation for -- had an allocation in FY2009 for the juvenile facility, and I can supply the Chair with the exact figures. Somewhere 139 4/6/10 - WHOLE - BILL 100115, etc. in the vicinity of $12 and a half million, and that was the funding that was intended to be used for this project.
Mr. McPherson is just saying how could we appropriate the $12 and a half million for an adult facility when it was really earmarked for juveniles? DEPUTY
I can speak to that. The appropriation originally came through under the PICA matter and we are seeking a PICA approval. We know that the process begins and then we'll bring it back to Council. I mean, we're at literally -- I mean, when I said we were communicating, we're being transparent, we are. We're at the very beginning, and this is the process that we're going forward. That's what the Councilwoman had requested of us. That's what we're following. And this is part of where we're going because of the need to take out the oldest facility, which is Holmesburg -- which is 140 4/6/10 - WHOLE - BILL 100115, etc. House of Corrections. We are literally pouring a lot of money into a building that is now dating -- COMMISSIONER GIORLA: Well, it actually opened in 1854 and was renovated in 1927. DEPUTY
And as we've indicated to the Councilwoman, this facility that we're talking about is a transfer facility. It's not -- it would not be used hopefully long, but while we would take down the House of Correction.
I'm sorry. Point of order. I understand they're not permanent? DEPUTY
Right. That's right. That's correct. I mean, that's why this is not a, quote/unquote -- we're not putting up, you know, bricks and mortar. We're talking about, as you've you talked, almost like -- they're hardened tents basically. That's why we're able to do 141 4/6/10 - WHOLE - BILL 100115, etc. it for the amount of money that we're able to do it.
But, Madam Chairwoman, I just want to specify that this is nothing that has been settled completely. DEPUTY
I think everything is apparently making the proper steps to go forward and, Commissioner, you did say that you met with the area residents? COMMISSIONER GIORLA: I met with --
That's a very important component I'm sure to Councilwoman Krajewski's concerns. What was the reaction? COMMISSIONER GIORLA: When we met with the Councilwoman and her staff, they directed us to meet with the two local civic associations, the Holmesburg Civic Association, the Upper Holmesburg. 142 4/6/10 - WHOLE - BILL 100115, etc. I met with both of those groups a couple times, last year and this year, informed them of our plans. A couple members were unsure, there were a couple members that were opposed, but overall mainly the groups just wanted to know what we were doing, what our intentions were. We tried to explain that this will allow us to renovate older facilities or replace older facilities that are costing us far too much money, giving us the eventual possibility of moving our entire operation back to State Road where operationally it would be much more efficient, and we have to have some type of transition. We need some type of transition.
Well, I would strongly urge you to please, please keep in close contact with Councilwoman Krajewski every step of the way. DEPUTY
Absolutely. That's the promise that I've 143 4/6/10 - WHOLE - BILL 100115, etc. made, and as she has been known to when I approach, she looks and she says, Okay -- when I come to her office, she says, Okay, I know that I'm getting my update now, come on in. And you got to be ready, and I says, I'm ready, Councilwoman, here's the update and this is where we are and what we're doing. So we've done that and we will continue to do that.
But you didn't mention I was going to throw you out of the office. DEPUTY
Commissioner, you mention on your testimony that you are preparing for the replacement of the House of Corrections. Can you tell us when you hope to replace it and the funding that has been included in the Five Year Plan 144 4/6/10 - WHOLE - BILL 100115, etc. for its replacement? COMMISSIONER GIORLA: Council President, at this time we don't have a set plan to replace the House of Correction. We don't have a design. What it will require is a master plan to study our State Road complex. There are parking and traffic issues there, utility connection issues, and an overall footprint study. The flood plans have been revised since the Katrina disaster, which has caused some of our facilities to be obsolete. It might require more construction. We haven't completed the study as yet. As far as the funding, there was $400,000 in our capital program for 2010 that would begin the study of the State Road complex.
Thank you. After your testimony, I was going to say this sounds like a success story. Now, it all depends on your 145 4/6/10 - WHOLE - BILL 100115, etc. answer for the next question. What is your projected Fiscal 2011 cost for medical treatment for prisoners? COMMISSIONER GIORLA: I believe our projected cost in the budget for mental and medical -- physical health and mental health treatment is somewhere in the neighborhood of $87 million.
Wasn't it 70 million last year? COMMISSIONER GIORLA: No. In actuality it was --
So if we have less inmates, why would it cost more? If my memory serves me, it was 70 million last year. COMMISSIONER GIORLA: We have the data for you, Madam Chair. (Witness approached witness table.)
Good afternoon. Bob Fitzmartin, Acting Administrative Services Director. We have -- I don't have the 146 4/6/10 - WHOLE - BILL 100115, etc. total here, but I have the components of the health contracts.
Are you looking at , Section 50? Is that what you're referring to, sir?
Well, do some calculations real fast. I think it was done for you.
No. 15 Your calculation is wrong. Our calculation shows 63,039,000.
Gee, you're great. COMMISSIONER GIORLA: That's correct.
Okay. What is the breakdown of medical treatment for sentenced prisoners and detainees? 147 4/6/10 - WHOLE - BILL 100115, etc. COMMISSIONER GIORLA: We don't keep figures based on custody type, such as sentenced versus detentioner inmates. Whatever treatment -- we don't provide treatment differently to each population.
Tell us what is the average stay for a detainee? COMMISSIONER GIORLA: The average stay for a detainee is around 90 days.
Ninety? COMMISSIONER GIORLA: Ninety days. That's a male detainee. For a female detainee, it's somewhere in the neighborhood of 56 days.
I'm sorry. I'm having difficulty. There's a lot of traffic outside. COMMISSIONER GIORLA: Ninety days for a --
Ninety days for a male, and how many for 148 4/6/10 - WHOLE - BILL 100115, etc. a female? COMMISSIONER GIORLA: And 56 for a female.
You are also requesting $1,900,000 for Aetna service contract. That's on your budget. Can you explain what these funds are for? COMMISSIONER GIORLA: Aetna is our third-party administrator on our medical contract. They negotiate hospital stay rates and services for us throughout the community and specialist services. Then they audit billing and negotiate rates.
Explain about special services, please. COMMISSIONER GIORLA: Specialist services, medical specialties, OB/GYN, orthopedics, radiology, other specialized medical services.
You know, we've been talking for years about the possibility of reducing the inmate 149 4/6/10 - WHOLE - BILL 100115, etc. healthcare costs. There should be some reimbursement I would think from the State. Have we applied lately for reimbursement from the State? And if we haven't, can you tell us what steps are being taken to possibly reduce the cost for the medical? COMMISSIONER GIORLA: Yes, Madam Chairwoman, I can. We've reduced our service volumes. We've changed, first of all, our sick call process. Formerly inmates would apply for sick call the day before and they'd be seen by a practitioner the next day regardless of their complaint. In some cases, they just wanted to make a phone call or they wanted to talk to someone. We now triage those slips at night, a nurse reviews them, and only those who indicate an illness are seen, and that's within five days. It's not necessarily the next day. If there's an emergency, they're seen immediately. They don't wait until the next day. That has reduced our sick 150 4/6/10 - WHOLE - BILL 100115, etc. calls from somewhere in the neighborhood of 138,000 in 2007 to about 61,000 in 2009. We've also looked at medication pricing. About 90 percent of our medication formulary has been converted to generics, and we're constantly looking for substitutes or generics that would be the equivalent and reduce our costs. We're also looking at Medicaid pricing for our medication. Currently, there's a Health and Human Services restriction on Medicaid pricing for prisoners' medication. We're trying to get that changed. We're lobbying actively to have that changed. And we're also -- we've just instituted digital radiography as a way to cut down on our transportation costs and allow a radiologist not to come to the facility, have x-rays read quicker and more efficiently. And, lastly, we're in the process of developing, along with the Health Department, an electronic health 151 4/6/10 - WHOLE - BILL 100115, etc. record for inmates. That project will allow us simultaneous use of our medical records, eliminate paper in the medical records process, and reduce the amount of documentation necessary for us to transfer inmates from one facility to another.
The Chair recognizes Councilman Green for a point of information.
I think everything you just described is great. I'm glad to hear you talk about those improvements, Commissioner.
I'm sorry. I commend you for everything you're working on in that regard that you just spoke about, Commissioner. Can you tell me where in the budget efficiencies from these changes are reflected? Thank you. 152 4/6/10 - WHOLE - BILL 100115, etc. COMMISSIONER GIORLA: The budget efficiencies are reflected in our overall cost estimates for the facilities. You know, our cost estimate for 2011 is roughly a one percent increase over 2010, which compared to medical increases in the community at large are much less. The average increase for medical costs in the community are between four and seven percent. We've reduced -- I'd be glad to provide information on how we reduced personnel costs for our medical staff, overall positions and any other data you might want to look at.
I'll conclude with my questioning. However, I still feel very strongly -- and we go into this just about every year -- about our looking to the State for some type of reimbursement for the medical needs of the inmates. Have we done that at all lately? 153 4/6/10 - WHOLE - BILL 100115, etc. COMMISSIONER GIORLA: It's illegal to provide Medicaid while inmates are in custody. One of the things we've done, we've worked with the State so that their Medicaid benefits are not revoked when they're in custody, that they're actually suspended. As it stands now, somebody released from our custody can report to the Human Services Office and have their benefits reactivated without reapplying. That's the most efficient system we've been able to institute thus far. If we get permission or the regulatory changes are made to cover inmates while in custody, we'll pursue that as well. There are efforts underfoot to have inmates designated as part of a medically underserved community and for the local health centers to engage in some participation in our medical health treatment that would allow us to seek that type of reimbursement, but at this time, it's just not possible 154 4/6/10 - WHOLE - BILL 100115, etc. for us. It will require regulatory and legislative change.
Well, I think that's something we should be lobbying for, first of all. We, the City, are paying for the cost of the prisoners. That should be done by the State. But that's not your problem; it's ours. And I think there's a better way of doing it. However, we're not the ones to do it. If we could, we would. At this time, the Chair recognizes Councilman Greenlee.
Thank you, Madam President. Good afternoon, gentlemen. (Good afternoon.)
Certainly your efforts, I think we all agree, to fight recidivism is encouraging, because it seems like the numbers have certainly increased in a lot of ways or the recidivism has decreased, so the results have increased. 155 4/6/10 - WHOLE - BILL 100115, etc. As far as GEDs, I see that there's a percent increase from 2007. 4 Do you have any idea how many, as an 5 inmate leaves, what the percentage is 6 that have at least a GED? 7 COMMISSIONER GIORLA: We don't 8 do diagnostic testing for everyone that 9 comes through the door. We do intake 10 interviewing and we ask for self-reported 11 information. Forty-eight percent state 12 that they do not have a GED. As far as 13 the other 52 percent who come through the 14 door and say they do, we're not sure 15 about some of those. When we have them 16 participate in programs, we look at their 17 skill level, and sometimes it's 18 inappropriate and we will refer them to 19 our adult basic education and our pre-GED 20 programs. 21 Now, the reentry -- RISE, the 22 Reintegration Services for Ex-Offenders, 23 they conduct tape testing of each 24 offender that they provide services to, 25 so they get a benchmark and a skill level 156 4/6/10 - WHOLE - BILL 100115, etc. and then they can make appropriate referrals. We're looking at a sentenced curriculum, a required sentenced curriculum.
That was going to be my next question. COMMISSIONER GIORLA: Based on several things that we think would be necessary to an appropriate reentry, anger management, victim awareness, GED evaluation, testing and placement, and any other drug and alcohol or specialized treatment they might require.
Now, would that have to be ordered by the court or can the Prisons make that as part of their requirements? DEPUTY
Both. COMMISSIONER GIORLA: For sentenced offenders, the Prison themselves can mandate it. Frequently the court will order, depending on what the defense attorney requests and what the nature of the offense is, they'll 157 4/6/10 - WHOLE - BILL 100115, etc. order a drug and alcohol treatment, they'll order a GED or some other type of placement.
Okay. Good. And as far as job training and the programs, it looks like the numbers have really increased there. As far as the job training, I know -- and I don't know a lot about this, but I know you have a printing process up there. COMMISSIONER GIORLA: Yes.
And I think there is some type of carpentry, furniture-making, that kind of thing? COMMISSIONER GIORLA: We have a number of vocational training. We have the Horticulture Society. We have our Philacor Prison Industries, which has a furniture shop, which has a hospitality program. They have a print shop and an engraving shop as well. JEVS Employment Services runs a building maintenance program for us, and we also have environmental maintenance and customer 158 4/6/10 - WHOLE - BILL 100115, etc. service training available for the inmates.
Now, the products that are produced out of that, the furniture or the stationery or whatever, do you have any working relationship with City agencies to provide -- to get like if City Council needs a desk or something? You know what I mean? Because I know we have to go through a certain procurement process, but is there some relationship with the Prisons and the City? There should be. COMMISSIONER GIORLA: We're permitted by law to sell to governmental agencies nationwide, non-profits who contract with the City, and we do so. We make virtually all our own office furniture for the Prisons. We've made a number of items in the last year for the Managing Director's Office and some other City agencies. We do printing for some agencies and a lot of the engraving as well. 159 4/6/10 - WHOLE - BILL 100115, etc.
So, what, it has to be like a specific -- do requests still go through Procurement? COMMISSIONER GIORLA: No. 6 Requests can be placed --
Right to the Prisons? COMMISSIONER GIORLA: -- right to the Prisons through our Philacor Industries.
Okay. That sounds good. COMMISSIONER GIORLA: I'll be glad to send to Council catalogues.
We'll give you a catalogue. We'll be glad to use the Philacor.
I 160 4/6/10 - WHOLE - BILL 100115, etc. assume that whatever revenues are generated, it goes right back into your fund, Commissioner? COMMISSIONER GIORLA: The --
Not yours, but... COMMISSIONER GIORLA: Well, the Industries' fund, which is generated by the proceeds from Philacor, our correctional industries, it goes back into the Philacor Industries' fund, whatever -- there's no profit there. It's entirely reinvested. It's nearly self-sustaining. The only cost it really doesn't cover are personnel costs for our shop supervisors and our security officers, but it pays for supplies, it pays for its own equipment and it provides whatever services we require.
No. 25 That's fine. Thank you, Madam President. 161 4/6/10 - WHOLE - BILL 100115, etc. One more question on a different note. You talk about the usual uptick in prisoners during the warm-weather months. On average, what is that? I mean, how much percentage roughly would you say it goes up in the warm weather? COMMISSIONER GIORLA: When we went back and looked at probably ten years past, our average increase was about four and a half percent. Now, there have been downturns before, court-ordered intervention. Prison Cat in the '90s caused a downturn in the population. Significant Police initiatives like Operation Safe Streets and Sunrise caused downturns in the population. But each time they rebounded and sometimes in the double digits. So I don't want to be -- this is the first time that you've seen efficiencies that are systemic rather than immediate and forced. There's no 25 court intervention here. These are 162 4/6/10 - WHOLE - BILL 100115, etc. actually efficiencies between the courts and the Prisons that have caused this reduction.
Cooperative effort. COMMISSIONER GIORLA: Yeah. We really believe we should be able to sustain this, but, you know, the crime rate itself is a variable, so...
Sure. All right. Thanks for all you do. Thank you, Madam President.
You're welcome. The Chair recognizes Councilman Jones.
Thank you. I have my PAL Councilperson here. She's empowered me to speak and ask you a couple of questions.
No, Councilman. I think you should be asking the question.
First of all, from your first presentation when I first came here as a Councilperson to now is a marked improvement over some of the things that you are talking about. You were able to respond to all of the questions. That's my statement. I am confident we are moving in the right direction based on some of your accomplishments. More participation in programs, increased minority participation in contracting, the reduction overall in inmate population. So I am impressed with what you're doing in the right direction. The question I would have is, 164 4/6/10 - WHOLE - BILL 100115, etc. to reemphasize why there's no 3 dollar-for-dollar decrease of the $125 a day every time we lose an inmate. Can you kind of help us with that? COMMISSIONER GIORLA: Certainly, Councilman. The figure has been thrown around repeatedly. Every year someone takes our entire average daily population and divides it into our budget. So if we had 9,000 and they divide that into 240 million, it comes to maybe $90 a day or $95 a day. Each offender has associated costs. We have, for instance, weekend offenders who stay two days, consume very little in the area of supplies and are low risk and require low security. They may cost us $10 to $12 a day. We have high-custody offenders who are very dangerous, assaultive, in some cases mentally ill and have chronic medical diseases. They may cost us $10,000 a month or $1,000 a day. We've seen persons in our custody with very significant therapeutic and 165 4/6/10 - WHOLE - BILL 100115, etc. medical needs that are extremely expensive. So for every inmate that we release or every person that we reduce the population by, it's not a dollar-for-dollar figure. We can't say we let 100 inmates out, so that's $9,700. What we try to look at is services across the board, if we can reduce medical services. And when the population goes down like this, we look at can we consolidate living space without jeopardizing programs, can we reduce the number of people assigned to a specific area. We look at -- our Contracts Office reviews our bills for food service and maintenance. Our Chief of Medical Operations looks at whether or not we can redeploy medical staff. Everything that we can do.
For the record, I think it's important for people to understand and this Council to understand that just because we drop 166 4/6/10 - WHOLE - BILL 100115, etc. inmate population, there's a variable as to where the direct cost per inmate goes. The second question, that reduction in total population, how much of that is due to farming inmates out to other private and often other counties in their facilities? COMMISSIONER GIORLA: None. None. In actuality, the population decrease has allowed us to withdraw from those facilities. We had contracts in Passaic, New Jersey and Monmouth, New Jersey. We're no longer there. We have a contract with Lehigh County, Pennsylvania. We've reduced that number. We have a couple of contracts with sites within the City. We've reduced the numbers there as well.
So per day stay, was that cost greater in those facilities or less? COMMISSIONER GIORLA: In some of those facilities, yes, it was.
It was 167 4/6/10 - WHOLE - BILL 100115, etc. greater? COMMISSIONER GIORLA: In Monmouth County, for example, it was $105 a day. In Passaic County, New Jersey, it was $88 a day. I'm not sure about the others.
So every time we reduce one of those outsourcing contracts, we actually save a dollar or two? COMMISSIONER GIORLA: Yes.
Excuse me. The Chair recognizes Councilwoman Sanchez for a point of information.
Thank you. I just wanted to clarify that, because that was one of the questions that I had, because in fact the Fiscal Year 2011 obligations for outside management, the number is the same. So I 168 4/6/10 - WHOLE - BILL 100115, etc. just wanted to clarify that, because that was going to be one of my questions. You have, according to Section 50, , $107 million in contracting that's going out, which is the same what you projected in 2010, and I wanted to ask about the disparities, because, Councilman Jones, if you'll allow me, there are places where we pay as little as 35 and at places where we pay 105. So the number hasn't gone down, at least not based on what you're proposing. COMMISSIONER GIORLA: The reductions at Monmouth County and Passaic County we took in FY10. We've renegotiated minimums at our other contract sites. So between '10 and '11, we didn't reduce any outside housing contracts. However, the number of inmates that we had housed at those sites exceeded our minimums, so we've tried to reduce to the minimum or maintain at the minimum as time goes on. So that our overall projection will be for a certain 169 4/6/10 - WHOLE - BILL 100115, etc. amount, but --
Because according to what you're putting here, our capacity is 1,500 inmates at $107 million. So you're saying we were over some of those limits? Because your numbers are the same, and I wanted to ask about that, because I was hoping that that's one of the areas where I would see reductions, and I don't. DEPUTY
Councilwoman, let me also just add something. One of the things that you have to be mindful of is that while we have been able to reduce the Prison budget by the nine million that you've seen in the overall, we have kept as a hedge against what the Commissioner was talking about earlier a spike that we would not be able to deal with, and for us to just reduce those contracts without that, we would be actually saying that we would not have the capacity to go back into them. So we have taken -- and by 170 4/6/10 - WHOLE - BILL 100115, etc. taking the floor out of those contracts and reducing that, we believe that we have the amount of money that we will be able to spend and it will be lessened by that through our anticipation of what the numbers would be this summer, but we did not want to just take out -- let's just say take out the Lehigh County completely and save the $950,000. We didn't want to do that, because if all the sudden there is a spike, we would have no place to put people.
I guess my issue is, if we have places that house them for half the price -- I'm sorry, Councilman Jones. I can come back to this -- rather than keep a contract with someone who is 105, we would increase the ones where the other was. So it's just not reflected here, and I know you guys are working hard on this and this is -- again, because it's $107 million in outside contracting. This is clearly one of the 171 4/6/10 - WHOLE - BILL 100115, etc. places where outside of some structural changes at the Prisons we should be able to see some -- I'll come back, Councilman Jones. COMMISSIONER GIORLA: If I could respond, Councilwoman. If I could respond. Within segments of the inmate population, there are custody needs. All these sites that are listed here are low-custody, low-risk inmate housing sites, and there are conditions placed on those contracts. Most of these vendors do not take those who are severely mentally ill, those who are assaultive, those who have high-custody classifications, and we try and place everyone within our population at these lower-cost sites that we can, and we believe at this point, we pretty much exhausted that segment of the population. Unfortunately, the rest of them, they're not only more costly for us, but they're more costly for the vendors, so they generally don't seek to house that type 172 4/6/10 - WHOLE - BILL 100115, etc. of offender.
I still believe this is an area where I think we need to find some money.
I'm sorry. The Chair recognizes Councilman Green for a point of information. Councilman Jones, we're going to get back to you.
To Councilwoman Quinones-Sanchez's and Councilman Jones' point, if you take a look at the reductions that the Prisons sent over that would account for a significant portion of the reductions proposed by the Prisons Department at the seven and a half percent number, you've got provisional housing, 3,249,000, which is described as the Prisons will no 23 longer have contingency housing in most outside jurisdictions. If population stabilizes, this will have no effect on 173 4/6/10 - WHOLE - BILL 100115, etc. operations. If population rises, additional triple-celling will be necessary. We have a whole -- that's $3 million right there. We have a whole series of public policies from CJAB, which I'm pleased to serve with you on, which has done great work, and so have the Prisons with them, from the DA, who is going to remove 3,000 people likely from our prisons a year to all sorts of things that are being put in place, community courts, diversion courts that are going to, if the public policy works the way we all think it would, lower the prison population over time. You may be even able to close a women's facility right now based on current numbers. And the question is why we can't budget in what we know is our public policy and what we are going to all try to achieve over the next couple years. DEPUTY
I would just say, Councilman, that it would be 174 4/6/10 - WHOLE - BILL 100115, etc. very good and it would be, I think -- that's where we hope to be, and I think that in budgeting, you have to anticipate that if it does not happen -- and, as you know, serving on CJAB with me, there are quite a number of moving parts, and we have been very collaborative and we've been able to do quite a lot. It still takes time for those things to happen. And if the District Attorney, which I fully support, is able to divert nothing more than just 3,000 folks out of the system, if that actually occurs, then, yes, next year we'll be able to say that we saved even more money than you've been able to see here. But I would not want the Commissioner to propose a budget that would say that is going to happen, because then we would be back here talking about, We don't have any way, shape or form of meeting the numbers.
There's two philosophies on budgeting. One is to keep it conservative so the Department 175 4/6/10 - WHOLE - BILL 100115, etc. can have a cushion, which I think we can all agree there's a large cushion in the Prison budget, in case the worst happens, in case population rises. That's one way of looking at budgeting. The other way is to say, Let's set a goal for what we actually want to achieve. We're going to have a surplus that PICA is going to require us to have in the year end, and if the worst happens, we will have the money in a contingency in the fund balance to deal with it. But let's set a realistic number for what we can achieve. COMMISSIONER GIORLA: Councilman, set --
Set reached goals. Otherwise, we're not going -- if we leave in the cushion, we're not going to be trying to meet reached goals. COMMISSIONER GIORLA: We're not leaving a cushion. We're basing our budget and our expectations on what our population has been historically. As I said, there have been reductions before. 176 4/6/10 - WHOLE - BILL 100115, etc. There have been marked reductions before. They've always been followed by sizable increases. They've always -- at this point where we stand is, we still have somewhere close to 700 triple beds, which we have to relieve, and that's the need for us to renovate -- that's part of the need for us to renovate Torresdale Avenue. We still have the question about custody levels and how we break down that population.
Right. I mean, day reporting, GPS ankle bracelets, diverting 3,000 people, all the -- moving things through the courts more quickly, I mean, we can do this, so let's say we can do it. Let's set a goal. Let's say we're going to save 15 million again this year.
Councilmember, I wish we could budget that way. I certainly don't feel comfortable. I would remind you that circa June of 2008 we did take a $9 or $10 million transfer 177 4/6/10 - WHOLE - BILL 100115, etc. ordinance to Council on behalf of the Prisons because we were very short, and at that point, the million I think was 5 about four to five percent of their 6 entire budget. 7
I 8 understand, and we'll have a fund balance 9 to do that if they can't get these 10 efficiencies. I think we need to set reached goals here.
Councilmember, if that happens in the early part of the year, because most of the revenue comes in late in the year, we wouldn't have a fund balance to do that.
Councilman Jones, I think we can now get back to you.
Thank you, Madam President. And I appreciate my colleagues' point of information and then series of questioning that they asserted, because had they at least waited a second, they might have heard some of 178 4/6/10 - WHOLE - BILL 100115, etc. them, but thank you for that. I just want to follow up on a couple of things. One -- and I appreciate that line of questioning sincerely, because it added insight to some of those cost reductions. But last year you mentioned in your testimony that an integral part of your strategy for inmate reduction was GPS systems and that last year in your testimony that would be undertaken. And I was wondering to what degree, because it's not reflected in your testimony, to what degree have you implemented that and is that a strategic part of that 3,000 inmate reduction, and, if so, how? COMMISSIONER GIORLA: Last year at this time we had not completed our evaluation and transfer of inmates to State custody. Our intention was to implement GPS tracking in our Work Release program. These transfers to State have significantly reduced those numbers by more than half. We did award 179 4/6/10 - WHOLE - BILL 100115, etc. a contract, but we haven't implemented that as yet, because we wanted to see what the eventual outcome is. We've just about exhausted the State population as it is now and we're probably better positioned to implement that on a more limited basis.
So what impact will that have on overall reduction plans? COMMISSIONER GIORLA: The GPS had no effect on the overall reduction.
No. I think that your question is is GPS still a long-range thing and a short range in order to help us with this. The answer is yes. But what we have to do is work with our criminal justice partners to make sure that we end up agreeing with that segment, and that's what we'll be talking about at CJAB, what segment of the population that is at the prison can we actually divert to GPS. I believe 180 4/6/10 - WHOLE - BILL 100115, etc. that there is a significant number. I'm hoping that we'll start small in order to show that the numbers and that the technology works. We have a great partner with the Juvenile Court, who has been doing this for the last six months to eight months. Their GPS is now -- I think they have somewhere between 50 and 60 individuals that are on that GPS technology. We're hoping that in the adult side, the partnership will come together and we'll put together the protocols so that we'll be able to divert even more adults using the same technology. Quite frankly, I'd like to see everyone that's doing DUI on weekends on GPS rather than being up at the prison. That's something that is a discussion point, and as Councilman Green knows, that was just mentioned at the last CJAB meeting where we were thinking about how would we go in this area to move this forward. If we can do that, that's a hundred people on the weekends. 181 4/6/10 - WHOLE - BILL 100115, etc.
Well, as you know, I'm not on CJAB. That's a story for another day, but having said that -- DEPUTY
-- having said that, it's an important statistic for us to be able to anticipate what those costs are. And, finally, I will say to you that I do not want you knee-jerk closing things. I want you to create a deliberate, thoughtful process. This is not like closing a rec center. It is a prison where we house individuals to protect society, and every time you do something in that realm, there is an intended and unintended consequence that needs to be thought through. So I'll end where I started, which is I believe we're moving in the correct direction, slowly though, deliberately and where it makes sense. DEPUTY
Thank you. The Chair recognizes Councilwoman Blackwell.
Thank you, Madam President. I was reading through some of these budget cuts if we had to cut and I think that -- of course, I don't like negative planning, so it's not my preference in how we do it to consider eliminating RISE that we just opened and programs and chaplaincy. Commissioner, not when you were Commissioner, prior to your being there, they had a lot of problems in the prisons where men were destroying the cell, defecating, smearing it on walls and all of that. They took 183 4/6/10 - WHOLE - BILL 100115, etc. the men out of prisons, cleaned them up, got showers, changed, cleaned the cells, put them back in and they did it again. It wasn't until they brought in chaplains, mental health, social workers that life begins to change. So when we consider what we cut, we have to consider that consequence as well. Now I'll get to my specific question. I understand that there's some issues with regard to parking, and the officers who go there to park are getting tickets. One day they received ten tickets in one day, and certain people are allowed to park, the 3:00 to 11:00 shift in one place and various issues. I'm sure you're aware of that, and I wondered where we are and if you could work out these issues. Apparently the inmates were offended when they were told that although they live in Philadelphia, that they could leave three hours early to get to work. That's, of course, the rumor. 184 4/6/10 - WHOLE - BILL 100115, etc. But problems like that, it seems to me, we should be able to solve, and I wonder where you are in that area. COMMISSIONER GIORLA: Councilwoman, as far as parking, the parking at our complex on State Road is very tight. It's very tight. There's a combination of parking provided for official visitors, visitors and our employees. We've been in discussions with our unions for well over a year on how to alleviate that situation. We've also -- one of the things that we've done in the past is to have our bike patrol officers and our transportation unit officers certified to write parking tickets, and they've done so for a couple of reasons. They've issued them to people parked illegally, those who are blocking our fire and emergency lanes and those who block entrances and park in non-parking areas. There was a problem with some of the staff receiving tickets when they 185 4/6/10 - WHOLE - BILL 100115, etc. were parking illegally. What we've done is, with the help of Councilwoman Krajewski's office, the parking regulations were changed to create public parking along the west side of State Road opposite our complex. During portions of the day when the shift changes, we do not permit visitors, either official visitors or personal visitors, to park there and we reserve parking for staff. In our plans for capital improvements, we've included a master plan study of our State Road complex, which will include a significant study not only of the parking needs, but an intention to provide additional parking for staff. I've been continuously talking with our union representatives about the issue of parking tickets and I've asked to see those to determine whether or not they were given inappropriately or appropriately, and I've not had any submitted to my office as of this time. 186 4/6/10 - WHOLE - BILL 100115, etc.
What about the suggestions -- there were some suggestions that were submitted to you by officers and union members with regard to their suggestions as to how it could be worked out, some six suggestions. Were they considered or any of their suggestions adopted? COMMISSIONER GIORLA: Yes, they were, absolutely. We enlarged the parking area at the House of Correction. We lengthened the time during which visitors were not allowed to park on our premises to create more parking spaces. They were two that the unions had suggested to us. They also suggested that we acquire additional property to the south of our complex on State Road, and given the current budget condition, we don't -- we're not able to do that at this time.
What about the issue of the parking lot at the main gate being reserved for 3:00-11:00 187 4/6/10 - WHOLE - BILL 100115, etc. shift officers only? COMMISSIONER GIORLA: We are doing that right now. Our bike patrol officers are reserving areas within that parking lot just for the 3:00 to 11:00 shift.
All right. Thank you, Madam President. I will finish my statement by saying, I'll take these issues back, but they were just complaining to me today. So apparently there's some issues, and if there are further concerns, I would like to reserve the right to come to you again to try to work these things out. COMMISSIONER GIORLA: I would be glad to.
Thank 188 4/6/10 - WHOLE - BILL 100115, etc. you. Again, I want to --
-- thank the Commissioner for all the work that's been done around the reductions. I'm extremely pleased with our ability to start moving some of these State prisoners. I think that's such an important piece. Going back to these outside providers, it would be important if you can share with the Chair the uniqueness of the services that they provide that provide for the wide range between $35 and 105. I think that's important for us to look at, because you're saying to me some of these providers don't do some of the chronic mental health patients. I want to know why that level of discrepancy or variation with them. As it relates to long-term planning around facilities, ultimately 189 4/6/10 - WHOLE - BILL 100115, etc. this is one of those departments where we're going to have to continue to hammer to find savings. Are we prepared to say that part of the facilities plan will include at some point an elimination of a prison, and then what would those savings be? I mean, what is our thinking of the facilities? We keep hearing about Holmesburg being repaired. What's our long-term goal for our facilities plan? COMMISSIONER GIORLA: The largest segment of our population are minimum-custody offenders and primarily males. They are approximately 40 to 45 percent of our population. The House of Correction, which we intend to replace, has 1,200 beds for low custody. The Detention Center, which is our second oldest facility, has somewhere close to 1,300 beds for the same purpose. Combining those two facilities into a single footprint eventually would give us a savings, because the way we manage jails in those older facilities, 190 4/6/10 - WHOLE - BILL 100115, etc. the direct supervision and the antiquated physical plant makes it difficult to run them the way newer facilities are run. I'll give you a for-instance. Our RCF facility is equipped with 105 or 106 video cameras, which decreases the number of direct observation required by our officers. The House of Correction has none. Detention Center has none. So what we have to do in those cases, we have to supply people where we need eyes.
I think that's very important, because ultimately that's where you're going to get the biggest savings. And we're interested and I know there will always be concerns about whose backyard this ends up being in, but ultimately that's the only thing that's going to get us to some serious reductions in the Prisons. As it relates to the overtime, because that's one of the issues, the constant theme, you have about $26 million in overtime. Are you expected to 191 4/6/10 - WHOLE - BILL 100115, etc. hire a class for correction officers to reduce some of your overtime? COMMISSIONER GIORLA: At this time, we just graduated a class on February the 17th. We made a number of promotions to the Sergeant, Lieutenant and Captain ranks. We're looking at our post plan to determine what the size of a class would be and then probably -- I'll submit a request to hire a class probably in the next 30 to 60 days.
So in this fiscal year, you will be hiring to fill some of the vacancies that are listed? COMMISSIONER GIORLA: We'll be making a request. We may not initiate the class -- seek to initiate the class until the new fiscal year begins.
I notice that one of the things that you outlined in the plan if we were to make any cuts to your department was your CEC contract, and one of the things you're proposing 192 4/6/10 - WHOLE - BILL 100115, etc. would be to shift from sentenced inmates to pretrial. Is that something that would only happen if we cut your budget? COMMISSIONER GIORLA: Yes.
So there's no plans for that? COMMISSIONER GIORLA: Not at this time.
That requires a conversation with the community, since we committed what types of offenders we would be putting in that site. COMMISSIONER GIORLA: Absolutely.
I want to make you aware of that, because there will likely be some cuts and so if that becomes one of the areas where reductions can happen, I think it's important that we go back to the community. I wanted to ask you around your minority participation numbers. I notice that from 2009 to 2010 there was a drop 193 4/6/10 - WHOLE - BILL 100115, etc. from almost 30 percent to percent, yet you're setting your goal at 33 percent. What was the cause of the drop and how are you going to increase it almost 50 percent in one year? COMMISSIONER GIORLA: Our previous contract obligations were -- well, our previous reporting was based on our contracts as a whole, which included not only our for-profit organization contracts but our not-for-profits and those which we contracted through other funds, not necessarily through our Operating Budget but through our inmate welfare funds and other sources. So that's the reason for the difference in those numbers.
So you 20 shifted from General Fund to Grants Revenue and that caused the disparity of ten percent in your minority contract? COMMISSIONER GIORLA: For some, yes.
And then 194 4/6/10 - WHOLE - BILL 100115, etc. so how are you going to get to 33 percent in one year? COMMISSIONER GIORLA: Well, this is based on our existing contracts right now. There are no --
Your projections for your 2010 minority participation is percent, and you're 10 saying for 2011 you're going to get to 33 11 percent. So that's why I wanted to know 12 where was the decrease and where do you 13 expect that bump up like that. 14 (Witness approached witness 15 table.) 16
Good afternoon. 19 My name is Roseanne Duzinski. I'm the 20 Contracts and Planning Administrator at the Philadelphia Prisons. In all honesty, Councilwoman, we notified the Office of Economic Opportunity that that 20 percent that was reported there was incorrect. The number 195 4/6/10 - WHOLE - BILL 100115, etc. is actually 33 percent, just as it is, but the correction was not made in the testimony.
Okay. My time is up. Sorry. COMMISSIONER GIORLA: And we'll be glad to provide a revised copy.
I think that's important. As we monitor different departments, those of you who are actually completing those goals can provide some good experience for us as we deal with other departments who are challenged with this.
Thank you. Thank you. Good afternoon, Commissioner. COMMISSIONER GIORLA: Good afternoon.
And company. I have a few questions. Regarding correctional officers and their 196 4/6/10 - WHOLE - BILL 100115, etc. reduction in sick time, in your statement, your testimony, you say you've reduced it by percent. What new 5 policies were put into place to achieve 6 that reduction? 7 COMMISSIONER GIORLA: There was 8 a combination of two things. First, we 9 sought to hire to reduce our vacancy 10 rate. In 2008 our vacancy rate was 11 somewhere in the neighborhood of 15 to 18 12 percent for correctional officers. That 13 resulted in a lot of forced overtime, and 14 our officers were quite exhausted. We 15 embarked on a hiring campaign. We hired 16 over 250 officers. We also looked at one 17 of the aspects of our leave time, which 18 is unpaid sick time, where officers and 19 some of our employees across the board 20 were exceeding their sick time, were not 21 applying for other authorized time; that 22 is, leaves of absence or family medical 23 sick time. We instituted a plan of 24 discipline. As a result, we tried to 25 channel them into appropriate and 197 4/6/10 - WHOLE - BILL 100115, etc. approved leave time, such as sick time, vacation time, family medical leave or medical leaves of absence. Those who still continued to use time were disciplined. As a result, that number fell. It fell significantly. The increase in occupied positions or the decrease in the vacancy rate also allowed the staff who didn't want to work overtime not to work overtime. They didn't have to anymore. Those who sought to work overtime, you know, had the opportunity, and that decreased -- they were exhausted. They were quite exhausted.
Well, it sounds like it worked for you, which is great. I want to talk a little bit about this recidivism and the Reintegration Services for Ex-Offenders. Now, even though you say it's a new program, but the reentry program has been around for a while; is that not correct? 198 4/6/10 - WHOLE - BILL 100115, etc. DEPUTY
And the only thing I'm really interested in is outcome, how many people have secured employment or -- the ultimate goal I know is employment. DEPUTY
And here you have 480 prisoners, but I think that's a new number? COMMISSIONER GIORLA: That's for Fiscal '10.
Right. So what happened last year? (Witness approached witness table.)
Good afternoon. My name is Carolyn Harper and I'm the Interim Director for RISE. And to answer your question for FY09, in FY09, we had 597 participants that were employed, and out of the 597, 199 4/6/10 - WHOLE - BILL 100115, etc. 213 received employment, and of the 213 that received employment, 155 of them remained on the same job for more than 90 days. Obviously some stayed on longer than that, but we track it for the first 90 days that they stay in the same job.
So what happened to those that weren't as successful as the 213?
We continue to case manage them and keep them. We put them in vocational training or whatever training that they need and we try to work on removing their barriers. In FY09, we've provided services for 683 participants, and those services included educational services, mental health treatment, substance abuse treatment, housing referrals, clothing referrals, anger management. So some of the individuals have barriers and so they're not ready to be placed in employment, but they still stay connected to the program.
I'm sure 200 4/6/10 - WHOLE - BILL 100115, etc. that some have multiple barriers.
Okay. And are there age requirements for your reentry? Someone told me that you could only service people between a certain age.
We have what we call a managed reintegration network and we look at the level of risk to public safety, and that determines what level of service we provide. And given that the highest number of offenses occur between the age population of and 34, they 16 receive what we call direct service. So 17 they have a case manager that they have 18 to see on a regular basis. Everyone is assigned a case manager. Those who are older than 34 or who have been out of prison for more than three years go to our cluster sites. We have three cluster locations, and they receive the same service, but at a different level. So we can service someone up to -- the age is 201 4/6/10 - WHOLE - BILL 100115, etc. not the deciding factor. The length of time out of prison is the deciding factor. So if they've been out of prison longer than seven years, we refer them to other services, because they're really not a threat to public safety. They know how to stay out of prison, but they may be looking for a better job or better housing.
Okay. Good. Where's your office? How do people contact RISE, I guess?
Our main office is at 34 South 11th Street on the 6th Floor. We also have a cluster office on 40th and Market. We are co-located with Partnership CDC at 4027 Market Street. And we also have a location on 7th between Callowhill and Spring Garden. We're co-located with our Goodwill facility for transitional work.
All right. That was quick, Madam 202 4/6/10 - WHOLE - BILL 100115, etc. President. But it is what it is. My time is up.
That's all right. Perhaps do you want a list of where the locations are?
Would you be kind enough to send that to the Councilwoman?
All right. 203 4/6/10 - WHOLE - BILL 100115, etc.
One of the things I wanted to know, can you send us a copy again of the breakdown at 8,500 inmates, why they're there, how many are there for probation or parole violations, how many are waiting for court, how many are sentenced? I know you say it every year, but I can't keep track of that. COMMISSIONER GIORLA: It's hard to keep track of it for us, too, Councilwoman, but we can send you a list.
That will be great. And also what other revenue-producing fees, operational fees. For example, I understand you now take pictures of visitors? COMMISSIONER GIORLA: We've done that for years. That program has been in effect for nearly 30 years.
Do you charge for the picture? COMMISSIONER GIORLA: Yes, we do. We charge a photo fee. We take instant pictures that the family members 204 4/6/10 - WHOLE - BILL 100115, etc. keep or the inmates themselves keep. That goes into a photo fund, which pays for inmate expenses, some inmate expenses in the facilities at the discretion of the warden.
But that goes into your operating fund, correct? COMMISSIONER GIORLA: Yes.
What other fees? I understand you have a kiosk now? COMMISSIONER GIORLA: We now have -- well, for well over the last year, we have kiosks in each of our facilities where family members can make deposits to inmate accounts. They can either use cash, use credit cards.
But you get a fee from that kiosk service? COMMISSIONER GIORLA: Yes, we do receive a commission.
Right. And I would think that there are other -- for example, you get fees for work 205 4/6/10 - WHOLE - BILL 100115, etc. release from work release inmates and whatnot. So there must be a list of revenue-producing fees that you get. I'd like to know what they are and how much do you get per year. COMMISSIONER GIORLA: We will do that. There's a number of fees. We initiated a check charge fee when an inmate disburses funds from their account where we have to prepare a check. We charge a fee for that. We initiated a commissary transaction fee. When an inmate makes a purchase from the commissary vendor, there's a processing fee associated with that. We looked at two things. We looked at a sick call co-pay and we thought it was more efficient to reduce our number of sick call visits, which we cut by almost two-thirds in two years and saved on our medical costs there. We looked at eliminating the portion of phone calls that we provide free to the inmates, and given our conditions and some of the 206 4/6/10 - WHOLE - BILL 100115, etc. overcapacity conditions at our facilities, we felt it wouldn't be worthwhile to do that at this time. So we're looking at -- we have the existing revenues, like work release, which goes into the General Fund. Revenue from the inmate telephone system goes into the Airport. It doesn't return to the Prisons. So we do have some revenue generators as well.
The Chair recognizes Councilwoman Sanchez for a point of information.
One of the areas that folks have mentioned to me have been -- apparently we have a lot of visiting time. Have we ever calculated that and considered charging a fee for visitors? Because what they tell me is, you have some inmates who have continuous visitors and it costs us money to manage that. Have we ever looked at that? 207 4/6/10 - WHOLE - BILL 100115, etc. Because other cities are doing it. COMMISSIONER GIORLA: Visits are limited. No inmate can have more than one hour in total visits per week. They can have as many as two or as few as one. We don't charge a fee to visit.
Have we ever looked at that? Just because it costs us money to manage the visit. COMMISSIONER GIORLA: Well, one of the things that the Prisons did about three years ago was eliminate visits on most holidays because the holiday premium that was paid in salary to the officers assigned was considerable, but we haven't looked at direct fees to the visitors as yet, no, but it's something we can take a look at.
Well, that's actually where I was going with this line of questioning, is that there are fees that other prisons are charging and they're actually producing income, and many of them are counties that have a 208 4/6/10 - WHOLE - BILL 100115, etc. smaller number than your 8,500, and one county in particular has 1,700 and they're generating more than $2 million a year just off those fees. So I'd also like to have that discussion with you later. COMMISSIONER GIORLA: And the existing fees that we have do generate significant revenue. The phone system generates well over a million dollars. The work release program before the number of State inmates were sent into State custody generated nearly half a million dollars a year. Smaller numbers --
What about work release? COMMISSIONER GIORLA: Excuse me?
Work release. COMMISSIONER GIORLA: Yeah, for work release. Our check charge and our commissary transaction fees are 209 4/6/10 - WHOLE - BILL 100115, etc. generating revenue as well.
Where does that show in the budget? COMMISSIONER GIORLA: We can supply you with the totals.
Where does that show, though, in the budget, your fees? Because we couldn't find it.
I'm sorry, sir. Would you identify yourself for the record?
It's not in the individual departments, the revenues, no. It's in the budget summary.
Okay. Where? City budget summary. What does it say? Prison revenue? 210 4/6/10 - WHOLE - BILL 100115, etc.
Okay. Do you have any idea how much it is, just a total?
Five hundred and fifty thousand. That's for locally generated revenue for the Prisons. That's what we're estimating.
Well, I think it's more than that, because you just said you get a million dollars off of something, off of work release.
The telephone reimbursements are in the Public Property budget, I believe. They're not shown in Prisons.
Councilwoman, we'll see to it that you 211 4/6/10 - WHOLE - BILL 100115, etc. get a copy of that. We'll break it out. We'll actually find it all and put it all on one document and send it to you.
But those funds go into the City Operating Budget that would -- I guess that would be money that you would not need to get or it's money that you're almost putting back into the budget for some of your expenses? COMMISSIONER GIORLA: Yes. They offset some of our expenses.
Right. Okay. I think you can get more, though. I mean, I really do. DEPUTY
If a 1,700-person prison gets more than two, with a projection of more than that for next year, and you have 8,500 people, come on, you can do better. COMMISSIONER GIORLA: We'll examine it again. 212 4/6/10 - WHOLE - BILL 100115, etc.
You're welcome. Councilwoman Sanchez, is she in the room? (No response.)
Thank you, Madam Chair. Commissioner, I can't remember when you were in here testifying, but I asked you to please sort of outline what in the budget reflected potential savings from the work of CJAB and other things that I've already mentioned here today and -- so, I mean, could we just get maybe the Deputy Mayor to tell us what reforms that we're working on that are likely to be put in place this year that will affect the Prison System. DEPUTY
Well, 213 4/6/10 - WHOLE - BILL 100115, etc. the one that I'm hoping we will be able to get first and foremost is day reporting.
If we can get that through and we can come to an agreement on the custody levels and the protocol, I think that -- we have a subcommittee, as you know, working on that. If we're able to do that, I think that day reporting will probably start small, will probably start with somewhere in the order of to 30 individuals just 16 to make sure we get it right, but if we 17 can expand that 20 to 30 per month 18 instead of 20 to 30 for -- depending on 19 your length of time, we'll be decreasing 20 the amount of people that are obviously in the care and custody of the Commissioner on State Road. I would like to see that grow, quite frankly, to somewhere on the order of 200 to 300. I think that that's up 214 4/6/10 - WHOLE - BILL 100115, etc. there. I think that that's the number we could probably get to, but I don't know the timeframe. But that's one of the first things that I could say right off the bat, I'm trying to get that through as quickly as possible.
If we would be able to get -- again, if we're able to move and get the right protocol so that we can put not just sentenced prisoners and getting them out early, so like early release, or even getting the people out on the weekends, the weekender population that swell the prison by up to a hundred, if we can get those folks out, we could actually reduce the numbers in prison again by hundreds or in the weekend by just dealing with our DUI population.
What about pretrial detainees, which are most of our prisoners, having GPS ankle bracelets? 215 4/6/10 - WHOLE - BILL 100115, etc. DEPUTY
That's the one that I think that we'll have probably the most to discuss at CJAB. I know that I have my vision about the numbers of pretrial detainees. As you know, two-thirds of our population is pretrial, and there are low custody elements. I know that there are a number of people that I believe we should be able to divert out of the system completely, and by a combination of bail restrictions and conditions and GPS, we should be able to take hundreds of people out. I think initially we should be able to work on that, but, again, it calls for a lot of collaboration, because we don't want to make any of our partners too nervous. We're working both with the Police and District Attorney and courts, and we have everybody we've got to get --
Especially with respect to GPS. I mean, I think that holds real promise for the system, 216 4/6/10 - WHOLE - BILL 100115, etc. because -- how hard would it be -- DEPUTY
How hard would it be for the Police to catch a person with a GPS ankle bracelet who robbed a Wawa at 13th and Callowhill? COMMISSIONER GIORLA: Councilman, GPS has its advantages, among those are realtime reporting about location, but it also has its limitations. There's a concept of satellite drift where you may -- the GPS signal may be inaccurate for a certain range. Indoors GPS does not work. You need a supplemental measuring system, whether it's electronic monitoring or cell phone detection, to accompany the GPS tracking. In areas like the subways or some high-rise buildings it doesn't work at all. You can track a person to the location. When we looked at GPS tracking, we also looked at realtime tracking, 217 4/6/10 - WHOLE - BILL 100115, etc. because in the event that there was a major crime or some type of incident in the City, we could determine who and how many and the identities of any of our offenders who might be in the area, might be witnesses, perpetrators or suitable for questioning in the incident.
That's great. I mean, as you know, these are all the things that I can say this Administration has been touting for a while. We've now gotten through an RFP process. We've qualified a number of folks. We have our partnership with the judicial branch that is coming on board. I know that Judge Dougherty has already trumpeted this now for our juvenile folks, who have already started using this, and now we're bringing it into the partnership at the adult level. I think that this is a very promising area, but I think that we are going to have to work through the 218 4/6/10 - WHOLE - BILL 100115, etc. protocols that have to be made, and that's what CJAB is for.
Sure, but, I mean, if you look at what we're talking about, I think we rattled off very quickly 600, 900 fewer people in our prisons. That doesn't include something else that has been recently reported, the 3,000 people we're going to divert from prisons for summary offenses. DEPUTY
Now, the average stay is 90 days, so you have to divide that up. So I assume you're talking 300 on an annual basis even though it would be a different 300 people in each category. The 3,000, if you divide that by four, is almost -- what is that, 550, something like that? I don't know. No; 750. So there's 750 fewer people. Already we're at 1,500 fewer people in our prisons without a whole lot of work having to be done, because we're 219 4/6/10 - WHOLE - BILL 100115, etc. almost there on a lot of this stuff. As you say, RFPs have been issued and people have won them, et cetera. And then I look at, say, the Aramark contract, for example, which for 2009 was $13,146,000. That's based on meals served. For last year was $13 million and for this year is projected to be $13 million. It doesn't make sense to budget the most conservative number in every single category when putting together a budget as a whole. I mean, why would we budget the same amount for that contract even though we have many fewer people that we anticipate being in? And that's just one of many examples. COMMISSIONER GIORLA: We had an increase in price per meal, Councilman, and we also had -- there's a built-in CPI increase in that contract as well over the terms. That amounted for some of that -- that accounted for some of that.
How much of that? 220 4/6/10 - WHOLE - BILL 100115, etc. COMMISSIONER GIORLA: I'm not sure, but we could supply you with that information.
Okay. CPI hasn't been that high lately. I mean, we're 1,400 fewer prisoners than we were June of 2009, I think. COMMISSIONER GIORLA: Well, that reduction took place over time. It wasn't 1,400 all of the sudden. It started --
Right, but we're there now. COMMISSIONER GIORLA: -- in roughly last fall.
And we're looking at another, let's just call it conservatively, 700 over the course of the next year. I mean, these little things that we roll through the budgeting process add up. So I guess what I'd like to do is just -- I was going to have you do this, but for the sake of time, I'll do 221 4/6/10 - WHOLE - BILL 100115, etc. it. Over the last year's Five Year Plan, the amount of increase off the base every single year was 5.9 million, 6.1 million, 6.4 million, 6.8 million, and it went in that direction every single year. Now, given what we know about the successes that we've had, this year's Prison budget and Five Year Plan goes up 5.5 million, 5.7 million, 6.1 million, 6.4 million off our new lower base. What I really don't understand is why it's not going down by $5 million every year off our new base given the conversation we just had about diverting maybe 500, 700 people this year and in the next couple of years 1,700 people, et cetera. I mean, it looks to me like we just took the same percentage that we used to multiply the budget by in last year's Five Year Plan and multiplied that budget by our new lower base without going into each individual contract and really being thoughtful about it. Is that unfair? 222 4/6/10 - WHOLE - BILL 100115, etc. COMMISSIONER GIORLA: I don't have the figures in front of me, but I can tell you the only place where we saw increases in the Five Year Plan was in Class 200, our contracts and services, and it was primarily cost estimators for escalations in cost to our medical and our maintenance and our food service costs.
But none of those assumptions assumed that we'd have 1,700 fewer people in the prisons in two years. COMMISSIONER GIORLA: No, they didn't.
Do we have a female population right now that would make it possible to close one female facility? COMMISSIONER GIORLA: Right now we have female inmates housed at four facilities. We have Riverside on State Road, which is our primary intake and all-custody-level facility, and 768 beds. 223 4/6/10 - WHOLE - BILL 100115, etc. That's somewhere in the neighborhood of 623 inmates today. There are areas which we can't occupy consistently, like intake and special management for a punitive say. We have the Cannery, which is located on Torresdale Avenue, has 124 beds. There are some work release inmates there that can't be moved because they have mental health and medical provisions, they need medical services. Of the remaining population, about 90 can be moved into our facilities, our Riverside facility, if necessary, and we have a contracted work release facility at Temple and Lehigh.
And can't we potentially put these people with medical needs in facilities not managed by us and then close that entire facility? COMMISSIONER GIORLA: If the population drops probably by 20 to 50, we may be able to look at mothballing the Cannery site, which is a hundred beds.
How much 224 4/6/10 - WHOLE - BILL 100115, etc. would that save us? COMMISSIONER GIORLA: Off the top of my head, I don't know, but it would save us --
If you could provide that to the Chair. COMMISSIONER GIORLA: It would save us --
I see service providers in this room that provide the kind of service that you're talking about that probably do it as efficiently as it's done at the Cannery. Okay. So you're familiar probably with what I've done at every department with respect to unfilled positions. So the budget reduction scenario we received for the Prison System included 14 items totalling 13.2 million in savings. We've been over them a little bit. Some of these seem like reductions we'd want to make in any event, especially given the conversation we just had as to the possible 225 4/6/10 - WHOLE - BILL 100115, etc. reductions. Specifically, provisional housing and some of these others can add up to $4, $5, $6 million very quickly. Why are we leaving this in the budget in a time of need for the City economically? COMMISSIONER GIORLA: And by "provisional housing," I'm not sure what you refer to, Councilman.
Item 1, provisional housing, Class 200, 3,249,000. Provisional housing: The Prisons will no longer have contingency housing in most outside jurisdictions if population stabilizes. This will have no 16 effect on operations. If population rises, additional triple-celling will be necessary. That change alone saves us 3,249,000, and given the conversation we just had, I feel like that's a reasonable assumption for us to make. COMMISSIONER GIORLA: Just as it states, we would -- it would require us to increase triple-celling, which is 226 4/6/10 - WHOLE - BILL 100115, etc. not a condition that we want to persist at this point. We can close all the provisional housing, triple and quadruple everybody on State Road.
Nobody is suggesting that. COMMISSIONER GIORLA: But if we wanted to go that route, that's quite possible. We could do that. Right now we're under the threat -- we're not under the threat, but we've had litigation filed against us and a lot of our budgeting and planning is to avoid creating conditions that would aggravate that litigation or bring it down on us, which we've seen in the past. It's extremely undesirable.
A lot of these reductions have to do with reduced cost for healthcare, reduced cost for food service, as I mentioned. The assumptions here say that we'll save $600,000 for each $500 reduction we have in our inmate population from the Aramark 227 4/6/10 - WHOLE - BILL 100115, etc. contract alone, and this is provided by the Prison Department in terms of what it suggested the cuts would be if they had to cut seven and a half percent. That seems like a reasonable assumption to make, that we are 500 lower than when this Aramark contract was put in place. That seems like a reasonable assumption for next year, that we'll save that $600,000 or we shouldn't appropriate it. Doesn't it? DEPUTY
Councilman, as I have said just in answer to your other question, this is again -- and as you indicated before, this is one of those philosophical matters that you're ending up dealing with. Yes, we can try and save. I think the Commissioner gave you the information about why that contract remain at the same budgeted level even though we have basically -- it is a reduction, because we have not actually increased it.
Well, he 228 4/6/10 - WHOLE - BILL 100115, etc. didn't actually provide that. He said that was a portion of -- DEPUTY
Right, a portion of it. Now, we are maintaining and, as I've indicated, we've been very basically transparent with the fact that he made recommendations to me about these various things, and when we looked at trying to take out another million one from the Aramark contract, we would end up having to actually have in place the reduction and keep that for the entire year, and I was not willing to kind of bet the farm without the kind of -- against the historical stuff that we have seen, a four percent increase over the last seven years that this Council has actually dealt with. I think that next year this time, if we continue doing what we're doing and actually doing the things that we've discussed, I think that you will be able to see not only that we wouldn't have spent that money, but we might be 229 4/6/10 - WHOLE - BILL 100115, etc. able to do something even better going forward. But we need to have that -- I think we really do have to have the evidence before moving in that direction.
And I think we've got the evidence. I think we've got the evidence. DEPUTY
Couple of clarifying points. Of the list that you have that add up to 13.3 million, there are a number of the items that we did take, in total about nine million from this list, plus an additional six and a half million, I believe, in reduction on growth factors for Class 200-related contracts where, as you had mentioned earlier, inflationary growth has clearly been a lot lower. So we took that. So, for example, the provisional housing piece you were just mentioning, that's no 230 4/6/10 - WHOLE - BILL 100115, etc. longer in the budget.
Okay. Let's go through that. I should have started there.
Yeah. It's taking bits and pieces, and really the best breakout is, we took two and a half million dollars from Class 100 for things like the overtime, the item just above that, and then we took the provisional housing and we then took pieces of other contracts that we felt were reflective of the change in population. We can sit down and sort of walk through that or we can just give you the list of --
If you could provide it to the Chair, that would be great.
But what you're saying is that these specific things add up only to -- that you've taken $9 million --
So of this list, 231 4/6/10 - WHOLE - BILL 100115, etc. we took $9 million. We then went back to the Prisons and looked at exactly the thing you mentioned earlier, which was with respect to the growth rates, where we had significantly higher inflationary assumptions for contracts from '11 through '15 and we actually brought that number down, so that in any given year, rather than seeing six or -- I'm sorry; $11 or $12 million in growth, what you see is typically five to six million in the balance of the Plan from '11 through '15.
Yeah, but we did take down to sort of base level again to reflect where we thought we were with population.
Sure, but we went up with the same rate of growth off the new base.
Right, and it's just a question of where you think 232 4/6/10 - WHOLE - BILL 100115, etc. inflation is going to be.
Well, okay. But what's troubling about that conversation, the conversation that we just had, is that that means that we've reduced the population significantly and haven't achieved any real savings in Class 100 or other classes.
Well, Councilmember, I mean, if we look at the growth rate just for Class 200 in FY11, the total Class 200 is about $110.2 million for FY11. The growth rate in the subsequent year shows a $5 million increase, which, if my math is correct, is about two percent. And we're looking at those kind of growth rates sort of moving forward. The last check that I made with respect to inflation nationally, inflation is looking to be two and a half to three percent, so we're kind of under that level.
How much was the budget for the Prisons last year? 233 4/6/10 - WHOLE - BILL 100115, etc.
239.8 million. I think you and I had this conversation before.
We can do it. We can do it. The Commissioner is up to the challenge of continuing to reduce costs. I'm asking each department planning to fill currently -- I've been through this. So of the eight correctional officer positions -- I apologize. Prison Operations Division, Section 50, . Of the eight correctional officer positions in this division, there was one unfilled that is still unfilled. How are 234 4/6/10 - WHOLE - BILL 100115, etc. these duties being performed today? COMMISSIONER GIORLA: Deputy Commissioner?
No. It's a correctional officer. There's one unfilled position. Line 7 in the detail, . COMMISSIONER GIORLA: I have it, Line 7, . One unfilled position?
No. How are those duties being performed today? COMMISSIONER GIORLA: By someone on overtime.
Is that reflected in the overtime budget that you gave us? COMMISSIONER GIORLA: Yes.
So if we fill this position, we can reduce the overtime budget? 235 4/6/10 - WHOLE - BILL 100115, etc. COMMISSIONER GIORLA: Yes.
Okay. Turning to the Administrative Services Subdivision, there was an unfilled accountant position, which is still unfilled. How are those job duties being performed now? COMMISSIONER GIORLA: It's being filled by someone who has been promoted. They're doing two jobs.
Are we paying them overtime? COMMISSIONER GIORLA: No. 15
It doesn't sound like we need another full-time person if someone is there capable of doing both functions. COMMISSIONER GIORLA: Councilman, we're seeking to fill that position. It's only a matter of time before that becomes impossible.
So what are the consequences to the Prison functions of us not providing this money? 236 4/6/10 - WHOLE - BILL 100115, etc. COMMISSIONER GIORLA: There will be a backup in inmate account transactions, deposits, disbursements, commissary transactions.
Is there a backup today? COMMISSIONER GIORLA: Not at the moment, no. 10
There's no 11 backup today, but there will be a backup in the future if we don't fill it. Okay. Accounting Supervisor, what are the job duties of this person?
Councilman, Bob Fitzmartin. The Accounting Supervisor is the supervisor of the inmate accounts, bank accounts that we maintain for all the inmates.
They're being performed by the person that was promoted to another position. 237 4/6/10 - WHOLE - BILL 100115, etc.
No. The accountant position is actually a backup for that position. There's two positions unfilled in that area.
If you filled only one of them, could that person perform both of these functions that are part time performed by the other two people?
The two positions is preferable because then it provides some additional backup and for additional services to be performed that currently go by the wayside.
Well, let me ask you a question. Is there any backup as a result of not having an Accounting Supervisor right now? COMMISSIONER GIORLA: No, there isn't because comp time is used to fill those duties.
238 4/6/10 - WHOLE - BILL 100115, etc. Administrative Specialist II, same questions.
The Administrative Specialist duties are in the Business Office. They perform various analytical and budgetary backup.
And I might argue that that needs to be filled, but how are these functions being performed today?
They're being done by the person that's ahead of them. It's just less analysis and less reporting that we can do. So that hurts as far as that's concerned.
Departmental Payroll Clerk, same questions. How are these functions being performed today? COMMISSIONER GIORLA: Departmental Payroll Clerk is being supplemented through overtime. 239 4/6/10 - WHOLE - BILL 100115, etc.
It looks like there's only one -- there's Departmental Payroll Supervisor vacant and a Departmental Payroll Clerk vacant. If we fill the clerk position, do we need the supervisor? COMMISSIONER GIORLA: Yes, we do. The supervisory duties are being performed by a payroll clerk, an acting at this point.
But we're creating two new positions. COMMISSIONER GIORLA: Yes.
So why not just promote the person acting and then hire one person to perform the Payroll Clerk functions that are being performed without any problem today? COMMISSIONER GIORLA: We're seeking to promote them off a promotional list, Civil Service list. 240 4/6/10 - WHOLE - BILL 100115, etc.
I understand. I mean, you fill the supervisor position with an existing employee and you hire one person instead of two, it sounds like you're going to be more efficient than you are in that department today and we've only hired one person instead of two. COMMISSIONER GIORLA: The Acting Payroll Supervisor is performing a clerk's duties as well.
I understand. COMMISSIONER GIORLA: So we have two people performing the duties of three positions. We've been using overtime to make up the difference.
We have two people performing -- we have one person performing two positions. We have the clerk performing the clerk's duties in the supervisor role, right? COMMISSIONER GIORLA: We have the two vacancies, the Payroll Clerk and 241 4/6/10 - WHOLE - BILL 100115, etc. the Payroll Supervisor.
So what sky is going to fall if we basically promote somebody as supervisor that's already on salary and only hire one Payroll Clerk? COMMISSIONER GIORLA: We will be in the same position.
No. You'll be one person more. COMMISSIONER GIORLA: We'll still have a vacancy at the Payroll Clerk position.
Well, you'll have a vacancy for what sounds like is not a required position because the functions are being performed today with two fewer people than you're asking for. COMMISSIONER GIORLA: The functions are being performed today using overtime.
I understand. COMMISSIONER GIORLA: To pay for the time that that person has to do 242 4/6/10 - WHOLE - BILL 100115, etc. the duties --
I understand. Is the overtime more than one full-time job? COMMISSIONER GIORLA: It's the equivalent of one full-time job.
Then that's all we need, one full-time job, not two. I'm going to move on. Human Resources Associate, same questions. DEPUTY
I have that that's filled. COMMISSIONER GIORLA: That's been filled. We have a vacant at Word Processing Specialist.
Word Processing Specialist II, how are these functions being performed today? COMMISSIONER GIORLA: They're being performed by other word processors assigned to our Personnel Department.
And why is the sky going to fall if we don't fill this position? 243 4/6/10 - WHOLE - BILL 100115, etc. COMMISSIONER GIORLA: Combination of overtime and comp time.
How much overtime does it cost us? COMMISSIONER GIORLA: The equivalent of a position.
I mean, I can check this, so please -- COMMISSIONER GIORLA: I can supply you with this.
And you're not including fringe in that calculation either. COMMISSIONER GIORLA: No. 16
So please provide with respect to that specific operation the overtime spent with Word Processing Specialist II's in your department, in this division. Correctional officer, there were 59 positions unfilled. How many are currently unfilled? They were unfilled, I think, in November. COMMISSIONER GIORLA: There are 244 4/6/10 - WHOLE - BILL 100115, etc. currently unfilled. 3
Nineteen 4 currently unfilled. And how are the 5 functions of these vacant positions being 6 performed today? 7 COMMISSIONER GIORLA: Through 8 overtime. 9
So if you 10 hire these 19 positions, we can reduce 11 the overtime that is in your budget? 12 COMMISSIONER GIORLA: Somewhat. 13
16 Excuse me. Councilman, is this list much 17 lengthier? We have had -- 18
Well, could you forward that to the Commissioner in writing -- DEPUTY
-- 245 4/6/10 - WHOLE - BILL 100115, etc. and he can respond in writing?
I do not care to do this in writing. I find it far more productive to do it --
Well, I just want to call your attention to the fact that we're trying to show how very efficient we are, when we have had --
Excuse me. We have had the Police Commissioner and just about all of his deputies sitting in the back of the room 15 for almost an hour now. So I just don't think it's fair to them.
Madam President, I don't set the schedule. I have a series of questions to ask.
Thank you. Social Worker II, same questions. How are these functions being performed now? 246 4/6/10 - WHOLE - BILL 100115, etc. COMMISSIONER GIORLA: Those functions are being performed now through a combination of limited overtime and increased caseloads beyond our policy expectations.
Administrative Specialist II, there's one of two positions at Riverside. COMMISSIONER GIORLA: That's a warden's administrative assistant.
How are these functions being performed today? COMMISSIONER GIORLA: By a correctional officer.
And would that free up that correctional officer to be one of the 19 positions that we need to fill? COMMISSIONER GIORLA: Yes.
Okay. So we can say that there are 18 positions that 247 4/6/10 - WHOLE - BILL 100115, etc. we need to fill if we free this correctional officer up, not 19? COMMISSIONER GIORLA: Yes.
Correctional Lieutenant positions, I think this is at Riverside also, are unfilled in November. Have these positions been filled? COMMISSIONER GIORLA: We recently made promotions to fill those positions.
So both of those positions were filled. Okay. I guess this is also at Riverside. Five of the 189 correctional officers. Are these part of the 17 positions or are these separate? 18 COMMISSIONER GIORLA: I'm sorry. Where are you referring?
Councilman, I can tell you that there was 19 all told, so I don't know whether they've been put together. 248 4/6/10 - WHOLE - BILL 100115, etc.
Okay. Turning to the Detention Center, eight of the 257 correctional officer positions were unfilled. Have these positions been filled? COMMISSIONER GIORLA: No. 8
And how are these functions being performed today? COMMISSIONER GIORLA: Through overtime.
And if you hire these people, we can reduce your overtime? DEPUTY
Same questions for Social Work Supervisor at the Detention Center. COMMISSIONER GIORLA: Yes. Same answer. It's being filled through an acting -- a social worker working acting in place of the Social Worker Supervisor and in increased caseload for the remaining social workers in the 249 4/6/10 - WHOLE - BILL 100115, etc. facility.
I'm moving very quickly now, Madam President. Industrial Correction Center, one of two Clerk Typist II positions. How are those functions being performed today? COMMISSIONER GIORLA: With correctional officers.
With correction officers. So if we fill this position, then you'd only need 14 correctional officers? 15 COMMISSIONER GIORLA: Yes. 16
Are there 17 any other positions in the Prisons where correctional officers are performing duties that are administrative in nature? COMMISSIONER GIORLA: Yes, there are.
Can you please, for the sake of time, provide the Chair with a list of that? COMMISSIONER GIORLA: 250 4/6/10 - WHOLE - BILL 100115, etc. Certainly. I can explain it in about ten seconds.
Oh, sure. COMMISSIONER GIORLA: There are approximately eight wardens' assistants in secretarial positions in our facilities that are filled with correctional officers instead of clerical positions. This was done as a result of the hiring freeze which took place, because the duties still have to be performed. It did create some vacancies in our correctional ranks.
And are we filling all of those positions to free up those correctional officers? COMMISSIONER GIORLA: We're requesting to fill all those positions, yes.
And so that would mean we'd only have to hire eight new correctional officers, roughly? COMMISSIONER GIORLA: At this moment, yes. At this moment, yes. 251 4/6/10 - WHOLE - BILL 100115, etc.
In the Maintenance Subdivision, one of the four Institutional Maintenance Supervisors positions was unfilled. How are those functions being performed? COMMISSIONER GIORLA: Through an acting tradesperson working in substitution and then backfilling with overtime.
And if we fill that position, will we be able to reduce your overtime? COMMISSIONER GIORLA: I have to expand on that. If we fill that position, yes. Those positions are extremely difficult to fill.
So it's probably -- COMMISSIONER GIORLA: We have a number of vacancies both in the trades and the support personnel for maintenance.
Okay. Prison Trades Worker II, Plumber. And I 252 4/6/10 - WHOLE - BILL 100115, etc. assume with respect to all of these trades jobs, you're going to tell me they're just very hard to fill and that's the problem? COMMISSIONER GIORLA: Yes.
Okay. For the sake of time, I'll send you a list of those rather than go through them one by one. That's it. Thank you, Madam President.
Thank you. Commissioner, we really want to congratulate you on doing such a fantastic job. You know, for years we in Council have been saying if all of the law enforcement people would gather together, there could be something worked out where this system would be what it is today. I think CJAB has been able to accomplish that. My only desire at this point in time, if everybody that's been working together can continue to do that 253 4/6/10 - WHOLE - BILL 100115, etc. regarding the medical costs, I think it would really be an A plus. I think you've been very, very responsive today. There wasn't a question that you were asked that you didn't know, and I want to applaud you for all of the changes that have been successfully made. Councilman Greenlee.
I'll just second what you say, Madam President. Thank you.
Thank you. COMMISSIONER GIORLA: Thank you, Madam President. DEPUTY
We can say come back again, but not today. Councilman Green. Excuse me, Commissioner. Councilman Green.
No. I'm 254 4/6/10 - WHOLE - BILL 100115, etc. finished.
Oh, your light is on for the next round? Okay. Again, thank you very much. DEPUTY
We will now, at long last, hear from the Police Department. (Witnesses approached witness table.)
Good afternoon, Commissioner. Thank you for your patience. Please identify yourself for the record and proceed with your testimony. COMMISSIONER RAMSEY: Yes, Madam President. Charles Ramsey, Police Commissioner, Philadelphia Police Department. Good afternoon, Madam President and all distinguished members of City Council. On behalf of the Philadelphia Police Department, thank you 255 4/6/10 - WHOLE - BILL 100115, etc. for your support and opportunity to testify before you today to discuss the future of policing in Philadelphia. The Philadelphia Police Department's Fiscal Year 2011 General Fund budget request is $541,403,280 with the below-listed allocations. Salaries and overtime expenses, or Class 100 funds, comprise 97 percent of the Philadelphia Police Department's budget. There's approximately $525 million in Class 100, $7 million in Class 200 and about $8 and a half million in Class 300 and 400 funds. 9 million more than the current Fiscal Year 2010 budget, and the increase is due specifically to the addition of two Academy classes, for a total of 260 recruits, a three percent salary increase and a one percent stress increase for sworn personnel as a result of the recent Act 111 contract award between the City and the Fraternal Order 256 4/6/10 - WHOLE - BILL 100115, etc. of Police, Lodge No. 5, and a $3 million allowance for the SugarHouse Casino set to open in the early part of Fiscal Year 2011. Our proposed budget for Fiscal Year 2011 maintains our authorized sworn strength of 6,624. The PPD did receive federal law enforcement funds from the Department of Justice's COPS Office for the hiring of an additional 50 officers this past fiscal year. These recruits are part of the current class of police recruits in the Academy slated to graduate this fall. 8 percent went to minority, women, disadvantaged or disabled business enterprises, and attached to this testimony is a breakdown of those contracts and various other awards. For Fiscal Year 2010, we continued to implement a civilian hiring freeze, with the exception of the 257 4/6/10 - WHOLE - BILL 100115, etc. 1 million. In addition, we returned 190 vehicles to Fleet Management and reduced the number of take-home vehicles by 41. For the past two calendar years, the Philadelphia Police Department has continued to make significant progress in driving down violent crime in this city. Amidst challenging fiscal times, we have sought out operational efficiencies and service improvements while harnessing our resources around visible uniform patrol. The results are striking. In Calendar Year 2009, using 2007 as a basis of comparison, according to our Uniform Crime Reports, or UCR, statistics submitted to the FBI, we had the lowest number of murders in Philadelphia in the past seven years. Cumulatively since 2007, homicides have dropped a total of 258 4/6/10 - WHOLE - BILL 100115, etc. 8 percent. 9 percent. percent. percent. And there are charts to my right that show some of those drops. Our investigative units have also been extraordinary in their efforts. 5 percent. The average clearance rate for cities our size is only 62 percent nationwide. The Forensic Science Bureau has been aggressively working to reduce their backlog of cases, and since 2008 to January 2010, they have reduced the ballistics evidence backlog by 81 percent, from 6,121 items of ballistic evidence to 1,178; reduced the chemistry 259 4/6/10 - WHOLE - BILL 100115, etc. backlog by 89 percent, from 9,119 cases to 993 cases; reduced the stranger rape DNA backlog by 88 percent, from 99 cases to cases. The Department has accomplished these goals despite attrition and slowed hiring of personnel. Guided by our principles of smart policing, collaboration, prevention and continuous improvement, we have centered on lowering homicide and violent crime, targeting hot spots with enhanced patrol efforts and aligning our entire organization with our crime-fighting mission.
These are all remarkable achievements, and the Department has done so while reducing overtime expenditures for this fiscal year by over $8 million and over $16 million for the past two fiscal years. With the establishment of an Overtime Management Unit in the Department, dedicated police personnel, working in partnership with the District 260 4/6/10 - WHOLE - BILL 100115, etc. Attorney's Office and the First Judicial District in order to develop a coordinated approach to increasing efficiencies in the criminal justice system, have been able to develop solutions-based approaches. The Police Department is constantly finding ways to fundamentally change how it does business with fewer financial resources. We have had several foundational efforts over the past year, which have guided our policing strategy. The Department implemented a neighborhood policing model in the City with the arrival of Police Service Areas, or PSAs, in all police districts. Geographic accountability and integrity are now at the core of our police strategy. Under the PSA model, both Police and community will be working together to develop specific tactics for addressing crime and disorder. The same personnel are responsible on a day-to-day basis for policing their designated PSA. Make no 261 4/6/10 - WHOLE - BILL 100115, etc. mistake, this is a significant shift in our policing strategy here in Philadelphia, one which increases accountability, takes a team-based approach and invests more resources in the community. In March 2009, the Department launched PPD2020, our strategic planning and development team, responsible for collecting data on best practices and policies in the areas of employee development, police service and public safety infrastructure. PPD2020 has managed several pilot projects involving the enhanced use of technology in our patrol districts, and the team is currently training our personnel on problem-solving tactics with the community. In April 2009, the Department spearheaded Operation Pressure Point, a multi-agency law enforcement initiative with 17 other local, State and federal agencies. Personnel from all of these 262 4/6/10 - WHOLE - BILL 100115, etc. organizations worked side by side during the most volatile weekend hours and were deployed to hot zones within the greatest proportion of violent crime. From April 10th through November 1st of 2009, homicides in our 8 most violent districts dropped over 50 9 percent and shooting victims decreased 11 10 percent. Pressure Point yielded almost 11 five million in narcotic seizures, 247 12 gun confiscations, 93 nuisance bar closures and 500 bench warrants served. This year we will once again leverage our law enforcement resources with Pressure Point beginning on April 9th. The Department also joined with researchers in the Department of Criminal Justice at Temple University in 2009 for a major research collaboration involving over 200 police officers on foot beats around some of the City's most violent corners. Our goal here in this strategic partnership was to answer the following question: How do we precisely know what 263 4/6/10 - WHOLE - BILL 100115, etc. works in terms of crime prevention and reduction? We implemented a data-driven plan for deploying our officers and we were able to measure the impact that our officers had in the beats in which they were assigned. Results after weeks 9 relative to the comparison areas were 10 positive, with violent crime decreasing 11 22 percent, vehicle-related crime 12 decreasing 12 percent, drug-related crime decreasing 28 percent and arrests increasing by 13 percent. Our foot patrol initiative was an important data-driven public-private partnership, which, given our demanding fiscal restraints, is extremely important now. Future classes that graduate from the Police Academy will be immediately deployed on foot patrol, including the class that will be placed this fall.
Lastly, as we plan our future over the course of the next year, we are looking forward to building a Realtime 264 4/6/10 - WHOLE - BILL 100115, etc. Crime Center, or RTCC, here in Philadelphia. The Realtime Crime Center will provide a variety of investigative and analytic functions, in addition to serving as a 24/7 central operations and command center. The Realtime Crime Center will leverage advanced technologies in communications, information technology, surveillance and intelligence analysis, bringing the Department to the next level in its crime prevention and crime-fighting mission. In summary, we are seeing positive results for the Department and for the City. This is not by happenstance. We are making a concerted and committed effort to move the organization into the future in a fiscally responsible and mission-driven manner. Our proposed budget for the next fiscal year allows us to maintain our current resources. 5 percent budget cut, we will lose 357 265 4/6/10 - WHOLE - BILL 100115, etc. 3 percent reduction in sworn strength. We all have a vested interest in public safety. This department can and will continue to drive down crime and work collaboratively with community members and all of our partners in making this city a safer place in which to live, work and visit. Thank you very much, Madam President, for your consideration, and we're here to answer any questions that you or others may have.
Thank you. I certainly want to thank you and the entire Police Department for all the wonderful work that you do. Commissioner, in your testimony you mentioned that you have received a $3 million allowance for opening of the SugarHouse Casino. Can you tell us where these funds are budgeted and how they will be used? 266 4/6/10 - WHOLE - BILL 100115, etc. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER GAITTENS: Yes. Good afternoon, Madam President.
Good afternoon. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER GAITTENS: Deputy Commissioner Jack Gaittens. The $3 million was allocated in our Class 100 funds. The opening of the casinos is scheduled to begin sometime late in the summer, possibly August, although insider information tells us they're going to try for a July 1 opening to catch the 4th of July holiday traffic, so they are moving along with that. Looking at the timing right there, that's in the middle of our summer vacation period. Also it's a busy time for us. So we're going to begin by staffing that with overtime for the officers that are working there. We will have permanent supervisors there. They will be out of the 26th District. Currently, we are going to be leasing space out of the Penn Treaty Plaza, which 267 4/6/10 - WHOLE - BILL 100115, etc. is very near to the site where they are putting up the casino, so it will be very close. Officers will be able to walk to their assignments from there. We will begin with overtime, but then as the Academy class comes out and as we move further on into the winter months, we will cut back on the overtime and utilize officers as we need them. Looking at the space we have, the lease will be $75,000 a year for the property, and we will be able to outfit it just by putting in lockers. The landlord is going to be amenable to making certain changes in the property itself. It was much more cost efficient than trying to build a new facility.
Thank you. What's the dollar amount for cost-related overtime proposed in Fiscal 2011? DEPUTY COMMISSIONER GAITTENS: The anticipated overtime for Fiscal '11 268 4/6/10 - WHOLE - BILL 100115, etc. is 41,653,877. And if you look at the change from Fiscal '10, that shows that that will be an increase of $731,000. Now, that's a little misleading because in this past year, our most recent Act 111 contract actually is going to cause us an increase in costs of $19,686,104. There was a three percent salary increase and a one percent stress increase. So in the Class 100 funds, that's an increase of $18.3 million right there. There's also an additional provision for officers who are notified that they have to go to court on their day off, if they don't get at least 48 hours notice, they will have to be paid a minimum of four hours at two and a half times their regular rate of pay. Additionally, there is --
I'm sorry. Before you go further, whose responsibility is it to give them 48 hours notice? DEPUTY COMMISSIONER GAITTENS: 269 4/6/10 - WHOLE - BILL 100115, etc. It is a joint responsibility. It starts with the District Attorney's Office.
That's what I thought. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER GAITTENS: They generate a court notice, and then the Department is responsible for delivering that court notice to the officer in a timely fashion. The estimated cost of that is about $6,070,000 for that fiscal year. Additionally, there was a tuition reimbursement, which is going to cost us 125,000. Another award was made for officers who decided to go with a .40 or .45 caliber Glock as opposed to our current nine millimeter, which will raise our cost by $570,000 in this year. And there was a provision for officers who attain their pilot's license or their Fixed Wing License for the Aviation Unit of 60,000. So, as I said, the total cost of the Act 111 award is going to be 270 4/6/10 - WHOLE - BILL 100115, etc. almost $19.7 million. But getting back to your question on the overtime, if you just take the salary, three percent increase and the one percent stress increase and apply that to the overtime we spent in Fiscal '10, that would put us over 42 and a half million, which would be a $1.6 million increase in our overtime expenditures.
But how much of that is court related? DEPUTY COMMISSIONER GAITTENS: Court related, the $625,000 for that. We are still striving to make reductions in court overtime. We have been able to make some significant cuts in recent years. We have created an Accountability Unit, and that is their function, to look at all cost savings. In Fiscal Year '08, our court overtime was $24.8 million. In Fiscal '09, we got it down to 22.7. In Fiscal '10, we are hoping to hit a $20 million mark flat. So we are still aiming at court. That is one of our 271 4/6/10 - WHOLE - BILL 100115, etc. bigger overtime factors, although we have 99 different overtime codes. There's 99 different ways of making overtime in the Police Department.
Thank you. Commissioner, what is your average attrition rate per pay period or per month? COMMISSIONER RAMSEY: About 12 per month is our average attrition. 13
That 14 has really been cut. I remember -- 15 COMMISSIONER RAMSEY: Well, 16 yeah. It used to be a lot higher, but what we found, as soon as the economy started to slip, we actually did slow down a great deal in terms of attrition.
I recall it being at least 30 a month for the longest time. How many recruit classes do you anticipate for Fiscal 2011? COMMISSIONER RAMSEY: Right now 272 4/6/10 - WHOLE - BILL 100115, etc. we're looking at two, two classes.
And with the stimulus, you received stimulus? COMMISSIONER RAMSEY: Yes, we did.
Is that how we are going to have these additional two classes? COMMISSIONER RAMSEY: No, ma'am. We put 50 officers in the Academy now and we used the stimulus money for that. Now, we have to maintain our current strength in order to be able to not pay back that money. I mean, that's one of the stipulations with the stimulus money. So that number that -- the two classes will make up for attrition so that we can stay at the current strength.
With the stimulus money, with the hiring of the 50 officers, is that for a certain period of time or just until the stimulus money -- COMMISSIONER RAMSEY: Three 273 4/6/10 - WHOLE - BILL 100115, etc. years is the length of time and so -- plus one year retention, and there is an out year impact, but it's four years down the road.
Thank you. The Chair recognizes Councilman Greenlee.
Thank you, Madam President. Good afternoon. COMMISSIONER RAMSEY: Good afternoon.
Commissioner, on the Police Service Area -- it might be a little early, because I know it hasn't been established that long -- how overall has the community accepted that? Because I know people don't like change sometimes. COMMISSIONER RAMSEY: Well, so far, I've been very pleased both from the community's response and also internally, which is where I thought I'd get the 274 4/6/10 - WHOLE - BILL 100115, etc. biggest problem, quite frankly.
I was going to ask you that, too. COMMISSIONER RAMSEY: It's going to take some time before people fully get comfortable with it, but the fact that they have -- a Police Service Area, for those that are watching this and may not fully understand it, is a geographical subdivision of a district. You could have anywhere from two Police Service Areas to four, depending on the district and how it's divided up. There's a Lieutenant in charge of each PSA and there's a cadre of Sergeants and officers that work on a regular basis assigned to that PSA. So there's continuity of assignment. People get to know who is in charge, people get to know who is responsible for working in that particular area. Over time it will get even stronger, but so far, the reception has been good. And remarkably, inside the 275 4/6/10 - WHOLE - BILL 100115, etc. Department there has not been any real problem at all. It's gone remarkably smooth, much smoother than I anticipated, because officers are no longer running from one end of the district to the other on a consistent basis. It's more stability for them.
And it's been -- again, it might be too early. Any stats or ideas on the crime rate? Has it decreased or is it a little hard to tell? COMMISSIONER RAMSEY: It's too soon to say through specifically the PSAs. We've had very, very good success in our crime fighting, and I expect it to get better as people take on more responsibility for given areas and get more involved in problem-solving with the community. I think it will have a tremendous impact on crime. But we didn't fully roll out our Police Service Area model until the end of 2009. That's when the last police districts went live 276 4/6/10 - WHOLE - BILL 100115, etc. with PSAs. So it's too early to say specifically about the PSAs. But we're continuing to drive crime down. Just so you know, 2010 compared to '09 right now, we're showing a ten percent decrease in violent crime and a four percent decrease in property crime. So we're continuing to drive the numbers down.
Going in the right direction, sure. Speaking of change and some people maybe not accepting it, the combining of the couple of the districts, I know I live near the old 23rd, which is now the 22nd, and there was at least this perception -- and I think I know the answer to this, but I wanted to ask just for the record. There's this perception that certain areas would be less served once the combination. Can you just kind of explain that procedure? And my understanding, there is no decrease in officers of any note. COMMISSIONER RAMSEY: No. We 277 4/6/10 - WHOLE - BILL 100115, etc. didn't pull any officers out of those districts. It really gives the Captain a little more flexibility operationally, and plus we just simply didn't have the resources to staff police districts, 7 and those districts being in the same 8 facility, it just made sense to combine 9 them. And with the PSA model being 10 rolled out at the same time, there is a 11 number of police officers that will be 12 assigned to each PSA. So they're not 13 running all over the district. There'll 14 be a smaller geographical area in which 15 we'll have numbers of officers assigned, 16 and that way, we can maintain some 17 stability. 18
Got you. 19 The foot patrols, now you're saying the 20 graduates of the recent class, the way I 21 read your testimony, they'll all be put 22 on foot patrol? 23 COMMISSIONER RAMSEY: Yes, sir. Since I've been here now, a little over two years, we've been putting recruits 278 4/6/10 - WHOLE - BILL 100115, etc. out on foot patrol. I happen to personally believe that's a good way to start your police career, start off on foot, get to know the community, get to know our neighborhood. Hard to do when you're riding up and down the street in a car. We'll continue to do that. Now, what we did last year, which was different than just flat out foot patrol, we actually did target specific areas based on a study conducted by Dr. Jerry Ratcliffe from Temple University, and we were able to show pretty dramatic results I think in the targeted areas, about a 17 percent reduction in crime in the areas 18 where we had the targeted foot patrol, 19 one of the largest foot patrol 20 experiments, if not the largest anywhere 21 in the country, more than 250 officers 22 last year. And we'll have foot patrol again. Now the weather has warmed up, we're going back to foot patrol again, and then when the officers graduate from 279 4/6/10 - WHOLE - BILL 100115, etc. the Academy, they, of course, will automatically be out on foot patrol.
And the idea is to keep them in that area? COMMISSIONER RAMSEY: Yes, sir.
So they're familiar with the area and the area is familiar with them? COMMISSIONER RAMSEY: Yes, sir. There may be a little bit of movement, only because if your crime patterns shift or whatever, what we started this summer with in one district, our resources may need to shift slightly, but for the most part, those officers stay put.
No. 24 Councilwoman Miller has a point of information. 280 4/6/10 - WHOLE - BILL 100115, etc.
Regarding foot patrols, is there a designated amount of time that they stay on foot patrol, or what? COMMISSIONER RAMSEY: You mean in terms of months?
It's not continuous? COMMISSIONER RAMSEY: Well, we shut it down for the winter months, but these last group of officers were out for three months, I believe it was, some as long as six months.
So when will -- well, I saw some foot patrol last week. It's the first time I saw them in a couple months, and I certainly understand them coming off particularly this winter with all the snow and everything else that we've had. So those that are there now will be there for about six months or so? COMMISSIONER RAMSEY: Well, maybe even longer than that. I'm a 281 4/6/10 - WHOLE - BILL 100115, etc. proponent of foot patrol. You don't have to sell me on foot patrol, but I also recognize that it's not necessarily the most efficient way of patrolling. It's very good in targeted areas. It's very good along commercial corridors, but it also limits an officer's ability to respond. So I really think the combination of foot patrol, bike patrol, which is another great way of patrolling the streets, as well as vehicle patrol and, quite frankly, I'm trying to get a mounted patrol back.
A what? COMMISSIONER RAMSEY: Mounted, horses. I think there's no reason for the City not to have a mounted police unit, especially in light of some of the crowd control situations we've encountered recently. We do need to have a small horse patrol unit. So I think that there's a variety of patrol strategies that need to be employed to be effective, but foot 282 4/6/10 - WHOLE - BILL 100115, etc. patrol is very, very effective, and I'm a big believer in it.
And it should be two officers? I know this is his question. I just want to make sure, it should be two, not one, correct? COMMISSIONER RAMSEY: Yeah. We try to walk in pairs as much as possible, but sometimes along a commercial strip, if you don't have a real violent crime, you may have one officer walking by himself, but for the most part, they're in pairs.
Actually, I was going to ask about the mounted police. That was going to be my last question. What would you say are the prospects of that? COMMISSIONER RAMSEY: I 283 4/6/10 - WHOLE - BILL 100115, etc. think --
I agree with what you just said. COMMISSIONER RAMSEY: I think the prospects are pretty good. I think that we've got to look very seriously at it right now. The Pennsylvania State Police, they have been excellent partners. I have no complaints at all about them. When we need them, they are always there. But we should not be reliant on an outside agency that may have other commitments on a given day that we need them to be able to perform a particular function. I think a modest-sized unit, perhaps or so, would be more than 19 enough to handle any incident that may 20 come up, whether we're talking these so-called flash mobs or we're talking about the Phillies winning championships or any other kind of crowd control situation.
That's 284 4/6/10 - WHOLE - BILL 100115, etc. going to happen again this year. COMMISSIONER RAMSEY: I believe so, too, sir. Any type of crowd control situation. Plus it's just an effective form of patrol in neighborhoods. So days when they aren't deployed that way, I would have them actually on crime patrols.
Thank you, Madam Chair. I have caused a delay in your testimony, which has caused me to have to send you most of my questions in writing. But what I've been doing with every department is going through the positions. I have a question about 35 all civilian positions, ten of which are 285 4/6/10 - WHOLE - BILL 100115, etc. newly created in the budget, and I will have someone e-mail over to the Deputy Commissioner, I suppose. COMMISSIONER RAMSEY: Not a problem.
And the questions that we're going to ask are who is performing the function now, why it's being performed. You've sat here for the Prisons. COMMISSIONER RAMSEY: Not a problem.
And we'd really like to understand why we need those 35 civilian positions. With respect to your overtime costs in the court system, has anything that you've heard about the new plans, whether it's 3,000 summary offenses instead of other things, which means fewer court appearances on minor drug offenses and other things like that, caused you to be able to lower the overtime you have now or is all of that 286 4/6/10 - WHOLE - BILL 100115, etc. and everything else we're doing on CJAB reflected in your current overtime budget for courts? COMMISSIONER RAMSEY: Well, certainly the issue of summary offenses for minor possession cases, marijuana, anything that keeps an officer from appearing in court is going to have an impact on our overtime budget and would be helpful. We, through CJAB, have been able to get a lot of cooperation from both the DA and the courts in doing a better job of scheduling these cases, getting court notices out in a timely fashion and the like. If you recall, sir, about two months ago, maybe three, I sent letters out to both the DA's Office and the presiding judge explaining our situation and, in fact, that should we find that we're paying overtime because of their failure to make notifications in a timely fashion, I'd be sending them a bill for the amount that it's costing us, because it's like giving someone else our 287 4/6/10 - WHOLE - BILL 100115, etc. checkbook with a free rein to write whatever you want to write. I mean, it's not right. So, I mean, we'll have to absorb some of it, but if it's because of an oversight or negligence and you fail to notify in a timely fashion, you should pay that tab, not the Philadelphia Police Department or the City of Philadelphia.
And you guys are in a position to enforce that. COMMISSIONER RAMSEY: But so far, everyone has honestly sat down and with the spirit of cooperation, they recognize the problem and they're doing everything they can. And that's not to say there won't be some mistakes made. I mean, we're all going to make some mistakes, but I think a lot of the unnecessary overtime is going to be cut down. That, coupled with our Overtime Management Unit that I'm very proud of that's really screening each and every case, and if a court notice comes over 288 4/6/10 - WHOLE - BILL 100115, etc. for six officers, we challenge that, Why do you need six, why not two, why not -- you know, you've got to go through each one of these individually.
That's a great point. So with respect to the summary offenses, probably on average two people would be called, two police officers? COMMISSIONER RAMSEY: Probably more than that actually, but probably on average, two would be a fair assumption, yeah.
So that's basically 3,000 times two, and for most of those cases, they have to be in court more than once just because. That's like 24,000 fewer court appearances just as a result -- and that's a conservative assumption -- just as a result of this change. COMMISSIONER RAMSEY: Yes, sir. Well, I mean, but it saves you two ways. I mean, one, it's not just always 289 4/6/10 - WHOLE - BILL 100115, etc. overtime when you're in court, because sometimes officers are on their regular tour and they're not being compensated overtime. But it does put bodies back on the street. So either way, you're saving, because we have an awful lot of officers tied up sitting in court, waiting for a case to be called that, quite frankly, may not be called because of the volume of cases. In the meantime, you don't have that officer available for duty.
So your budget does not currently include any overtime savings as a result of this new policy by the DA; is that correct? DEPUTY COMMISSIONER GAITTENS: Just to give you an example, when we first heard about the --
I'm sorry, Deputy Commissioner. I just need a yes or no at the beginning of this. Your budget does not include -- DEPUTY COMMISSIONER GAITTENS: 290 4/6/10 - WHOLE - BILL 100115, etc. Not directly, but indirectly, yes, it is in there, because --
Were you aware of this policy when you prepared the budget? DEPUTY COMMISSIONER GAITTENS: We're going to decrease -- we were aware of the fact that we were trying to decrease overtime by any means possible, and then when we went into the Act 111 discussions with the union and we first heard about this two and a half times the regular rate penalty for the overnight court --
Do you think it's going to compensate for that essentially? DEPUTY COMMISSIONER GAITTENS: Yes, sir. That will offset that.
Thank you. The Chair recognizes 291 4/6/10 - WHOLE - BILL 100115, etc. Councilwoman Miller.
Thank you, Madam President. This new policy, I don't know that we're all very familiar with that, but is that the policy that the Prison Commissioner in his testimony said that he expects to have an increase in population due to changes in Municipal Court and the bail system? Is that the same thing? DEPUTY
No. 14 The Prisons Commissioner, Mr. Giorla, was referring to there is a -- there will be a renewed effort from the PPD trying to go out and get fugitives that we have to be anticipating. I mean, we are serious about getting that fugitive problem under control. We're trying to get and deal with a number of different partners, and that was one of the contingencies that the Prisons Commissioner was referring to. If we end up stepping up and having to bring people in and put them in jail, 292 4/6/10 - WHOLE - BILL 100115, etc. then he has to have space for them. So that's what he was referring to in his testimony, Councilwoman.
The bail system, that there has been a review for the past year that I've been working with various members of the CJAB talking about how can we end up changing the bail system that would enable it to get people to get to court, bottom line. There are a whole number of issues that are associated with our current situation. Currently, ten percent of bail is what you put up to be released from custody. If we go to full valuation, we would have to adjust the amount of money that people are getting for bail in order to make sure that the same numbers on a value basis would be eligible for the bail and get out. If we didn't, a $50,000 bail, if you have to put up $50,000 to get out, it would spike our 293 4/6/10 - WHOLE - BILL 100115, etc. prison population tremendously, when in fact what, in essence, is going on is that people with a $50,000 bail only put up 5,000, so it's really a $5,000 bail. So we'd have to adjust the entire criminal justice system to deal with that bail situation, but we are working towards that, because, quite frankly, we just can't do the same thing that we've been doing for a long time because we've got the result we have.
Thank you. Thank you for that explanation. Commissioner, over the weekend from Thursday, I'll just say, through Easter Sunday, there were a number of shootings in the City, but in particular in the districts that -- in the 8th Council District, 39th, 14th and 35th, and I don't have a list of all of them and I don't know all of them off the top of my head, but what is it that you need from the community? I mean, most of the community are not people involved in 294 4/6/10 - WHOLE - BILL 100115, etc. these shootings. COMMISSIONER RAMSEY: Right.
But the shootings are just really upsetting people in the neighborhoods. People continuously be shot. I want to at some point, not today, talk about the shooting at Happy Hollow Playground that's in my councilmanic district on Wayne Avenue. But what do you -- I don't really know how to answer people. There are a couple places we're going to have community meetings regarding the shooting, the high incidence of violence. There's one on Thursday night, and that was a shooting that took place in the 14th on Cliveden Street. So I just don't know. Right now I got a couple complaints about people. People are calling to say that some of the trouble areas where you have foot patrols or bike patrols, you know, the warm weather is coming and people are starting to come out, and people doing 295 4/6/10 - WHOLE - BILL 100115, etc. the wrong things are starting to come out more, and I would hope that those would be some of the areas where foot patrols are being targeted and placed. I just don't know. I mean, this has been going on forever. It's not new. Every spring we have the same problem here in Philadelphia, and I'm quite sure they have them around the country. But I think neighbors get frustrated. As elected officials, we breathe kind of hard to try to help people figure out what to do, how to do it, how to make their neighborhoods safe. Do you have any recommendations, I guess? COMMISSIONER RAMSEY: Well, I wish there was one thing I could say that would really, you know, just eliminate the problem, but there really isn't. But one thing that can be done and needs to be done is, people need to be able to provide information to us about people who are known to carry guns and who are violent out there on the street. 296 4/6/10 - WHOLE - BILL 100115, etc. Somebody knows who they are. They aren't coming from Mars. They're coming right from our own neighborhoods. And oftentimes, people are reluctant to pass on that information. And even if they don't do it directly, call the tip hotline, call your office, call somebody and let us know who these individuals are, so when we see them, we can stop them, we can make sure that they're not doing anything inappropriate, they're not carrying guns and so forth. Because you're right, I mean, the warm weather is starting. If this is any indication of what we're experiencing now already in early April in the 80's, I mean, this could be a very warm summer, so we need to all be concerned about that, but it's easy to get a handle on it if you know who it is that's out there causing problems. And it's a minority of people that are. It's just a question of getting the right people identified so that we can take the appropriate action. 297 4/6/10 - WHOLE - BILL 100115, etc.
Well, you know, I was one of the big proponents here of video surveillance cameras, and one thing, you put the camera up and then they move and then they move somewhere else also, so that causes more and more people, but -- more and more problems. But I kind of think if the police were there more or on a consistent basis, just the mere site of the police would help keep these guys moving. We can do our part in maybe trying to direct some of them into job training programs and those kind of positive or educational programs, those kind of positive activities if they will take our suggestion, but I think it becomes very frustrating when nothing seems to happen. And I'm not saying nothing is happening, but they're there every day like it's a job. They go around to a particular street or a particular corner every day like I come to work, and we just need to break that up. 298 4/6/10 - WHOLE - BILL 100115, etc. COMMISSIONER RAMSEY: I don't disagree with you, and one of the things I hope we accomplish through our Police Service Areas, by having consistent officers assigned every day, those problems become well known, they know it's their problem, they have to deal with it on a regular basis. So it's not -- don't drive by it, because it's going to be there for you tomorrow, too. So you need to be able to deal with it effectively, and that's what I hope we can accomplish through having officers assigned to regular areas on a regular basis, working with the community to problem-solve these chronic problems and so forth, coming up with some solutions that can be long lasting, so we don't go through this year after year after year, same problems.
Right. Another question. In my district at one of the high schools, there are hundreds of children that walk to a bus stop, so, 299 4/6/10 - WHOLE - BILL 100115, etc. of course, because flash mob has now become a popular term, I don't want these kids labeled as flash mobbers. They're just going down the street to get the bus to go home from school, but congregate a little bit. I know as a teenager I enjoyed seeing my friends after school. When the weather was warm, we could just walk around and just talk a little bit. But do you work along with schools or anyone from the Police Department work along with schools when they need maybe SEPTA? I mean, I'm going to help them with trying to get SEPTA to come to the actual school rather than to have the children walk a few blocks down the street, because it makes it look flash mobby and it's really not. COMMISSIONER RAMSEY: Well, we do work with the SEPTA and we work with the schools. We've been able to make some adjustments in terms of bus scheduling when we had conflicts between schools and so forth. 300 4/6/10 - WHOLE - BILL 100115, etc. This whole term, "flash mob," is not one I'm particularly fond of, but it's one that I guess we're stuck with now that's kind of been labeled that way. But, again, when you have officers assigned on a regular basis to a given location, they can tell the difference between a bunch of kids leaving basketball practice versus a bunch of kids out there ready to do something that's wrong, because you know the kids too, and you avoid a lot of issues and you avoid a lot of problems. We don't have a problem with kids coming out in large numbers to enjoy a nice warm day. What we object to is people that think that they can then create property damage or assault other people or whatever. So the answer to your question is, yes, we do work with those agencies. We'll continue to work with them, and hopefully by having officers assigned on a consistent basis in geographical areas, 301 4/6/10 - WHOLE - BILL 100115, etc. they'll come to know all the residents of that area and better be able to deal with any issues that come up, whether it's young people or not.
One other thing. On police overtime, have you worked with the DA's Office maybe to have the officers on call rather than just sit in the Criminal Justice Center waiting? COMMISSIONER RAMSEY: Yes, we have. I mean, not just the DA's Office, but the courts as well, trying to do anything we can to minimize, but there are times when a case is called and the judge wants that officer there. And we have officers sometimes in multiple courts at the same time because they make a lot of arrests and work out something where an officer can be in the court handling multiple things and they'll hold it until they can get back to that particular courtroom where the case is being tried. So we're exploring a lot of 302 4/6/10 - WHOLE - BILL 100115, etc. different ways in which we can minimize not just overtime. Again, I lose officers on the street, and that to me is as big a concern as the overtime is, because you'd rather have them on the street than sitting in a courtroom waiting for a case to be called. So I think the problem is really twofold, and a solution to that really helps us two ways.
Right. I mean, I think it's important too to have officers on the street. I do have a lot of questions, Council President, but I know my time is probably up soon, if not already.
Thank you, Madam President. Good afternoon, gentlemen. (Good afternoon.)
First, 303 4/6/10 - WHOLE - BILL 100115, etc. Commissioner, I'd just like to commend you individually for your willingness to make a tough call decision both internally and externally. I've watched you since you've been here and you're willing to make that tough call. COMMISSIONER RAMSEY: Thank you.
That has not been missed. I'd like to briefly get into one of my favorite subjects. I know Jack is saying, Here he comes with those cameras. You're right, Jack. I want to kind of get a handle on this.
See, this is what I have to go through, right? I can't help it if I represent Broad Street. But I kind of -- can we kind of talk through first in terms of the 304 4/6/10 - WHOLE - BILL 100115, etc. resources put forth to implement the camera program recently, because I understand now we have various sources that initially was just the City's General Fund. We put some money in. We had some challenges early on operationally, but I think since then, we're in a position where there's some additional sources of funding. Can you kind of talk me through so I can have a sense of where whatever resources are coming to the table, and then I want to, if I have time, I want to follow up on some of the operational issues. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER GAITTENS: I can give you an update on where we are with the cameras right now. For the City cameras, there are a total of 208 up right now. We've also made connections with other sources for cameras. We have four in City Hall, 42 from PennDOT, 13 from PHA, 566 from SEPTA, 12 from the Streets Department. So that's an 305 4/6/10 - WHOLE - BILL 100115, etc. additional 637 external cameras that we can view, along with the City's 208. So that gives us a total capability of 845 cameras right now. Through the efforts of Congressman Chaka Fattah, we were able to get a grant for critical infrastructure through the City, and that is going to be a partnership, multi-agency partnership, with the feds and SEPTA, Amtrak and a few other agencies, the Delaware River Port Authority and the Bridge Commission. We will be trying to set up cameras to protect critical infrastructure throughout the City. And Deputy Mayor Gillison also sent a letter to the grantors trying to add some more of the historical sites in Philadelphia. So this may give us an additional anywhere from 200 to 400 more cameras that we will be able to monitor from our video monitoring center. The Deputy Mayor can talk about the funding source. DEPUTY
Yes. 306 4/6/10 - WHOLE - BILL 100115, etc. Basically -- Deputy Mayor Gillison. Basically it's been the grants from working in partnership with Congressman Fattah. We are hoping to even -- I've actually requested again that we get additional money, and because of our homeland security being raised from a Tier 2 to a Tier 1, we're exploring additional revenue and additional grants to pull up and even more grants that would end up having more cameras available to us with that as well and, quite frankly, some of the other discussions you and I have had basically from this table. Going forward, we want to try the Chicago method and force multiply where we ask businesses to partner with us as well and have them provide digital cameras at their location, and they would obviously pay for it, but they would give the Police Department the permission because they're web based to actually go into and just activate the camera 307 4/6/10 - WHOLE - BILL 100115, etc. whenever we would need to see what was going on in that area. Chicago has somewhere around 3,000 cameras, I believe, if I understand their positioning correctly. And one of the things that that's doing, along with DOT, is that we want to now get into facial recognition software and automate this, so we don't just have police officers sitting, but there will actually be the ability to have the software monitor different things that are going on and bring an officer's attention to an issue as we really expand this and get thousands of cameras up. So that's the plan, that's how we're going, and that's how we're going to pay for it.
Okay. I have some follow-up questions operationally. We have the potential -- and make sure I understand this -- 800 cameras in various ownership that are fed to the Police Administration Building? 308 4/6/10 - WHOLE - BILL 100115, etc. DEPUTY
And this is the difficult, challenging part, and I hate to ask this question in public. In terms of our ability to adequately staff our monitoring station, where are we at with that? I think that's where our problem is. COMMISSIONER RAMSEY: Well, you can't monitor that many cameras. The key to the cameras is, one, that they're recorded, so that should something occur, you do have now potential evidence that can be used to find the individual or individuals responsible for the particular crime that took place. There may be some indication at times when a particular activity is taking place in a given time and that one you would want to live monitor. There could be an event going on in the City. There could be some intelligence that something is going to happen in a given area, and then you 309 4/6/10 - WHOLE - BILL 100115, etc. might want to live monitor. But I do not think it's an efficient use of police officers or police resources to have someone sitting 24/7 live monitoring that many cameras. You can do it with a small amount, but when you start to get that many cameras, then what you have to do is pretty much be able to turn the camera on when it's needed. So if they're connected to 9-1-1, for example, if a call comes in to 9-1-1 and it's at a given area, 18th and Montgomery, you got a camera there, that camera right away -- in fact, the dispatcher could even pull it up and see what's going on at the same time someone in the Realtime Crime Center or something could be seeing it as well. Those kinds of capabilities would be something that would be very good. The Deputy Mayor mentioned the Chicago model. They've actually got a very strong wireless network. An officer sitting in his car can pull a camera up right on his mobile data terminal, can 310 4/6/10 - WHOLE - BILL 100115, etc. actually see it right there and be sitting a few blocks away and see what's going on.
In Baltimore they call it the "football." COMMISSIONER RAMSEY: Yeah. Particularly good when it comes to monitoring drug trafficking and doing the surveillance and so forth. So there are a variety of ways of doing it, but the more we expand, it becomes increasingly difficult and impossible actually to be able to monitor. And we don't want people thinking that we're going to be looking at 800 cameras hours a day, seven days 18 a week. We just don't have the resources 19 to do that. 20
Right. And 21 I understand that, believe me, more so 22 than a number of people. 23 One of the things that -- and 24 Deputy was part of that process early on when we went out and looked at some of 311 4/6/10 - WHOLE - BILL 100115, etc. the sites. The thing that most intrigued us, some of the people that represent some of the more challenging areas just for purposes of the environment, not necessarily a crime actually being committed, we wanted to get into a real preventive measure, and understanding your limitations in terms of being able to have people watch on a consistent basis, it would be helpful if we can talk in very specific terms -- not necessarily today, because we're limited with time -- about a strategy that in a very preventive way -- and you referenced earlier flash mobs, if you had the ability to see a group of people, as you say, there's recognition of mobs and groups and people coming from basketball games, that you can prevent those crimes. Because at the end of the day, I think all of us would rather put the necessary resources in preventing a crime instead of having the crime committed. And, yes, we have a committed -- yes, we have it 312 4/6/10 - WHOLE - BILL 100115, etc. recorded. Yes, we closed the deal on the court case because we have a very graphic video. Our preference is to never have it happen. So at a later time or through the Chair, however you can allow, a very specific strategy, assuming that resources were enhanced, because I know we don't have a lot of money, but I really -- and the reason why I say that, because in the early stages of the implementation, the Deputy and the people working with him, they identified some areas in my Council district that I can speak of. I looked at them. I said, man, this is like 90 percent of the spots that I know about. You know, they were right on. And they calmed those neighborhoods and they created an environment where people just knew the camera wasn't being watched -- they didn't know, but the knuckleheads thought that they were being watched. So this created a different environment. Time is going on and I think some of them 313 4/6/10 - WHOLE - BILL 100115, etc. understand, nobody is really watching, and I'm a little worried about that whole understanding of what we're doing being carried out to the wrong people. So if we could have a selective process in a random basis, people understood that there will be live feeds in these various locations. COMMISSIONER RAMSEY: Well, there's no question there will be some live monitoring of cameras, and that will continue. And the bad guys don't know when you're watching and when you're not watching, but they'll have to be selective and they'll have to move it around a bit, simply because of some other concerns. But it will be some live monitoring. That we're not going to get rid of.
And obviously we don't want to talk about it 314 4/6/10 - WHOLE - BILL 100115, etc. in a public forum, because the bad guys watch Channel 64 also. At some point can we kind of talk about a way that we can enhance -- I mean, I kind of have a sense of how many people are actually working down there, but we can enhance the ability -- and the last thing I want to have is a police officer watching a monitor, because they're better served out on the street for all of us -- enhance the ability to have that live feed in various locations throughout the process, that will be very helpful.
Councilman, excuse me. I believe Councilwoman Miller is asking for a point of information.
It's a point of information. I just have two questions.
I'm sorry. Okay. 315 4/6/10 - WHOLE - BILL 100115, etc.
Okay. I just have two questions about the video surveillance cameras. How many are operable in the neighborhoods by Council district -- and perhaps you could send this information to Council President Verna -- and how many are not. Some have that plastic bags up and I just want to know when we're going to get those working. DEPUTY
Thank you, Madam President. And also from an operational perspective -- and we probably don't want to talk about this here publicly -- this whole notion of cameras -- and I 316 4/6/10 - WHOLE - BILL 100115, etc. understand that this is to supplement the Police Department, not to replace, but my limited knowledge of this is that there's an operational component of camera placement, not just simply putting a camera up and walking away, that there are patterns developed as a result of cameras, particularly when you have live cameras and response is based on cameras. Is there someone within the Department that's working on or have worked on how you respond in terms of your deployment to camera placement and the displacement as a result of camera placement in a very aggressive way? You put a camera at 32nd and Diamond, those guys are gone, right? And they move to 31st and Fontain, right? And, boom. I call you up, boom, put a camera there, right? They move from there. Now they're on Berks Street. And I guess somewhere down the line in private if we can kind of talk about how does that affect your ability to 317 4/6/10 - WHOLE - BILL 100115, etc. basically limit the opportunities for people doing bad things. COMMISSIONER RAMSEY: Well, again, Councilman, I go back to the Police Service Area model. Having officers assigned to geographical areas on a regular basis, they know when that displacement occurs and they know exactly where they went, and they'll go there with them. So there's no one thing that's going to be the magic formula here. Cameras can only do so much. It still takes a person to get out there on patrol, see what's going on and take action. And they'll be able to see that pretty quickly, because when 32nd and Diamond clears up, you know they went somewhere. They didn't -- so it won't take long to find out where they went. Then we have to come up with a different strategy or tactic in that particular area. You may notice something going 318 4/6/10 - WHOLE - BILL 100115, etc. on on a camera that then you may say, We need an undercover operation to take place at that particular location, and we'll implement an undercover operation to deal with drug trafficking or whatever might be going on. So there are a variety of things that we'll do as a result of information we pick up from various forms of patrol, and I consider surveillance cameras being just one more form of police patrol.
One last question on cameras. It's my understanding that some of the funding sources go to different departments, and correct me if I'm wrong. The homeland security money coming in goes to a particular department, Police Department. Money from the General Fund may go into the Technology Division and therefore. Is there a process that ensures that the implementation or basically the funding is consolidated in a way that it 319 4/6/10 - WHOLE - BILL 100115, etc. maximizes opportunities? And this is a sign of some little inside stuff that I'm hearing, and I probably shouldn't be talking about this in a very public way. I'll ask the question like this: All of the resources that come to bear for cameras, be it purchase, deployment, technology, at the end of the day does it all end up in one place where a group or an individual or a committee makes a determination on the expenditures? DEPUTY
Can I go 320 4/6/10 - WHOLE - BILL 100115, etc. on? Is my time --
Thank you. Good afternoon. I want to also acknowledge the great work that's been done by the Police Department and thank you all for your leadership in that regard. I wanted to talk a little bit about -- obviously a great supporter of the PSAs and the intent and where we want to go, but I wanted to talk a little bit about our chronic street corners where there is selling and there has been kind of these institutional corners that we have in neighborhoods. And I've yet to kind of hear an articulation of what is our long-term strategy for them, 321 4/6/10 - WHOLE - BILL 100115, etc. particularly in places where now the elements own several properties in that particular block, so it's hard to tell somebody not to sit on their corner. Have we totally gone away from the notion of looking at limiting loitering in certain corners that we understand are chronic, and, if not, what is our game plan? COMMISSIONER RAMSEY: Yes, Councilwoman. The need for consistent enforcement is really what you're referring to, and whether it's asking people to move along that are loitering on corners or whether or not it's dealing with nuisance properties and using nuisance abatement type laws in order to deal with that sort of thing, that all comes about through PSAs and problem-solving, meeting with community and working together to try to resolve some of these issues, but you have to have consistent enforcement. I mean, these are very, very difficult things to 322 4/6/10 - WHOLE - BILL 100115, etc. eliminate, drug trafficking areas that have been around for in some cases decades, but it's not impossible. But it takes a great deal of consistent enforcement, and then it takes the other part of it, which is treatment, prevention and all those kinds of things to fit in if you're going to have real long-term impact on it. So, yeah, that's all part of the problem-solving process. That's all part of what will be handed off from one group of officers to another in what I'm hoping through to action plans that we write now. And they have to actually write real action plans, here's the problem, here's what I'm doing about it, here's what I hope to accomplish. So that those strategies and those plans can be passed along so you don't have something today we enforce something real heavily, tomorrow we don't, today we do, two weeks later we don't. I mean, you've got to have consistency if we want to 323 4/6/10 - WHOLE - BILL 100115, etc. start having some real improvement in any of our neighborhoods. But, again, it takes neighborhood cooperation too with people that sometimes know what's going on, reluctant to say anything. Sometimes it's their own family members that are involved and they're reluctant to say anything.
And that's my concern a little bit with the PSAs. The issue is, we know who these drug dealers are. They've grown up there. They live there. I'm one that goes to many meetings where I see the mother and the grandmother sitting in the room, and people want you to talk to them about some of these issues. I never do. My issue is, look, I live -- in most of these cases, some of these are in my own neighborhood. But I just think we need to think about something else to do in these corners. It's too slow, and I have some 324 4/6/10 - WHOLE - BILL 100115, etc. corners that we just -- again, the Captain, when I call the Captain, how many guys you got out on sick? I know there's an issue of manpower. There just seems to be for me nothing that we're doing that's different or new. When we had Operation Safe Streets, clearly there was a tactical move. You did something. I haven't seen that, and I'm frustrated because they're still there and I almost feel like they laugh in my face because they know. And so I just think we need to come up with something, and I'm just extremely frustrated. And I don't want to pass the buck. I just think if it's legislatively, if we say you can't hang in this particular corner, I mean, whatever it is, I just think we need to come up with it. And just in the last few days where you see the weather get better, you just see this coming up again, and to me, the notion that there is a corner where there are 20 guys and 325 4/6/10 - WHOLE - BILL 100115, etc. everybody knows what they're doing and it's okay is just so problematic and I don't -- I don't know what else to tell constituents. And I drive by these corners all the time. People call and say, Maria, there's guys out there. 8 There's a cop car, you know, down the 9 street. 10 So I guess my concern for the 11 summer is, are we -- does your budget 12 allow for some of the beat cops and some 13 of the things that we did that in certain 14 areas it did have a tremendous impact? 15 In Fairhill, I know in Hartranft that we 16 share some areas, those beat cops made a 17 difference. Are we going to be able to 18 do that this summer? 19 COMMISSIONER RAMSEY: Yes, 20 ma'am, we will. As far as the foot 21 patrol beat cops, Operation Pressure 22 Point starts up again April 9th, this 23 weekend. That was very effective last 24 year, and we'll continue to do that. 25 That's when we have 17 different agencies 326 4/6/10 - WHOLE - BILL 100115, etc. come in and give us a hand. So there'll be a lot of things we're doing, not just in the warmer months but year round in order to try to get a handle on these particular problems that you're describing. But, again, I'm not going to promise you an easy solution to it, because it's not an easy solution to it, but we are using all the resources we do have at our disposal. And it's not a budgetary issue as much as it is just consistency in terms of our targeting and our enforcement. But people then have to be able to stand up and support us when we do that, because as soon as you stop two or three people, then somebody is calling up beefing that we're profiling somebody or we're doing whatever, harassing them and this, that and the other, and that becomes a different issue. So what we need is real community support. Not halfway, but full support. That doesn't give officers the right to 327 4/6/10 - WHOLE - BILL 100115, etc. do things illegally or improperly, but certainly if people understand what you're doing, why you're doing it, then we certainly need the community support as well.
So you don't see us needing any other type of legislative or policy to allow us to do greater enforcement? COMMISSIONER RAMSEY: There could be, but loitering is a difficult thing, because loitering ordinances in many jurisdictions have been struck down as being unconstitutional. So there's a lot of things you can pass. Whether they withstand any kind of legal test is a different issue. It's very hard. That's been a problem for decades, not just here but a lot of different places when you start locking people up for standing on a corner if there's nothing else associated with it. Our Deputy Mayor here is nodding his head in the affirmative. 328 4/6/10 - WHOLE - BILL 100115, etc.
I'm a civil liberties person, but I think that we've taken that to the extreme where we have neighborhoods that -- COMMISSIONER RAMSEY: I understand.
This has to stop. COMMISSIONER RAMSEY: Believe me, I'm with you. I understand, but we have to work within the law.
Well, that's what I'm saying, what other hammers do you need? And I guess I've not seen anything different about what other types of hammers we might potentially be able to use or don't have that we need to use to tackle this problem. So that's what I'm looking for. And I think the PSAs will get us some better dialogue with the community and stuff, but ultimately -- DEPUTY
The key, Councilwoman -- Deputy Mayor Everett Gillison. The key, Councilwoman, really is where you're coming back. We have the tools basically, but the key to anyone taking back, quote/unquote, the community that they live in is to be involved in it, to be seen in it and to work with the Police to make sure that we go and get the kind of community that we want to live in. And when people get frustrated and stay inside, then we get what we have. If people get frustrated and come outside and work with the Police and really just make their presence known, the PSAs that we're trying to really flesh out, that's how we end up getting back having the community that we all want. So that's really it. I mean, I understand the frustration. I can hear it in your 330 4/6/10 - WHOLE - BILL 100115, etc. voice. Believe me, I understand it.
I've threatened to take Ramsey and the Mayor by with me. One of these days I'm going to pick you guys up. And I know Captain Wright knows all the corners, because they're still there -- or Commissioner Wright. They're still there. I just think that we need to think of something. DEPUTY
It's alternatives. Sometimes depending on who those persons are, if they've been there for ten years, those guys ain't going to leave. But if you kind of can cut off the young ones, if we aim and have the strategy, which I believe we do, to get the young ones and get them out, then you actually -- you can actually deal with that, but we have to have the community support. That's really what it's about, and that's what the PSA entire model is.
For instance, when you take certain corners that we know, we lock up some of the 331 4/6/10 - WHOLE - BILL 100115, etc. middle guys, they lease out the corner. I mean, the fact that you have folks who can talk about this industry in a way that you sublet a corner out because so-and-so is in jail and all these direct connections, it's just very frustrating, because I know information about stuff that I wish I never knew, and I just feel like it's too clear out there for us not to be able to tackle. I just want to be helpful and I just think if we have the tools, then let's use then. If we don't have the tools and there's something else we need to add, then I'd like to know about that, because I want to be an advocate. I just think that this has been unacceptable. And I represent a district where there are corners that people just know. And so we have to -- we're using all the tools, whether it's the take-outs and using our enforcement when licenses come up. I mean, I'm doing everything I possibly can in every other way. So I'm just saying, if there's 332 4/6/10 - WHOLE - BILL 100115, etc. something else, then we need to be doing it. I don't know what that is, but I just think that it's unacceptable. And sometimes I get this notion of if we contain it in one area, then that's fine and then everything else is fine and not consider the people in those areas. Because that's what I see sometimes, our strategy becomes you contain it, so you put a camera here -- by the way, I don't have a quarter of the cameras this guy has. So I'm just looking for those. And if we want to ask businesses to participate by doing cameras, then let's talk about that. If we can provide tax incentives to do that, then we want to do that here in Council. We want to give you all those additional tools, but there has to be this sense of urgency on this. I mean, I've only been in office two years. It's just very difficult, and I don't know what else to do to help you do that. 333 4/6/10 - WHOLE - BILL 100115, etc. COMMISSIONER RAMSEY: Well, one thing, too, I just want to make sure that it is understood by everybody, we don't think crime is fine anywhere and it's not acceptable anywhere. It's more difficult to eradicate in some places than it is other places because it's so deeply engrained, but it's not okay. And if we've got a situation where you've got somebody who is leasing space to sell drugs or doing other things, there are federal laws that we can then start to use, because now you're talking about organized criminal conspiracies and things of that nature. So we can kick it up to another level. But, again, it takes information from the public in order to be able to build those kinds of cases, but it is doable. But we certainly don't think it's okay in any neighborhood to have that sort of thing going on. We really don't. But it's really going to take neighborhoods to help us take neighborhoods back. 334 4/6/10 - WHOLE - BILL 100115, etc.
You're welcome. The Chair recognizes Councilman Greenlee.
Thank you, Madam President. Quickly, I just had a question regarding the relationship with -- I was thinking particularly of PHA police, but some of the others, SEPTA police, university police. Is there some kind of special working relationship there or is there something when a call comes in, say, at a PHA facility, that they have like a special way to get to the police or do they -- does the PHA officer have to just call 9-1-1? COMMISSIONER RAMSEY: Well, PHA, unfortunately, had such severe cutbacks in their workforce that there just aren't that many of them. So we do work together, but, quite frankly, it's 335 4/6/10 - WHOLE - BILL 100115, etc. just not enough of them to be able to cover the number of units and areas that they need to cover. That's just reality. So we do have a working relationship, but a lot of it does fall on us, simply because they just can't handle it. We do work very closely with SEPTA on a regular basis. There's always a lot of issues that involve SEPTA, whether we're talking about crime committed on SEPTA or on a platform or just transporting, for an example, again, these large groups of kids that have suddenly popped up different places. They get there by public transportation. So working with SEPTA to let us know when they see unusual numbers of people on the line getting off at a particular area, let us know, give us a heads-up, because that could be the beginnings of something like that and we get a jump on it. So we do have a very, very good relationship with both PHA and with SEPTA and other law enforcement agencies. I've 336 4/6/10 - WHOLE - BILL 100115, etc. only been here a couple years myself and I'm really very pleased with the amount of cooperation we have both in the City and regionally.
Again, I'm thinking a university like Temple University. COMMISSIONER RAMSEY: University police. In fact, Temple, University of Pennsylvania, I mean, these are sizable departments and they're a huge help to us in the neighborhoods that they're located in. They take a tremendous burden off us, and we do a lot of coordinated crime-fighting.
What arresting ability do some of these entities -- and I've seen -- SEPTA police can actually arrest somebody, right? COMMISSIONER RAMSEY: Yeah. Yeah.
Can these other entities do that? COMMISSIONER RAMSEY: Yes, they 337 4/6/10 - WHOLE - BILL 100115, etc. can.
You're welcome. The last but not least, Councilman Clarke.
Thank you, Madam President. Just real quickly. Follow-up on Councilwoman Sanchez's question earlier, and, Commissioner, you may remember. My understanding in Chicago there was a law passed ten years ago that designated corners -- there was a term and it was documented corners for gang activity -- COMMISSIONER RAMSEY: Right, gang corners.
-- that allowed the police proactively to move people based on the designation of this corner. Did that end up passing muster? 338 4/6/10 - WHOLE - BILL 100115, etc. COMMISSIONER RAMSEY: I don't know if it was upheld over time. It was when I left. It was the gang ordinance 5 they called it, and it required -- you had to document certain areas and crime that had taken place over time at that area. When you went there, you had to provide warnings to individuals to get off the corner or be subject to arrest. I think you had to warn them two times or so, or else they'd be subject to arrest. If they moved, then you couldn't do anything to them. If they didn't move and you came back, then you could. But that was called the gang ordinance. I've been away from Chicago now 12 years, so I'm not quite sure if that's still active or not, but that's one you might want to consider at least looking into. And it did work in many of the more troubled areas. There was a lot of background work you had to do, but that's okay, because it's pretty well documented. Like Councilwoman Sanchez is 339 4/6/10 - WHOLE - BILL 100115, etc. saying, some of these corners, it's not like it goes away or that you can't easily document what's going on. But, yeah, that was a pretty good ordinance.
Okay. Yeah. I remember at one point we were considering it here, but there was no 9 appetite for -- bottom line, I couldn't get nine votes for it, so it didn't pass. Real quickly, on the PSAs -- and I think it's actually a good model in terms of the intent. My understanding when I went to my first PSA meeting with Captain Cram -- it was a good meeting, a real good guy -- I got the impression that it was being driven by the Managing Director's Office. That's the way it was rolled out at the time, although the Police were taking a lead. COMMISSIONER RAMSEY: I understand where the confusion has come in. The 26th District happened to be a pilot for a variety of things that we were doing, and one of the things that 340 4/6/10 - WHOLE - BILL 100115, etc. the Managing Director wants to do is to take PSAs, Police Service Areas, and create public service areas where you not only have police geographically based, but all City services more geographically based, and we used the 26th District as a pilot for that. So when you had the meeting out there, when they say PSA, they were actually saying public service area, because that's where we started to try to have whether it was Streets, L&I, whatever it might be, to have some geographical accountability for delivering services as well. Now, that's the only district right now that is doing that, but we are looking at rolling that out, and other cities have found that's an effective way of delivering services in general, not just police services, but services in general, because then you can go to a specific person if you've got a specific area that's not being taken care of properly and you know exactly who is 341 4/6/10 - WHOLE - BILL 100115, etc. responsible for it as opposed to larger areas where it's kind of hard to put your finger on a person who should be doing whatever it is you want them to do. So that's where the 26th District kind of came in a little bit and may have confused the situation.
Okay. And I like the concept of providing additional services, because, one, the people feel comfortable coming to the meeting because they know that the Police are going to be there, so you'll probably get a larger turnout, but, two, the ability to provide other alternatives, because at the end of the day, you can't turn a neighborhood around without providing all these other services. You can have as many police as you want. It will help. The 23rd District as an example, there's been a marked improvement. The reality is that we basically demolished half of the blighted community and built 300 brand new homes, 342 4/6/10 - WHOLE - BILL 100115, etc. and that's why, in large part, that district has changed, because the whole demographics and the environment has changed. So when I asked the question earlier, I was just thinking about our ability to interact if we expanded the PSAs to include potential job opportunities and educational opportunities, because at the end of the day, these young guys, they don't have anything else to do. They want a job, but they're not adequately educated. I know hopefully in the next week or two we'll get notice from the stimulus program we're going to be able to hire 5,000 people on a temporary basis, but $13 an hour, you know, to do various things. I think it will be helpful to build that relationship with the people that are the problem, because you all have a good relationship with the people that are not the problem. They like the Police, the whole PDACS. I mean, they tend to be the same people that are block 343 4/6/10 - WHOLE - BILL 100115, etc. captains, committee people. It's the element that we can't figure out a way to get them in the room. So if we expand that to include things that these guys may be interested in, education or job opportunities or GEDs, whatever, if we can incorporate that into the PSA to kind of build that relationship. Right now, speaking of the 26th, Captain Cram is trying to put the PAL in Hartranft School. Unfortunately, for whatever reason, the school is trying to charge him. And I'm going to deal with that. That's kind of bizarre. But I'm saying, that's already building a positive relationship with the guys that more likely would be in a situation where they might be a challenge. So if we can look at that in a more aggressive way, I'd be willing -- I mean, housing services, I know the Housing Authority is thinking about creating a program where we can provide housing opportunities to 344 4/6/10 - WHOLE - BILL 100115, etc. some men, because at the end of the day, we've always focused on women, and that's important, but at the end of the day, maybe if you get this guy a house somewhere, a unit, he might be a little more productive and be more responsible. You know what I mean? So I'd like to see, if it's all possible, we can work together and expand that PSA model to incorporate some of those other things. COMMISSIONER RAMSEY: I look forward to it. I think you're on the right track. I think it's absolutely the way to go.
Yes. Councilwoman Sanchez. 345 4/6/10 - WHOLE - BILL 100115, etc.
I had asked Deputy Mayor Gillison, so for the record, I want to ask it for the Police Department. We've had some challenges obviously with the payment of police as it relates to special events. So I wanted for the record to ask, in the case of police expenses, does the Phillies, the Eagles, concert promoters, do they pay dollar for dollar for police time? DEPUTY
I want to see that. What's the agreement with the Eagles and stuff? Don't they take care of everything inside and we take care of everything outside? DEPUTY
I've been working on the interpretation of the both Phillies, Eagles, Sixers, whatever. We are working. There has been a 346 4/6/10 - WHOLE - BILL 100115, etc. historic agreement where they pay full time for officers basically to work on the inside and then on the outside, then there was -- we used to bill them for the traffic flows on the outside. We have changed our approach to it, where we're now trying to provide as many straight-time officers, consistent with our change in policies this year, and then they are only being asked to pick up the overtime. But depending on the force and depending on the availability of officers, that number sometimes goes up, because we don't have officers for straight time. They have to basically purchase the services for overtime.
Yes, it is. I'm trying to get it into a formula so that I'll be able to just give that to everybody and across the board everybody will be able to see that, but I'm still working on the specifics for all the 347 4/6/10 - WHOLE - BILL 100115, etc. agreements to make sure that each of the agreements represent the intent of what I'm trying to get done. So the answer is, yes, it is dollar for dollar and it applies to everyone.
Okay. If you could supply a table to that effect, because I'd like to see what they pay. DEPUTY
I'm still working on the table that you gave me to work on. So I'm working on all that, Councilwoman. Thank you very much.
Thank you. Any further questions from members of the Committee? (No response.)
Seeing none, thank you very much. COMMISSIONER RAMSEY: Thank you, ma'am. 348 4/6/10 - WHOLE - BILL 100115, etc.
You've been extremely, extremely patient. COMMISSIONER RAMSEY: Thank you.
Thank you. This Committee will stand in recess until tomorrow morning, Wednesday, April the 7th at 10:00 a.m. Thank you all very much. (Committee of the Whole recessed at 5:05 p.m.) - - - 349 CERTIFICATE I HEREBY CERTIFY that the proceedings, evidence and objections are contained fully and accurately in the stenographic notes taken by me upon the foregoing matter on April 6, 2010, and that this is a true and correct transcript of same. ______________________________ MICHELE L. MURPHY RPR-Notary Public (The foregoing certification of this transcript does not apply to any reproduction of the same by any means, unless under the direct control and/or supervision of the certifying reporter.)