civus
Minutes

Committee Hearing, May 4, 2009

Philadelphia City Council Committee HearingsMay 4, 2009

People mentioned

Names our system found in this transcript. Automatically extracted, so it can include anyone named in the record, not only officials or parties.

COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PHILADELPHIA2 COMMITTEE OF THE WHOLE - - - Room 400, City Hall4 Philadelphia, Pennsylvania Monday, May 4, 2009, 10:20 a.m.5 - - - Res. 090226 - Approval of revised Five-Year7 Financial Plan covering FY 2010 through 2014. Bill 090212 - FY '10-'15 Capital Program. Bill 090213 - FY '10 Capital Budget. Bill 090214 - FY '10 Operating Budget. COUNCILMEMBERS PRESENT: Anna C. Verna, Chair Marian B. Tasco, Co-Chair14 Jannie C. Blackwell Blondell Reynolds-Brown15 Darrell L. Clarke Wilson W. Goode, Jr.16 Bill Green William K. Greenlee17 Curtis Jones, Jr. James F. Kenney18 Donna Reed Miller Brian J. O'Neill19 Frank Rizzo Maria Quiñones-Sanchez20 - - - V A R A L L O Incorporated Litigation Support Specialists23 1835 Market Street, Suite 600 Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 1910324 215.561.2220 215.567.2670 2 5/4/09 COMM. OF THE WHOLE - FISCAL '10 BUDGET1

Council President Verna

Good2 morning, everyone. This is a continued3 public hearing of the Committee of the4 Whole.5 The first department to6 testify...7 MR. McPHERSON: ... will be the8 City Representative's Office.9 (Witness comes forward.)10

Council President Verna

Good11 morning.12

Ms. Johnson

Good morning.13 COUNCIL PRESIDENT VERNA:14 Kindly identify yourself for the record15 and proceed with your testimony.16

Ms. Johnson

18 Good morning, Council President19 Verna and members of Council. I am here20 to present testimony on behalf of the21 Office of the City Representative FY '1022 Operating Budget request of $1,137,491,23 which is a decrease of $4,225,022 over24 FY '09 obligations. This budget request25 5/4/09 COMM. The Office of the City5 Representative is responsible for6 developing and promoting events to7 attract commerce, visitors, and new8 residents to Philadelphia and improving9 the quality of life for the people who10 live here. 13 The City Representative, under14 City Charter, is a member of the Mayor's15 Cabinet. The Office of the City16 Representative handles:17 Marketing, promotions, and18 branding internally and externally;19 international protocol; special events;20 ceremonial events; ceremonial documents,21 3,000 produced annually; ceremonial22 gifts, 4,000 presented annually; public23 relations; photographic services;24 presentations; and also oversees the Fund25 4 5/4/09 COMM. 9 In the November 200810 rebalancing, the Department of the City11 Representative eliminated two positions12 that were vacant, and notwithstanding the13 reduction to its workforce, this office14 has been able to carry out some important15 accomplishments in FY '09. Some examples16 are:17 Coordinate a strategy with the18 Mayor's Office to assist with public19 relations and marketing efforts for20 issue-based programs for seniors,21 mortgage foreclosure, hunger, and the22 education campaigns for all ages;23 Infrastructure-enhancement24 programs and collaboration with Commerce25 5/4/09 COMM. 22 And we have maximized23 efficiencies by finding creative24 solutions to do more with less. We have25 6 5/4/09 COMM. OF THE WHOLE - FISCAL '10 BUDGET1 solicited engaged agencies to assist in2 our marketing efforts pro bono. percent over FY '0922 funding levels. The remainder, or23 $525,022, represents reduction over24 various classifications in this proposed25 5/4/09 COMM. 2 An analysis of the FY '103 budget by classification shows a decrease4 of $103,000 in Class 100, representing a5 reduction of workforce positions that6 occurred during the November 2008 FY '097 rebalancing. 10 Class 200 will be reduced by11 43 percent from FY '10 to $544,833. 17 Class 300 and 400 combined will18 be reduced by 10 percent from FY '09 to19 $72,250. These cuts will result in less20 resources across the board that help to21 support the basics operations of this22 department and our constituents such as23 ceremonial documents and presentation24 offerings, publications, office supplies,25 8 5/4/09 COMM. 2 Our office had planned to hire3 an in-house graphic designer who would be4 able to save the City significant money5 by providing graphic design support to6 all City departments. 21 Annually, we receive more than22 3,000 requests for documents and 4,00023 for gifts, including the ones provided24 for dignitaries. If Plan B occurs, we25 9 5/4/09 COMM. OF THE WHOLE - FISCAL '10 BUDGET1 will have to revise the policy even more2 than we are currently to provide these3 services. 5 Thank you for the opportunity6 to testify before you. 8

Council President Verna

Thank9 you very much.10 The Chair recognizes Councilman11 Jones.12

Councilman Jones

Thank you,13 Madam President.14 Good morning, Miss Johnson.15 How are you this year?16

Ms. Johnson

I'm doing well.17 Thank you, Councilman.18

Councilman Jones

Good, good,19 good.20 I wanted to just take a moment21 to thank you, and I didn't see it in your22 testimony or hear it, but you, based on23 the budget and based on the recession,24 have probably been besieged with a number25 10 5/4/09 COMM. OF THE WHOLE - FISCAL '10 BUDGET1 of additional expenses by way of parades2 and requests for assistance.3 I would also say that we4 probably, in this city, came a lot closer5 to cancelling worthwhile events than we6 care to know in the public but, but for7 your work, along with the Managing8 Director's Office along and others that9 formed ad hoc teams that individually10 saved these events.11 And I wanted to recognize also12 Congressman Brady, who most recently13 saved the Bike Race in the City of14 Philadelphia by bringing new sponsors to15 the table.16 Could you elaborate on what the17 behind-the-scenes efforts have been to18 save parades from the Bike Race to the19 Mummers to the Marathon to the Greek20 Parade to the Hispanic Parade that we21 have, ethnic parades, that we have around22 the City and what went into that effort23 to save them?24

Ms. Johnson

Certainly.25 11 5/4/09 COMM. OF THE WHOLE - FISCAL '10 BUDGET1 There's a task force of different2 departments that have something to do3 with special events throughout the City,4 and that task force meets individually5 with the organizers of the different6 events so that we can look at exactly7 what they need, what their services are.8 None of these events in the9 past have ever paid for City services.10 So we absolutely understand from the11 beginning that it's kind of a sticker12 shock for them when they see a bill that13 they've never seen before. So we try to14 work with them to produce an event that15 still gives them what they want but16 provides them with a lower cost as much17 as we can without messing up safety.18 So that's basically what we do.19 We sit down and we talk to them. And all20 of the departments, from the MDO's Office21 to Fairmount Park, just try and work with22 them to come up with a good plan that23 helps everyone.24

Councilman Jones

So what we25 12 5/4/09 COMM. OF THE WHOLE - FISCAL '10 BUDGET1 do now versus what we used to do before2 we kind of did this service, whether it3 was Police, Fire, Sanitation, cleaning up4 after a parade almost gratis for the most5 part, and now we're itemizing each one of6 those expenses and kind of presenting7 them with a bill in order for them to8 understand what it costs us to provide9 it.10 Now, granted, we get in return11 positive public relations. I can't12 imagine what 4th of July does for the13 image of the City, but we also get hotel14 nights' tax that we get from that, so we15 have to kind of balance that out in a16 mathematical way to make sure that we're17 getting the proper return on our18 investment.19

Ms. Johnson

Absolutely.20 Because of the current budget problems21 that we have, we've worked, as I said,22 with the different individual organizers23 of different events -- the Bike Race24 being one of them, as well as the St.25 13 5/4/09 COMM. OF THE WHOLE - FISCAL '10 BUDGET1 Patrick's Day Parade was one of the2 first, the Mummers -- to try and figure3 out exactly we can still make these4 events happen because they're such a core5 part of Philadelphia.6 And Welcome America, it's7 little different. That's an event that8 we produce from my office, and we try to9 come up with different marketing ideas10 and figure out more sponsorship.11 And also, last year, when we12 first did it, we -- the total of the cost13 of producing that event was about14 3 million. We cut a million dollars from15 that budget to bring it in at about16 2.1 million. This year, we're trying to17 do the same. We've made some really good18 changes that help in cutting some costs.19 And we also came up with a marketing plan20 for the hotels that puts some money back21 into Welcome America and also gives them22 a opportunity to be promoted nationally.23 I'm not sure if you heard, but24 Channel 6 announced who our talent for25 14 5/4/09 COMM. OF THE WHOLE - FISCAL '10 BUDGET1 the July 4th concert would be for this2 year, and that's Cheryl Crowe.3 (Timer bell rings.)4

Councilman Jones

Now, having5 said all of that, you know, the Dell6 isn't opening again this year.7

Councilman Jones

So we should9 anticipate from your shop a concert10 series? Or are we going to have to cut11 that?12

Ms. Johnson

I believe that's13 going to be cut, Councilman.14

Councilman Jones

Okay.15 Finally, we, as "the Freshmen 15,"16 offered no swag, no kinds of gifts and17 stuff like that. But, however, under18 full disclosure, we had a group Chinese19 business people ready to relocate here,20 and your office was very helpful in21 making sure they understood that the City22 of Philadelphia, even though we were23 poor, somehow found a way to welcome24 them.25 15 5/4/09 COMM. OF THE WHOLE - FISCAL '10 BUDGET1 And as a result of that, I want2 you to know that that small gesture meant3 so much that they are considering opening4 a plant here in the City of Philadelphia.5 So I just want to give and put6 into context that what the City Rep's7 Office does by the way of hospitality8 also sometimes every now and then results9 in new business coming to the City of10 Philadelphia, which means new tax11 ratables for the City. And I want to12 thank your office for cooperating with13 that.14 Also, the public relations that15 went into supporting the Senior16 Foreclosure Diversion Program that helps17 thousands of citizens take advantage of18 programs that are germane to them to keep19 them in their houses. And you don't get20 enough credit for your participation in21 that. And I wanted to thank you publicly22 for it, Miss Johnson.23

Ms. Johnson

Thank you.24

Councilman Jones

Thank you,25 16 5/4/09 COMM. OF THE WHOLE - FISCAL '10 BUDGET1 Madam Chair.2 COUNCIL PRESIDENT VERNA:3 You're welcome.4 The Chair recognizes5 Councilwoman Tasco.6

Councilwoman Tasco

Thank you.7 I join in with my appreciation8 for the work that you do and as9 Councilman Jones has laid out and wish,10 you know, that you will continue. I know11 that you will continue to do what you do12 very well.13 On Page, I guess, 2 of your14 testimony, you talked about Plan B. You15 wanted to hire a graphic designer, a16 in-house graphic designer.17 Has there been any cost18 analysis to show that it's more19 cost-effective to bring that person20 in-house as opposed to hiring consultants21 or contracting that out, given the fact22 you have to have staffing for that23 position plus location and all of that24 cost.25 17 5/4/09 COMM. OF THE WHOLE - FISCAL '10 BUDGET1

Ms. Johnson

We haven't done2 anything formally, but we pretty much3 know how much we spend when we use an4 outside vendor for graphic services.5

Councilwoman Tasco

Mm-hmm.6

Ms. Johnson

And those7 services -- even if we bring a graphic8 designer in, we would still need to do9 some outside but certainly not as much,10 but that graphic designer would be able11 to give more services to other City12 departments.13 We helped create the brochure14 that went out for the foreclosure15 program, and we worked with other16 departments to build up these collateral17 materials, but there's no formal cost18 analysis as to what could be saved at19 this time.20

Councilwoman Tasco

Okay.21 Now, you said you have ten people on your22 staff now?23

Ms. Johnson

We have seven,24 but there's also the Fund for25 18 5/4/09 COMM. OF THE WHOLE - FISCAL '10 BUDGET1 Philadelphia, which is a part of my2 department, which adds three other3 people. There are three vacant4 positions, which brings it to ten.5 And also, we do the Welcome6 America and the Marathon, so they have7 staff which are consultants for8 part-time. Well, they're full-time, but9 only for a short period of time.10

Councilwoman Tasco

So the11 Office of Cultural -- the Cultural12 Fund -- wait a minute. The Office of...13

Ms. Johnson

The Office of14 Arts and Culture?15

Councilwoman Tasco

Yeah, the16 Office of Arts and Culture and the17 Creative Economy, are you all located in18 the same facility?19

Ms. Johnson

No. Their office20 is here, on the seventh floor.21

Councilwoman Tasco

So why22 aren't you all sort of like together, in23 one location.24

Ms. Johnson

That's the way it25 19 5/4/09 COMM. OF THE WHOLE - FISCAL '10 BUDGET1 was set up when they set it up, my office2 being over in 1515 Arch. And when they3 hired someone for the Office of Arts and4 Culture, they're a part of the Mayor's5 Office, so they're located in this6 building.7

Councilwoman Tasco

But do you8 work together on projects and events --9

Ms. Johnson

We do --10

Councilwoman Tasco

-- or just11 the planning for cultural events in the12 City?13

Ms. Johnson

We haven't done14 anything formally. We do -- they have a15 monthly meeting where a member, one of my16 deputies, sits on that committee. And17 Gary and I, who run that department, we18 speak occasionally about some of the19 things that we're doing; for instance,20 something that we might be trying to21 create, a Mayor's Award for the Arts, and22 so forth.23 So we try to keep each other up24 to date on what's going on in each of our25 20 5/4/09 COMM. OF THE WHOLE - FISCAL '10 BUDGET1 departments.2

Councilwoman Tasco

Okay.3 Thank you very much.4

Ms. Johnson

Thank you.5

Council President Verna

Thank6 you.7 The Chair recognizes Councilman8 Green.9

Councilman Green

Thank you,10 Madam Chair.11 I have a question that goes12 back to our Majority Leader's question13 about the graphic designer. Could you14 show me where in Class 200 for FY '0915 you're spending money on the graphic16 designer on outside services?17

Ms. Johnson

Most of that18 money comes from the promotion and19 marketing, which was $175,000, which sits20 in the Fund for Philadelphia --21

Councilman Green

Okay.22

Ms. Johnson

-- which is the23 money for promotions and marketing for24 the City of Philadelphia.25 21 5/4/09 COMM. OF THE WHOLE - FISCAL '10 BUDGET1

Councilman Green

Okay. So --2

Ms. Johnson

And that's where3 that money is usually taken from when we4 decide to use it for graphic design.5

Councilman Green

So how much6 of that Fund for Philadelphia money was7 used for graphic design?8

Ms. Johnson

It depends,9 Councilman. We use some of that from --10

Councilman Green

Well, so far11 this year, how much?12

Ms. Johnson

I don't have an13 answer for your specifically.14

Councilman Green

Okay. I15 note that you're lowering the Fund for16 Philadelphia by $27,500 yet you're hiring17 a graphic designer for $84,000, including18 fringe benefits.19

Ms. Johnson

Actually, we20 haven't hired the graphic designer; it's21 a vacant position in my office. And22 since there's a freeze currently, I don't23 believe that we will be able to do that24 anytime soon.25 22 5/4/09 COMM. OF THE WHOLE - FISCAL '10 BUDGET1

Councilman Green

Oh, I'm2 sorry. So --3

Ms. Johnson

And we4 wouldn't --5

Councilman Green

So if we6 took out the graphic designer from your7 budget, it would not impact your8 operations. In other words, you don't9 intend to hire it, so why would we fund10 it?11

Ms. Johnson

I didn't say that12 we didn't intend to hire; I said that we13 have not been given permission to do that14 hire yet.15 As I said in the testimony, I16 believe that we could eventually save17 money if we had a graphic designer and18 didn't have to outsource. We work with a19 number of different agencies. We've been20 able to do some pro bono to get some of21 that work done.22 But we have someone that may be23 on retainer that we're spending money on24 for us to do this work if we had it25 23 5/4/09 COMM. OF THE WHOLE - FISCAL '10 BUDGET1 in-house.2

Councilman Green

You've3 issued RFPs for graphic design work?4

Councilman Green

Do you know6 what you're paying on an hourly basis?7

Ms. Johnson

Nothing from the8 General Fund. At the moment, we're9 paying a retainer of about $5,000 through10 the Marathon.11

Councilman Green

Through12 the...?13

Ms. Johnson

Philadelphia14 Marathon.15

Councilman Green

I'm sorry.16 You just testified that it was being paid17 through the Fund for Philadelphia. I'm18 very confused.19

Ms. Johnson

The Fund for20 Philadelphia runs the Philadelphia21 Marathon.22

Councilman Green

Okay.23

Ms. Johnson

And we pay money24 from the Philadelphia Marathon for a25 24 5/4/09 COMM. OF THE WHOLE - FISCAL '10 BUDGET1 graphic design company, about $5,000 a2 month for a retainer.3

Councilman Green

So that's a4 $5000-a-month retainer. Do we exceed the5 retainer in any month?6

Ms. Johnson

Not usually, no.7 We try our very best to keep it under8 that. It's usually on a hourly basis so9 we'll know how many hours each month we10 have.11

Councilman Green

Do you use12 all of the hours that you are billed for?13

Ms. Johnson

Do we use -- yes,14 we do, because we use it not only for the15 marathon, but for other things, yes.16

Councilman Green

Okay. Would17 you please provide all of the detail18 surrounding that contract, how much you19 spend, how much hours of service they20 provide at each month. And we'll take a21 look at that.22

Ms. Johnson

Certainly.23 And so that you understand,24 Councilman, that's not General Fund money25 25 5/4/09 COMM. OF THE WHOLE - FISCAL '10 BUDGET1 at all.2

Councilman Green

But you --3 but a graphic designer on your staff4 would be General Fund money.5

Ms. Johnson

Yes, it would.6

Councilman Green

Okay.7 That's rather the point.8

Ms. Johnson

And I'll9 certainly get that to you as soon as I10 can.11

Councilman Green

Thank you.12

Council President Verna

Point13 of information, please.14 Does the General Fund15 contribute anything for the Fund for16 Philadelphia?17

Council President Verna

No19 City dollars go into that whatsoever?20

Ms. Johnson

Only through when21 they get a grant. But, no, we don't --22 they're not City employees at all.23 There are three people that24 work in that office, but no City funds25 26 5/4/09 COMM. OF THE WHOLE - FISCAL '10 BUDGET1 are used -- no general funds are used for2 the Fund for Philadelphia.3

Council President Verna

Thank4 you.5 Go ahead, Councilman.6

Councilman Green

Thank you.7 Could you please -- I happen8 to -- I have a lot of constituency that's9 very different, all the different ethnic10 parades, and they've dealt with your11 office along the lines that Councilman12 Jones has discussed.13 The estimates that were given14 to some of these parades, given their15 size and other things, are very large.16 It's hard to see how they can continue17 traditions that have sometimes gone back,18 you know, over a hundred years.19 Could you please, for each20 parade that's happened so far this year,21 provide the original amount requested and22 the detail that would back that up in23 terms of the number of police, the24 sanitation workers, et cetera.25 27 5/4/09 COMM. OF THE WHOLE - FISCAL '10 BUDGET1 Then provide the amount that2 was actually agreed to, the specific3 number of police, sanitation, and other4 that were committed to be on that event5 that went into that calculation.6 And then the actual number of7 police, sanitation workers, others that8 were at that event and whether or not9 they were on overtime or on straight time10 when they attended the event.11 Because I think our goal here12 is to recover our costs. And based on13 the count of police officers I saw at the14 St. Patrick's Day parade, they were being15 charged for far more police officers than16 were actually present on the street.17 So I'm very interested in the18 detail of how you do these calculations,19 and I want to make sure that we get some20 reimbursement, but I also don't think we21 should be trying to make a profit off of22 these different activities.23

Ms. Johnson

Certainly.24

Councilman Green

Thank you.25 28 5/4/09 COMM. OF THE WHOLE - FISCAL '10 BUDGET1 You discuss the Infrastructure2 Enhancement Program. Can you describe3 what this is.4

Ms. Johnson

We work with a5 number of different organizations. The6 budget for the promotion and marketing in7 the City of Philadelphia doesn't allow us8 to do a whole lot, so we work with9 outside organizations such as PCVB,10 GPTMC, Center City District.11 (Timer bell rings.)12

Ms. Johnson

All of these13 organizations -- and Greater Select14 Philadelphia -- that basically promote15 the City of Philadelphia.16 And there is a core group that17 has a monthly, sometimes more, meeting to18 determine exactly how they're marketing19 so that the City has a say and the City20 has a place so that we can help with the21 marketing with the little resources that22 we do have.23 So that's basically what that24 means.25 29 5/4/09 COMM. OF THE WHOLE - FISCAL '10 BUDGET1

Councilman Green

Okay. So it2 meets monthly. Are minutes kept of those3 meetings?4

Councilman Green

Can you6 describe any particular changes that were7 made to GPTMC or Center City District or8 Pennsylvania Conventioneers Visitors9 Bureau that -- in their marketing efforts10 that were a result of your meeting with11 those offices?12

Ms. Johnson

They had a --13 GPTMC put together a committee from14 outside organizations, including our15 office, to talk about the new program16 that they're getting ready to launch, I17 believe, actually tomorrow. And everyone18 there sat down and looked at a number of19 different -- a number of different20 programs to determine which department21 and which -- which program would be used22 for the promotion of Philadelphia through23 their summer program.24 So that's something that has25 30 5/4/09 COMM. OF THE WHOLE - FISCAL '10 BUDGET1 happened. And the Mayor is actually2 going to be a part of that as well.3 So our presence allowed us to4 have a say as to what the program that5 they would use for their marketing6 efforts were for this year.7

Councilman Green

Who in your8 office is responsible for liaising with9 these organizations about what really are10 Philadelphia tax dollars being spent with11 respect to GPTMC and others --12

Ms. Johnson

It depends.13

Councilman Green

-- on14 marketing.15

Ms. Johnson

All of us, all of16 us. We all sit on different committees.17 We all interact with the different18 organizations.19 I have a deputy who basically20 does all marketing and public relations,21 and she sits on a lot of those22 committees, as do I and as do the other23 deputy who does logistics for events. So24 we all are basically --25 31 5/4/09 COMM. OF THE WHOLE - FISCAL '10 BUDGET1

Councilman Green

Who's in2 charge of that activity?3

Ms. Johnson

That would be me.4

Councilman Green

You, okay.5 Do you have a chart -- please6 provide a chart to the Chair that shows7 the different boards your people sit on,8 what those boards do, and the activities9 of those boards.10 That's the end of my time,11 Madam President.12

Council President Verna

Thank13 you.14 The Chair recognizes Councilman15 Blackwell.16

Councilwoman Blackwell

Thank17 you, Madam President.18 I am hopeful that, given all of19 these cuts, that many of the programs we20 enjoy will survive.21 We do want to thank the City22 Rep and her deputy for helping us with23 our myriad programs we have and24 especially for people who come out of the25 32 5/4/09 COMM. OF THE WHOLE - FISCAL '10 BUDGET1 City, state, and country.2 Thank you very much.3

Ms. Johnson

Thank you,4 Councilwoman.5

Council President Verna

The6 Chair recognizes Councilman Green.7

Councilman Green

Thank you,8 Madam President.9 You also testified that the10 duties of the Office of the City11 Representative include handling12 marketing, promotions, and branding13 internally and externally. The proposed14 FY '10 budget includes 3 million in15 strategic marketing fees as to the FY '0916 budget.17 Is this -- could you describe18 what strategic marketing fees are and --19

Ms. Johnson

I'm sorry. Where20 are you reading from, Councilman?21

Councilman Green

Well, in22 your testimony, you stated that you were23 in charge of handling marketing24 promotions and branding internally and25 33 5/4/09 COMM. OF THE WHOLE - FISCAL '10 BUDGET1 externally. In the budget, there are 32 million that we should receive for3 strategic marketing fees?4

Ms. Johnson

In the budget,5 you said, that there's 3 million for6 marketing fees?7

Councilman Green

Strategic8 marketing fees, revenue we should receive9 as a city. And I'm wondering what10 involvement you have in that, if any.11

Ms. Johnson

Are you talking12 about the Cultural Fund, the 3.7 million13 for that?14

Councilman Green

No. It's on15 the MDO's budget. It's on of the16 budget detail.17

Ms. Johnson

I don't believe18 that's in my budget, Councilman.19

Councilman Green

No, but it's20 marketing, and it's a revenue side item.21 It's not in your budget.22 I'm asking what your -- you're23 supposed to be handling marketing,24 promotions and branding internally and25 34 5/4/09 COMM. OF THE WHOLE - FISCAL '10 BUDGET1 externally, and I'm wondering what2 connection, relationship you've had with3 respect to that $3 million.4

Ms. Johnson

I don't know that5 $3 million because it's not in my budget.6

Councilman Green

Okay. So7 the MDO's Office hasn't involved you in8 the strategic marketing that they're9 under -- revenue ideas that they're10 undertaking.11

Ms. Johnson

There is a12 connection between my office and the13 MDO's Office for Special Events. I'm14 also involved with the MDO's Office in15 terms of a RFP that we're putting out to16 look at what the City may offer in terms17 of promotion of our assets; for instance18 Dilworth Plaza, courtyard, how we can19 look at those as an ability for us to20 promote that but also market it and make21 revenue from it, if that answers your22 question.23 But as far as $3 million, it's24 not in my budget so I'm not aware of what25 35 5/4/09 COMM. OF THE WHOLE - FISCAL '10 BUDGET1 that is. If that's specifically for2 marketing out of MDO's Office, then yes,3 I am still a part of the MDO's Office; we4 do work together on those two things that5 I just told you.6

Councilman Green

Okay. So I7 think this is probably street furniture8 and other things.9

Ms. Johnson

Okay.10

Councilman Green

Are you11 involved in that?12

Ms. Johnson

I am not, no.13

Councilman Green

Okay. Well,14 those are all of my questions. I have a15 few more questions; I'll submit them in16 writing to you so that we don't take more17 time on this.18 But I just want to say that I19 think your office does a terrific job.20 Part of our job here is to try to find21 savings and money.22

Ms. Johnson

Absolutely.23

Councilman Green

I think,24 through your testimony, we found at least25 36 5/4/09 COMM. OF THE WHOLE - FISCAL '10 BUDGET1 $84,000.2

Ms. Johnson

No, my graphic3 designer.4

Councilman Green

That's it.5

Ms. Johnson

Yeah. (Laughs.)6

Councilman Green

And I7 appreciate the work that you and your8 team does for the City of Philadelphia.9 You represent us very well. And, you10 know, it's nice to see you here today.11 Thank you.12

Ms. Johnson

Thank you,13 Councilwoman.14

Council President Verna

Thank15 you.16 The Chair recognizes Councilman17 Jones.18

Councilman Jones

Just a point19 of information. How many events did you20 have last year?21

Ms. Johnson

Wow. I don't22 know. Probably over 20.23

Councilman Jones

Have you had24 any major --25 37 5/4/09 COMM. OF THE WHOLE - FISCAL '10 BUDGET1

Ms. Johnson

Plus the2 Phillies.3

Councilman Jones

Which was4 probably a record-setting parade.5

Ms. Johnson

Oh, yes.6

Councilman Jones

Foe pass in7 any of those events.8

Ms. Johnson

I think we9 produced them very well and most people10 were satisfied.11

Councilman Jones

Thank you12 very much just for the record.13

Council President Verna

Are14 there any other questions from members of15 the committee?16 (No further questions.)17

Council President Verna

Thank18 you very much.19

Ms. Johnson

Thank you,20 Councilwoman.21

Council President Verna

Thank22 you.23 MR. McPHERSON: The next24 department is the Commerce Department.25 38 5/4/09 COMM. OF THE WHOLE - FISCAL '10 BUDGET1 (Witnesses come forward.)2

Council President Verna

Good3 morning. Please identify yourself for4 the record.5

Mr. Altman

Good morning. 8 Good morning. My name's Andy9 Altman. I'm the Deputy Mayor for10 Planning and Economic Development and the11 Director of Commerce. 20 Good morning, President Verna21 and members of the City Council. I am22 here to present testimony on behalf of23 the Department of Commerce's FY '1024 operating budget request of $262,550,773,25 39 5/4/09 COMM. OF THE WHOLE - FISCAL '10 BUDGET1 which is a net increase of $24,754,4482 over FY '09 obligations. 11 And $164,576,000 to the12 Aviation Fund. 5 million to the General23 Fund. Of this, 25 million is the24 Convention Center lease service fee,25 40 5/4/09 COMM. OF THE WHOLE - FISCAL '10 BUDGET1 which represents an increase of2 $2,347,478 over FY '09. The remaining3 $3,553,000 is a $209,000 decrease over4 '09. 18 The Department of Commerce's19 mission is to create and retain jobs by20 fostering and improving the business21 climate, growing the City's business22 sector, while increasing population and23 enhancing the quality of life through24 sustainable development with the City of25 41 5/4/09 COMM. OF THE WHOLE - FISCAL '10 BUDGET1 Philadelphia. All the work of the2 Department of Commerce takes place within3 the context of the Deputy Mayor's five4 economic development strategies:5 1. 7 2. 8 3. 11 4. 13 5. 20 In the rebalancing plan, the21 Department of Commerce had a reduction of22 10 employees as a result of the overall23 Department of Commerce reorganization, 824 were laid off, was transferred. And 125 42 5/4/09 COMM. OF THE WHOLE - FISCAL '10 BUDGET1 resigned. 5 Notwithstanding the reduction6 to its workforce, Commerce has been able7 to carry out some important8 accomplishments in FY '09, which include,9 but are not limited to:10 Establishing the Office of11 Business Services and appointing Kevin12 Dow. 18 We are integrating the Office19 of Economic Opportunity, formerly the20 Minority Enterprise Council, and with the21 Office of Economic Opportunity now a part22 of Commerce, we can better implement the23 goals and objectives of the Economic24 Opportunity Cabinet, most notably25 43 5/4/09 COMM. 14 We've been supporting efforts15 to increase the educational attainment16 levels of our citizens through the work17 of Graduate! Philadelphia. 24 And, finally, we've been25 44 5/4/09 COMM. OF THE WHOLE - FISCAL '10 BUDGET1 reorganizing the Penn's Landing2 Corporation into the Delaware River3 Waterfront Corporation, seating new board4 members, and making all board meetings5 open to the public. 11 FY '10 Budget Details in Plan12 A. 25 45 5/4/09 COMM. 6 And I just want to point out7 that the chart that we have submitted as8 a part of the testimony was our9 attempt -- 'cause we understand that the10 Commerce budget is often somewhat11 confusing 'cause we have, unlike other12 departments, so many different sources,13 and we wanted to put them in one place so14 you had the whole picture of sources for15 our staffing. 17 An analysis of the FY '1018 budget by classification shows an19 allocation $3,091,818 in Class 100, an20 increase of $1,065,000. The variance is21 a result of:22 The full FY '10 staffing costs23 attributed to the integration of the24 Office of Economic Opportunity, as they25 46 5/4/09 COMM. 10 Class 200 will be reduced by 2411 percent from FY '09 to $1,720,495. 18 Of particular note is the Class19 250 allocation that's provided through20 PIDC for the Department of Commerce21 business attraction and retention. 25 47 5/4/09 COMM. 4 Class 900 reflects a payment of5 $25 million in FY '10, consistent with6 the City's commitment to support the7 Pennsylvania Convention Center. 10 To improve operations, the11 Department of Commerce will seek to12 augment its services through13 integrational functions currently14 provided through the Philadelphia15 Commercial Development Corporation. 22 In so doing, Commerce will be23 able to eliminate redundant commercial24 corridor functions, refocus on core25 48 5/4/09 COMM. 8 Plan B.

Mr. Altman

If Plan B is9 implemented, it will result in an10 additional $794,405 in reductions to the11 Department's proposed FY '10 budget. 24 Reductions in Neighborhood and Business25 49 5/4/09 COMM. 11

Council President Verna

Thank12 you.13 Mr. Altman, can you tell us the14 amount of unspent Stimulus Funds that15 PIDC has.16

Mr. Altman

Unspent. I would17 have to -- Council Chair, I'm looking18 now -- I would have to do an account --19 let me do a full accounting of that and20 submit that for the record for you.21

Council President Verna

Thank22 you.23 While you're doing that, I24 would also like to have a detailed25 50 5/4/09 COMM. OF THE WHOLE - FISCAL '10 BUDGET1 breakdown of the Stimulus Funds that the2 City has given to PIDC.3 I would further like a4 breakdown, to be by fiscal year, of the5 amount that was awarded, the project that6 it went towards, and the benefits the7 City received from the project.8 Any funds that PIDC still has9 under contract and the status as to10 whether it's been committed to a project.11 If so, what is the status of that12 project. And can the City cancel its13 commitment and the amount of uncommitted14 funds?15 I know that all of this16 information would be readily available to17 you, and I would appreciate it if we18 could receive that information by the19 close of today's business.20

Mr. Altman

I, um...21

Council President Verna

You22 have all that information.23

Mr. Altman

I would have to24 work with PIDC to get the full accounting25 51 5/4/09 COMM. OF THE WHOLE - FISCAL '10 BUDGET1 of all that. I would --2

Council President Verna

Thank3 you. We would appreciate it if we could4 have it by the close of today's business.5 On -4 of your detail, it6 reflects a $580,966 increase for a7 consolidation of OEO. Can you explain8 the consolidation and what its funding9 level was in 2009?10

Mr. Altman

Yes. I'm sorry.11 Could you just repeat the page,12 Chairwoman? I'm sorry.13

Council President Verna

19-4.14

Mr. Altman

19-4. I'm just15 finding it in the book. Oh, here it is,16 Section 19-4. Got it.17 The $580,000 in total18 consolidation of OEO, which includes both19 Class 100 and Class 200, those are costs20 we are -- as you know, Chairwoman, we21 are -- the Office of Economic Opportunity22 is coming into the Department of23 Commerce. Now we are in the process of24 consolidating the staffing function into25 52 5/4/09 COMM. OF THE WHOLE - FISCAL '10 BUDGET1 Commerce.2 Those funds are paying for --3 there's -- I think it's basic -- it's4 essentially sort of administrative costs.5 I mean, the overall OEO funding has6 actually been reduced over time in terms7 of the consolidation in terms of -- let8 me just point out.9 If you look at the chart in my10 testimony, it shows the... the original11 funding let me just go through just to12 show you quickly 'cause I think the13 chart -- that's why we tried to put this14 in a chart that would be helpful.15 In '09, the General Fund for16 the Office of Economic Opportunity was17 about $1 million and had about 18 staff18 and one vacancy. With the rebalancing,19 that number went to 842,748, which is 1620 staff. And the Office of Economic21 Opportunity in the '10 budget -- and,22 again, this is just for staffing23 levels -- would be $772,468 which is 1524 staff.25 53 5/4/09 COMM. OF THE WHOLE - FISCAL '10 BUDGET1

Council President Verna

We're2 having a little difficulty in trying to3 figure this out.4

Mr. Altman

This is the5 staffing cost that was transferred to us6 estimated at mid-year of last year. And7 that has since, obviously then, been --8 that's the number that comes over to the9 Commerce Department in terms of staffing10 for our budget.11

Ms. Lewis

Council President,12 Sade Olanipekun-Lewis. May I provide a13 little clarity?14 You were requesting the15 $530,000 on .16

Council President Verna

Right.17

Ms. Lewis

Okay. That18 $530,000 represented what was believed to19 be the staffing costs for OEO. We've20 estimated that the true staffing costs21 for the half-year was going to be22 something a little bit less than. And23 then we annualized that, which is where24 you have th 842 on the chart in the25 54 5/4/09 COMM. OF THE WHOLE - FISCAL '10 BUDGET1 testimony, at 842,748.2 What we're trying to show in3 the chart is the full year of staff costs4 for OEO in FY '09, the rebalancing, and5 what we're projecting in FY '10, although6 the amount that was transferred to7 Commerce is an amount that's less than8 the annualized staffing cost as a result9 of it happening at mid-year.10 So those 530,000 -- the11 501,000, excuse me, that represents the12 Class 100 transfer was an estimated cost13 that was transferred to Commerce to cover14 staffing costs for OEO.15

Council President Verna

You16 know, it's got me a little confused, and17 it doesn't take much to confuse me these18 days.19

Mr. Altman

No, it's the20 budget -- it's the --21

Council President Verna

In22 FY '09, you had a staff of 16, with no23 vacancies, and the General Fund amount24 was 842,000, okay?25 55 5/4/09 COMM. OF THE WHOLE - FISCAL '10 BUDGET1

Mr. Altman

Mm-hmm.2

Council President Verna

For3 '10, there's one less employee, and we4 have a staff of 15.5

Mr. Altman

That's right.7

Council President Verna

With8 772,000.9

Council President Verna

And I11 just don't understand that.12

Mr. Altman

Well, the13 reduction -- so, in terms of the number14 of the reduction, it goes from -- so, as15 you said, in '09, with the rebalancing,16 you had 842,000.17 Within '10 what we're18 projecting, what is in the budget, is19 772,000. So it reduces by one staff.20 There are also -- there are21 some costs in there of different, you22 know, different positions that have had,23 you know, step increases over time.24 There's an overall adjustment so that25 56 5/4/09 COMM. OF THE WHOLE - FISCAL '10 BUDGET1 that number nets out. It is less and it2 does reflect a reduction of the, you3 know, 25, you know, close to $70,000.4 So that's a staff -- you know,5 it's a loss of a staff position. It's a6 staff position.7 And there's a little bit of an8 add back in. At the end of the day, it's9 $70,000 of the reduction.10

Council President Verna

All11 right, thank you.12 On -4, you're requesting13 an increase of $751,000 in Class 100 in14 the Community Development Fund. Is this15 request for new hires or to transfer16 existing employees?17

Mr. Altman

Yeah, it's --18 it's -- it is a combination of both. The19 answer to it -- again I'd like to -- the20 way we tried to make some sense of21 this -- and I say that because we22 recognize that our budget is a bit23 confusing --24 COUNCIL PRESIDENT VERNA:25 57 5/4/09 COMM. OF THE WHOLE - FISCAL '10 BUDGET1 Complex.2

Mr. Altman

-- because there3 are so many sources. And, in fact, when4 we went through this budget, you have to5 go through and say, Some are community6 development sources, some are General7 Fund sources, some are other sources --8

Council President Verna

Right.9

Mr. Altman

-- hotel tax.10 Commerce has always had this myriad of --11 let me just refer, 'cause I think it will12 be helpful back to the chart, which we13 tried to do in our testimony to help make14 this as clear as possible.15 And just, Chairwoman, what I16 wanted to do -- the reason we did this17 chart, which may be a bit unusual in18 testimony --19 COUNCIL PRESIDENT VERNA:20 Mm-hmm.21

Mr. Altman

-- is to22 recognize, when you go through the23 budget, as you're doing, the line by24 line --25 58 5/4/09 COMM. OF THE WHOLE - FISCAL '10 BUDGET1

Council President Verna

Right.2

Mr. Altman

You have to kind3 of put together and say, What is the4 picture of what Commerce is? So here's5 the story in a nutshell.6 If you see on the chart, FY '097 rebalancing, CDBG goes from Community8 Development Block Grant, goes from9 287,245; and then in '10, 1,038,416.10 That's the difference you're talking11 about is, what is that increase and how12 is it reflected in our budget?13 At the end, because we are14 doing consolidations here, at the end of15 the day, we will have 50 positions in16 Commerce that will be funded from General17 Fund, Community Block Grant, or other.18 So you see that it's, at the end, a net19 increase of 1.20 So the answer to your question21 is: There may be some new hires in the22 consolidation, there may be some23 reductions in the consolidation, but the24 net of the addition of the money is not25 59 5/4/09 COMM. OF THE WHOLE - FISCAL '10 BUDGET1 all new staff, because what's happening2 is, as you can see in the chart, Block3 Grant dollars go up, but other sources4 are reduced.5 And that's the balancing.6 Essentially, Block Grant money will be7 paid for different staffing that are8 Block Grant-eligible.9

Council President Verna

Thank10 you.11 I have one last question.12 There may be more, and I see that a13 number of Councilmembers want to be14 recognized.15 However, on -5, you show16 an increase of $5,250,000 in Classes 30017 and 400 for Environmental Initiatives.18 Can you explain what this is and where19 these funds are budgeted?20

Mr. Altman

I believe...21

Ms. Lewis

What page? I'm22 sorry.23

Council President Verna

19-5.24

Ms. Lewis

That's Aviation.25 60 5/4/09 COMM. OF THE WHOLE - FISCAL '10 BUDGET1

Mr. Altman

I'm just looking,2 Councilwoman, I'm sorry. It may be in --3 I'm -- I'm -- it may be in Aviation.4 I'm just checking 'cause in my5 Commerce budget detail, I don't have6 that, which means I may have taken that7 out because Aviation was going to testify8 to that.9 Let me come back to that. I'm10 happy to -- if you have it, I'm happy to11 look at it.12 Yeah, Councilmember, this is in13 Aviation, which will be testifying later.14 It used to be within Commerce. Aviation15 is no longer within Commerce anymore.16

Council President Verna

Okay.17 The Chair recognizes Councilman Goode.18

Councilman Goode

Thank you,19 Madam President.20 Good morning, Mr. Altman.21

Mr. Altman

Good morning.22

Councilman Goode

I actually23 have questions for the Office of Economic24 Opportunity, but before they come25 61 5/4/09 COMM. OF THE WHOLE - FISCAL '10 BUDGET1 forward, could you give me a brief update2 on the Loan Guarantee Program and the new3 Job Creation Tax Credit?4

Mr. Altman

Yes. Thank you,5 Councilmember.6 On the Loan Guarantee Program,7 as you know, we are very happy to report8 progress on that. As you know, thanks to9 the legislation that you sponsored and10 your, I think, vigilance in seeing that11 program get up and running last week, we12 announced with you and with two banks in13 Philadelphia, Valley Green and United,14 that there will be a launch of that15 program.16 And with the Industrial17 Development Corporation, we'll be18 investing about a million dollars of its19 funds in that program, which we think20 will leverage dollar-for-dollar21 small-business lending. The two banks22 were doing that as a demonstration23 project to be able to provide access to24 capital to small businesses.25 62 5/4/09 COMM. OF THE WHOLE - FISCAL '10 BUDGET1 So what this will allow -- and2 we think this is a really exciting3 initiative -- is banks to take a bit more4 risk to reach a group of businesses in5 our neighborhoods that may have been on6 the margin, that need a little bit more7 assistance, but are viable businesses,8 and to reach them. And we hope that,9 should that be successful, we'll be able10 to expand that.11 So I do acknowledge that you12 were -- a year ago, that was one of the13 items you put on our agenda, and we're14 very happy that it's worked out. We15 would obviously love the larger banks to16 participate, and we hope by demonstrating17 success with the smaller banks that it18 will build momentum.19 In terms of the Job Creation20 Tax Credit, the Finance Office has just21 completed -- they had committed to22 complete their analysis of the current23 program. They have had the Wharton24 School, through Robert Inman, doing an25 63 5/4/09 COMM. OF THE WHOLE - FISCAL '10 BUDGET1 analysis of actual users of the program2 to learn about where the defects are,3 where it has been effective, and how many4 jobs really have been created as a result5 of the program, sort of the "but-for"6 test. And they have literally just7 completed that.8 And we would like to sit down9 with you and go over it. I think they10 just delivered the results last week. I11 think it will be a foundation for us12 to -- at the hearing that you had on this13 and your proposed modifications to it,14 for us to sit down and, I think, design a15 more effective program within the next16 two to three weeks.17

Councilman Goode

Okay. I'd18 like to do that as soon as possible.19

Councilman Goode

In terms of21 the Office of Economic Opportunity, I22 have a question about departmental23 goal-setting. I don't know who would24 want to take that question.25 64 5/4/09 COMM. OF THE WHOLE - FISCAL '10 BUDGET1

Mr. Dow

I'll take it.2

Councilman Goode

Okay.3 During the course of budget hearings for4 each department, there's been an issue,5 which, I'm sure, Councilwoman Brown is6 going to follow up on with regard to7 departmental goal-setting, but one of the8 original problems we had when we did the9 Charter change and called for an annual10 disparity study and then participating11 goals on an annual basis was that the12 first set of annual participation goals13 that were set were not actually based14 upon the disparity study, and that was an15 issue with how MBEC set participation16 goals.17 We resolved that issue18 somewhat, and we actually asked the19 consultant who conducted the disparity20 study to make recommendations on21 participation goals, which happened in22 terms of the overall goals.23 But the issue is, the24 participation goals set on an annual25 65 5/4/09 COMM. OF THE WHOLE - FISCAL '10 BUDGET1 basis per the Charter mandate, do they2 actually correspond to the departmental3 goal- setting? because they don't seem4 to.5

Mr. Dow

Well, we -- my name6 is Kevin Dow. I'm the Deputy Commerce7 Director for Neighborhood and Business8 Services.9 And the disparity goals that10 you're referring to, an eConsult study,11 and whether or not they line up to the12 Charter; is that what your question is?13

Councilman Goode

Whether the14 overall disparity goals set for15 disadvantaged businesses, minority16 business, for women businesses or City17 goals, whether they actually line up and18 correspond to departmental goal-setting.19

Mr. Dow

Mm-hmm, mm-hmm. The20 candid answer is that we have not done a21 good job on that in the years past. And22 for '08 into '09 for this current year,23 we and MBEC, now OEO, established those24 goals based on historical information and25 66 5/4/09 COMM. OF THE WHOLE - FISCAL '10 BUDGET1 attainment levels.2 So we took the '08 numbers into3 '09, and that's the goals that we have4 established for that year.5

Councilman Goode

So the6 departmental goal-setting was simply7 based upon what happened before, and they8 were not necessarily accurate.9

Mr. Dow

Well, the accuracy10 was reflected in the Fiscal Year '0811 numbers, so I would say that there was12 conversations that took place, and MBEC13 worked with those departments in '08. We14 did not do that going into '09. And so,15 what we took was the numbers from '08 to16 '09.17 So I would say that the18 accuracy that was there for '08 was what19 we have.20

Councilman Goode

Let me give21 you a glaring example of it.22 Under your departmental23 testimony, it says that the Commerce24 Department itself did zero percent25 67 5/4/09 COMM. OF THE WHOLE - FISCAL '10 BUDGET1 because it did no contracting; is that2 true?3

Mr. Dow

Which department?4

Mr. Altman

Commerce.5

Councilman Goode

The Commerce6 Department.7

Mr. Dow

Oh, Commerce. Yes,8 I'm sorry, I didn't hear you.9 I'm looking for my chart here.10 Yes, that is correct. And the reason why11 we had zero participation --12 (Timer bell rings.)13

Mr. Dow

-- was because we14 track only for-profit contracts and --15

Councilman Goode

But what16 were the goals --17

Councilman Goode

But what19 were to goals set for the Commerce20 Department?21

Mr. Dow

42, 42 percent.23

Councilman Goode

So how can24 the goals be set for 42 percent and then25 68 5/4/09 COMM. OF THE WHOLE - FISCAL '10 BUDGET1 there be zero percent participation?2

Mr. Dow

Because in previous3 years -- because in '08 and previous4 years '07 and further back, we had levels5 of participation at that level. And so,6 it was carried forward because there was7 no strong conversation between8 departments and MBEC in this year, and so9 we just carried it forward.10

Councilman Goode

I'll come11 back. I don't believe you've ever12 achieved 42 percent. I don't believe a13 42 percent goal was ever real, and this14 is a very serious issue with regard to15 departmental goal-setting.16

Mr. Dow

Sure, sure.17

Councilman Goode

Okay. Thank18 you.19 Thank you, Madam Chair.20 COUNCIL PRESIDENT VERNA:21 You're welcome.22 The Chair recognizes Councilman23 Rizzo.24

Councilman Rizzo

Thank you,25 69 5/4/09 COMM. OF THE WHOLE - FISCAL '10 BUDGET1 Madam Chair.2 Good morning. I'd like to get3 started by letting you know how much I4 appreciate in the last year the numerous5 occasions I've had to interact with your6 team, with your organization. It's been7 really a good experience, they're very8 quick to respond, and so I just wanted9 you to know that.10 Also, you alluded to the Penn's11 Landing Corporation, the new organization12 down there. Similarly, I've had a really13 good experience with Joe Brooks and the14 people down there. So anytime there's15 issues in the near community, problems16 that exist with concerts, et cetera, that17 organization has also been very18 responsive.19 The couple of questions that I20 have is, do we have an inventory -- based21 on our financial condition right now, do22 we have an inventory of available land,23 excluding Fairmount Park land, that we24 should really start to get serious and25 70 5/4/09 COMM. OF THE WHOLE - FISCAL '10 BUDGET1 dispose of to fill up the General Fund2 with some of that money?3 Do we know -- do we have a list4 of all of this real estate that the City5 has clear title to?6 Because I've had so many people7 tell me that they have tried to buy the8 little lot next door to them that is9 owned by the City. We're not -- in this10 day and age, I don't think we should be11 investors of real estate. And so, where12 it's appropriate, where it fits into the13 community design, I think we should start14 putting some of this stuff up for sale.15

Mr. Altman

Yeah. And the16 answer, Councilmember, is that that is17 coming together. There have been --18 there are number of different sources --19 I guess two really principal sources of20 where land is held -- I mean -- let me21 say three.22 I mean, one is the RDA clearly.23 The second is Public Property, and then24 PIDC has some industrial parcels25 71 5/4/09 COMM. OF THE WHOLE - FISCAL '10 BUDGET1 remaining.2 We are -- we do have a merged3 list now of those properties that's being4 worked on between RDA and Public5 Property. The question of clear title6 may be always a little more complicated7 as we go through that list to see what8 other liens or anything's on that, but I9 think we're getting a good handle.10 I couldn't give you that number11 today of how many parcels, but I could12 get back to you and tell you.13

Councilman Rizzo

I think14 that's an important question.15

Councilman Rizzo

Because many17 people, especially people trying to buy18 some land in their neighborhood, the19 prices have gotten so expensive that20 they're backing away from it, and I think21 that we've got to get real, got to get22 realistic on what some of this is worth,23 because I'd rather have someone buy it24 that's going to protect it, take care of25 72 5/4/09 COMM. OF THE WHOLE - FISCAL '10 BUDGET1 it, develop it maybe some time in the2 future.3 But some of the numbers that4 people are telling me that we're asking5 for this property -- I guess RDA -- it's6 out of reach. And guess what? It just7 becomes another dirty piece of property8 in the community because many of those9 folks have basically given up.10

Mr. Altman

Understood, yes.11 I agree.12

Councilman Rizzo

Let me see.13 And I did say excluding Fairmount Park;14 I'm not in favor of starting to --15

Mr. Altman

Yeah, 9,000 acres,16 I don't think we'll probably want to17 touch that.18

Councilman Rizzo

Realistic,19 there has been some noncontiguous land20 that the Fairmount Park has sold in21 recent years, that the Fairmount Park22 said it doesn't serve us any use, because23 it's not connected to our acreage. And24 they have on occasion, I understand,25 73 5/4/09 COMM. OF THE WHOLE - FISCAL '10 BUDGET1 disposed of some land.2 But how can we get a real feel3 for what we have? Are you able4 eventually to -- and, again, I don't want5 to burden you with a lot of requests that6 take a lot of time, but I think it's7 important to know what is available8 because we, as members of City Council,9 run into people all the time that are10 interested, but they feel as though it's11 really a tough approach --12

Mr. Altman

I agree.13

Councilman Rizzo

-- trying to14 buy something that they understand that15 the City of Philadelphia owns.16

Mr. Altman

We can make the --17 it is a bit of a work in progress, but18 are -- we do have a consolidated list of19 public property and RDA, and RDA is sort20 of leading the charge and putting21 together a land disposition policy and22 looking at all of our vacant property23 right now but -- so we'd be happy to -- I24 can provide you with what we have.25 74 5/4/09 COMM. OF THE WHOLE - FISCAL '10 BUDGET1

Councilman Rizzo

I think it2 would be interesting.3

Councilman Green

Point of5 information.6

Council President Verna

The7 Chair recognizes Councilman Green for a8 point of information.9

Councilman Green

Thank you,10 Madam Chair.11 I guess it's still "good12 morning," Mr. Altman.13 If you could please provide to14 the Chair just a data merge of all of the15 properties that you say that you have now16 compiled in one list with the BRT17 full-value estimates of those properties.18 We've asked many times -- you19 know, a question that's been asked of20 every department that's sort of under21 your jurisdiction that's been here is:22 What are these values worth? what are the23 properties worth? You know, let's start24 selling them, let's see what they're25 75 5/4/09 COMM. OF THE WHOLE - FISCAL '10 BUDGET1 worth.2 And the answer we've gotten is,3 "We don't know what they're worth. We4 don't do" --5

Councilman Green

Basically,7 we haven't done appraisals on all 5500.8

Mr. Altman

That's right.9

Councilman Green

But, lucky10 for us, the BRT just did, and they have11 an estimate of full value -- of what they12 would be worth at full value.13 And so, if we could get that14 data merge to the Chair as quickly as15 possible. I'm sure the Department of16 Technology can handle it; if they can't,17 I'm happy to consult.18

Councilman Rizzo

Thank you,19 Madam Chair.20 So, again, thank you. You have21 a lot on your plate, and I appreciate22 always the relationship my office has23 with yours.24

Mr. Altman

Thank you.25 76 5/4/09 COMM. OF THE WHOLE - FISCAL '10 BUDGET1

Councilman Rizzo

Thank you.2

Council President Verna

Thank3 you.4 The Chair recognizes Councilman5 Jones.6

Councilman Jones

Thank you,7 Madam President.8 And good -- is it still9 morning? Good morning.10 A couple of questions. One,11 what is the current CDBG allocation to12 the City of Philadelphia?13

Mr. Altman

The total?14

Councilman Jones

Yes.15

Mr. Altman

I don't have the16 exact number. I want to say it's...17

Councilman Jones

And Part 218 to that question -- because I've learned19 how to work these questions and not wait20 for your answers but keep asking21 questions.22 The Part 2 of that is: What23 percentage of that CDBG allocation goes24 to economic development?25 77 5/4/09 COMM. OF THE WHOLE - FISCAL '10 BUDGET1

Mr. Altman

Yeah, I would have2 to get you the precise numbers. I want3 to say it's about 60-ish million dollars4 allocation per year and per the5 consolidated plan. And I'll get you a6 breakdown of that.7

Councilman Jones

And8 historically, it's been about 79 percent --10

Councilman Jones

-- dedicated12 out of that total to economic13 development. So if that's wrong correct14 me, but that's been the historical norm.15 I want to thank you, first of16 all, because I wrote questions to you as17 follow-ups last year, and I actually did18 get responses to them, which is a good19 thing, because it makes these sessions go20 much better.21 And in one of the responses, I22 want to put on the record is that out23 of -- I asked a question of how many24 recognized commercial corridors that were25 78 5/4/09 COMM. OF THE WHOLE - FISCAL '10 BUDGET1 in the City of Philadelphia, and the2 answer, according to the Planning3 Commission, is 265, for which about4 $5 billion in tax revenue or economic5 development revenue in general is6 generated, of which that total, 187 of7 those corridors are basically8 neighborhood corridors, which leads me to9 my question.10 What is our strategy for11 neighborhood economic development in12 coordination with EOC? And I want to13 kind of get a sense of where we're going14 on the record 'cause I kind of have a15 sense of it, but I want to hear it on the16 record, I want to hear the rationale.17 Because all of my colleagues18 here, including the at-large ones,19 represent these commercial corridors.20 And it's important to us. We get more21 comments and criticisms and concerns22 about neighborhood corridors, although we23 are responsible for the entire city, but24 we get more responses to that.25 79 5/4/09 COMM. OF THE WHOLE - FISCAL '10 BUDGET1 So I want to know what the2 strategy basically is to deal with those3 issues.4

Mr. Altman

Sure. Thank you,5 Councilmember.6 Let me just give you not a very7 long answer 'cause we've had many8 discussions, but --9

Councilman Jones

Your answer10 can take as long as it wants.11

Mr. Altman

Oh, okay.12 First of all, let me say that13 one of the things that we are very much14 looking forward to over the next, I would15 say, six or seven months is that we still16 have remaining and allocated -- I want to17 say of the Cultural and Commercial18 Corridor bond money, probably over19 $30-some million that will be going out20 to commercial corridors throughout the21 City to complete that bond issue and22 those are all streetscape improvements,23 façade improvements, you know, working24 with the Councilmembers in each of their25 80 5/4/09 COMM. OF THE WHOLE - FISCAL '10 BUDGET1 districts.2 And, you know, we've sat down3 over the past month to go through where4 we are. And I think we feel pretty5 confident that we're on track. Those6 have to be spent pursuant to the bond7 requirements, and I think we're on track8 to do that in large part.9 So I would say that over the10 next -- as I said, you know, that's a11 short term in terms of where a lot of our12 focus and energy is on the commercial13 corridors is to make sure that those14 funds are spent, they're spent well on15 those projects, and that those dollars16 are hitting the street.17 And we're working, as you know,18 with community development organizations19 everywhere, from Girard Avenue to Ogontz20 to Frankford to Lansdowne across the21 City.22 In a bigger-picture sense, I23 mean, what we're trying to do, in looking24 at where Commerce is going and in25 81 5/4/09 COMM. OF THE WHOLE - FISCAL '10 BUDGET1 bringing together in Commerce different2 elements of what we think really promotes3 neighborhood economic development, and,4 obviously then, commercial corridors.5 So Commerce, the Office of6 Economic Opportunity and PCDC, the7 Commercial Development Corporation, we8 see as really three very critical9 entities. And the coming together of10 those entities, what we believe it will11 allow us to do is to have a very12 integrated approach to neighborhood13 economic development.14 So what do I mean be that? It15 means that we want to move with a couple16 of things. One, that it's clear that17 Commerce would be -- I don't want to --18 "one-stop shop" is so overused, but a19 point of contact where you could say, if20 I'm interested in small business21 development in the City, who do I call?22 Councilmember Clarke has asked this in23 some of our hearings before.24 There are lofts organizations25 82 5/4/09 COMM. OF THE WHOLE - FISCAL '10 BUDGET1 in the City, it's been very fragmented2 for lots of different reasons. Without3 anything negative about any organization,4 who do I call? So the point of entry5 and, this past year, bringing Kevin Dow6 on board to be that single point of7 contact.8 Now, once you're in the system,9 what are we trying to do? One, we want10 to connect contracting and opportunities.11 So having the Office of Economic12 Opportunity be not only a --13 (Timer bell rings.)14

Mr. Altman

-- regulatory15 body, where, clearly, you have issues,16 which I know we're going to discuss, but17 --18

Councilman Jones

Uh, hold --19

Mr. Altman

You said I could20 take as long as I wanted but --21

Councilman Jones

No, no, you22 could take as long as you want.23

Mr. Altman

I'll just take24 another minutes.25 83 5/4/09 COMM. OF THE WHOLE - FISCAL '10 BUDGET1

Councilman Jones

Charlie2 McPherson is wicked with that bell, and I3 just wanted to have you, in your answer,4 speak specifically to a growth process --5

Councilman Jones

-- of a firm7 that comes in in one form in PCDC. How8 do they mature, what kind of TA, what9 kind of contract opportunities, a10 holistic treatment, if you would --11

Mr. Altman

Right.12

Councilman Jones

-- of a13 small business.14

Mr. Altman

Right.15

Councilman Jones

-- and how16 are they going to receive that --17

Councilman Jones

-- is, I19 guess, kind of my --20 (Indiscernible; parties talking21 over each other.)22

Mr. Altman

I'll finish this23 really quickly just so everyone has a24 picture 'cause the answer is reflected in25 84 5/4/09 COMM. OF THE WHOLE - FISCAL '10 BUDGET1 what we're trying to do in this budget,2 which is to say, Okay, you have basically3 these three legs. You've got the4 one-stop, you know, Commerce. We have5 OEO, as part of Commerce, which we want6 to move to connecting contracting7 opportunities, supporting small8 businesses in those contracting9 opportunities, and clearly, which is the10 discussion we're going to have, being11 better about setting goals and targets12 and being aggressive and having a system13 that has had many problems in the past,14 that we want to fix.15 But the goal by having it in16 Commerce is not just how we say, What is17 your goal? X-percent, but how do we help18 you get there?19 So the technical assistance and20 the support, and that's where also the21 PCDC comes in terms of integration with22 Commerce 'cause the small-business23 technical assistance helping you, whether24 it's how to grow your business, how to25 85 5/4/09 COMM. OF THE WHOLE - FISCAL '10 BUDGET1 take advantage of the contracting2 opportunity.3 So all those services could be4 available in one place for a small5 business in the City. And so, if you're6 a small business that comes in the door7 and you say, "I want to grow," we would8 then be able to offer you, I would say, a9 set of services okay?10 So things like what11 Councilmember Goode mentioned before:12 What are the loan products that we might13 have available? Do we need to refer them14 for the Small Business Loan Guarantee15 Program? Okay, we have a place to go,16 PIDC and two banks. Maybe that's a17 possibility.18 Do I actually have financing19 lined up but I'm missing a gap? We have20 a gap financing product, which we put21 out, and we hope to do another round.22 Do I need help with licenses,23 getting through L&I? Okay, the business24 team, under Kevin, helps you work through25 86 5/4/09 COMM. OF THE WHOLE - FISCAL '10 BUDGET1 that process, get you to L&I or Planning2 or whatever it may be, to help you grow.3 Or I'm looking for4 opportunities, contracting opportunities.5 Great, we have the Office of Economic6 Opportunity, here's what we believe the7 contracting opportunities are in the next8 year, here's how you can access to it.9 If it's an issue of10 certification, if it's an issue of11 technical assistance, an issue of growth,12 we can help them.13 So the idea is, whether it's14 help in financial products, whether it's15 help with technical assistance, whether16 it's help with permitting and regulations17 or access to capital and access to18 opportunities, there's a place where you19 enter the system and we help you in20 whatever your needs are.21 And that's, at the end of the22 day, what we're trying to achieve by23 taking the different entities and pulling24 us all together into one operating25 87 5/4/09 COMM. OF THE WHOLE - FISCAL '10 BUDGET1 function.2

Councilman Jones

I can see3 you're trying to break down silos that4 may have traditionally been there. The5 key of it is how we track that.6 And are you prepared to say7 today that -- I will hold you accountable8 tomorrow -- that we're going to increase9 productivity?10

Councilman Jones

Are you12 prepared to --13

Councilman Jones

By how much?15

Mr. Altman

I'm looking at16 Kevin Dow, because I, then, of course,17 hold him accountable and you hold me18 accountable.19 (Laughter.)20

Mr. Altman

We do think we can21 increase efficiency -- "efficiency" is22 not the right term. Volume of the23 activity. We hope that we can get24 through another 15 to 20 percent in25 88 5/4/09 COMM. OF THE WHOLE - FISCAL '10 BUDGET1 volume in terms of increasing, you know,2 small-business activity. I can't say --3 you know, 'cause many businesses close,4 many businesses open, but I think in5 terms of the overall, you know, volume of6 activity, of working with small7 businesses, I think we can ramp up that8 number, and we're prepared to do that.9

Councilman Jones

All right.10 I'm going to quantify that with this:11 That you will provide to the Chair, the12 President, and members of Council what we13 did by way of gross net volume of PIDC,14 PCDC, what our contract attainment was15 for MBEC -- EOC, and then be able to say16 that this time next year, quantifiable,17 we will have 15 to 20 percent more18 overall?19

Mr. Altman

That's our hope.20

Councilman Jones

Is that a21 "yes"?22

Mr. Altman

That's our hope.23

Councilman Jones

Stenographer24 , underline that, please.25 89 5/4/09 COMM. OF THE WHOLE - FISCAL '10 BUDGET1

Mr. Altman

That's our hope.2

Mr. Dow

Let me help my boss3 and clarify that it's over a two-year4 period 'cause we realize that we have to5 ramp up, we have to get the structure in6 place.7

Mr. Altman

That's true.8

Mr. Dow

And then over that --9 from this point on, which would be 7-1 to10 two years, we would be able to achieve11 that goal, so it's not in one, absolute12 one year; it's over a two-year period.13

Councilman Jones

So we should14 see, on average, a 7 percent increase15 next year to get to the 15 to 20.16

Mr. Altman

Well, I see -- I17 look at it this way, which is that in the18 next year, we have a lot of work to do19 organizationally. I mean, to -- in20 fairness, I think that, you know, there's21 work of integrating these organizations22 and creating the system.23 We're doing a lot of things24 right now. We're creating a website for25 90 5/4/09 COMM. OF THE WHOLE - FISCAL '10 BUDGET1 business. We're consolidating functions.2 Yes, we would love to do that,3 but I think Kevin is right that we see4 that the next year is a ramping-up, and5 the following year, you'll see a real6 increase.7

Councilman Jones

The bottom8 line for me -- and I'll pass the mic --9 is that I understand that the Center City10 skyline is important, but there is more11 constituent involvement in my commercial12 corridors. And I never want to see the13 tail wag the dog, if you would, by way of14 that balance that has to be maintained by15 your office and then through the various16 support agencies that do that.17 And each year, I'm going to18 look to that kind of growth from a small-19 business perspective, because that's20 who's really paying the bucket of taxes21 for America and for the city in22 particular.23

Mr. Altman

And I would just24 comment on that --25 91 5/4/09 COMM. OF THE WHOLE - FISCAL '10 BUDGET1

Councilman Jones

Thank you,2 Madam Chair. I saw you getting ready to3 tell me "enough."4

Council President Verna

I5 was.6 (Laughter.)7

Councilman Jones

I'm8 beginning to anticipate.9 COUNCIL PRESIDENT VERNA:10 You're reading my mind now, huh?11 The Chair recognizes Councilman12 Green.13

Councilman Green

Thank you,14 Madam Chair.15 My questions, Mr. Altman,16 should not come as a surprise to you. If17 you could -- I've provided many of them18 in advance so that we could try to get19 some answers.20 Could you please provide21 details, including class amount and22 budget detail, in which the savings23 appear about -- savings that will follow24 from bringing PCDC functions within the25 92 5/4/09 COMM. OF THE WHOLE - FISCAL '10 BUDGET1 Commerce Department and PIDC?2

Mr. Altman

You -- I'm sorry,3 Councilmember. You would like us to4 submit that, or do you want me to answer5 --6

Councilman Green

Well, do you7 have -- I mean, if you --8

Mr. Altman

I can get back to9 you, I can provide that.10

Councilman Green

Okay. The11 key question related to, I think, the12 Council President's questions about13 savings and other things, and if you look14 at the chart in your testimony, and you15 go down 14 positions and that the16 spending only goes down by $350,000.17 So basically, if you look at18 Class 100 salary spending and staffing19 levels for the balance of FY '09 and20 through FY '10, can you provide the Chair21 a detailed breakdown of what the Commerce22 Department actually expects to spend in23 Class 100 spending only -- that is, only24 line 1 on of the budget detail in25 93 5/4/09 COMM. OF THE WHOLE - FISCAL '10 BUDGET1 FY '09.2 And descriptions of any3 positions that are currently vacant in4 the Department, the number of positions5 the department plans to have filled by6 the end of FY '09, and the projected7 Class 100 salary only spend for FY '098 based on current staffing levels as of9 May 1, 2009.10 And if you don't have that, we11 have that in writing for you.12

Mr. Altman

I'd be happy to13 (indiscernible).14

Councilman Green

Okay. On15 of the budget detail for the16 Commerce Department, it indicates 2217 people in the Department, 11 on the18 General Fund, and 11 on the Community19 Development Fund. Your written testimony20 indicates that the requested FY '1021 appropriations will fund a total of 6622 positions.23 And when we met with you the24 week before last, I think you said that25 94 5/4/09 COMM. OF THE WHOLE - FISCAL '10 BUDGET1 Commerce had approximately 42 staff2 members, with 19 from the General Fund.3 So I'm still trying to get a handle on4 how much staff Commerce has, their job5 duties and funding sources for their6 salaries.7 And I understand that this has8 to do with inherited staffing setups,9 reorganizations, et cetera, but for the10 sake of clarity, if you could provide a11 written chart, including:12 All Commerce Department staff13 and listings for each one, job title, job14 duties, departmental budgets funded from,15 with the cite to the section and page in16 the budget detail from which each staff17 person appears;18 For any staff not included in19 Commerce's budget, an explanation of the20 reason for inclusion on another21 department's budget;22 And whether the Administration23 plans to move the staff person to24 Commissioner's budget in FY '11, assuming25 95 5/4/09 COMM. OF THE WHOLE - FISCAL '10 BUDGET1 it's not there.2

Mr. Altman

Yes. We'd be3 happy to provide that.4 By the way, Councilmember, for5 clarification, I believe that what the6 budget shows are 33 positions. If you7 look -- at least if I look at the budget8 detail, it has 19 under Economic9 Development General, which is Section 19;10 it would be .11 And then I'm just looking to12 find the other number. Hold on one13 second. And under -- on , under14 the Community Development Fund, it shows15 another 14.16 So, anyway, but -- so it17 still -- it begs the same question, I18 understand.19

Councilman Green

Yeah. I --20

Mr. Altman

There are 33. So21 when I go back to our chart, our22 testimony, it says 66 --23

Councilman Green

Right.24

Mr. Altman

And I think 33 are25 96 5/4/09 COMM. OF THE WHOLE - FISCAL '10 BUDGET1 shown there are, 33. And, as you say,2 historically because they've either been3 on Managing Director's or Mayor's or4 PIDC. And we can give that you.5

Councilman Green

Great.6 So I've asked the Mayor's7 Office this question, but I'll ask you as8 well 'cause I think some people may be9 coming to you. Could you describe what's10 happening to the staff previously11 assigned to NTI?12

Councilman Green

And whether14 or not they're staying on the payroll?15

Councilman Green

What budget17 and salary positions are included in the18 FY '10 budget?19

Mr. Altman

Yes. The -- hold20 on one second here.21 The -- let me go through the22 numbers -- some -- the numbers, 'cause,23 again, it's not reflected in the detail,24 but let me give you the breakdown.25 97 5/4/09 COMM. OF THE WHOLE - FISCAL '10 BUDGET1

Councilman Green

And2 including -- can you point to the line3 item where their salaries are reflected?4

Mr. Altman

It's -- they were5 not in our budget; those had been carried6 in the Mayor's Office budget. Those now,7 as part of the new sources, that are8 coming together between Community9 Development Block Grant and General Fund10 and Revenues, some of those NTI staff11 have come off of what have been the12 Mayor's Office budget and onto our13 budget.14 So as of FY '10, there are15 about eleven staff that remain. Seven of16 what had been called "NTI staff" have17 been laid off, three resigned, and one18 was transferred, actually took a position19 at the Zoning Code Commission, as you20 know, so that leaves now eleven staff who21 now come onto the Commerce payroll, what22 had been NTI.23 And, by the way, I just want to24 say for the record that, you know, NTI25 98 5/4/09 COMM. OF THE WHOLE - FISCAL '10 BUDGET1 also -- what had been called "NTI staff,"2 many of those staff had been in Commerce3 under other programs.4 (Timer bell rings.)5

Mr. Altman

And then when NTI6 came on, we called it "NTI staff," but,7 really, many of them are performing core8 Commerce functions. So in NTI, many of9 those people are doing commercial10 corridor work. So many of the people in11 the Neighborhood Commercial Corridor unit12 actually had, at one time, been called13 "NTI."14 So that's --15

Councilman Green

So, in your16 response, if you don't have it now, just17 to close a loop on this one question, if18 you could point to the line item in the19 budget where their salaries are reflected20 and then provide a job description21 post-NTI job duties.22

Mr. Altman

It's not --23 Councilman, it's not reflected in any one24 place. So some of them are reflected25 99 5/4/09 COMM. OF THE WHOLE - FISCAL '10 BUDGET1 under the Community Development funding2 that I just outlined of the 14 positions,3 some are reflected in the General Fund4 funding, some are reflected in other5 sources.6

Councilman Green

Well, if you7 could just --8

Mr. Altman

So there's no one9 place, but I could give you --10

Councilman Green

Point to all11 lines --12

Mr. Altman

I mean, it's easy13 enough to do a chart and show where the14 sources of each position are.15

Councilman Green

Okay, thank16 you.17

Mr. Altman

Right.18

Council President Verna

Thank19 you.20 The Chair recognizes21 Councilwoman Blackwell.22

Councilwoman Blackwell

Thank23 you, Madam President.24 I wanted to talk a little bit25 100 5/4/09 COMM. OF THE WHOLE - FISCAL '10 BUDGET1 about and PCDC. I know we talked2 a little bit about it, but it's still3 been on my mind. And can you tell us how4 much money we save for making this5 change, how much money it saves in the6 budget?7

Mr. Altman

It's... It's --8 it's about -- and I'm looking to show the9 where -- the line item where this would10 actually -- I don't think it will11 really -- I'm just looking to see where12 the line item is, Councilmember.13

Councilwoman Blackwell

Thank14 you.15

Mr. Altman

Hold on. Let me16 just turn to it.17

Councilwoman Blackwell

Thank18 you.19

Mr. Altman

Yeah. I mean, I20 guess the closest number I could give21 you -- and I need to be honest, it would22 really be a question of not just of our23 office 'cause this really goes to an24 overall reallocation within the overall25 101 5/4/09 COMM. OF THE WHOLE - FISCAL '10 BUDGET1 budget. So it's really more of a2 question to the Budget Office.3 But I think at the end, on Page4 65, Section 19, if you see the number5 there under Class 100, A, it goes from --6 you'll see estimated obligations. The7 increase or decrease is about 751,000.8 Now, whether all of that is captured in9 the General Fund, again, we'd have to10 check with the budget.11 But that's the increase in the12 amount of dollars -- it's the increase in13 Community Development Block Grant dollars14 that would be used within Commerce.15

Councilwoman Blackwell

Yeah,16 I thought it was about half of that.17 And can you explain to us, who18 use PCDC a lot, what this -- how would19 this department look, what would it be20 like, and what would the change be like?21

Councilwoman Blackwell

And23 how will our constituents access these24 services?25 102 5/4/09 COMM. OF THE WHOLE - FISCAL '10 BUDGET1

Mr. Altman

Yes.2 Councilmember, as I was saying before,3 what they would see is that the Commerce4 Department would be assuming -- would be5 an integration into Commerce. We would6 be assuming the majority of those7 activities. So that's the process we're8 going through right now in discussions9 with PCDC.10 Your constituents would see11 that it would -- if you -- if someone12 were to ask you, Where do I go? you would13 say, for commercial corridors, for small14 business, for assistance, you would send15 them to the Department of Commerce, and16 that's where we would provide that17 activity. And we would still be18 providing those services to the19 neighborhoods.20 We actually hope that this will21 increase efficiency and, as Councilmember22 Jones wants to see the increase in23 volume, that we'll be able to give them a24 broader access to services through the25 103 5/4/09 COMM. OF THE WHOLE - FISCAL '10 BUDGET1 integration.2

Councilwoman Blackwell

I know3 I said it then, but we are concerned. I4 know your organization's been around a5 very long time, some 35 years, but we've6 finally gotten to the place where we feel7 that we have the ability to refer people,8 minority contractors and such, who don't9 know how to get themselves in order. A10 lot of times people need advice on --11 even though they have to prepare their12 paperwork, they need -- they need a13 conduit, like PCDC has been, between14 itself and PIDC, 'cause a lot of us have15 felt PIDC has been a little bit further16 along for some of these small businessmen17 who just don't know what to do, don't18 know how to prepare, and need somebody to19 just work with them on really a beginning20 level.21

Mr. Altman

Mm-hmm, yes. We22 don't intend to -- there -- that service23 will remain. I mean, there would be not24 any interruption.25 104 5/4/09 COMM. OF THE WHOLE - FISCAL '10 BUDGET1 What we're trying to do here is2 to actually enhance those services. So,3 as an example, to help the businesses4 that you're talking about, the technical5 assistance with PCDC has provided. We6 would continue to provide that.7 We would also be expanding that8 by having the Office of Economic9 Opportunity. That would also give access10 in one place for contracting and other11 access to opportunities.12 So we're trying to -- actually,13 Councilwoman, our goal here is to create14 this as simple as possible and to provide15 those services.16

Councilwoman Blackwell

Is it17 -- do we have to do it this year? I18 mean, couldn't we have some interim19 period before -- I assume that you won't20 be ready July 1.21 (Timer bell rings.)22

Councilwoman Blackwell

Could23 not we have some interim period for this24 to happen?25 105 5/4/09 COMM. OF THE WHOLE - FISCAL '10 BUDGET1

Mr. Altman

I think we2 believe, Councilmember, the best way to3 do it is to do it now and to do it all4 together.5 We don't think that it'll -- I6 mean, there -- we think that that's7 achievable. We think that there won't be8 a disruption in services by doing that.9 And we, in fact, think that that will10 create a lot of -- just a lot of clarity11 immediately, and that this is a good time12 to make those changes.13 And, Kevin, if you have14 anything to add.15

Councilwoman Blackwell

Well,16 finally, if we couldn't get a year leave17 time, could you provide to the Chair a18 summary of what this new program would19 look like?20

Mr. Altman

Oh, absolutely,21 absolutely.22

Councilwoman Blackwell

Thank23 you. Thank you.24

Councilwoman Tasco

Thank you,25 106 5/4/09 COMM. OF THE WHOLE - FISCAL '10 BUDGET1 Councilwoman Blackwell.2 I was going to follow up on3 that with the same question. What -- I'm4 interested too in the reorganizational5 structure of PCDC. What will their6 charge be, and then how will they fit7 into the PIDC structure?8 And then how do you split half9 between you and Commerce and PIDC? I10 mean, how does that all work?11

Mr. Altman

It's -- let me12 explain, 'cause I think it's a very good13 question.14 Most of -- if you think about15 the functions, you have three functions,16 PCDC: Commercial corridors, technical17 assistance, and lending, just in general18 terms.19 The -- the commercial corridors20 and technical assistance would come into21 the Commerce Department so that there is22 one place, as we said, where all23 commercial corridor assistance happens,24 where all technical assistance for small25 107 5/4/09 COMM. OF THE WHOLE - FISCAL '10 BUDGET1 businesses happens, where all access to2 opportunities and equal opportunity can3 happen.4 Lending would -- because5 Commerce does not do lending, we do it6 through third parties, the lending7 function would be a part of what PIDC8 would do. It would be a specific program9 within PIDC for that lending.10 So it would probably have --11 and we're just in discussions now and12 thinking about it -- maybe a specific13 subsidiary board within it just focused14 on the small-business lending. PIDC also15 has some small-business lending programs.16 So there would be a whole,17 again, range of loan products, all of18 which could go out on the street. They19 have the Emerging Loan Program, there'd20 be the Small-Business Lending Program.21 So there would be -- lending would be22 there. And all commercial corridor23 technical assistance, business assistance24 would all be in Commerce.25 108 5/4/09 COMM. OF THE WHOLE - FISCAL '10 BUDGET1 But you would come into2 Commerce -- let's say, for example,3 you're small business and, say, you know,4 you'd sit down with us. And as I said5 before, we would say, you know, What are6 your needs? And they may sit down with7 us and say, My need is, I need loans to8 help me with operating capital or working9 capital. Great. We would refer them10 over, here's the place to go, go to PIDC,11 and there's a small business group there12 that could make those loans.13 If they need technical14 assistance on the corridors, we'd provide15 that to them, as I said.16 So there would be a point of17 access, and I think it would be a very18 clear system.19

Councilwoman Tasco

Well,20 where will the current -- how many staff21 members are left with the current PCDC22 department?23

Mr. Altman

Well, there --24 we're -- I mean we're working through25 109 5/4/09 COMM. OF THE WHOLE - FISCAL '10 BUDGET1 those numbers right now because a certain2 number are going to come -- you know,3 we're looking at how many would come over4 to the Commerce Department. And the5 Lending Unit's a smaller group that would6 be a part of PIDC.7 Again, we're literally having8 these discussion right now to work9 through what the numbers look like.10

Councilwoman Tasco

So will it11 still be PCDC at the end of the day, or12 would it be a combination -- something --13 would they be all employees, those who go14 to PIDC, employed with PIDC. Those who15 are PCDC work in the Commerce Department.16

Mr. Altman

That's right.17

Councilwoman Tasco

They're18 the Commerce Department.19

Mr. Altman

That's right.20

Councilwoman Tasco

So PCDC,21 as it currently exists, will not exist.22

Mr. Altman

That's right.23

Councilwoman Tasco

As it24 currently exists?25 110 5/4/09 COMM. OF THE WHOLE - FISCAL '10 BUDGET1

Mr. Altman

As it currently2 exists, that's right.3

Councilwoman Tasco

Okay.4 Now, would PCDC have a board? Will that5 board be eliminated?6

Mr. Altman

I think the whole7 -- there could be a -- yeah, the answer8 is, to be straight, yes. There could be9 a new board with members of what had been10 PCDC constituted to oversee this11 small-business lending function. As you12 know, PIDC has many subsidiary boards, so13 it still could have -- it probably would14 have a separate -- a board under it15 focused on small-business lending.16

Councilwoman Tasco

PIDC17 would.18

Mr. Altman

Potentially.19 That's what we're exploring now.20

Councilman Jones

Point of21 information.22

Mr. Altman

But we're looking23 at that now.24

Councilwoman Tasco

Yes,25 111 5/4/09 COMM. OF THE WHOLE - FISCAL '10 BUDGET1 Councilman.2

Councilman Jones

Thank you,3 Madam Chair.4 Having some small recollection5 of how that works, is that it is a6 independent entity, anyway. I mean, the7 board -- even though it is a quasi-8 governmental entity, it is a 501(c)(3) or9 thereabouts entity.10

Councilman Jones

Private,12 nonprofit. It has to exist for a couple13 of reasons going forward.14 One, they have some outstanding15 contracts probably that they have as a16 entity, that they have to fulfill under17 RFPs and other things like that.18 There are some outstanding loan19 obligations that I would imagine have to20 be fulfilled and monitored and21 collections being done on that. So the22 entity a legal entity will have to exist.23 Now, I would also -- and I'm24 not try to micromanage the Commerce25 112 5/4/09 COMM. OF THE WHOLE - FISCAL '10 BUDGET1 Department -- think that you also have2 some flexibility there that you do not3 have under a city administration.4 Knowing where funds come from for5 organizations similar to that, some RFPs6 and sources of fund from the federal or7 state government strictly prohibit the8 use of it by a municipality. So you have9 to have a PIDC, PCDC kind of entity to be10 a conduit for money that we are eligible11 for as a municipality.12 So under some kind of13 configuration, you're going to, for some14 time, have to have a PCDC.15

Councilman Goode

Point of17 information.18

Councilwoman Tasco

Point of19 information, Mr. Goode.20

Councilman Goode

Having some21 experiences also --22 (Laughter.)23

Councilwoman Tasco

I have had24 some.25 113 5/4/09 COMM. OF THE WHOLE - FISCAL '10 BUDGET1

Councilman Goode

Just to2 complement what my colleague said, it3 started out as the Model Cities4 Development Corporation, had an Urban and5 Local Development Corporation title at6 some point, merged into a PCDC/Urban7 Local Development Corporation title, has8 had other subsidiaries, including9 Minority Venture Partners at one point.10 And so, it's not hard to11 reconfigure. And, essentially, you have12 to keep some of those original pieces in13 place.14 I think it's probably also some15 UDAG money and Urban Development16 Assistance Grant money that dates back17 years that has to be configured into18 whatever organization.19 So it never really disappears20 at all.21

Mr. Dow

Yeah. So the entity22 itself, as it's currently structured as a23 legal entity, can stay the same. We just24 might redirect its activities in a25 114 5/4/09 COMM. OF THE WHOLE - FISCAL '10 BUDGET1 different way so that we could maintain2 funding programs that have contractual3 relationships that come in, and we can4 still attach to those, we can still have5 an opportunity to go out after additional6 monies through a RFP process.7 If there's additional grants or8 whatever, that a separate organization9 separate from the City can do, we will10 still have that ability.11

Councilwoman Blackwell

Point12 of information.13

Councilwoman Tasco

Point of14 information.15

Councilwoman Blackwell

How16 many employees are there now in that17 department?18

Councilwoman Blackwell

At20 PCDC.21

Mr. Dow

I believe there's 28,22 27, 28.23

Councilwoman Blackwell

Well,24 if we have 28 now and you haven't25 115 5/4/09 COMM. OF THE WHOLE - FISCAL '10 BUDGET1 configured what the new department will2 look like, how can we be ready? How can3 we be ready July 1 if we haven't worked4 on where they'll be and exactly who's5 doing what?6

Councilwoman Blackwell

In8 other words, we want to make sure that9 these people are protected as well.10

Mr. Altman

We are working11 very much on that and with the July 112 date so that we can work through all of13 that in terms of personnel skills and how14 that sorts out. So we are very aware of15 that.16

Councilwoman Blackwell

Would17 you likewise submit that information to18 the Chair so we can follow up?19

Mr. Altman

As we're doing it.20

Mr. Dow

Yes. As we move21 forward, we will keep the Council22 informed about those processes.23

Councilwoman Blackwell

Thank24 you.25 116 5/4/09 COMM. OF THE WHOLE - FISCAL '10 BUDGET1

Councilwoman Tasco

How much2 does this organization save the City?3

Mr. Altman

That was the4 number I went through before,5 Councilmember. I don't know -- what I6 said is that if you -- I was pointing out7 the line items. I think it was where the number -- and, again, I just9 want to preface this.10 The number that's in the book11 is 751,000. How much of that is saved to12 the City, again that's not just -- this13 is just within Commerce; in other words,14 what the Block Grant dollars would15 potentially save but whether that's16 reflected in the overall General Fund and17 overall budget is something you'd have to18 ask the Budget Office.19 In other words, that's how much20 is returned, but some of that may have21 been needed for other services or22 functions that are outside of Commerce.23 So I don't know the net number, which is,24 I think, what you're asking.25 117 5/4/09 COMM. OF THE WHOLE - FISCAL '10 BUDGET1

Councilwoman Tasco

So that's2 the question that Councilwoman Blackwell3 asked; I didn't.4

Councilwoman Tasco

Okay. Has6 the strategic plan for the Office of7 Economic Development been presented yet?8

Mr. Altman

For the Office of9 --10

Councilwoman Tasco

Of11 Economic Opportunity.12

Mr. Altman

Opportunity, oh,13 okay.14

Mr. Dow

No, it has not.15

Councilwoman Tasco

When do16 you plan to have that plan prepared?17

Mr. Dow

We anticipate18 presenting a final draft to the Mayor by19 the fiscal year end, by June 30th.20

Councilwoman Tasco

Okay. It21 was supposed to have been done January of22 '09?23

Mr. Dow

Unfortunately, we24 were unable that done. We were waiting25 118 5/4/09 COMM. OF THE WHOLE - FISCAL '10 BUDGET1 for the MACCID recommendations, the2 Mayor's Advisory Commission on3 Construction Industry Diversity, which4 came out in mid-March, and so, we're5 taking those into consideration and we'll6 deliver the plan that will take those7 recommendations into consideration by the8 end of the fiscal year.9

Councilwoman Tasco

Councilman10 Goode asked about the, um... Well, I11 can't remember what he asked about, but12 let me ask you a question.13

Mr. Dow

Participation goals.14 And I think I got an answer to --15

Councilwoman Tasco

Yeah, but16 I'm interested in who in the City -- you17 know, we have given -- we have cut18 business privilege tax and wage tax19 because the ultimate goal is to keep20 businesses in the City and/or attract21 businesses.22 And who has done a study to see23 what impact our lowering of these taxes24 have had on the City? Has it been a plus25 119 5/4/09 COMM. OF THE WHOLE - FISCAL '10 BUDGET1 or a minus or a status quo?2

Mr. Altman

In terms of the --3 of an economic impact of the tax, what4 the taxes have resulted in?5

Councilwoman Tasco

Mm-hmm.6

Mr. Altman

The lowering of7 taxes?8

Councilwoman Tasco

Mm-hmm.9

Mr. Altman

I don't have those10 here. There have been a number of11 studies. I think probably Steve Agostini12 testified to these before.13 But there has been Wharton14 studies. I believe Bob Inman had done15 some studies of this. I don't have the16 numbers off the top of my head, but it17 showed what the reduction he believes18 correlated to in terms of jobs.19 And we can get that to you; I20 just don't have that it in front of me.21

Councilwoman Tasco

Do we know22 how many jobs have been created as a23 result -- additional jobs created as a24 result of what --25 120 5/4/09 COMM. OF THE WHOLE - FISCAL '10 BUDGET1

Mr. Altman

We can --2

Councilwoman Tasco

Yes.3 Point of information.4

Councilman Goode

Maybe you5 could show how many jobs have been saved,6 not necessarily created.7

Mr. Altman

That's right.8

Councilman Goode

And I9 believe the number -- I don't want to10 guess at it, but I think the number may11 have been over 100,000 jobs saved since12 we started cutting the business and wage13 tax.14 But the number -- it's not15 jobs -- a jobs-creation number; it's16 actually jobs saved.17

Mr. Altman

Right.18

Councilman Goode

Jobs that19 would have otherwise been lost.20

Councilwoman Tasco

Okay.21 Thank you. And that's the question you22 asked too, earlier, right?23 Okay. Let me just recognize24 some other people here, and I'll come25 121 5/4/09 COMM. OF THE WHOLE - FISCAL '10 BUDGET1 back.2 The Chair recognizes Councilman3 Clarke.4

Councilman Clarke

Thank you,5 Madam Chair.6 Good morning.7

Mr. Altman

Good morning.8

Councilman Clarke

Let me ask9 you a question about if you can give me10 briefly the status of the City's two --11 at this point still proposed -- casinos12 proposed casinos. And if you can kind of13 summarize it 'cause I have a follow-up14 question that's budget-related.15

Councilman Clarke

So,17 Mr. Agostino, you may want to be ready to18 come up.19

Mr. Altman

The status is as20 follows: Let's start with SugarHouse.21 The SugarHouse casino on the north22 Delaware, there is -- we have been23 working with them on their permits and24 approvals. They were actually issued a25 122 5/4/09 COMM. OF THE WHOLE - FISCAL '10 BUDGET1 foundation permit, I believe, over a2 month ago.3 They are before the Gaming4 Board this week; I believe the hearing is5 this Wednesday, in Philadelphia, for the6 extension of their permit, which had7 expired. We're working with them and8 have submitted a letter in support of9 that.10 And they will be -- there's11 legislation before the Council that the12 Council will be considering, but in terms13 of their plan of development, they need14 to modify their plan of development to15 reflect their -- some of the changes they16 made to their design.17 But we anticipate and what the18 schedule is bringing that forward to the19 Planning Commission, and hopefully that20 will be concluded by June.21

Councilman Clarke

That's the22 interim facility.23

Mr. Altman

That's the interim24 facility, which they project they would25 123 5/4/09 COMM. OF THE WHOLE - FISCAL '10 BUDGET1 like to open essentially a year from2 today, if all goes well. And that's,3 again, their projected schedule.4 That interim facility is about5 1700 slots and -- and is actually a6 permanent facility, and then ultimately7 would expand to 3,000 slots.8

Councilman Clarke

Right.9

Mr. Altman

And then there10 would be a Phase II. So that's11 SugarHouse.12 Foxwoods, they are -- as you13 know, they are looking at the Strawbridge14 site at 801 Market. Similarly, there is15 legislation before Council. They would16 like to be on a similar timeframe in17 terms of approval of their plan of18 development also by June, and we're19 working with them on that.20 They need Gaming Board approval21 for relocation of their license from the22 South Philadelphia site to the Center23 City site, and they have to apply for24 that, and I believe they anticipate that25 124 5/4/09 COMM. OF THE WHOLE - FISCAL '10 BUDGET1 anticipate that in May or June; I'm not2 sure of the actual date, I'd have to3 check with them.4 But we're working, again, very5 closely with them on a plan of6 development for approval.7

Councilman Clarke

Okay.8 Mr. Agostino, can you...9 (Mr. Agostino comes forward.)10

Mr. Agostini

Good morning,11 Councilmember, good morning.12

Councilman Clarke

Good13 morning.14 With respects to the timing --15 and Mr. Altman has laid out what we16 hope -- and based on the spirit of17 cooperation that is happening everywhere18 as a result of this, there's a likelihood19 that we will have -- and I'm pretty20 confident about SugarHouse; I still don't21 know where I am with Foxwoods. We will22 have something on line to reflect23 revenues generated for Fiscal '11; am I24 correct?25 125 5/4/09 COMM. OF THE WHOLE - FISCAL '10 BUDGET1

Mr. Agostini

That's correct.2 I believe -- and I just sent a note back3 the my office to get the exact number. I4 believe it's in the low 20s, like5 23 million, beginning in FY '11.6

Councilman Clarke

Is that for7 SugarHouse?8

Mr. Agostini

I believe it's9 for one of them. I don't know that it's10 both.11

Councilman Clarke

All right.12 So worst case, 20, a little more --13

Mr. Agostini

About 23.14

Councilman Clarke

Best case,15 40, 50?16

Mr. Agostini

I don't -- I17 don't remember how the numbers were18 arrived, and I don't know if they assume19 the same number of slots and the same20 revenues. But for your purposes now,21 let's say it's about that --22

Councilman Clarke

All right.23

Mr. Agostini

-- or similar.24

Councilman Clarke

So in our25 126 5/4/09 COMM. OF THE WHOLE - FISCAL '10 BUDGET1 budget Five-Year Plan, all right, where2 are the revenues projected to?3

Mr. Agostini

There is -- I4 can -- I'll pull that from the plan and5 give that to you in detail, but we do6 show a figure of additional revenue, and7 I forget if it's in non-departmental8 revenue that represents the income from9 the arrangements regarding the casinos.10 As you know, one of things we11 haven't shown are some of the related12 costs, and we also haven't shown related13 tax revenues associated with some of the14 jobs.15

Councilman Clarke

I asked you16 a real easy question. Where does it17 show? It's either Fiscal '11 or Fiscal18 '12.19

Mr. Agostini

Yeah, I'd have20 to go back. I don't remember.21

Councilman Clarke

It's in22 '12.23

Mr. Agostini

Okay.24

Councilman Clarke

So assuming25 127 5/4/09 COMM. OF THE WHOLE - FISCAL '10 BUDGET1 that these move along in schedule,2 there's a strong likelihood that, worst3 case, we may have $20 million that's not4 being showed in Fiscal '12. Best case,5 40 million is not -- I'm sorry, '116 that's not being showed in Fiscal '11.7 Best case, upwards of 40 million in8 Fiscal '11 that's not being showed.9 If that happens, given -- and10 I'm going to use Council's budget11 proposal for these purposes. Given12 Council's proposals that Council has a13 proposal in the second year, we have14 shown interest-only payments of $2015 million.16 Worst-case scenario, we may be17 in the position to pay the interest on18 those interest-only proposals as a result19 of this $20 million that's not referenced20 in the Five-Year Plan.21

Mr. Agostini

Councilmember,22 if the casinos were to begin, then yes, I23 think that your premise is probably24 correct, that we would show some revenues25 128 5/4/09 COMM. OF THE WHOLE - FISCAL '10 BUDGET1 in either late half of '10 or '11 that we2 currently don't show in the plan.3 (Timer bell rings.)4

Mr. Agostini

What we have not5 shown in the plan as well -- and I think6 we've said this on other occasions -- are7 costs associated with the things like the8 additional police presence that would be9 required, some of the traffic mitigation;10 we have not shown any of those costs in11 any part of the plan and assume that on12 some level, some of the additional13 revenue associated with the wage taxes14 and business-privilege taxes associated15 would be used to take care of those16 costs.17 But we have not demonstrated18 those costs in the plan.19

Councilman Clarke

Well, would20 you acknowledge that it won't cost us21 $20 million for additional police and22 supportive services?23

Mr. Agostini

I --24 Councilmember, honestly, I don't know.25 129 5/4/09 COMM. OF THE WHOLE - FISCAL '10 BUDGET1 (Indiscernible; parties talking2 over each other.)3

Councilman Clarke

I think I4 have a little bit of knowledge on that5 based on my early involvement with6 respects to leading up when we7 anticipated that this was going to8 happen, and it's not even close to that,9 not to mention the fact that you show no10 revenues associated with the construction11 side that will actually start, according12 to SugarHouse, on July 1.13

Mr. Agostini

In terms of the14 tax, the associated tax --15

Councilman Clarke

The wage16 tax, right, yeah. We're going to have a17 substantial number of jobs, purchase of18 services.19 So -- and I say this because we20 get a letter from Mr. Dubow that outlined21 the fact --22

Councilman Green

(Inaudible,23 off-mic.)24

Councilman Clarke

Sorry,25 130 5/4/09 COMM. OF THE WHOLE - FISCAL '10 BUDGET1 Councilman, I heard your point of order.2 I don't want to lose my train of thought.3 And I know Council President is4 ultimately in charge of this.5 That you have not shown any6 revenues associated with construction,7 purchase of services for those years.8 And I say that because we get a letter9 from Mr. Dubow that talks about our10 proposal that will require significant11 reductions both for the 25 million in12 cost savings and the interest payments.13 But the reality is that there's14 the potential -- I mean, best or worse --15 for a significant amount of revenue16 coming to the City to help repay the debt17 service on that borrowing.18

Mr. Agostini

With respect to19 the casinos, Councilmember, you're20 correct. We have not shown because it21 was kind of difficult to understand the22 number of jobs and the wage taxes and the23 business-privilege taxes, so we have not24 shown that. You're correct.25 131 5/4/09 COMM. OF THE WHOLE - FISCAL '10 BUDGET1

Councilman Clarke

Well, I2 mean, all you have to do is look at the3 document from two years ago. I mean, it4 was clearly laid out, you know,5 particularly on the SugarHouse, the type6 of jobs and the number of jobs that would7 be associated. So we don't have to8 reinvent the wheel.9 So, I mean, there is a10 potential to generate some significant11 revenues, and we're not showing it --12

Mr. Agostini

Right, that's13 not reflected in --14

Councilman Clarke

-- in '1015 or '11.16

Mr. Agostini

That's right.17

Councilman Clarke

All right.18

Councilman Rizzo

Point of19 information.20

Council President Verna

The21 Chair recognizes Councilman Green for a22 point of information.23

Councilman Green

Thank you,24 Madam Chair.25 132 5/4/09 COMM. OF THE WHOLE - FISCAL '10 BUDGET1 Piggybacking on Councilman2 Clarke's question, could you please, in3 the years where you have revenue in the4 Five-Year Plan, provide to the Chair what5 expenses you have in additional police6 officers, additional fire, additional7 sanitation, or whatever you have in the8 Five-Year Plan that relates to the fact9 that the casinos are expected to be up10 and running.11 Say, in the Five-Year Plan in12 FY '12, you're saying that there's13 revenue in the budget. Your objection to14 us taking the savings and applying it for15 another percent of revenue in FY '1116 was -- you know, there are associated17 expenses.18 I'd like to see where those are19 outlined in the Five-Year Plan, those20 associated expenses that you say we'll be21 required to pay in FY '11 as a22 consequence of having the casinos.23

Mr. Agostini

Councilmember,24 for the record, I did not object; I just25 133 5/4/09 COMM. OF THE WHOLE - FISCAL '10 BUDGET1 said that we didn't have those costs in.2 We will -- if there's a document, we'll3 be happy to put this together --4

Councilman Green

No, no.5 In --6

Mr. Agostini

But we do not7 have anything -- to my knowledge, we do8 not having anything in the Five-Year Plan9 on the cost side associated with the10 opening and operation of two casinos.11

Councilman Green

That's, I12 guess, my point. There is nothing in the13 Five-Year Plan with respect to associated14 costs, so you've got revenue in the15 Five-Year Plan starting in FY '12.16 If that revenue is in FY '11,17 then it's revenue because you weren't18 charging any extra costs in '12, you19 weren't saying we need 20 extra20 policemen, we need this, that, and the21 other thing. It's all taken care of in22 the big expenses and budget that we23 already have.24 Therefore, when we move the25 134 5/4/09 COMM. OF THE WHOLE - FISCAL '10 BUDGET1 revenue up, we're not going to increase2 costs, just like there are no increased3 costs in FY '12. That's my point.4 Thank you, Madam Chair.5

Councilman Rizzo

Point of6 information.7

Council President Verna

I8 believe Councilwoman Tasco has a point --9

Councilwoman Tasco

On this10 issue, I'll pass.11

Council President Verna

Oh,12 okay. The Chair recognizes Councilman13 Rizzo for a point of information.14

Councilman Rizzo

Good15 afternoon.16

Mr. Agostini

Good afternoon.17

Councilman Rizzo

In previous18 meetings, we discussed the concept which19 was embraced, I believe, by the20 Administration that for the costs for21 police, that we would create a model22 that's been so well done by the Airport,23 like the Aviation Fund that funds the24 police officers that are assigned at the25 135 5/4/09 COMM. OF THE WHOLE - FISCAL '10 BUDGET1 Airport. And pretty much, those officers2 are assigned there. A significant issue3 could occur someplace else in the City;4 they stay at the Airport.5 And I thought that we were6 looking -- down the road, that we would7 create something like that, where the8 casino industry would contribute to a9 fund that would support the extra10 required police officers in the casino11 environment.12

Mr. Agostini

Councilmember,13 I'm not aware of that. You'd have to ask14 others who have been more directly15 involved.16

Councilman Rizzo

Well, no, I17 think you were in the room when this was18 brought up, so maybe you just don't19 recollect, but it was discussed pretty20 thoroughly that that was going to be one21 of the considerations that would be on22 the table.23 And I'll recollect that there24 was then a controversy whether, you know,25 136 5/4/09 COMM. OF THE WHOLE - FISCAL '10 BUDGET1 it's the Pennsylvania State Police who2 has the jurisdiction within the property3 lines of the casino, who's responsible4 outside. So we had a lot of5 conversations about this.6 It's been a while ago, but7 hopefully, that model would be8 considered.9 Mr. Altman?10

Mr. Altman

Councilmember, all11 I can say is that, look, it's something12 we have to look at in light of the timing13 of the casinos and also how they've14 modified their plans. We have to go and15 look at the costing of what the service16 is and how they would be provided.17 Obviously, for example,18 Foxwoods is going into Center City, is19 going to have a very different set of20 assumptions than when it was at the21 waterfront, and it will have a set of22 different kinds of impacts that we're23 analyzing now. Also, the size of24 SugarHouse going in, 1700. So we're25 137 5/4/09 COMM. OF THE WHOLE - FISCAL '10 BUDGET1 looking at those costs now.2

Councilman Rizzo

Well, the3 same way for special events. When we4 have a Phillies game, Eagles game, other5 special events, that those officers that6 are there -- that are, let's say, a part7 of the requirement, but anything in8 excess -- obviously, the way we police9 those two locations today is going to be10 a lot different once casinos are11 full-blown.12 So I don't think that the13 taxpayers of the City of Philadelphia14 should have to pay for that extra15 coverage that will be required. Somebody16 else is going to have to pay the bill.17

Councilman Green

Point of18 information.19

Council President Verna

The20 Chair recognizes Councilman Green.21

Councilman Green

Thank you,22 Madam Chair.23 Mr. McPherson, Council's CFO,24 just pointed out the budget detail to me,25 138 5/4/09 COMM. OF THE WHOLE - FISCAL '10 BUDGET1 and there's $23,600,000 in additional2 revenue in Years '12, '13, and '14 in the3 budget for casinos. There are no4 expenses associated with that revenue5 during those years.6 And it is assumed that the7 extra economic activity that results from8 the casinos in terms of jobs, wage taxes,9 et cetera, will pay for the costs of the10 casinos. at least in the Administration's11 current Five-Year Plan.12 And so, I would ask the13 Administration to go to Chester or go to14 the Park, and take a look and see how15 many extra policemen or city services are16 provided there. There are none.17 So I think if we move it up a18 year, we'd move $23,600,000 more into the19 Five-Year Plan.20 Thank you, Madam Chair.21

Council President Verna

Thank22 you.23 The Chair recognizes24 Councilwoman Brown.25 139 5/4/09 COMM. OF THE WHOLE - FISCAL '10 BUDGET1

Councilwoman Brown

Thank you,2 Madam President.3 Good morning.4

Mr. Altman

Good morning.5

Councilwoman Brown

I have a6 quick follow-up to Councilman Goode's7 question.8 In FY '09, the documents show9 that you had $2.3 million in contracts in10 Class 200. So my question is actually a11 repeat: Why does your MBE/WBE chart show12 zero dollars in total contracts for FY13 '08 and '09.14

Mr. Dow

And that's for the15 Commerce Department, and you're referring16 to the spend that we have on our for-17 profit contracts?18

Councilwoman Brown

For-profit.19

Mr. Dow

For-profit. And so,20 we only track, for these purposes,21 for-profit contracts.22

Councilwoman Sanchez

Point of23 information.24

Council President Verna

The25 140 5/4/09 COMM. OF THE WHOLE - FISCAL '10 BUDGET1 Chair recognizes Councilwoman Sanchez for2 a point of information.3

Councilwoman Sanchez

We do4 the commercial corridor contracting, and5 all of that stuff is done through PIDC.6 And while it's not in your budget, it's7 reflective of your activities. And8 that's why a chart this way doesn't9 reflect your activities.10

Mr. Dow

That's right.11

Councilwoman Sanchez

So when12 are we going to see that?13

Mr. Dow

That's right. And14 you'll begin to see that next year. When15 we sit here next year, we will be able to16 show you some different information.17 We don't have the information18 on the nonprofit contracting that occur19 throughout the City; we do in certain20 areas track it.21

Councilwoman Sanchez

I'm22 talking about your commercial. We have23 encumbered money through commercial24 corridors, cultural, corridors and so25 141 5/4/09 COMM. OF THE WHOLE - FISCAL '10 BUDGET1 forth.2

Councilwoman Sanchez

Where4 are you going to reflect that, which is a5 reflection of your activities.6

Mr. Dow

The Cultural and7 Commercial Corridor Bond, we have some of8 that information for you.9

Mr. Altman

Councilmember,10 what you're talking about is how the11 funds have been spent on commercial --12 the 30-plus million dollars --13

Councilwoman Sanchez

The14 Commerce Department has a lot of15 contracting.16

Councilwoman Sanchez

Where18 you do it through PIDC --19

Councilwoman Sanchez

-- or21 you choose to do it through wherever --22

Councilwoman Sanchez

-- it's24 a reflection of your activity. So this25 142 5/4/09 COMM. OF THE WHOLE - FISCAL '10 BUDGET1 chart is inaccurate to your activity.2

Mr. Altman

That's right. We3 will be --4

Councilwoman Sanchez

So when5 are we going to see that?6

Mr. Altman

We will be7 submitting a report. For example, on8 Commercial and Cultural Corridor Bonds,9 which is really, I would say, the10 principal source for Commerce, that's11 really the large majority of it.12 And we're going to be13 submitting a report, I think, within the14 next ten days, and we'll be able to break15 that down for you. We're looking at all16 of the contracts and what the percent is.17 We owe the Council a report on that.18

Councilwoman Sanchez

Okay.19 So all of that money is in PIDC?20

Mr. Altman

It flows through21 PIDC as the -- as the -- yes, as the22 project --23

Councilwoman Sanchez

Because24 they don't come before us to testify, I25 143 5/4/09 COMM. OF THE WHOLE - FISCAL '10 BUDGET1 think not having that data as part of2 your activities doesn't actively regulate3 your activities.4

Mr. Altman

And we -- you5 know, it's -- that's right. We should --6 we will submit a report on that. Part of7 it's --8

Councilwoman Sanchez

That's9 all right. I'm only on a point of10 information.11

Councilwoman Brown

I12 appreciate that.13

Mr. Altman

Oh, sorry.14

Councilwoman Brown

I15 appreciate that.16

Mr. Altman

Yeah. Oh, I'm17 sorry. Right, it is --18

Councilwoman Brown

What we19 need to make clear is that going forward20 forever, any person who gets a penny from21 the City of Philadelphia, be it directly22 or indirectly, subcontracts, prime23 contracts, nonprofit, for profit, we want24 to see numbers that speak to MBE/WBE25 144 5/4/09 COMM. OF THE WHOLE - FISCAL '10 BUDGET1 participation, period.2

Councilwoman Brown

Okay.4

Mr. Altman

And we're happy to5 provide that.6 I was going to say that part of7 this is how the budget is reflected, and8 so, the literal reading of the budget of9 what funds you have going out is zero.10 It doesn't reflect our contracting11 activity, which will be in our report on12 Commercial and Cultural Bond Corridor13 proceeds, which we'll get to you.14

Councilwoman Brown

On of your testimony, you indicate here that16 there has been a $3 million-plus increase17 over FY '09 for Hotel Tax Fund. What18 would you attribute that growth to?19

Mr. Altman

That growth is20 attributable to the increase that -- I21 believe of 1.2 percent that the Council22 approved. We had state-enabling23 legislation --24

Councilwoman Brown

Okay.25 145 5/4/09 COMM. OF THE WHOLE - FISCAL '10 BUDGET1

Mr. Altman

And so, that's the2 increase in those dollars.3

Councilwoman Brown

All right,4 then.5 In this peer report that6 Councilman Goode always keeps in his7 desk, it shows here that of industries8 and job growth over the last many years,9 the greatest area -- the area where we10 have the greatest indicators of education11 and job growth are in education and12 health services.13

Mr. Altman

Mm-hmm.14

Councilwoman Brown

With that15 in mind, is there any synergy with your16 office and the Philadelphia Visitors and17 Convention Bureau, which has various18 congresses to attract different19 industries?20

Mr. Altman

Yes. I mean, we21 work very closely with them. We work22 with all of the different23 economic-development entities -- the24 Convention and Visitors Bureau and --25 146 5/4/09 COMM. OF THE WHOLE - FISCAL '10 BUDGET1

Councilwoman Brown

In what2 way? In what way specifically as it3 relates to those industries.4

Mr. Altman

Well, a couple of5 examples. We work with them on the Life6 Science Congress for example.7

Councilwoman Brown

Okay.8

Mr. Altman

And that9 aggressively tries to bring in10 conventions and as well as just meetings11 of the life science industry.12

Councilwoman Brown

Okay.13

Mr. Altman

So we work to be14 supportive of those activities. Our15 office works directly with them, whether16 it's on marketing, making arrangements.17

Councilwoman Brown

Okay.18

Mr. Altman

We also, by the19 way, just on this, directly, though,20 because of exactly the fact that21 education and medical industries are such22 a key component of our economy --23

Councilwoman Brown

Mm-hmm.24

Mr. Altman

-- roughly out25 147 5/4/09 COMM. OF THE WHOLE - FISCAL '10 BUDGET1 of jobs. The Mayor has convened the2 heads of all of the universities as well3 as the heads of all of the hospitals to4 engage them directly in how can we be5 supportive of your growth in the City.6 One of the things we've done,7 for example, is, in the Commerce8 Department, we have appointed someone,9 Indira Scott, whose job is just to work10 with them on coordinating all of their11 capital projects.12

Councilwoman Brown

Okay.13

Mr. Altman

There's probably a14 billion dollars in capital projects that15 will come to fruition over the next 24 to16 36 months in the pipeline if you take in17 the aggregate of all of the institutions.18

Councilwoman Brown

Mm-hmm.19

Mr. Altman

And we felt one of20 the things that we can be most supportive21 of is how to help them just even get22 through the process.23 So there are lots of ways like24 that that we're trying to work with them.25 148 5/4/09 COMM. OF THE WHOLE - FISCAL '10 BUDGET1

Councilwoman Brown

Okay.2 That's very helpful.3 Given the role that they play,4 the hospitality industry plays, in our5 economy, what is the role of the6 Department of Commerce when it comes to7 the Convention Center?8 According to your testimony on9 , the payment drops in FY '11 to10 $15 million annually. So that's on the11 financial, fiscal side.12

Mr. Altman

Right.13

Councilwoman Brown

What role14 does your department play, if any, with15 policy or overseeing contracts or MBE/WBE16 participation goals, any role at all?17

Mr. Altman

No, we -- we -- I18 mean, on the finance side, we're really19 just -- it's a pass-through in the20 budget.21

Councilwoman Brown

Oh, okay.22

Mr. Altman

So we're -- that's23 why our budget reflects many24 pass-throughs.25 149 5/4/09 COMM. OF THE WHOLE - FISCAL '10 BUDGET1

Councilwoman Brown

Okay.2

Mr. Altman

As you can see in3 that opening testimony, whether it's4 Aviation, hotel tax, and Convention, we5 work with them on the programmatic side.6 (Timer bell rings.)7

Mr. Altman

And so, for8 example, with the Convention Center9 expansion, we are working on what could10 be the physical improvements around the11 Convention Center on North Broad Street,12 on Arch, on Race, as well as in terms of13 what their future marketing is.14

Councilwoman Brown

Okay.15

Mr. Altman

So we work with16 them very much on the program side, but17 not on the funding or contract side.18

Councilwoman Brown

Very well.19 Thank you.20

Council President Verna

Thank21 you.22 The Chair recognizes Councilman23 Goode.24

Councilman Goode

Thank you,25 150 5/4/09 COMM. OF THE WHOLE - FISCAL '10 BUDGET1 Madam President.2 Mr. Dow, getting back to3 departmental goal-setting --4

Councilman Goode

-- and using6 the Commerce Department as an example,7 the Fiscal Year '09 goal was 15 percent8 MBE, 25 percent WBE, 2 percent DSBE. The9 actual participation was zero, for10 reasons that we've noted, that11 essentially the Department did no12 for-profit contracting.13 The goal for Fiscal Year '0814 was the same: 15 percent MBE, 25 percent15 WBE, 2 percent DSBE. And the16 participation was zero because,17 essentially, we don't track for-profit18 contracting.19 So why were the goals set at 4220 percent DBE participation for Fiscal '0821 and '09?22

Mr. Dow

They were carried23 over from the previous years. In '06,24 '07, we have roughly 80 percent of the25 151 5/4/09 COMM. OF THE WHOLE - FISCAL '10 BUDGET1 contracts for-profit contracts. There2 was only one; it was $35,000. And that3 translated into 80 percent of --4

Councilman Goode

Mr. Dow, you5 might be correct, but I don't know what6 document you're reading from because the7 document I'm reading from now has Fiscal8 Year '07 actual, zero percent.9

Mr. Dow

Right, right. And so10 at '06 --11

Councilman Goode

So it wasn't12 carried over from '07.13

Mr. Dow

The goal was, not the14 actual, the goal. So the goal was15 carried over based on '06 numbers, and16 then, subsequent to that, carried over17 until today.18

Councilman Goode

But in19 Fiscal Year '07, it was zero percent, and20 Fiscal '08 was zero percent, and Fiscal21 Year '09 was zero percent.22

Mr. Dow

Achievability, right.23

Councilman Goode

So why were24 there 42 percent goals set in '08 and25 152 5/4/09 COMM. OF THE WHOLE - FISCAL '10 BUDGET1 '09?2

Mr. Dow

There were --3

Councilman Goode

It could not4 have been based upon Fiscal '07.5

Mr. Dow

I would agree. I6 would think that that's where we need to7 do a better job of having conversations8 not only with the individual departments9 about what their realistic and actual10 spend is and then develop goals and11 objectives based off of that. That's12 what we don't do a good job of right now.13

Councilman Goode

Yeah, but14 let me just run down the list in terms of15 some different departments and the16 over/under. And this is for Fiscal Year17 '08:18 Public Property was 3 percent19 under the goal.20 The Board of Revision of Tax21 was 25 percent above the goal.22 The Managing Director's Office23 was 19 percent above the goal.24 L&I was 16 percent below.25 153 5/4/09 COMM. OF THE WHOLE - FISCAL '10 BUDGET1 And then you have:2 11 above.3 22 percent.4 percent above.5 9 percent below.6 24 percent below.7 6 percent below.8 percent above.9 3 percent below.10 15 percent above.11 2 percent below.12 21 percent below.13 percent below.14 14 percent below.15 19 percent below.16 12 percent below.17 8 percent below.18 20 percent below.19 15 percent below.20 4 percent below.21 18 percent below.22 19 percent below.23 15 percent below.24 20 percent below.25 154 5/4/09 COMM. OF THE WHOLE - FISCAL '10 BUDGET1 40 percent below.2 -25 percent below.3 -40 percent below.4 -30 percent below.5 -15 percent below.6 And I go through all of that, a7 long exercise of it, to say that there's8 no way to reach citywide goals if9 departmental goals are off that much.10 And I guess my question at the end of the11 day is: How close should you be in terms12 of matching the goal with the actual13 achievement?14

Mr. Dow

How close should we15 be?16

Councilman Goode

Yeah. I17 mean percent, percent --18

Councilman Goode

Even to some20 extent, maybe 10 percent above or below21 is not that big of a deal.22

Councilman Goode

But even24 with a 25 percent above, that means the25 155 5/4/09 COMM. OF THE WHOLE - FISCAL '10 BUDGET1 goal was set too low.2

Councilman Goode

And with a4 45 percent -- a 40, 45 percent below, it5 may mean the goal was set to high, or it6 may mean that someone needs to have a7 talking-to.8

Mr. Dow

That's exactly right.9 I think what you see there is historical10 performance and (indiscernible), I can't11 shift that. We can take that, analyze12 that, and see why we were so off in that13 regard.14 So going forward --15

Councilman Goode

But if we're16 basing it upon historical performance,17 that means that the numbers are never18 going to move.19

Mr. Dow

Okay. So that's20 where we do a better job of educating --21 well, this is where that -- what Andy22 referred to as a three-pronged type of23 processes that we have here.24 One, the OEO world has to do25 156 5/4/09 COMM. OF THE WHOLE - FISCAL '10 BUDGET1 a -- we have to do more work around2 engaging each individual departments3 around what their actual spend is; what4 are they actually spending, not only from5 a dollar perspective, but where they are.6

Councilman Goode

You should7 know for the record that each department8 has come here --9

Councilman Goode

-- and11 Councilman Brown, in particular, has12 asked them, Why did you spend that amount13 of money? And they always point back to14 Commerce and OEO.15

Councilman Goode

And they17 basically blame you for bad goal-setting.18 Now, we don't -- we actually19 within Council, I don't think, put it on20 you, but you should know that we can't go21 back and forth and play that game where22 departments say, "We didn't set the23 goals; they set the goals," and then you24 say, "Well, we have to work closely with25 157 5/4/09 COMM. OF THE WHOLE - FISCAL '10 BUDGET1 them to set the goals," 'cause at the end2 of the day, the goals do not match the3 performance.4

Councilman Goode

And I'm6 asking, how do we get to a point where7 the goals actually match the performance?8 (Timer bell rings.)9

Councilman Goode

And then,10 lastly, how far off can we be in terms of11 goal-setting if we're actually going to12 achieve the citywide goals?13

Mr. Dow

For me, I think that14 that's the difference in new leadership15 that we're going to be able to provide.16 That's the difference in integrating them17 into the Commerce world.18 We will be able to look at and19 work with, on a very much proactive20 basis, much more so that we've done in21 the past, with the departments to22 establish realistic, achievable goals23 that have some stretch metrics in it.24 Then we will look at judging them based25 158 5/4/09 COMM. OF THE WHOLE - FISCAL '10 BUDGET1 on that, holding them accountable2 throughout the fiscal year flowing3 through.4 Where we want to go is to5 identify where the gaps are. And then6 once we understand where the gaps are, we7 can look at, how do we increase the8 availability of firms to fill those gaps,9 working with the Office of Economic10 Opportunity, working with the Office of11 Business Services, to draw those as12 portals to fill those gaps.13 And then, over time, we should14 be able to see improvement in the numbers15 as well as fewer gaps in the overall16 accounting of it. And then, also, if we17 miss or go above or below it, that range18 of miss is much, much thinner.19

Councilman Goode

But we can20 agree that departmental goal-setting was21 not real.22

Mr. Dow

We can agree that23 departmental goal-setting was not done24 well.25 159 5/4/09 COMM. OF THE WHOLE - FISCAL '10 BUDGET1

Councilman Goode

But it was2 not real goals, because essentially, it3 was simply based upon goals set the year4 before, and those goals weren't real.5 So even if last year, what you6 did was base departments goals beyond the7 previous year, and that was real for you,8 you may have done that without realizing9 that the goal set for the year before was10 not real.11 And so, essentially, if the12 goal wasn't real two years ago, then the13 goal wasn't real last year. Is that14 fair?15

Mr. Altman

Councilman, let me16 say -- yeah, I mean, we certainly --17 there's been a -- you know, we aren't18 here to defend how it was done in the19 past or to, you know, in some ways,20 criticize 'em in the --21

Councilman Goode

And I22 wouldn't ask you to defend it.23 (Laughter.)24

Mr. Altman

No, but I think25 160 5/4/09 COMM. OF THE WHOLE - FISCAL '10 BUDGET1 it's clear that there is -- the reason2 that the Mayor created the Economic3 Opportunity Cabinet and restructured and4 has an Office of Economic Opportunity and5 has that as part of Commerce, I think6 recognizes the fact that there is a7 problem.8 And what you're pointing out9 is, there's a problem in how you do the10 numbers, there's a problem in how you set11 the targets, but there's also been a12 problem in terms of -- I think we wanted13 to be clear and the Mayor wanted to be14 clear that there was accountability from15 the top.16 Each of the deputy mayors sits17 on the cabinet, the Finance Director is18 at the cabinet, the Chief Integrity19 Officer is at the cabinet. These are20 goals coming from the highest level;21 these aren't just numbers, as you say,22 that aren't realistic, and he's going to23 hold everyone's performance to it.24 So, unfortunately, I wish we25 161 5/4/09 COMM. OF THE WHOLE - FISCAL '10 BUDGET1 could give you a more specific answer.2 All we know is that it's a system that3 has to change. We're going to be setting4 those targets differently. And we5 recognize, as do you, that this has been6 a problem.7

Councilman Goode

So I won't8 ask you for a answer right now; I'll just9 actually make a request. And I know my10 time is up, so I'll move quickly.11 The problem we've had in the12 past for all of the years that I've been13 here was, first, not getting information.14 We solved that problem by making a15 Charter mandate that we have an Annual16 Disparity Study instead of anticipation17 goals.18 Even when we did that, MBEC,19 OEO's predecessor, wanted to create20 participation goals that weren't based21 upon the Disparity Study. We thought we22 corrected that.23 And now we find that even when24 we set departmental goals and ask for25 162 5/4/09 COMM. OF THE WHOLE - FISCAL '10 BUDGET1 them to be put within that study as a2 matter of law, that those goals are not3 real. And it's the first time those4 departmental goals have been made public.5

Mr. Altman

Mm-hmm.6

Councilman Goode

And so, at7 the end of the day, we're not able to do8 our job without the proper information.9 And to some extent, those departmental10 goals are false information.11 And it's not just a matter of12 us not being able to do our job; but more13 importantly, those departments can't be14 held accountable unless not only do they15 have real goals, but they are told those16 goals were meant to be real.17

Councilman Goode

Thank you.19 MR. McPHERSON: Councilwoman20 Sanchez.21

Councilwoman Sanchez

Good22 afternoon, gentlemen.23 I want to complete that24 conversation with Councilman Goode,25 163 5/4/09 COMM. OF THE WHOLE - FISCAL '10 BUDGET1 because it was very disheartening for me2 to have him request and Blondell Reynolds3 consistently from departments, and one of4 the things that we found was that the5 independent agencies also don't feel like6 they need to set up OEO goals.7 So my request on those lines,8 in addition to making sure that the9 departments, under our purview, are10 following these goals and setting11 realistic goals, but that there be some12 formal communication between this office13 and our independent elected offices,14 because what I don't want them to do is15 come here next year and say, "We've had16 no interaction with this."17 And we're talking specifically18 about the Courts and the independent19 elected office, who have absolutely no20 goals. And unless we make them, we'll21 have -- they will not establish any goals22 for us to hold them accountable to us,23 since they do also do run on tax dollars.24 So it's really important that,25 164 5/4/09 COMM. OF THE WHOLE - FISCAL '10 BUDGET1 in addition to our local departments,2 that we begin a process to engage our3 independent elected offices so that they4 establish some goals; and, in this case,5 more realistic goals that we can hold 'em6 to. So that's important.7 I wanted to speak a little bit8 about the PIDC merger, and I'm all for9 efficiencies. But as I mentioned to both10 you, Kevin and Andy Altman, is my concern11 around any merger is: One, we haven't12 done some of these mergers well in other13 departments, but more important around14 diversity.15 In the rebalancing of last year16 in the Commerce Department, you laid off17 nine people, and seven were of color.18 And we want to make sure that as we19 transition PCDC, we understand that that20 level of diversity to deal with the21 different corridors and a lot of ethnic22 corridors that we -- that our office23 reflects that.24 So I want to make sure that25 165 5/4/09 COMM. OF THE WHOLE - FISCAL '10 BUDGET1 when he ask you -- or when you submit the2 data that Councilwoman Blackwell is3 asking for, that we see those numbers4 improve in terms of your diversity.5 You talked about subcontracts.6 What's the data that you're going to7 request out of subcontracts to make sure8 on the diversity? because I'm concerned9 that we just ask for staff, and I'd like10 to see us, if we're going to make some11 requirements to our subcontractors or12 nonprofit subcontractors, that we look at13 board composition, that we look at14 employee composition as those factors.15 Is there anything else you're16 going to be requesting of the nonprofits?17

Mr. Dow

We'd like to look a18 little bit -- and there are a couple of19 areas that are already working in that20 regard. The Department of Health, under21 Don Schwarz, is doing some work and22 looking at some of those stuff.23 We need to do a little bit more24 step beyond that and look at what25 166 5/4/09 COMM. OF THE WHOLE - FISCAL '10 BUDGET1 actually those nonprofits are spending2 their money on and look at giving them3 some objectives around utilizing diverse4 minorities -- men, women, those who are5 disabled -- within their own actual spend6 so we can look a little bit deeper.7 We not only support nonprofits8 from a programmatic perspective, but9 there are administrative costs that are10 available, and looking at, okay, helping11 them understand what's available to them,12 helping them understand that. Then we13 can put some language into our contracts14 that would engage them in meeting some of15 those goals and objectives.16

Councilwoman Sanchez

What is17 that pool of nonprofit vendors that18 Commerce currently uses? How many people19 are we really talking about?20

Mr. Dow

In our world? Our21 nonprofit world? I don't have the exact22 answer there, but I will tell you it's23 many. I mean, that's who we contract24 with. That's -- all our contracts are25 167 5/4/09 COMM. OF THE WHOLE - FISCAL '10 BUDGET1 with nonprofits.2

Councilwoman Sanchez

Okay.3 And in our contracting for commercial4 corridors as it relates to PCDC, are we5 looking to enhance any of those other6 contracts for folks who do commercial7 corridor work?8

Mr. Dow

And you mean by9 "enhance" -- I'm not sure.10

Councilwoman Sanchez

Either11 their objectives or goals.12

Mr. Dow

Oh, we have the13 objectives and goals for minority14 participation and workforce including --15

Councilwoman Sanchez

No, I'm16 saying for the actual services delivered.17 If we have, as you're saying, a whole18 host of nonprofits to do some of the work19 that PCDC does throughout City, right,20 commercial corridor work?21

Councilwoman Sanchez

Are we23 looking to enhance any of that work?24

Mr. Dow

Yes, yes. In our --25 168 5/4/09 COMM. OF THE WHOLE - FISCAL '10 BUDGET1

Councilwoman Sanchez

As part2 of the reorg?3

Councilwoman Sanchez

Okay.5

Mr. Dow

That's the plan,6 absolutely.7

Councilwoman Sanchez

As it8 relates to them, the biggest complaint I9 get around commercial corridors and10 Commerce Department contracting is11 exactly that. The fiscal year starts12 July 1st, people don't get contracts13 until January. Can you tell me where are14 you as it relates to our ability to15 contract? What's the turnaround time for16 our contracts?17

Ms. Lewis

Good afternoon,18 Council. I'm Sade Olanipekun-Lewis.19 You are right. We have been20 having challenges. The contract21 processing comes under my unit. And22 through the rebalancing, we've lost two23 contracting staff. We're hoping to bring24 on another two through the25 169 5/4/09 COMM. OF THE WHOLE - FISCAL '10 BUDGET1 reorganization.2 We manage about 109 contracts,3 and there have been challenges, we agree,4 in terms of processing them.5 We're working through a --6 we're going through an exercise where we7 determine how to better process these8 contracts so that the providers don't get9 their contacts middle of fiscal year or10 the latter part; we believe that's11 unacceptable.12 And so, we hope to have a plan13 together for the fiscal year based on our14 contracting.15

Councilwoman Sanchez

So what16 is your date? Is it 90 days out? What17 can I expect this year?18

Ms. Lewis

We're still looking19 at -- all of our contracts have different20 demands. And so, we're trying to21 determine those contracts that are easily22 able to roll out --23 (Timer bell rings.)24

Ms. Lewis

-- which may happen25 170 5/4/09 COMM. OF THE WHOLE - FISCAL '10 BUDGET1 in as little as 30 days and those that2 may need a little more support in terms3 of completing the contracting process.4 And when I say "support," some5 of the providers may need some technical6 assistance in beginning to provide the7 services, so we may deploy staff to try8 to work on that deficiency in the9 contract.10 So it depends on the provided.11 And so, we're working through that12 process.13

Mr. Altman

What we're looking14 to do and what Sade's doing is to set15 clear targets for each of the different16 contracts. And right now, that, as you17 say -- you're right, that doesn't exist,18 and it's confusing and difficult for19 groups, and -- and we want to fix that.20

Councilwoman Sanchez

Okay.21 What's the goal, though? I mean, it's --22 is it 90 days? Am I calling you November23 1st because my contractors don't have24 contracts, or am I calling you December25 171 5/4/09 COMM. OF THE WHOLE - FISCAL '10 BUDGET1 1st? What is our goal? What is our2 aspirational goal?3 Because it's not good business.4 I mean, we're the Commerce Department.5

Councilwoman Sanchez

If we7 don't have good business practices, how8 do we expect nonprofits for cash flow to9 manage what we're asking them to do? So10 that has to be seen as urgent.11

Ms. Lewis

And 90 days is not12 an unreasonable amount, again, being the13 average, depending on the provider.14

Councilwoman Sanchez

Well, a15 lot of these are re-ups. These are16 people that contract with us every year?17 Why is someone who we contract for 2018 years having to wait 120 days, 180 days19 if it's the same contract?20

Ms. Lewis

We have a very21 painful contracting process,22 Councilwoman. And we're looking to23 see if we can --24

Councilwoman Sanchez

I can't25 172 5/4/09 COMM. OF THE WHOLE - FISCAL '10 BUDGET1 hear you.2

Ms. Lewis

We have a very3 painful contracting process, a long4 contracting process that we're looking to5 streamline.6 In fact, we're working through7 the Mayor's Private-Sector Task Force,8 we're working with Temple University. We9 have a graduate team, a team with10 graduate students, who are looking to see11 how we can better perfect our contracting12 process. And that is underway right now.13 So when that analysis is14 complete, we should hopefully have in15 place some recommendations that can16 streamline our contracting process.17

Councilwoman Sanchez

Thank18 you, Madam President. Or can I keep19 asking questions?20

Councilwoman Tasco

Point of21 information. And don't take me off the22 list.23 (Laughter.)24 COUNCIL PRESIDENT VERNA:25 173 5/4/09 COMM. OF THE WHOLE - FISCAL '10 BUDGET1 Councilwoman Tasco.2

Councilwoman Tasco

Have -- in3 streamlining the process, have you -- are4 you having conversations with the5 organizations to see what -- how they see6 the impediment? Are you talking to them?7

Ms. Lewis

Not -- right now,8 we're looking internally, Councilwoman,9 at our processes, which we believe is the10 first step. I think once we've done11 that, we're going to look globally at the12 providers. Again, our providers have13 different capacity, so we will look at14 them to see where we can better expedite15 their processes.16

Mr. Altman

In fairness, we do17 hear from them regularly. I mean, I --18 so we have spoken with them, because19 they -- the ones who run into problems20 talk to us and say, Here's how I think21 you can do it better. Different22 organizations have made a number of23 suggestions.24 We're pulling all of that25 174 5/4/09 COMM. OF THE WHOLE - FISCAL '10 BUDGET1 together to try to get to this 90-day2 goal, if we can, for the majority of3 contracts. And we've heard from many of4 them.5 So I think we have some pretty6 good outreach to the groups.7

Councilwoman Tasco

Okay. I8 didn't lose my spot, did I?9

Council President Verna

No,10 you didn't.11

Councilwoman Tasco

Thank you.12

Council President Verna

I'm13 going to recognize Councilman Jones, and14 after he questions the witnesses, we're15 going to recess until 1:45. So I'd like16 everybody in the audience to know that.17 Councilman Jones.18

Councilman Jones

Thank you,19 Madam President.20 And now it's "good afternoon."21 We've been here that long.22 Two things. One, there's the23 Office of Economic Opportunity, and then24 there's the Economic Opportunity Cabinet,25 175 5/4/09 COMM. OF THE WHOLE - FISCAL '10 BUDGET1 and I need to kind of delineate what the2 responsibilities of one are and whether3 they're working together to create this4 opportunity.5 I give that question in context6 to the American Recovery Investment Act,7 and I notice that you're scheduled -- or8 at least applying in part for funds under9 the Economic Development Assistance, the10 Broadband Expansion, Weatherization, High11 Grow Industry Green Jobs, and Brown12 Fields Cleanup, and Training. Those are13 all categories by which the Commerce14 Department may be eligible for some of15 those Stimulus dollars.16 My question is in the context17 of how we evaluate what levels of18 minority participation should be involved19 in these kinds of opportunities and how20 we are going to, going forward, kind of21 implement that and making sure that, you22 know, there's some equity by way of23 distribution of these dollars.24

Mr. Altman

Yeah. I think the25 176 5/4/09 COMM. OF THE WHOLE - FISCAL '10 BUDGET1 answer, Councilman, is: Most of these2 are under federal guidelines, and they3 set specific goals, I think.4 So our role with respect to the5 recovery dollars is more connecting firms6 to those opportunities as most of those7 mandates -- you know, most of the8 requirements and goals are set by the9 federal government.10 But I think what we're trying11 to do is set up a pipeline of different12 opportunities for service providers and13 others to take advantage of those as they14 come in.15

Councilman Jones

What you16 hear from various Councilmembers is that,17 you know, as we start to look at these18 opportunities, historically as a body,19 whether it was cable in the last century,20 whether it is the hope of gambling21 revenues now, whether it is the Stimulus22 Package, what we need to have is better23 kind of coordination and then24 matriculation to opportunities for25 177 5/4/09 COMM. OF THE WHOLE - FISCAL '10 BUDGET1 minority firms.2

Councilman Jones

And at the4 end of the day, when we start counting5 these things up, what we want to say is6 what I asked for in the beginning: A7 quantitative measurement that says we're8 going to be better next year than we were9 this year, better the year following10 that, and being able to quantify that in11 ways of opportunities.12 For example, in weatherization,13 there's going to be two types of14 opportunities: Those that come from15 departments within the City of16 Philadelphia and then those that come17 from subcontracting opportunities.18 I'll give you an example. If,19 in fact, the Water Department or the Gas20 Works does a certain amount of piping21 that it does in-house, through its own22 crews, then there is a opportunity to23 hire people through that Stimulus24 Package, but many of those contract25 178 5/4/09 COMM. OF THE WHOLE - FISCAL '10 BUDGET1 opportunities are subcontracted out.2

Councilman Jones

So the4 question becomes: Are we talking, are we5 coordinating with various agencies to6 make sure there's a pathway to7 opportunity for female companies, for8 minority companies, because in most of9 the spending, we're talking about a10 180-day window from start to completion,11 or obligation of the funds at least.12 So if we're not talking now13 then this wave of opportunity is going to14 hit us, go right over us, and we're not15 going to benefit from it in a substantial16 way if those mechanisms aren't being put17 in place right now.18

Mr. Altman

I agree, yes. I19 mean, weatherization is a good example20 where, you know, we're starting now to21 look at a few fronts. I mean, one is the22 training front, clearly because that's23 going to be a significant source of jobs.24 About two weeks ago from -- two25 179 5/4/09 COMM. OF THE WHOLE - FISCAL '10 BUDGET1 weeks ago today, we launched a training2 class with ECA, the first class of 20,3 which will be going through for training4 in weatherization.5

Councilman Jones

Are these6 individuals or companies?7

Mr. Altman

These are8 individuals; we're just talking about9 people for the moment.10

Councilman Jones

All right.11

Mr. Altman

So -- 'cause we12 know there's going to be a number of --13 we don't know yet the total14 weatherization dollar number, but it15 could be pretty substantial, so we're16 trying to get that training up and going17 now.18 We did that -- as an example of19 what you proposed, I mean, we didn't wait20 to receive weatherization dollars; we21 haven't actually received new recovery22 weatherization dollars, 'cause they go23 through the State, which then disburses24 those to the cities, but we've already25 180 5/4/09 COMM. OF THE WHOLE - FISCAL '10 BUDGET1 set up the training program, using some2 workforce dollars.3 And we're now starting to get4 organized around what business5 opportunities may come from6 weatherization. We're analyzing,7 actually, where the business8 opportunities may be in terms of supplies9 to try to figure out what -- how we can10 support potentially some smaller11 contractors and businesses to take12 advantage of it.13 So we're trying to do that14 ground work now.15

Councilman Jones

My16 question -- because, again, I want people17 to go to lunch -- is: If I have 3018 contractors right outside of City Hall19 ready to go, ready to participate,20 where's their first port of entry?21 Where's their first door they go through?22

Mr. Altman

Well, in terms of23 weatherization or just in general?24 COUNCILMAN JONES:25 181 5/4/09 COMM. OF THE WHOLE - FISCAL '10 BUDGET1 Weatherization.2

Mr. Altman

Weatherization3 right now, it's going to -- we are4 working with the State. The State has5 not -- the dollars are going to go6 through the State. The State then7 distributes it -- is deciding how they8 want to distribute it to the City.9 They may distribute those10 funds, we hope, to PHDC, they may11 distribute some of those directly to ECA12 as a provider. We're working with them13 now to try to figure out that system.14

Councilman Jones

Here's my15 point: Right now, there's 30 contractors16 lined up, ready for this Stimulus17 Package, Recovery Package to hit.18

Councilman Jones

Right now,20 when I say to you, Where do they line up21 at to get the opportunity --22 (Timer bell rings.)23

Councilman Jones

-- we don't24 have that answer.25 182 5/4/09 COMM. OF THE WHOLE - FISCAL '10 BUDGET1

Mr. Altman

Well, I would say2 right --3

Councilman Jones

And that's4 the answer.5

Councilman Jones

That's the7 180-day, that's the $100 million dollar8 question we have to give them a answer9 to.10

Mr. Altman

Right.11

Councilman Jones

So whether12 it's a PCDC, PIDC, Commerce, it -- the13 acronym matters less than where do they14 line up for the opportunities?15

Mr. Altman

I'd say the easy16 answer to that right now would just be17 Commerce, that if there's a list of 30,18 we're organizing that.19 But I would say, again, part of20 what we're doing is figuring out that21 provider system in weatherization, but we22 will be compiling, and we have actually a23 grant to help us organize specifically24 weatherization, because of those25 183 5/4/09 COMM. OF THE WHOLE - FISCAL '10 BUDGET1 opportunities, to get that system in2 place, so that we can have a -- where3 they can sign up.4 And whomever it is, if the5 dollars go to X, Y, and Z they're lined6 up to take advantage of it.7

Councilman Jones

Just so you8 know, we're talking about a considerable9 amount of dollars expended in a short10 amount of time.11

Mr. Altman

That's the big --12

Councilman Jones

And my only13 concern is, I don't want to be here next14 year, and my colleagues are asking these15 same questions for which we cannot give16 them answers.17

Councilman Jones

So it is19 important -- if it ain't measured -- and20 I say it in broken English, just to make21 the point -- it ain't managed. And we22 have to measure where those opportunities23 are, who they're going to. Whatever the24 door is, tell us. And we have25 184 5/4/09 COMM. OF THE WHOLE - FISCAL '10 BUDGET1 constituents that are waiting right2 outside of this hall, ready to go, but3 they don't know where to report to.4

Councilman Jones

And that's6 the key for us.7

Councilman Jones

Thank you,9 Madam President.10

Council President Verna

Thank11 you.12 We will stand in recess until13 1:45.14 (Lunch break taken.)15 (Proceedings resume.)16

Councilwoman Tasco

Good17 afternoon. We will reconvene the18 hearings this afternoon, and we'll19 continue with the Commerce Department.20 I think Councilman Clarke --21 he's not here, Councilman Green is not22 here.23 Councilwoman...24

Councilwoman Sanchez

He's25 185 5/4/09 COMM. OF THE WHOLE - FISCAL '10 BUDGET1 here.2

Councilwoman Tasco

Oh, I'm3 sorry. I'm trying to do this like --4 okay, Councilman Green.5

Councilman Green

Thank you,6 Madam Chair.7 Good afternoon. I appreciate8 your patience with us today. I will try9 to get through my questions in five10 minutes, so if you don't have the answer11 right away, if you could just provide12 them to the Chair.13 I'd like to look at your14 revenue projections. So if you look at15 , which details revenue from other16 governments, funding is falling by17 2 million, or 24.8 percent. What was18 this revenue and how was it allocated and19 why is it dropping?20

Mr. Altman

On in the21 budget brief?22

Councilman Green

Yeah.23

Mr. Altman

I'm sorry. Okay,24 hold on one second.25 186 5/4/09 COMM. OF THE WHOLE - FISCAL '10 BUDGET1

Ms. Lewis

This is Sade2 Olanipekun-Lewis speaking.3

Councilwoman Tasco

Sade, you4 have to speak up.5

Ms. Lewis

Yes, ma'am.6

Councilwoman Tasco

We can't7 hear you we have old hears.8

Ms. Lewis

Yes, ma'am. The9 difference of the 2-million-171 is10 actually, the effect of two items in the11 budget.12 On of the budget13 details, the Grants Revenue, we are14 expecting an increase -- we've asked for15 an increase of $519,000 of appropriations16 power for various grants that we will17 receive over the fiscal years; it's a18 continuation of grant.19 You net that against of20 the budget details, which shows a line21 item of about 3,191,000, and that22 represents a revenue source of UDAG23 repayment the City received from a24 project that was done, I guess, in FY --25 187 5/4/09 COMM. OF THE WHOLE - FISCAL '10 BUDGET1 it was done years ago, but the payment to2 support the project was done in FY '09.3

Councilman Green

Okay. So4 that was one-time payment.5

Ms. Lewis

Yes, sir.6

Councilman Green

Okay. So7 then there's a FY '09 original budget,8 including 5 million from Other9 Governments, and it's now -- and this is10 also on 42, and now it's only 728. Can11 you explain this change?12

Ms. Lewis

That part of the --13 if I can refer to you of the14 budget details, Commerce Budget, on15 Section 19, , this -- there are a16 number of grants that City Commerce will17 be requesting -- will be receiving over18 the course of the fiscal year, and the19 net increase is going to be 19,093, and20 these come from different sources.21 I can provide you the details22 of the differential of the 600,000 over23 the 728, but the 5 million -- one of the24 things, when we look at the budget, we25 188 5/4/09 COMM. OF THE WHOLE - FISCAL '10 BUDGET1 request an appropriations power to2 receive certain grants over the course of3 the fiscal year. We may not receive up4 to the appropriations power, but it's5 there to allow us to receive grants that6 we anticipate during fiscal years, and7 those grants that we never anticipate.8 It's a placeholder for us to receive the9 funding.10

Councilman Green

Okay, I11 understand. If you could provide detail12 about what you expected to receive and13 then what you are planning to receive on14 .15

Councilman Green

So that we17 can understand what we're giving you18 appropriation power for potentially.19

Councilman Green

On Page21 49 -- I'm going to skip that question22 'cause it's the same thing.23 On of the summary,24 which is CDBG --25 189 5/4/09 COMM. OF THE WHOLE - FISCAL '10 BUDGET1

Councilman Green

-- it's3 declining by 7 percent, FY '10 versus4 '09.5

Councilman Green

Can you7 explain that?8

Ms. Lewis

Yes, sir. That9 also is a net effect of three things:10 The first effect is on of your budget. shows the12 $238,000 appropriations for PCDC, and13 that number has been zeroed out because14 of proposed reorganization.15

Councilman Green

But that's16 an expenditure number, and I'm asking17 about revenue.18

Ms. Lewis

I'm sorry, sir?19

Mr. Altman

Revenue.20

Councilman Green

I'm asking21 about revenue.22

Ms. Lewis

And you're on Page23 49?24

Councilman Green

50.25 190 5/4/09 COMM. OF THE WHOLE - FISCAL '10 BUDGET1

Ms. Lewis

Oh, I'm sorry.2 Wrong page.3 Yes. These are -- again, these4 are appropriations powers, Councilor, and5 this is money that we will receive in the6 fiscal -- that we expect to receive in7 the course of the fiscal year. And these8 numbers are estimates. It includes9 original appropriations, plus prior10 years' appropriations.11

Councilman Green

Okay, so --12

Ms. Lewis

So this is just13 this year, what we're expecting.14

Councilman Green

If you could15 provide the detail about that is going to16 be for, you expect, in addition to the17 detail you're going to provide with18 respect to , I'd appreciate that.19

Ms. Lewis

Okay.20 (Timer bell rings.)21

Councilwoman Tasco

Let me22 just follow up on the -- I may have23 missed something you said. What was24 zeroed out of what portion of your budget25 191 5/4/09 COMM. OF THE WHOLE - FISCAL '10 BUDGET1 for PCDC?2

Ms. Lewis

There's a -- on3 , there's a $238,0004 appropriations in FY '09. There's no5 allocation for that in Fiscal Year 2008.6

Councilwoman Tasco

What was7 that for?8

Ms. Lewis

There -- the 2389 was typically -- was used by PCDC for10 loan programs. Each year, PCDC gets an11 appropriations through the Community12 Development Block Grant. Monies that13 aren't expended that year go into14 reserve, and so, this 238 represents15 additional entitlement dollars, new16 dollars, but it doesn't represent the17 true spending for loan origination.18 Based on our numbers, they've19 originated about a-million-9 in loans20 this year, but this 238 is just a portion21 of the amount of loans they've originated22 because they have prior reserves -- they23 have reserves from prior fiscal years.24 So the appropriation authority25 192 5/4/09 COMM. OF THE WHOLE - FISCAL '10 BUDGET1 is just not there.2

Councilwoman Tasco

So where3 does it go if -- according to the4 testimony, you're moving PCDC to Commerce5 and part of it's commercial corridors and6 Commerce and part of the loan program and7 PCDC, where will that appropriation go?8

Ms. Lewis

The appropriation9 will still with the iteration, the new10 iteration, of PCDC; it will sit with11 that. They will still -- it's12 anticipated that they will still provide13 loan services pursuant to their mandate,14 but it may not necessarily come through15 this vehicle in terms of the funding.16

Mr. Altman

The answer is,17 it's not an actual -- many of these, as18 Councilmember Green has pointed out, are19 not actual dollars but are authority to20 spend a certain amount of dollars.21 I this think what -- in this22 instance, with the lending capacity, if23 it goes to PIDC, there's loan authority24 there that they'd be able to use.25 193 5/4/09 COMM. OF THE WHOLE - FISCAL '10 BUDGET1 There's not an actual dollar amount that2 would be a decrease in loan activity3 because, in fact, we want to increase4 loan activity.5 So, it's just shifting -- it6 would shift to a different authority and7 a different vehicle to do that.8

Councilwoman Tasco

Okay.9 The Chair recognizes10 Councilwoman Brown.11 Councilwoman Brown is not here.12 Councilman Goode.13

Councilman Goode

Thank you,14 Madam Chair.15 Good afternoon.16 Following up on a question that17 Councilman Jones asked before the break,18 which wasn't fully answered -- and I19 think he went on to other matters -- the20 Economic Opportunity Cabinet, what's its21 purpose? how long ago was it created? and22 how many times has it met?23

Mr. Altman

Very good. We'll24 get you the actual number of times it25 194 5/4/09 COMM. OF THE WHOLE - FISCAL '10 BUDGET1 met.2 It was created, Councilmember,3 to, I think, bring to the highest level4 of attention that the Mayor wanted to set5 up -- because many of the issues that6 you've pointed out and that we went7 through before the break in terms of how8 goals are set, how seriously they're9 taken, how they're implemented, felt that10 that needed to come from the Mayor, from11 the deputy mayors, from the Cabinet, so12 that all of the departments, there was13 accountability at the highest level.14 So the Equal Opportunity15 Cabinet was set up. It is intended, I16 believe, to meet, I want to say,17 quarterly. We have met --18

Mr. Altman

No. More than20 once. It was established --21

Councilman Goode

The second22 question what was, when was it created?23 How many times has it met since it was24 created?25 195 5/4/09 COMM. OF THE WHOLE - FISCAL '10 BUDGET1

Mr. Altman

I think it's met3 once since it was created, but it met two4 -- the Cabinet met a couple of -- at5 least two times before the actual6 creation in terms of organizing itself7 and the executive order, reviewing the8 executive order. So I think we've come9 together, in the past year. Probably10 three times. And I think it's intended11 to get together quarterly.12 So we had planning some13 meetings, where cabinet members were14 there went, through what the goals would15 be, went through what the --16

Councilman Goode

So be a17 little bit more specific, if you can18 remember. When did it meet?19

Mr. Altman

Oh, I'd have to20 get you the specific dates. Unless Kevin21 you have it.22

Mr. Dow

It was in the October23 timeframes.24

Councilman Goode

Okay.25 196 5/4/09 COMM. OF THE WHOLE - FISCAL '10 BUDGET1

Councilman Green

Point of2 information.3

Councilwoman Tasco

Point of4 information, Councilman Green.5

Councilman Green

Excuse me,6 Councilman.7 My question -- if you could8 answer Councilman Goode's one question9 I'm very curious about, which is one of10 the parts of his question is: What is11 the actual authority of the Economic12 Opportunity Cabinet? In other words,13 what is it deciding? It's a cabinet14 meeting for a purpose; what is it15 deciding? what decisions does it make?16 Thank you, Madam Chair.17

Mr. Altman

I mean, the goal18 of it, I don't have the executive order19 in front of me -- you may Councilman20 Goode, but the intent of it was to, at21 the high level, set -- have the22 coordinated policy and strategy related23 to our equal opportunity goals.24 And we talked before about the25 197 5/4/09 COMM. OF THE WHOLE - FISCAL '10 BUDGET1 strategic plan. We'll be bringing2 forward a strategic plan, which would be3 presented to that cabinet, to the Equal4 Opportunity Cabinet. It would be5 adopted, in the sense of the buy-in, by6 all of the deputy mayors and the Finance7 Director and cabinet officials so that it8 becomes an operating policy document that9 all -- everyone is held accountable to.10 So adoption of the strategic11 plan and, I'd say, execution,12 implementation of that strategic plan.13 And then to have this kind of a14 conversation that we're having today,15 where, I think, that what the Mayor and16 what we envision is that the deputy17 mayors would have to come before and say,18 How did we meet -- are we establishing19 goals? did we meet our goals? why did we20 meet our goals? And that we would21 literally be accountable for that22 performance over the next year.23

Councilman Goode

I guess24 that's where I'm going at the end of the25 198 5/4/09 COMM. OF THE WHOLE - FISCAL '10 BUDGET1 day, and I thank Councilman Green for the2 question, 'cause, to some extent, there's3 no need to just try to hold you4 accountable or Mr. Dow accountable or5 Mr. Bell accountable, because that's not6 where we're trying to get to. We're7 trying to hold every department8 accountable.9

Mr. Altman

Right.10

Councilman Goode

And all of11 those departments report to deputy12 mayors, and it seems, in terms of how13 this was structured, that the Economic14 Opportunity Cabinet is actually the15 entity itself that we want to hold16 responsible, yet it appears that it may17 not have actually made any decisions yet18 since its creation.19

Mr. Altman

The next piece20 that we're waiting on is -- or that will21 be the meeting will be bringing forward22 the strategic plan, which, as Kevin said,23 we're going to complete in the next24 couple of months.25 199 5/4/09 COMM. OF THE WHOLE - FISCAL '10 BUDGET1 And that will be, I think, very2 important 'cause that's where the goals3 and objectives are going to be set for4 this cabinet, and we're now incorporating5 the recommendations of the Structure and6 Diversity Task Force, and we're working7 on that. So that's right.8 And then it will be, from that9 point forward, held accountable the,10 deputy mayors and then departments.11

Councilman Goode

Okay.12 Thank you, Madam Chair.13

Councilwoman Tasco

Thank you.14 That's your strategic plan for15 its Commerce Department?16

Mr. Altman

That's for the17 Economic Opportunity Strategic Plan.18

Councilwoman Tasco

Okay.19

Councilwoman Tasco

So you'll21 have -- when is that due? When do you22 plan to have it for?23

Mr. Altman

What we intend --24 I believe we said earlier we'll have that25 200 5/4/09 COMM. OF THE WHOLE - FISCAL '10 BUDGET1 completed for the -- well, the end of the2 year, for July, for the fiscal year.3

Mr. Dow

The fiscal year.4

Councilwoman Tasco

Okay.5 Councilwoman Sanchez.6

Councilwoman Sanchez

Thank7 you.8 Going back to the commercial9 corridors discussion, we talked about the10 187 neighborhood-based commercial11 corridors. How many are under the12 current management of PCDC?13

Mr. Altman

Of those14 corridors?15

Councilwoman Sanchez

Mm-hmm.16

Mr. Altman

I believe 27.17

Councilwoman Sanchez

Is that18 the total that they do?19

Mr. Dow

They prioritize their20 commercial corridors, so they prioritize21 27.22

Councilwoman Sanchez

And how23 many do with we do internally through our24 subs?25 201 5/4/09 COMM. OF THE WHOLE - FISCAL '10 BUDGET1

Mr. Dow

We have --2 neighborhood commercial corridors are3 187, which we define.4

Councilwoman Sanchez

Right.5

Councilman Jones

Point of6 information. Point of information.7

Councilwoman Tasco

Would you8 yield for a point of information?9

Councilman Jones

I think we10 should call up Mr. Sabor, 'cause, from my11 recollection, there are a lot more than12 27 corridors that are under the13 management contractual obligation of14 PCDC, and I think we might save ourselves15 a couple of questions and steps by16 bringing him up so he could speak to17 those issues that my colleague wants18 answered.19

Councilwoman Tasco

The Chair20 recognizes Mr. Sabor; is he available?21 (Witness comes forward.)22

Mr. Sabor

Good afternoon,23 Councilwoman.24

Councilwoman Tasco

State your25 202 5/4/09 COMM. OF THE WHOLE - FISCAL '10 BUDGET1 name, please, for the record.2

Mr. Sabor

Kiel Sabor,3 President of the Philadelphia Commercial4 Development Corporation.5 With respect to the contractual6 obligation that PCDC has regarding7 commercial corridors, there are 458 corridors that we are responsible for, of9 which 20 have been designated as priority10 corridors.11

Councilwoman Tasco

Who's12 asking the question?13

Councilwoman Sanchez

I am.14

Councilwoman Tasco

All right.15

Councilwoman Sanchez

So of16 the 45, can you please provide to the17 Chair that clarification in terms of the18 45 under contractual arrangements versus19 the 27 that are priorities. You said 20?20

Councilwoman Sanchez

The22 Councilman said 27, okay.23 And then -- 'cause I guess my24 point is, part of the streamlining line25 203 5/4/09 COMM. OF THE WHOLE - FISCAL '10 BUDGET1 is, we're going to be able -- going back2 to Councilman Jones' point earlier -- do3 more corridors or develop more4 efficiencies. So I would like to see5 where we are today and then what the6 goals is in terms of servicing some of7 those corridors.8 So, if you could provide that9 as part of your transition plan, that10 would be important.11 One thing that's missing -- and12 I had this conversation with the Commerce13 Director and Kevin Dow. One of the14 things that's missing in the15 conversation, as we talk about business16 development, is manufacturing. I have17 600 manufacturing jobs in my district18 that I'd like to protect.19 Can you articulate for me what20 our agenda is as it relates to21 manufacturing, light manufacturing?22

Mr. Altman

I was just23 checking on one thing.24 I think there are two -- well,25 204 5/4/09 COMM. OF THE WHOLE - FISCAL '10 BUDGET1 at least two, but let's just talk about2 two things.3 One is, as you know4 Councilmember, we have funded over the5 past few -- Commerce has funded over the6 past few years the Urban Industry7 Initiative, UII. They have been the8 principal organization doing outreach to9 the manufacturing sectors, Steve Jurash.10 They -- I've gone to a number of meetings11 with them, with manufacturers.12 Their goal is both to do13 advocacy for that sector as well as14 problem-solving. One of the things15 they've been working on -- and I met with16 Mr. Jurash about two weeks ago -- is17 actually a training module with the18 community colleges, which has been19 designed with manufacturers.20 Apparently -- and I'm not sure21 of the exact number -- but there are22 something close to 800 job openings in23 manufacturing.24

Councilwoman Sanchez

In the25 205 5/4/09 COMM. OF THE WHOLE - FISCAL '10 BUDGET1 city, in the City.2

Mr. Altman

In the City. And3 they have found that it's been hard to4 fill those jobs in terms of just basic5 skill requirements, the manufacturers6 have. So they've designed this program.7 I believe they've received some funding8 for it. And so they've been doing that9 kind of outreach.10 They also work on referring11 many manufacturers to us in Commerce just12 on a day-to-day basis in terms of their13 needs. Many of them -- a lot of their14 needs have to do with licensing, getting15 through permitting processes, business-16 license issues because of the17 classification of the industries. So18 there's a lot of interaction day-to-day19 between our staff and UII. So that's20 kind of on the daily basis.21 On a policy level, we are22 working with the -- I think you heard23 this, I think, maybe in Allen24 Greenberger's testimony during the25 206 5/4/09 COMM. OF THE WHOLE - FISCAL '10 BUDGET1 Planning Commission, the -- the2 Industrial Land Use Study that we're3 doing with PIDC and the Planning4 Commission, which is looking at all of5 the supply of industrial land, looking at6 what the demand is for industrial land.7 So taking a longer-term view in terms of8 the manufacturing sector and what its9 needs are because we are either10 land-constrained or, if not land-11 constrained, the parcels we have are12 either brownfield sites or difficult13 sites when the manufacturing wants to14 expand.15 (Timer bell rings.)16

Mr. Altman

So I'd say two17 fronts: One is day-to-day problem-18 solving related to both their training19 needs and business needs, and then taking20 the long-term view of what we need to do21 to prepare ourselves to keep this sector22 vibrant in the City.23

Councilwoman Sanchez

Okay.24 One of my concerns is, and Councilwoman25 207 5/4/09 COMM. OF THE WHOLE - FISCAL '10 BUDGET1 Tasco's, who shares part of Cardone2 Industries, they've recently started3 moving out of the area. And when I4 attempted to speak with them prior to5 this administration, their issue was,6 they had some financing issues and some7 other things that the City did not8 respond to that led to them moving to9 McAllen, Texas, some of their10 manufacturing plants, 'cause they're11 trying to be competitive globally.12 And I'm very concerned because,13 going back to job retention, this market14 does not get the same attention from our15 business component but provides for those16 of us in the neighborhood critical17 entry-level jobs.18 And it is -- when you hear the19 number, there's 800 jobs they can't fill,20 and we're not creating a pipeline either21 through our technical component at the22 School District or through our community23 college. That is of great concern,24 because these are jobs that, in some25 208 5/4/09 COMM. OF THE WHOLE - FISCAL '10 BUDGET1 cases, don't require high school diplomas2 but are good-paying jobs because they3 start immediately at anywhere between $154 and $17.5 I'd like us to be a little bit6 more aggressive. I have a lot of this in7 my district. I know, for Councilwoman8 Tasco, we lost hundreds of employees9 through Cardone Industries, hundreds.10 And they're going to continue to divest11 from the City because they didn't feel12 that the City was as proactive as we can13 be, so we need to put that on our radar;14 it's important.15

Mr. Altman

Yeah. And let me16 just make two very quick points on that,17 Councilmember.18 One is, we agree with you. And19 we met with Cardone as recently as, I20 would say, in the past maybe 60, 90 days,21 met with actually their whole leadership22 team. And all of us, we went out there23 and met with them. And they signed up24 for our Home, Buy Now Program the25 209 5/4/09 COMM. OF THE WHOLE - FISCAL '10 BUDGET1 expanded program, because one of the2 issues that they said they had is that3 they wanted to have an incentive, you4 know, to keep for employees in the5 neighborhoods.6 And, as you know, they probably7 employ -- I don't want to say an exact8 number, but let's say 50 percent, 609 percent of their employees -- they have,10 let's say, 4,000 employees -- are within11 the northeast area, in Northeast12 Philadelphia.13 So they signed up first --14 actually, Michael Cardone himself. And15 we did a tour of their facility. And16 they are participating.17 We've also gone out to18 manufacturers, like Agusta, of19 helicopters in Northeast Philadelphia.20 We really wanted to hit these21 manufacturers, and, I agree with you,22 both on the training front and also in23 terms of employee retention.24 So, you know, there's always25 210 5/4/09 COMM. OF THE WHOLE - FISCAL '10 BUDGET1 more we can do, but it's a very important2 sector, and we do see that these are3 firms that are in the neighborhoods and4 providing jobs in the neighborhoods,5 which is why we started with them on some6 of these incentive programs.7

Councilwoman Sanchez

Okay,8 thank you.9

Councilwoman Tasco

Thank you.10 The Chair recognizes Councilman11 Jones.12

Councilman Jones

Thank you,13 Madam Chair.14 And I know by now that you at15 that table think we just like hearing16 ourselves talk, but such is not the case.17 We like being -- we like being heard,18 however, when we do talk, and one of the19 things that we want you to hear loud and20 clear is that the inclusion factor, the21 diversity factor is something that we22 take very seriously.23 And that when -- I'm a little24 distressed when I hear that we've only25 211 5/4/09 COMM. OF THE WHOLE - FISCAL '10 BUDGET1 met -- the Cabinet has only met one or2 possibly even three times in this period3 -- wait a minute -- and that we haven't4 gotten together a plan yet.5 We are 15 months into this6 administration. And the projects aren't7 starting up while we plan our way through8 this. Groundbreakings happen every day,9 there's shovel-ready projects going10 through the Stimulus Fund. And if we11 don't get our kind of collective acts12 together, these opportunities are going13 to pass right by us.14 And so, it's not that we like15 hearing ourselves talk, but we want to be16 heard when we do.17 And we want you to understand18 that, just like I want to see a increase19 of 15 to 20 percent in the loan20 production, the business development side21 of this, I'd like for us to have a real22 land that includes real businesses in23 some of these opportunities that we can24 all be proud of when -- I don't know if25 212 5/4/09 COMM. OF THE WHOLE - FISCAL '10 BUDGET1 we're having the mid-week this year or2 budget cuts prevent it, but at the3 mid-week luncheon, we have really need to4 have something substantial to point to by5 way of our work.6 And the other suggestion that I7 would add is that you might want to8 invite Council, or a member or two from9 Council, to work with that office,10 because, as you do things in an11 administrative capacity that needs12 legislative action, we can be a part of13 the team as well.14 And we can help you. When a15 developer comes in here, trying to get16 relief from us or different things from17 us, we want to be able to help you to18 help them to be diverse. And that's19 something that we're going to look20 forward from you guys in the couple of21 months -- not years.22 We don't want to take windows23 of years in between, but we want to look24 at this on a quarterly basis, maybe under25 213 5/4/09 COMM. OF THE WHOLE - FISCAL '10 BUDGET1 the Fiscal Stability Committee and see2 how we're doing.3

Mr. Altman

Absolutely.4

Councilman Jones

You can say5 "yes" in the mic so that it's on the6 record.7 (Laughter.)8

Mr. Altman

Yes, I hear you.9

Councilman Jones

Does that10 mean "Yes, we're going to" --11

Mr. Altman

That means yes.12

Councilman Jones

Okay.13

Mr. Altman

I mean yes is that14 we -- look, we also are taking it very15 seriously. We're going to -- we're not16 just waiting for this plan. We're17 looking at every opportunity we can to18 increase this. And we will -- we hear19 you that this is on the top of our radar20 screen as well.21

Councilman Jones

Just as a22 friendly amendment, I was told just now23 that we're doing it through the Commerce24 Committee, of which Wilson Goode is the25 214 5/4/09 COMM. OF THE WHOLE - FISCAL '10 BUDGET1 Chair.2 So thank you, Madam Chair.3

Councilwoman Tasco

Thank you.4 And speaking of diversity, I5 note earlier we had gotten some concerns,6 and Councilwoman Sanchez raised the issue7 of the number of people who left your8 department and that the majority of them9 were minorities.10 And what is the breakdown, the11 minority breakdown, of your executive12 staff?13

Mr. Altman

You're seeing the14 team here.15

Councilwoman Tasco

The16 executive staff?17

Councilwoman Tasco

Okay. How19 about --20

Mr. Altman

I mean, there21 is also -- I mean, there's also -- right22 here, we have here the key people, my --23 you know, Kevin's in charge of overall24 Neighborhood Business Service, as well as25 215 5/4/09 COMM. OF THE WHOLE - FISCAL '10 BUDGET1 Equal Opportunity Employment reports to2 Kevin.3 Sade is in charge of all4 finance and operations.5 And Dwayne's in charge of both6 the policy as well as the development arm7 of -- within Commerce.8

Councilwoman Tasco

How about9 your middle managers?10

Mr. Altman

In the middle11 managers, we have Mike Bell, Andrew12 Frishkoff, and Dawn Summerville. I would13 say that's it.14 Dawn's running under Kevin, the15 Business Team. Andy Frishkoff runs the16 Neighborhood Commercial Corridor Group.17 Michael Bell runs Equal Opportunity.18 Those are kind the of the three19 principal divisions, I would say.20

Councilwoman Tasco

Okay. Are21 they the only three in middle management?22

Mr. Altman

Yeah, we only23 have -- remember, Commerce is only -- I24 mean, in total, we're -- when you25 216 5/4/09 COMM. OF THE WHOLE - FISCAL '10 BUDGET1 integrate, I mean, the Office of Economic2 Opportunity and Commerce, we're 653 people. I mean, Commerce itself today is4 about 49 people, so --5

Councilwoman Tasco

What I6 would like for you to do is give us a7 list of your staff members.8

Councilwoman Tasco

One of the10 things that we talked about when we met,11 one of the issues we talked about, was12 increasing the Asian diversity, Asian13 representation in your office.14

Councilwoman Tasco

Due to the16 fact that many of our commercial17 corridors are -- the businesses are owned18 by Asians and other ethnic groups, one of19 the problems we have found with the --20 (Timer bell rings.)21

Councilwoman Tasco

--22 particularly in my area, on Fifth23 Street -- Fifth Street, particularly, and24 some of the other areas not quite as bad,25 217 5/4/09 COMM. OF THE WHOLE - FISCAL '10 BUDGET1 but the language issue and having the2 business owners understand, you know, how3 to do business with the City, how to do4 business in the City. And just the5 inability to communicate with someone who6 works for the City.7 And not just your department8 but all of the City departments,9 particularly those departments where they10 -- that impacts on their business, L&I,11 for instance.12

Councilwoman Tasco

And14 understanding the L&I rules and15 regulations as well as having someone16 communicate with them who can speak their17 language and work with them.18 And so, I think there ought to19 be some effort to, particularly in your20 business --21

Mr. Altman

Business services.22

Councilwoman Tasco

--23 Business Services Group.24

Mr. Altman

Yes.25 218 5/4/09 COMM. OF THE WHOLE - FISCAL '10 BUDGET1

Councilwoman Tasco

That those2 employees should be -- certainly reflect3 what the City looks like and the business4 community that you're serving.5 So, we'll ask that question.6 And when you come back, we want to have7 some better numbers.8

Mr. Altman

Well, I mean, the9 numbers in terms of the senior staff --10

Councilwoman Tasco

Mm-hmm.11

Mr. Altman

-- and as I went12 through, as you can see, the sort of the13 executive staff here, and then, you know,14 in terms of the middle management, what15 we consider the middle management16 division managers. So I'm happy to17 provide that in writing for you.18 But your point about -- and19 we've talked about this. We do have20 someone who's very good, who done a lot21 of outreach, as you know, to the Asian-22 American community.23

Councilwoman Tasco

Mm-hmm.24

Mr. Altman

Unfortunately, we25 219 5/4/09 COMM. OF THE WHOLE - FISCAL '10 BUDGET1 only have one person doing that. And2 with the budget constraints we've had, we3 obviously haven't been able to hire more4 people, but it is something that we're5 looking at doing 'cause of the demand6 that's there. And there's no question7 the need in the commercial corridors.8

Councilwoman Tasco

Maybe you9 could get employees from other10 departments to provide any direct contact11 or services to the community.12

Mr. Altman

Yeah. We'll13 driver's license look at that.14

Councilwoman Tasco

Councilman15 Green.16 I'll come back.17

Councilman Green

Thank you,18 Madam Chair.19 On of the detail,20 you've got a-million-452 for PCDC for --21 the purpose described is economic22 stimulus.23

Councilman Green

What does25 220 5/4/09 COMM. OF THE WHOLE - FISCAL '10 BUDGET1 that mean?2

Mr. Altman

That number is...3 Yeah, that number, this fiscal year, is4 largely a staffing number. And that's5 one of the numbers that's included in the6 testimony under -- of sources. That's7 one of the other sources of staffing8 money.9

Councilman Green

I'm sorry.10 Why is it described as "economic11 stimulus"?12

Mr. Altman

This is a fund13 that has -- there's a stimulus fund that,14 I guess, historically has always -- it15 has been steadily declining over the16 years. That's been used for a whole17 variety of different uses from grants to18 businesses to doing different development19 deals to staffing.20 Most of that money, as you can21 see, has declined over the years. You22 can see, in '08, it was about $4 million,23 and before that, it was at significantly24 greater levels. It's now down to about25 221 5/4/09 COMM. OF THE WHOLE - FISCAL '10 BUDGET1 $1.4 million.2

Councilman Green

Well, this3 isn't a fund. This is, from the General4 Fund, an appropriation to PIDC.5

Councilman Green

As it was in7 2008. It was a $4 million appropriation8 from the General Fund.9

Mr. Altman

That's right.10

Councilman Green

There's no11 fund. It's the General Fund.12

Mr. Altman

Right. It's a13 fund. It's a general -- I'm sorry. I14 meant it's a line item, not a separate15 fund. And the line item now, really the16 core of it, is just paying for staffing.17 It used to pay for a lot more when we had18 a greater number.19

Councilman Green

What do20 these people do and how much do they21 earn? Can you please provide the Chair22 with a copy of that?23

Mr. Altman

Yeah, I can --24

Councilman Green

A job25 222 5/4/09 COMM. OF THE WHOLE - FISCAL '10 BUDGET1 description of each person in PIDC --2

Councilman Green

-- that4 we're paying for?5

Councilman Green

How much7 they earn and, you know, why we feel8 like, with all of the fees and the other9 things that they generate as a result of10 doing a lot of business for the City, we11 need to supplement their staff and we12 can't make them self-sustaining.13

Mr. Altman

Yeah, let me be --14 let me clarify, Councilmember Green.15

Councilman Goode

Point of16 information. Point of information.17

Councilman Green

Yes. I18 yield.19

Councilman Goode

Just to give20 some background.21 Even before Mr. Altman was22 here, the Economic Stimulus Fund was23 actually started under the Rendell24 Administration and different sources of25 223 5/4/09 COMM. OF THE WHOLE - FISCAL '10 BUDGET1 funding, including tax lien sales, a2 portion of which went to the School3 District; the other portion went toward4 economic development projects, some other5 sources of funding through the sales6 support proceeds. At one point, it was7 at 70 or $80 million or more.8 When that money was depleted,9 we began to plug in General Fund money to10 keep the Economic Stimulus Program going,11 but it could be only appropriated at the12 level about of 4 or $5 million.13 And so, PIDC simply administers14 the fund.15

Councilman Green

But there's16 no fund anymore.17

Councilman Goode

It's still a18 fund, but it's funded through the General19 Fund.20

Councilman Green

Okay.21

Mr. Altman

Let me try to make22 the -- I think -- and, Councilmember,23 you're right.24

Councilman Goode

To the25 224 5/4/09 COMM. OF THE WHOLE - FISCAL '10 BUDGET1 extent that they were loans made that are2 paid back to the Economic Stimulus3 Program, that money goes back into the4 fund.5

Councilman Green

Okay.6

Mr. Altman

Right. What's7 happened -- and Councilmember is8 absolutely right. It -- just to be9 clear, this is funding -- the line item10 that you refer to, the $1.4 million --11

Councilman Green

Right.12

Mr. Altman

-- that money pays13 for staff at Commerce not at PIDC. So,14 in other words, it's just funded15 through -- and this is just -- this is16 part of what I wanted to do in the17 testimony, because Commerce has18 historically --19

Councilman Green

No. I'm20 sorry. This is Class 200 detail. This21 is a contract -- this is money that goes22 to PIDC.23

Councilman Green

This is25 225 5/4/09 COMM. OF THE WHOLE - FISCAL '10 BUDGET1 Class 200 detail. This does not pay for2 Class 100 staff at Commerce.3

Mr. Altman

I -- it -- that's4 why I'm showing -- in the testimony, I5 say we have a variety of sources that6 have paid for staffing. If you look at7 the chart --8

Councilman Green

So you're9 saying that what we do is, we appropriate10 money to PIDC, and then somewhere in the11 five-year budget detail, under Commerce,12 there's money that comes back to Commerce13 from PIDC?14

Mr. Altman

It doesn't come15 back to Commerce. It's appropriated.16 And this is historically just17 -- I mean, what's happened, it's been, I18 guess, appropriated to PIDC, and then it19 has paid for staff at Commerce. They're20 PIDC employees, but they are deployed to21 Commerce, and they do various activities22 at the Commerce Department.23

Councilman Green

Where are24 they, in your office building?25 226 5/4/09 COMM. OF THE WHOLE - FISCAL '10 BUDGET1

Mr. Altman

In our office2 building.3 (Timer bell rings.)4

Councilman Green

Okay. Just5 provide the Chair --6

Mr. Altman

That's the way --7 and, again, it's one of these -- like8 there's funds at MDO that work at9 Commerce, there's money through PIDC that10 had staff at Commerce. And just, it's --11

Councilman Green

I just --12

Mr. Altman

I understand.13

Councilman Green

I see no14 reason to have Class 200 funding for PIDC15 employees if they work in your office.16 It should be Class 100 in your office or,17 you know, it's just -- there's no18 transparency or even accountability; they19 don't work for you.20

Mr. Altman

Well --21

Councilman Green

So, you22 know, let's get the information to the23 Chair. And then we'll see if we can24 clean it up in this budget, maybe.25 227 5/4/09 COMM. OF THE WHOLE - FISCAL '10 BUDGET1 Madam Chair, I had a point of2 information, which took about three3 minutes roughly. You weren't here so --4 (Laughter.)5

Councilman Green

-- I have6 one final question.7

Council President Verna

All8 right. I'm timing you.9

Councilman Green

I have one10 final question, and that is: In the11 Controller's audit, one of the main12 complaints was that PAID did not remit13 land bank sales to you, to this General14 Fund quickly, and that costs us a great15 deal in interest expense.16 The Commerce Department's17 response, in the 2007 audit, was that the18 department will modify its contract to19 require it to remit -- with PAID, to20 require it to remit the proceeds of land21 bank properties in a timely manner. And22 in those instances, where PAID has failed23 to comply, it will assess interest and24 get reimbursed.25 228 5/4/09 COMM. OF THE WHOLE - FISCAL '10 BUDGET1 Can you please tell me, have2 you actually done this revision with your3 contract? And, if so, provide to the4 Chair a chart that shows when the sale5 happened and when the funds were remitted6 since 2007.7

Ms. Lewis

Councilman Green,8 Sade Olanipekun-Lewis.9 The 2007 audit, the exit10 conference, was had last fall. And in11 our response, we committed to what you12 just shared on the record. And we13 anticipate in FY '10, in the beginning of14 July, all of the contracts will be15 modified to reflect the interest payment16 that we're going to assess if the land17 proceeds are not remitted in a timely18 basis.19

Councilman Green

Was there a20 reason you didn't do it right away?21

Ms. Lewis

We just concluded22 the exit conference, and we --23

Councilman Green

It was in24 the fall, you said.25 229 5/4/09 COMM. OF THE WHOLE - FISCAL '10 BUDGET1

Ms. Lewis

Right, in the fall.2 We're updating all of our3 contracts with the new fiscal year,4 although the current contracts were5 already let. So for the new fiscal year,6 we're going to modify --7

Councilman Green

I'd say we8 have a little bit of hand with PAID,9 given that the Mayor appoints all five10 members of the board. And maybe we ought11 to revise that contract when we know12 there's a problem.13 Thank you, Madam Chair.14 COUNCIL PRESIDENT VERNA:15 You're welcome.16 The Chair recognizes17 Councilwoman Brown.18

Councilwoman Brown

Thank you,19 Madam President.20 Good afternoon.21 As a matter of record, Michael22 Bell reports directly to...?23

Mr. Altman

Kevin Dow.25 230 5/4/09 COMM. OF THE WHOLE - FISCAL '10 BUDGET1

Councilwoman Brown

Are any2 one of you at the table when Michael Bell3 is sitting with the department heads to4 think through and strategically determine5 what MBE/WBE goals will be?6

Mr. Dow

I have not been, but7 we will be and can be, yes.8

Councilwoman Brown

Okay. It9 gets back to Councilman Goode's and all10 of our concern, who do we ultimately hold11 accountable and responsible when it comes12 to what is essential for us, and that is13 leveling the playing field for women- and14 minority-owned businesses.15 To the Mayor's Advisory16 Commission Report on Construction17 Industry Diversity, what are the18 Administration's next steps in regards to19 any of those recommendations?20

Mr. Dow

We are taking those21 recommendations into hand now and we are22 going to be integrating some of our23 responses in the strategic plan for the24 economic opportunity that we'll take into25 231 5/4/09 COMM. OF THE WHOLE - FISCAL '10 BUDGET1 conversation, the 75 recommendations2 there. So there were 75.3 We're going to try to do best4 to respond to all of them. We might not5 get 'em all, probably won't.6

Councilwoman Brown

Sure.7

Mr. Dow

But they have help us8 and influence what we do in the strategic9 plan.10

Councilwoman Brown

Okay. In11 an effort to lead by example, and in12 response to the First Judicial District's13 comments that they weren't a City14 department, so therefore, they don't have15 to provide us numbers, is your department16 at all involved with non-city,17 quasi-government agencies in helping them18 understand that this is an expectation of19 this administration, here are the goals,20 what are you doing?21 Do they get any kind of reach,22 contact, conversation, dialogue, from23 your office on this issue?24

Mr. Dow

And you're talking25 232 5/4/09 COMM. OF THE WHOLE - FISCAL '10 BUDGET1 about Courts and the --2

Councilwoman Brown

Courts,3 SEPTA, Community College.4

Mr. Dow

Right. No, not at5 this time. We have not have been6 involved with them over the years,7 involving them in their minority8 participation.9

Councilwoman Brown

Okay.10 Councilman Jones has spoken at length11 about our interest in ensuring that,12 again, the playing field is even and13 level for persons in neighborhoods having14 access to jobs and subcontractors having15 access to opportunities.16 What is OEO going -- doing to17 assist MBE contractors to prepare and18 ramp up for these dollars? Given the19 fact that the Commerce Director has20 indicated you're still waiting for21 additional guidance from the State, what22 are you doing to ramp up in anticipation23 of those dollars?24

Mr. Dow

We hold a number of25 233 5/4/09 COMM. OF THE WHOLE - FISCAL '10 BUDGET1 outreach sessions with a number of2 different organizations to prepare them3 in terms of making them aware of what the4 opportunities are.5 So right now, it's a lot about6 let's make sure that folks understand7 what opportunities are coming down the8 pike for weatherization, the Neighborhood9 Stabilization Program. We've done the --10 we've done the Hispanic Chamber, we've11 done MSDC, we've done a number of12 different outreach programs to engage13 that community so that they can14 understand what they need to do to get15 their ducks in order in advance, and so,16 when they come and they are ready and we17 get these funding sources, they'll be18 prepared to take advantage of it.19

Councilwoman Brown

There may20 be a role for District Councilmembers as21 well --22

Councilwoman Brown

-- to be24 aware of those efforts so that they can25 234 5/4/09 COMM. OF THE WHOLE - FISCAL '10 BUDGET1 reach to their constituencies even in2 their way to really make sure that the3 word gets deep as far as wide, in4 addition to wide.5

Mr. Altman

Agreed.6 And we are, by the way, holding7 on Monday, next Monday, an event with8 the -- on the 11th -- with the SBA, the9 Small Business Administration with the10 federal government, which will be a major11 outreach effort to small businesses to12 make them aware of the SBA opportunities13 for -- they've changed some of their14 lending criteria, they have a number of15 outreach programs that serves small16 business development. So we're going to17 be hosting a major event with them as a18 first of series of how do we get ready19 Recovery dollars --20

Councilwoman Brown

Yes.21

Mr. Altman

-- and here are22 the opportunities of the federal23 government, and here's what we can24 prepare for. So we're launching that.25 235 5/4/09 COMM. OF THE WHOLE - FISCAL '10 BUDGET1 (Timer bell rings.)2

Councilwoman Brown

Terrific.3 We'll look forward to the --4

Mr. Altman

And I'll be happy5 to send it to everybody. Hopefully, if6 you haven't received the invitation, you7 will receive one.8

Councilwoman Brown

Terrific.9 The bell has rung, and I'll10 honor the bell.11 Thank you, Madam President.12

Council President Verna

Thank13 you.14 The Chair recognizes15 Councilwoman Tasco.16

Councilwoman Tasco

Thank you17 very much.18 Mr. Altman, you talk about of19 the 28 of 5 million dollars that's of20 your budget that's for the General Fund,21 $25 million is the Convention Center22 lease-service fee.23

Councilwoman Tasco

Now, isn't25 236 5/4/09 COMM. OF THE WHOLE - FISCAL '10 BUDGET1 the Governor supposed to re -- aren't we2 supposed to stop paying that fee?3

Mr. Altman

Yeah, I'm not the4 expert on that. I mean, that would5 really be through the Finance Office.6 We're a pass-through, but that number is7 supposed to go down to a fixed amount. I8 believe it goes to, I want to say,9 $15 million a year. And then that term10 was extended.11 So our -- we're never relieved12 of total responsibility. What the State13 is going to do is, I believe, they have14 to issue a bond. They have to defease15 the current bonds, and then --16

Councilwoman Tasco

Is the17 Budget Director here?18

Mr. Altman

They have to19 defease the --20

Council President Verna

Is21 the Budget Director available?22 (Steve Agostino returns to the23 witness table.)24

Mr. Altman

But, essentially,25 237 5/4/09 COMM. OF THE WHOLE - FISCAL '10 BUDGET1 what's happening is, they just have to2 defease the bonds; they haven't been able3 to do that, given the market condition.4 So, therefore, we're holding on to -- we5 have to continue payments a bit longer6 until they're able to do that, and then7 the amount will go down to 15 over a8 longer term, but I'll let...9

Mr. Agostini

Steve Agostini.10 Good afternoon.11 Pretty much what he said,12 almost verbatim.13

Councilwoman Tasco

Mm-hmm.14

Mr. Agostini

I forget if the15 number is 15 or 19 million; it has been16 extended out. We're still in discussions17 with the State. We do function as a18 pass-through, so what Andy said for the19 record pretty much --20

Councilwoman Tasco

But will21 we still be responsible for 15 million?22

Mr. Agostini

Yes.23

Councilwoman Tasco

So the24 State is not picking up the entire cost?25 238 5/4/09 COMM. OF THE WHOLE - FISCAL '10 BUDGET1

Mr. Agostini

No, they're not,2 and there is still some discussion about3 some elements of that, but no, they have4 not alleviated us of that cost.5

Councilwoman Tasco

When we6 did the Convention Center, weren't they7 supposed to pick up that whole fee?8 Okay, we'll check on it and will come9 back to you on that; that's not the10 Commerce Department, but yes, they are --11 I have one other question,12 Mr. Altman. It's my understanding that13 OHCD reports to you. In addition, and14 according to your testimony, one of your15 five economic development strategies is16 to build liveable neighborhoods.17 In this regard, I find it18 troubling that in this year's preliminary19 consolidated plan for OHCD, which will20 come to this Council, there is no21 proposed funding for anti-predatory22 lending products. Since 2003, the City23 has provided funding to support the24 program costs, and you know it's my25 239 5/4/09 COMM. OF THE WHOLE - FISCAL '10 BUDGET1 favorite program, the Fill Plus and the2 Mini Fill Home Improvement Loans.3 Considering your economic4 development strategies, Philadelphia's5 foreclosure crisis, America's stagnant6 economy, and a reduced amount of7 available credit from financial8 institutions, why have these programs9 been cut?10

Mr. Altman

Councilwoman, I'll11 have to look at that and get back to you.12 I do understand how important that is,13 and we've been a national model in this14 regard.15

Councilwoman Tasco

Mm-hmm.16

Mr. Altman

So let me look at17 the comp. plan and the funding and then18 get back to you, and I know we'll have a19 hearing on that, but --20

Councilwoman Tasco

Thank you21 very much.22 We did get some testimony from23 the GPUAC, who testified before the -- on24 the consolidated plan.25 240 5/4/09 COMM. OF THE WHOLE - FISCAL '10 BUDGET1

Councilwoman Tasco

And from3 that testimony, I gather that the program4 has not been funded. So I hope you will5 look into it, please.6

Mr. Altman

Let me look at7 that before the hearing, and then we'll8 get together with you.9

Councilwoman Tasco

Okay. One10 more question.11 It's my understanding that OHCD12 will have access to additional CDBG13 dollars as a result of the federal14 Stimulus Program. With the Stimulus15 funds, additional federal regulations are16 being developed to instruct recipients,17 like Philadelphia, on how they must use18 these funds.19

Councilwoman Tasco

In this21 regard, the Administration will present22 to Council the Consolidated Plan23 Ordinance, which must be passed by this24 spring. And considering that the federal25 241 5/4/09 COMM. OF THE WHOLE - FISCAL '10 BUDGET1 Stimulus regulations may not be released2 before the need to pass the plan, what is3 the Administration's plan to address this4 issue?5

Mr. Altman

Well, we are6 waiting for guidance. We do anticipate,7 in terms of the Block Grant, somewhere8 around --9

Councilwoman Tasco

Here comes10 the guy here, the budget guy.11

Mr. Altman

Oh, Steve?12 (Timer bell rings.)13 (Laughter.)14

Mr. Altman

Let me just15 finish. $14 million. And go ahead.16

Mr. Agostini

Madam President17 and Councilmembers, we have been very18 concerned about the reporting19 requirements, and we've been doing a lot20 of research across all of the Stimulus21 areas.22 We are in the process now of23 putting together a list of the steps that24 we need to take for the reporting25 242 5/4/09 COMM. OF THE WHOLE - FISCAL '10 BUDGET1 requirements.2

Councilwoman Tasco

Mm-hmm.3

Mr. Agostini

We've even gone4 so far as to actually put together a5 description of the people we would need6 to administer the Recovery Act funds and7 the reporting requirements, 'cause they8 are very onerous. So we're putting that9 together. And it's our intent to come10 back at some point and sort of explain11 all of those pieces that we're putting12 together.13 But you're right: The14 requirements are going to be very15 onerous. And we're trying to prepare16 ourselves, particularly for those17 entities, most notably CDBG and a couple18 Health Department grants, where there's19 money that's coming in right now, and we20 haven't put all of those reporting21 requirement and reporting mechanisms in22 place, and we have to do that.23

Councilwoman Tasco

Do you24 have any ideas when the feds are going to25 243 5/4/09 COMM. OF THE WHOLE - FISCAL '10 BUDGET1 release their --2

Mr. Agostini

We've been --3 Councilmember, we've been checking on a4 regular basis. Some of the departments5 are a little further along.6

Councilwoman Tasco

Mm-hmm.7

Mr. Agostini

For example, the8 Economic Development Administration, as a9 part of Commerce, which I'm familiar10 with, is a little further along in terms11 of the reporting requirements that they12 are going to be under.13

Councilwoman Tasco

Mm-hmm.14

Mr. Agostini

Others are not15 there yet. And until they put those16 together, we're not going to know one.17 Of the things we're looking to18 do, probably in the next week or two,19 actually, is a couple members of the20 Administration are actually going to go21 to Washington, D.C. and talk to the22 President's appointee for Stimulus23 oversight to try and get a handle on what24 that would be.25 244 5/4/09 COMM. OF THE WHOLE - FISCAL '10 BUDGET1

Councilwoman Tasco

And with2 the clock ticking for -- on the months3 this money will be available, is there4 any effort to lobby the extension time5 for these dollars through maybe the6 National League of Cities? because we're7 not the only one facing this problem.8 Maybe there's something that they could9 lobby on to get the time period extended10 to spend these dollars.11

Mr. Agostini

That's a very12 good suggestion. And when we go down to13 Washington, we should probably take that14 up with them. That's a very good15 suggestion.16

Councilwoman Tasco

All right.17 Thank you.18 Thank you, Madam President.19 COUNCIL PRESIDENT VERNA:20 You're welcome.21 The Chair recognizes Councilman22 Green. Is he in the room?23 UNIDENTIFIED SPEAKER: No.24

Council President Verna

Well,25 245 5/4/09 COMM. OF THE WHOLE - FISCAL '10 BUDGET1 we're not going to wait.2 Are there any other questions3 from members of the committee?4 The Chair recognizes5 Councilwoman Brown. No?6 Any other questions from7 members of the committee?8 (No further questions.)9

Council President Verna

Thank10 you. Thank you very much.11

Mr. Dow

Thank you, Madam12 President. Thank you.13

Council President Verna

We14 will now hear from the Commerce Aviation.15 (Witnesses come forward.)16

Councilwoman Brown

Madam17 President.18 COUNCIL PRESIDENT VERNA:19 Councilwoman Brown?20

Councilwoman Brown

I'll have21 a conversation offline. I did have a22 couple of other questions -- additional23 questions for OEO; I'll just have it24 offline.25 246 5/4/09 COMM. OF THE WHOLE - FISCAL '10 BUDGET1

Council President Verna

Okay,2 thank you.3 Good afternoon. Kindly4 identify yourself for the record.5

Mr. Gale

Good afternoon,6 President Verna and members of City7 Council. My name is Mark Gale, and I am8 the Acting Director of Aviation.9

Council President Verna

Just10 a moment, please.11 The noise level is much too12 high.13 Please proceed, Mr. Gale.14 Thank you.15

Mr. Gale

Would you like me to16 read the full testimony, Madam President?17

Council President Verna

You18 can abbreviate it. And we'll give a copy19 a copy of your testimony to the20 stenographer, and she will transcribe it21 in full.22 (Mr. Gale's written testimony23 is attached hereto.)24

Mr. Gale

Okay. I'm here25 247 5/4/09 COMM. OF THE WHOLE - FISCAL '10 BUDGET1 today to present testimony on behalf of2 the Division of Aviation FY '10 operating3 budget. 3 million over Fiscal Year 20097 estimated obligations. 17 The Airport deferred several18 maintenance projects and equipment19 purchases from Fiscal Year '09 to Fiscal20 '10. 8 million to fund materials, supplies,23 and equipment. 1 million are required to fund25 248 5/4/09 COMM. 25 million in new Class 40012 appropriations for additional electric13 GSE, or ground service equipment,14 recharging stations. 9 million. This includes23 appropriation in the Police, Fire, Fleet24 Management, Public Property, Law, and25 249 5/4/09 COMM. D. 20 Our airport is one of the21 largest economic engines in Pennsylvania,22 generating $14 billion annually into the23 local economy. Over 200 businesses24 linked to the Airport employ some 42,00025 250 5/4/09 COMM. 7 PHL is currently the8 tenth-busiest airport in the United9 States in terms of annual takeoff and10 landings. 14 Twenty-nine tenant airlines15 operate more than 600 flights to 12416 cities, including 58 daily nonstop17 flights, to 40 international18 destinations. 22 Also, USAirways has just23 announced PHL's first-ever direct service24 to South America. This new service to25 251 5/4/09 COMM. 7 In addition to good8 international reach, low-fare carriers9 continue to positively impact our10 domestic airfares. 21 During the past year, passenger traffic22 slightly decreased at the Airport, albeit23 at a lesser rate than many other24 airports, and also less than the national25 252 5/4/09 COMM. 3 percent. 15 We are pleased to report that solutions16 have been put in place to meet these17 challenges. Specifically:18 We remarketed our 2005 C19 variable-rate bonds, 179 million in20 December 2008, with a bank letter of21 credit obtained through a competitive22 process;23 And in April of 2009, we24 refunded our 2005 B -- excuse me -- 2005B25 253 5/4/09 COMM. 11 The refunding bonds also take12 advantage of the two-year alternative13 minimum tax exemption on Airport bonds14 under the Economic Stimulus Law. 24 Within an anticipated return to25 254 5/4/09 COMM. 5 The most significant terminal6 improvement project is the $300 million7 expansion and renovation of Terminals D8 and E. 25 255 5/4/09 COMM. OF THE WHOLE - FISCAL '10 BUDGET1 The first level of a new2 connector building housing a3 state-of-the-art check baggage handling4 system that will include the most modern5 explosive-detection technology will be6 complete and on line by the summer of7 2010. The baggage-claim renovations are8 scheduled to be complete in late 2009,9 the gate expansion is scheduled to be10 complete by March of 2010. 13

Council President Verna

I14 don't mean to interrupt you, but I15 thought you were going to abbreviate.16

Mr. Gale

Okay, I'll summarize17 the next few paragraphs.18

Council President Verna

Thank19 you.20

Mr. Gale

The Airport just21 recently completed its work on the 173522 expansion. This runway expansion23 extended the runway by 1,040 feet, but in24 the total, the 6500 feet, which gives us25 256 5/4/09 COMM. OF THE WHOLE - FISCAL '10 BUDGET1 the ability to handle additional aircraft2 on that runway, reducing congestion and3 delay, and adding capacity at the same4 time, saving the airlines an estimated5 $20 million in direct operating costs and6 an estimated value of passenger time of7 $29 million annually.8 During Fiscal '10, the Airport9 will focus on three terminal building10 projects: The first is a multiple-11 airline relocation, which will provide12 additional gates for USAirways'13 international growth; it will handle or14 facilitate the merger of Delta and15 Northwest Airlines; and would also16 efficiently -- or maximize utilization of17 the terminal facility by relocating18 AirTran Airways to Terminal E.19 The second project will be the20 expansion of Terminal F, which will also21 move the baggage-claim facility for22 Terminal F from its current location23 across the road onto the arrival side,24 which would be consistent with all of the25 257 5/4/09 COMM. OF THE WHOLE - FISCAL '10 BUDGET1 other terminals. It will expand the2 offerings in terms of the concession3 amenities program, and it will also4 increase the size of the security5 checkpoint.6 We also are going to be working7 on a project with USAirways to create a8 new check-baggage handling system in9 Terminals B and C, again to provide the10 most modern and efficient baggage-11 handling system, with inline explosive-12 detection technology.13 The last two projects, the14 Terminal F renovations, and the B and C15 check-baggage handling system, we expect16 to have the designs for both of those17 projects complete by the end of this18 year, or early next year, and out to bid.19 The Airport did -- or is20 expected to receive significant financial21 benefit from the Stimulus, or the ARRA22 Act. We anticipate receiving as much as23 $63 million through a combination of24 Stimulus monies that would come from the25 258 5/4/09 COMM. OF THE WHOLE - FISCAL '10 BUDGET1 FAA and the TSA for various projects,2 including airfield renovations and3 security.4 Looking forward to the future,5 we continue to work on the Airport's6 master plan, or the Capacity Enhancement7 Program, as it is often referred. We8 anticipate that the FAA will issue a9 final environment impact statement with10 respect to our project by late this year11 and, hopefully, a record of decision by12 early 2010.13 The Airport is committed, as we14 sit here, to environmentally-sound15 practices and green initiatives. We have16 over 50 recycling bins placed throughout17 our terminal facility, and we also have a18 number of other environmental initiatives19 underway, including one that's in our20 budget, to continue the purchase of the21 recharging stations for electric ground22 service equipment to reduce knocks23 emissions on the airfield.24 Diversity in our professional25 259 5/4/09 COMM. OF THE WHOLE - FISCAL '10 BUDGET1 services and construction and contracting2 is a priority at the Airport. During3 Fiscal Year '09, 34.4 percent of4 professional service contracts were5 awarded to DBE firms, representing6 13.8 million of the 40.8 million total.7 For construction, $15.8 million8 of the contracts, totaling $74.9 million,9 or 21 percent, were awarded to minority,10 female, or disabled firms.11 Over the past four years,12 35.2 percent of professional-service13 contracts and 17.3 percent of14 construction contracts were awarded to15 DBE firms.16 Thank you for the opportunity17 to testify. Both myself and senior18 airport representatives are here to19 answer any questions you may have.20

Council President Verna

Thank21 you very much.22

Mr. Gale

Thank you.23

Council President Verna

The24 Chair recognizes Councilwoman Brown, if25 260 5/4/09 COMM. OF THE WHOLE - FISCAL '10 BUDGET1 she's in the room. She's not?2 Councilman Jones.3

Councilman Jones

She actually4 asked me to ask some of her questions5 seriously.6

Council President Verna

Okay.7

Councilman Jones

So when she8 left, she let me know.9 Gentlemen, thank you for coming10 in, and it did not fall on deaf ears,11 your participation numbers, and some of12 them were 34 percent MBE by way of13 professional service contracts, equaling14 about $18 million, and I think it was15 18 percent in your construction?16

Mr. Gale

It was --17

Councilman Jones

Equal ling18 $74 million?19

Mr. Gale

-- $15.8 million in20 contracts.21

Councilman Jones

Right.22 Which did not fall on deaf ears and23 which -- is that a federal requirement24 that you followed? You followed the25 261 5/4/09 COMM. OF THE WHOLE - FISCAL '10 BUDGET1 federal guidelines on participation; is2 that correct?3

Mr. Gale

For anything that4 involves the use of federal functions5 fundings, that's correct.6

Councilman Jones

How did you7 fare in -- and I'm assuming that you and8 the Northeast Airport administratively9 are connected; is that correct?10

Mr. Gale

That is correct. We11 oversee the operation of the Northeast12 Philadelphia Airport.13

Councilman Jones

And it's my14 understanding that through the Stimulus15 dollars, that we're also expanding, or16 are gaining a runway; is that correct?17

Mr. Gale

Just recently, the18 Mayor, along with Governor Rendell and19 our Deputy Mayor for Transportation and20 Utilities, were at the Airport to accept21 a check from the Secretary of22 Transportation LaHood that actually23 awarded Philadelphia International $524 million in Stimulus monies for work at25 262 5/4/09 COMM. OF THE WHOLE - FISCAL '10 BUDGET1 Philadelphia International and $1 million2 for taxiway repair work at Northeast3 Philadelphia Airport.4 These are projects that5 otherwise probably would have sat there6 and not have gotten done as quickly7 without these monies.8

Councilman Jones

So I took9 note also in your testimony that we now10 have a directing flight out to Beijing,11 China, whereas, before, we -- in order to12 make it to China, we would have to go up13 to New York. What does that mean for14 revenues to the City of Philadelphia?15

Mr. Gale

We do not have a16 current flight to Beijing today.17 USAirways had applied, through the18 Department of Transportation, for the19 rights to fly to China and receive that20 for 2009, as did a couple of other21 airlines.22 Most all those -- I think all23 of those airlines deferred the right to24 fly to Beijing, given the economy, and25 263 5/4/09 COMM. OF THE WHOLE - FISCAL '10 BUDGET1 requested that they begin flying those2 routes in the spring of 2010.3

Councilman Jones

So in 2010,4 we will have a district flight --5

Mr. Gale

We're anticipating6 that USAirways will continue to honor7 that and fly that Beijing route in the8 spring of 2010.9

Councilman Jones

In your10 market research of flights from New York11 airport to Beijing, what does that mean12 by way of market share, market potential13 and revenue to the City of Philadelphia,14 just expanding that flight?15

Mr. Gale

I don't have exact16 figures on what it means in terms of17 market share. Obviously, I think that,18 for the longest time, Philadelphia19 International Airport was often20 characterized as being an airport that21 only had reach into Europe and was never22 able to get beyond that.23 So to take the bold steps and24 to see USAirways actually reach into the25 264 5/4/09 COMM. OF THE WHOLE - FISCAL '10 BUDGET1 Pacific Rim, into Asia, and hopefully2 into many other spots in the Far East3 area in the coming year, I think, is a4 great tool for Philadelphia to use going5 forth in the future as a world-class6 facility.7

Councilman Jones

And by8 way -- there's been a lot of publicity by9 the way of the swine flu and how people10 are trying to prevent traffic of that11 particular flu, and one of the pieces of12 equipment that is used is a recognition13 of body temperature equipment, and I14 wanted to know if Philadelphia has that15 same type of identification mechanism.16

Mr. Gale

We currently don't17 have thermal imaging, or body heat,18 scanners at the Airport. We are looking19 at to see how much they would be to20 deploy those at our facility.21 I would say that we have been22 working extremely closely with the Center23 for Disease Control and the Philadelphia24 Health Department as well as our Customs25 265 5/4/09 COMM. OF THE WHOLE - FISCAL '10 BUDGET1 and Border Protection folks on2 identifying flights that were coming in3 from Mexico and taking necessary4 precautions, again, to spread the word5 that the best way to prevent the disease6 from spreading any further is just7 through good hygiene practices -- washing8 your hands, coughing into a tissue and9 disposing of it.10 So we're keeping in very close11 contact with them, as we could for any12 other possible pandemic that would occur,13 being an international gateway company --14

Councilman Jones

Do you15 anticipate in the near future investing16 in that type of equipment?17

Mr. Gale

I believe that if it18 proves to be cost-effective and the19 equipment that we would use, if we20 weren't able to get it from one of the21 federal agencies such as the CDC that22 might have it, to be able to be used --23 (Timer bell rings.)24

Mr. Gale

We do have a CDC25 266 5/4/09 COMM. OF THE WHOLE - FISCAL '10 BUDGET1 officer that resides at the Airport, and2 so, we can confer with them to see if3 that would be use in the future.4

Councilman Jones

My final5 point and question, and this comes from6 Councilwoman Blondell Reynolds-Brown.7 She has informed me that you are a leader8 in greening and recycling and wanted you9 to expound upon that.10 And, by way of point of11 information, is Dennis Waller with you at12 the Airport?13

Mr. Gale

That is correct.14 Dennis Waller is --15

Councilman Jones

Then that16 explains the participation numbers. He's17 a former Minority Business Enterprise guy18 and a deputy over there, and he had a19 real hard boss when he was there. So I20 understand why you achieved such good21 numbers.22

Mr. Gale

Thank you. Thank23 you, Councilman.24

Councilman Jones

You can25 267 5/4/09 COMM. OF THE WHOLE - FISCAL '10 BUDGET1 answer the recycling and greening2 question.3

Mr. Gale

Well, as in my4 testimony, we do have a public-venue5 recycling program underway, with over 506 receptacles throughout the Airport.7 We are working on several8 different environmental initiatives that9 include the use of electric ground10 service equipment, going after federal11 and state grant dollars to be able to12 purchase the equipment to put it at the13 Airport.14 We're work on LEEDS-initiatives15 buildings that we are currently throwing16 into design to make sure that they are17 LEEDS-certified moving forward.18 And I don't want to take all of19 it, but if you would like further20 information, our Deputy Director for21 Planning and Environmental Stewardship,22 Calvin Davenger, is here, and he actually23 spearheads all of these initiatives for24 the Airport and has done a wonderful job.25 268 5/4/09 COMM. OF THE WHOLE - FISCAL '10 BUDGET1 If you'd like to hear from him --2

Councilman Jones

Yeah, I3 would, but just -- and I'm going to let4 my other colleagues take this, but how do5 we compare with other airports in that6 regard?7 So I'll take that answer from8 whomever.9

Mr. Gale

Okay. I'll let10 Mr. Davenger respond to that.11 I think that we're doing very12 well compared to other airports these13 days.14

Councilman Jones

Thank you,15 Madam President.16 COUNCIL PRESIDENT VERNA:17 You're welcome.18 (Witness comes forward.)19

Mr. Davenger

Good afternoon.20 My name is Calvin Davenger. I'm the21 Deputy Director for Planning and22 Environmental Stewardship at the Airport.23 And, Councilman Jones, I'll be24 happy to fill you in on what the Airport25 269 5/4/09 COMM. OF THE WHOLE - FISCAL '10 BUDGET1 is doing and how we compare to other2 large-hub airports.3 I recently returned from a4 conference in L.A. on climate change.5 And at these various conferences, we do6 get a sense for how we're doing in7 relation to other large-hub airports that8 have the same issues that we have.9 To start, though, the Mayor10 recently introduced his Green Works11 Philadelphia Plan, and we have any number12 of initiatives either in place or are13 being planned or will soon be in place14 that certainly are parallel what I tend15 to term his "5 Es" that were mentioned in16 his plan.17 And as it relates to that, the18 first E he talked about was energy. And19 when it comes to energy, we look at how20 we can best reduce the demand or reduce21 the demand for energy.22 And what we have done there is,23 we're -- we have an RFP which will be24 released very soon for an energy audit.25 270 5/4/09 COMM. OF THE WHOLE - FISCAL '10 BUDGET1 And the goals of an energy audit would2 be, first of all, to parallel the City's3 plan for climate change as it relates to4 a 5 percent reduction in energy by 2010,5 another 10 percent by year 2015.6 And also, there will be7 measures, which will be introduced, to8 conserve energy, in the hopes of helping9 to offset some of the deregulation of10 energy, which is due to happen in the11 year 2011.12 Mark, Mr. Gale, has already13 mentioned the fact that we're tied to14 leadership in energy and environmental15 design, LEEDS. We are members of the16 U.S. Green Building Council.17 We also have introduced a18 program for our tenants for LEEDS,19 Commercial Interiors, and USAirways has20 taken that a step further; they have a21 maintenance repair facility that's being22 constructed which they intend to have as23 a LEEDS gold facility.24 Mr. Gale had mentioned our25 271 5/4/09 COMM. OF THE WHOLE - FISCAL '10 BUDGET1 upcoming Terminal F project. That is2 being legislated to be, at minimum, a3 LEEDS silver facility.4 When it comes to alternative5 energy, we're going to continue our6 renewal of wind energy purchase at the7 level of 8 percent.8 We're looking at solar power.9 We're looking at a pilot10 project at our vehicle storage facility11 And we're also considering or12 looking at the possibility of hot13 water -- solar hot water at our new14 international terminal, Terminal A, if we15 can find space to place collectors on the16 vicinity -- in the area of the roof to17 make that happen.18 When it comes to environment,19 which is or carbon footprint, greenhouse20 gas emissions, we are undergoing a21 greenhouse gas inventory right now.22 We've started it, but since we've begun,23 we have new resources that have come into24 play. The Delaware Valley Regional25 272 5/4/09 COMM. OF THE WHOLE - FISCAL '10 BUDGET1 Commission has since released their2 greenhouse gas report, so we're looking3 at that.4 Also, the Airport Cooperative5 Resource Program, which is part of the6 Transportation Resource Board, they have7 released a document that outlines how8 airports need to accomplish this task, so9 we'll go back and review that.10 Also, airline conservation as,11 Mr. Gale mentioned, with regard to12 converting diesel ground support13 equipment to electric equipment. We have14 a program now where about one-third of15 the inventory of the Airport's airlines'16 ground support equipment could possibly17 be switched over to electric, thus18 eliminating, again, additional greenhouse19 gas emissions.20

Councilman Jones

I just want21 to say, last year, when you testified,22 you said in earnest that you were going23 to start to look at all of the greenhouse24 and green carbon reduction methods that25 273 5/4/09 COMM. OF THE WHOLE - FISCAL '10 BUDGET1 the Airport could have. You've been2 extremely busy over the last year, and I3 want to compliment you, the Airport, and4 Deputy Mayor Cutler for your work on5 that. And that is progress.6 So I appreciate the update.7

Mr. Davenger

Thanks,8 Councilman.9

Councilman Jones

Madam Chair,10 thank you.11

Council President Verna

Thank12 you.13 The Chair recognizes14 Councilwoman Tasco.15

Councilwoman Tasco

Good16 afternoon, gentlemen, and I know you've17 been here a long time. Thank you so much18 for your good work that you're doing at19 the Airport.20 I just have one question I'm21 curious about. On , Section 19 of22 the budget, under your, I guess, your23 contractors, contracting out services,24 you have one line item that I'm curious25 274 5/4/09 COMM. OF THE WHOLE - FISCAL '10 BUDGET1 about.2 You have a contract with the3 Mental Health Association of4 Pennsylvania. Would you explain that?5

Mr. Gale

Yes, Councilwoman.6 I'll let Tom take the question.7 He's been handling it.8

Councilwoman Tasco

Okay.9

Mr. Becker

Tom Becker,10 Assistant Director of Aviation.11 Councilwoman, that contract's12 actually with the Health Department, but13 the Airport -- the Aviation Fund has14 funded outreach services at the Airport15 since January of 2007. And we use a16 contract with the Mental Health17 Association of Southeast Pennsylvania to18 send outreach workers to the Airport.19 It was five nights a week, now20 it's going to be seven nights a week --21 to -- they've been out there for the22 homeless. We've gotten pretty good press23 out of it.24

Councilwoman Tasco

Mm-hmm.25 275 5/4/09 COMM. OF THE WHOLE - FISCAL '10 BUDGET1

Mr. Becker

It's been a2 combined effort with the Office of3 Behavioral Health, Dr. McGuire, Dainette4 Mintz's staff, and Airport Police and5 Operations to take an approach to do6 outreach before -- we had intended all7 along to -- there's a regulation on the8 books that to be in the terminal9 buildings between midnight and 5, you10 need to be a ticketed passenger or an11 employee.12 So since, I guess, January of13 2007, we've had the outreach workers14 there. And it's been a very successful15 program, and we've been able to do a16 soup-to-nuts approach, where the outreach17 workers can place the homeless at the18 Airport in shelters or get the services19 that they need.20 So it's very successful, and21 we're going to continue that program on22 in 2010.23

Councilwoman Tasco

Thank you.24 Thank you, Madam President.25 276 5/4/09 COMM. OF THE WHOLE - FISCAL '10 BUDGET1 COUNCIL PRESIDENT VERNA:2 You're welcome.3 The Chair recognizes4 Councilwoman Sanchez.5

Councilwoman Sanchez

Thank6 you, Madam President.7 We were having a sidebar here8 with Councilman Green because I was9 trying to understand how the police10 officers at the Airport are paid for.11 And I'm aware that you fully pay them12 through your Aviation Fund, so none of it13 is General Fund money, right?14

Councilwoman Sanchez

There16 are quite a bit of police officers17 directing traffic there, and I've always18 wondered why we need so many police19 officers directing traffic, even though20 they're paid for as a practice. And my21 concern is that we need as many police22 officers in the street.23 Is that just the practice that24 we've followed over the years? Is there25 277 5/4/09 COMM. OF THE WHOLE - FISCAL '10 BUDGET1 a federal requirement that we have so2 many police officers there?3

Mr. Gale

Councilwoman,4 there's no federal requirement that there5 be a police officer at every single6 terminal, but what we have found is that7 the lack or the presence of a police8 officer would contribute to folks parking9 right up against the curbside, so it's10 not only a congestion issue, but in this11 day and age, when there's such a12 significant threat out there for13 explosives to be packed into a vehicle or14 a vehicle-borne explosive, the police15 officers take a very active approach in16 making sure that if they either see a17 suspicious vehicle or somebody that's18 been sitting there for a long time, to19 try to move things, move the traffic20 along there so we don't have mass21 congestion and so we also don't have a22 security risk at the same time.23

Councilwoman Sanchez

Okay.24 How many officers do we have allocated to25 278 5/4/09 COMM. OF THE WHOLE - FISCAL '10 BUDGET1 the Airport right now?2

Mr. Gale

I think 155.3

Councilwoman Sanchez

1554 officers?5

Mr. Gale

Yes, 155, and that's6 7/24.7

Councilwoman Sanchez

Seven --8

Mr. Gale

That's seven days a9 week, 24 hours a day.10

Councilwoman Sanchez

7/24,11 okay.12 That was just my one question.13 I use the Airport quite frequently, and I14 must say there's been incredible15 improvements and efficiencies there, so I16 like actually flying -- I used to fly17 through Newark all of the time because of18 the flight fees, but I'm back to flying19 through Philly.20

Mr. Gale

Thank you,21 Councilwoman.22

Councilwoman Sanchez

That23 will be all, Council President.24

Council President Verna

The25 279 5/4/09 COMM. OF THE WHOLE - FISCAL '10 BUDGET1 Chair recognizes Councilman Rizzo.2

Councilman Rizzo

Thank you.3 Likewise, it's a pleasure to visit the4 Airport. There's a lot of good things5 going on there. And it's this team that6 makes it worse, and I personally7 appreciate that.8 The reason is, people coming to9 the City lately, it's not just that seal10 of approval you got from J.D. Powers;11 it's the people that I know that fly that12 account to me and say that the experience13 has really been a good one for them.14

Mr. Gale

Thank you,15 Councilwoman.16

Councilman Rizzo

You know,17 just the environment itself, with all of18 the aircraft and the emissions that they19 put out, I know it's good to invest money20 in going green, but isn't there a better21 place to spend our money than the ground22 support equipment -- that probably should23 be running on natural gas since we own a24 utility company -- rather than investing25 280 5/4/09 COMM. OF THE WHOLE - FISCAL '10 BUDGET1 on electric-powered equipment?2 And I know it would probably be3 just a drop in the bucket, what it4 contributes, and I know people are going5 to say that any little bit helps.6 But don't you think that maybe7 we ought to be a little more careful8 where we spend our dollars, especially in9 an environment. And I know jet engine10 aircraft have gotten a lot cleaner11 throughout the years, but it seems to me12 to worry about those little diesel-13 powered carts, when possibly propane or14 some other form of clean energy might15 suffice, especially natural gas.16 And then that leads me to: Are17 our natural gas-powered buses back in18 service?19

Mr. Gale

They are not20 presently in service at Philadelphia,21 although I would say that USAirways and22 others, car rental agencies and the like,23 continue to evaluate compressed natural24 gas vehicles for their fleets.25 281 5/4/09 COMM. OF THE WHOLE - FISCAL '10 BUDGET1 The response to the first part2 of the question with respect to electric3 versus propane or another one of an4 alternative fuel variety, if you will, is5 that we've been working collaboratively6 with the airlines. It's not just7 Philadelphia International that they're8 doing these types of migrations or9 transitions on their ground support10 fleets to electric- or battery-powered;11 they're doing it at multiple stations.12 And they're trying to set a level of13 standardization across the board at the14 same time.15 So, in addition to that, as was16 in the testimony, we're going after17 federal grant dollars that are available18 for this type of acquisition as well.19 So, in the end, it should not20 end up costing the Airport, or even the21 airlines, any dollars for that except for22 the investment that the airlines will23 make in that type of equipment that will24 save them in the long run in terms of25 282 5/4/09 COMM. OF THE WHOLE - FISCAL '10 BUDGET1 fuel costs and the fossil -- the2 emissions that come from fossil fuels.3

Councilman Rizzo

What4 happened with our -- I know we had a fire5 with one of the buses at the Airport.6

Councilman Rizzo

And they8 were really beautiful, natural-gas-9 powered, close-proximity, your own10 fueling station. I guess it's been two11 or three years. What happened with that12 fleet of buses?13

Mr. Gale

Oh, it's -- it's --14 time has been flying by, Councilman.15 It's been probably closer to seven or16 eight years since we've had the17 compressed natural gas buses, but it is a18 fuel alternative that we continue to look19 at and evaluate, to see whether or not it20 would be a viable solution for the21 Airport going forth in the future for not22 just vehicles that we have in our airport23 fleet. A work van, for example, we've24 had C and G work vans, but also larger25 283 5/4/09 COMM. OF THE WHOLE - FISCAL '10 BUDGET1 vehicles.2 Hopefully, at some point in3 time, we'll have the majority of the4 vehicles that are circulating around the5 Airport, whether they be rental car6 facilities or shuttle buses and the like,7 converted to some other type of8 alternative fuel, either using a9 bio-diesel or a compressed natural gas or10 an ultra low sulfur diesel that would11 actually reduce the emissions.12

Councilman Rizzo

Well, even13 though it's wrong longer than I can14 remember, were they the property of the15 Airport, those buses?16

Mr. Gale

No. That was a bid.17 And as part of the requirement for the18 bid, the vendor had to procure those C19 and G buses that we had specked out. And20 you're right, they were nice buses at21 that point, with the clouds on them.22 But we did have -- there were23 fires on the vehicles, but none were ever24 shown to be attributed directly to the C25 284 5/4/09 COMM. OF THE WHOLE - FISCAL '10 BUDGET1 and G tanks themselves.2

Councilman Rizzo

Right.3

Mr. Gale

But there were4 multiple fires.5

Councilman Rizzo

Overheating6 I think I can remember.7

Mr. Gale

There was at least8 three.9

Councilman Rizzo

Yeah, and an10 overheated power-steering pump, which11 would have happened if it were a12 gasoline-powered vehicle.13

Councilman Rizzo

But not as15 often if it was a diesel.16 But, again, it's good to see17 you have a lot of opportunities the make18 this stuff work. So good luck.19

Mr. Gale

Thank you,20 Councilman.21

Councilman Rizzo

Thank you.22

Council President Verna

Thank23 you.24 The Chair recognizes Councilman25 285 5/4/09 COMM. OF THE WHOLE - FISCAL '10 BUDGET1 Green.2

Councilman Green

Thank you,3 Madam Chair.4 Good afternoon.5

Mr. Gale

Good afternoon.6

Councilman Green

I apologize7 for missing your testimony at the8 beginning, so if I've -- if I ask a9 question that was covered there, just10 point me to it, and I'll move on.11 Can you tell me how much you12 make from concessions, concessionaires in13 the Airport?14

Mr. Anastasi

Good afternoon.15 My name is Ed Anastasi, Deputy Director16 of Aviation for Finance and17 Administration.18 The Airport generates a total19 annually of about $120 million in20 non-airline revenues. And included in21 that count are the retail and food and22 beverage operations at the Airport, which23 probably totals in the area, I would say,24 net to the Airport of around between 1525 286 5/4/09 COMM. OF THE WHOLE - FISCAL '10 BUDGET1 and $20 million.2

Councilman Green

When you say3 "net to the Airport," what do you mean by4 that?5

Mr. Anastasi

Well, net to the6 Airport because the arrangement we have7 with the company that manages the8 concession program is a profit-sharing9 type of arrangement.10

Councilman Green

How much do11 they make?12

Mr. Anastasi

The way the deal13 works is that the profit, at the end of14 the formula, approximately 85 percent of15 the profit goes to the Airport, and the16 other 15 to 20 percent, depending upon17 the total amount of net income, goes to18 the concession operator.19

Councilman Green

So would you20 please provide the exact detail for the21 last few years of how much the Airport22 made, how much the concessionnaire made,23 and explain why you don't think it makes24 more sense for us to just hire a25 287 5/4/09 COMM. OF THE WHOLE - FISCAL '10 BUDGET1 professional to do this and not give 3,2 or $4 million away to a partner.3

Mr. Anastasi

Right. We could4 certainly provide that, Councilman.5

Councilman Green

Okay. Also,6 could you please provide details of every7 single concession contract you have at8 the Airport, the RFP process used, and9 the submissions of all of the different10 people that they made for concessions for11 the last four years.12

Mr. Anastasi

We can provide13 that also.14

Councilman Green

Thank you.15 Those are all my questions,16 Madam Chair.17

Council President Verna

Thank18 you.19 Are there any other further20 questions from members of the committee?21 (No further questions.)22 COUNCIL PRESIDENT VERNA:23 Seeing none, thank you very much.24

Mr. Gale

Thank you, Madam25 288 5/4/09 COMM. OF THE WHOLE - FISCAL '10 BUDGET1 President. Have a good day.2

Councilman Green

One more3 question.4

Council President Verna

One5 more question.6

Councilman Green

Sorry. I7 forgot to ask, could you also give a8 breakdown of Minority Business9 Enterprises in terms of concessionnaires10 if that question has -- with the chart11 and detail you provide about the rest of12 the information. Not just total number,13 but level of income at their stores,14 'cause I think you keep actual sales data15 for every single business. In other16 words, if it's 40 percent but only 717 percent of the revenue, I'd like to know18 that or vice-versa.19

Councilman Green

Thank you.21

Mr. Anastasi

We'll provide22 that Council.23

Council President Verna

Thank24 you.25 289 5/4/09 COMM. OF THE WHOLE - FISCAL '10 BUDGET1

Councilman Jones

Point of2 information.3

Council President Verna

Yes.4

Councilman Jones

While you're5 doing that part, it might be good to look6 at not only the actual concessions and7 restaurants but the kiosks that are made8 available as well. Put that in your9 total aggregate so that we have a better10 sense of what the economic opportunity11 is.12

Mr. Anastasi

Yeah, we can14 break down that information.15

Councilman Jones

Thank you,16 Madam President.17

Council President Verna

Thank18 you.19 Any further questions or20 comments?21 (No further questions.)22

Council President Verna

Thank23 you.24

Mr. Gale

Thank you, Madam25 290 5/4/09 COMM. OF THE WHOLE - FISCAL '10 BUDGET1 President.2

Council President Verna

We3 will now hear From the City4 Commissioners.5 (Witnesses come forward.)6

Council President Verna

Good7 afternoon.8 PANEL MEMBERS: Good afternoon.9 COUNCIL PRESIDENT VERNA:10 Welcome. Thank you for your patience.11 Please identify yourself for12 the record and proceeds.13

Mr. Lee

Yes my name is Bob14 Lee. I'm the Voter Administration15 Administrator, AND I'm here for the three16 City Commissioners.17

Mr. Voigt

I'm Fred Voigt,18 Deputy City Commissioner.19

Council President Verna

I20 don't think the stenographer heard you.21

Mr. Voigt

I'm Fred Voigt,22 Deputy City Commissioner.23

Council President Verna

Thank24 you.25 291 5/4/09 COMM. OF THE WHOLE - FISCAL '10 BUDGET1

Mr. Lee

Madam President and2 members of City Council, good afternoon.3 I'm Bob Lee, Voter Registration4 Administrator, and I'd like to thank you5 for this opportunity to provide testimony6 regarding the proposed Fiscal Year 20107 operating budget.8 The budget that we've been9 provided by the City's Finance Department10 totals $8,794,177.11 The Commission prepared its own12 requirements budget; however, it got over13 to the Finance Department too late to be14 included. But there's a stark difference15 in the numbers.16 We believe that we're about17 $1,118,000 short of having what we need18 to conduct elections in FY 2010.19 I'll give you an example. The20 Class 200 that's been allocated in the21 City budget is $2,741,350.22 Just to pay the poll workers23 alone for two elections is --24 COUNCIL PRESIDENT VERNA:25 292 5/4/09 COMM. OF THE WHOLE - FISCAL '10 BUDGET1 Excuse me. We did not get a copy of your2 testimony.3

Mr. Lee

Yeah, the written4 testimony was e-mailed Friday.5

Council President Verna

I beg6 your pardon?7

Mr. Lee

The written testimony8 was e-mailed on Friday.9

Council President Verna

I10 don't have a copy of it.11

Mr. Lee

I have an extra one12 here.13

Council President Verna

I14 don't have it.15 Thank you.16 Sorry to interrupt you, but --17

Mr. Lee

15 million. That would leave about24 $590,000 in other Class 200 expenditures,25 293 5/4/09 COMM. 2 I can work through the basic3 numbers. 7 million. 25 294 5/4/09 COMM. 8 The City's allocating $491,472. 23 There's other numerous mandated24 posters and forms used at the polling25 295 5/4/09 COMM. 25 296 5/4/09 COMM. 7 The Class 100. We are finally8 at a permanent employee position level,9 where we believe we have sufficient10 personnel to carry out the mandates. We11 worked out our numbers based on the12 annual salary of those employees and the13 temporary employees. We've been hit with14 a substantial increase in the pay scale15 for the temporary employees. Our costs16 have probably doubled based upon an17 ordinance in Council that they be paid18 150 percent of the Federal Minimum Wage19 Act that probably ran an extra 4 or20 $500,000 a year. 24 And the overtime. When you25 297 5/4/09 COMM. 8 And it's the kind of thing9 where we wouldn't have enough man hours10 to do what is needed to be done in the11 peak season right before and after an12 election. Election cycles vary, and the13 workload varies. 21

Council President Verna

Have22 you spoken to the Administration about23 this?24

Mr. Lee

No, not yet. We sent25 298 5/4/09 COMM. OF THE WHOLE - FISCAL '10 BUDGET1 over a requirements budget a while ago,2 but we were told it was too late to be3 included in the master budget.4 But the expenditures are right5 out of the FY '08 actual expenditures,6 with a small increase. And there's some7 questionable differences on the Class8 100.9

Council President Verna

Is10 the Budget Director in the room?11 (Budget Director is not present12 at this time.)13

Council President Verna

Yes.14 I think -- would you have him come up,15 please. Thank you.16 The Chair recognizes Councilman17 Jones.18

Councilman Jones

Thank you,19 Madam President.20 It's good to see you,21 Mr. Voigt.22 I have one question: Where are23 we by way of machine breakdowns as to24 prior years if you track it over the25 299 5/4/09 COMM. OF THE WHOLE - FISCAL '10 BUDGET1 years? Are we experiencing during2 election time less machine failures? And3 based on the study you did, were you4 right?5

Mr. Lee

Oh, in the '066 primary, we did have over 200 machines7 where we had an issue with the printers8 and the paper tapes coming out. And we9 did do a study of that, and we went back10 and we did regression testing on a lot of11 machines.12 And we were right: It was a13 simple incorrect setting or something14 that's called a "counterweight," which is15 supposed to be in the lower position to16 hold that paper tape taut to that paper17 roll so it doesn't come loose and unspool18 and come out the front window.19 Most of our machine issues20 naturally are operator issues -- getting21 ready in the morning, getting set up,22 getting the machine rolling. Once they23 do that, we have very few issues.24 We do have issues. We probably25 300 5/4/09 COMM. OF THE WHOLE - FISCAL '10 BUDGET1 replace about 27, 28 to 30 printers an2 election, maybe 15 to 20 batteries.3 We don't do Election Day4 repairs to machines only because of the5 implications. And if we have an issue6 with a machine that cannot be done7 through a simple reset or a simple8 rerouting of the paper, we will replace9 the machine, and we replace anywhere from10 15 to 20 machines per election. We roll11 them out on Election Day.12

Councilman Jones

How does13 that compare to the old Jamestown or14 shoot machines?15

Mr. Lee

These machines are a16 lot more reliable and are a lot more17 easier to work with, and the poll workers18 can get out of there a lot quicker.19 And, for the most part -- and20 I'll say all the time, the count is21 accurate. You never have that issue22 where you have 8500 poll workers counting23 up 3.5 million numbers by hand after 1324 hours in a polling place and then25 301 5/4/09 COMM. OF THE WHOLE - FISCAL '10 BUDGET1 hand-writing them down and hand-adding2 them. The count is much more accurate.3

Councilman Jones

What was the4 Obama effect on voter administration in5 the City of Philadelphia?6

Mr. Lee

That was probably the7 highest registration that we've seen in8 recent history. It even surpassed the9 1983 primary of Wilson Goode and Frank10 Rizzo.11 For the five months before12 that, we got about 293,000. For the13 November; 08 election we got 299,00014 paper applications plus an additional15 80,000 electronic applications.16

Councilman Jones

So that's17 why the angry texts I got from Councilman18 Rizzo and Councilman Goode about that19 record being broken. I get it.20 (Laughter.)21

Councilman Jones

So that's22 the highest we've had?23

Mr. Lee

It's the highest I've24 heard of. Yes.25 302 5/4/09 COMM. OF THE WHOLE - FISCAL '10 BUDGET1

Councilman Jones

Thank you,2 Madam President.3 COUNCIL PRESIDENT VERNA:4 Councilman Green.5

Councilman Green

Thank you,6 Madam Chair.7 I'm just curious and,8 obviously, I'm not sure what the reason9 is -- there could have been a conflict,10 but you're in here asking for funding of11 an additional 1,100,000-plus dollars that12 has not been allocated to you from the13 Administration's proposal. You have not14 spoken to the Administration about this15 difference.16 And I'm an elected official,17 I'm here, I'm asking questions, trying to18 guess answers, but the people who are19 responsible for making decisions at the20 City Commissioner's Office are not here.21 Frankly, I think we need to22 have the commissioners back when the23 commissioners are free to testify, Madam24 Chair.25 303 5/4/09 COMM. OF THE WHOLE - FISCAL '10 BUDGET1

Council President Verna

When2 the commissioners are free to testify?3

Councilman Green

Yes, ma'am.4

Mr. Lee

I have a comment if5 you'd like.6

Councilman Green

When the7 elected officials are free to come defend8 their budget and testify here, we ought9 to have these hearings. But, I mean, it10 is certainly appropriate for staff to be11 this with people -- my staff works very12 hard for me -- but I'd like to hear from13 the people we elect as to why they need a14 million-1.15 Thank you, Madam Chair. I have16 no further at this time, but I believe we17 should call back the commissioners so18 that when -- at a time when they're19 available to testify before us.20

Council President Verna

Thank21 you.22 Councilwoman Sanchez.23

Councilwoman Sanchez

Thank24 you.25 304 5/4/09 COMM. OF THE WHOLE - FISCAL '10 BUDGET1 I wanted to ask a little bit2 probably, as you know, my issue around3 language access has been one that I've4 worked on for many, many years. Where5 are we as it relates to our compliance6 with our consent decree with the7 Department of Justice around8 language-access issues.9

Mr. Lee

For the November '0810 election, we had slots in the agreement11 at about 10 percent that were vacant12 either due to failure of those who were13 recruited and appointed to show up or14 inability, in some cases, to actually15 even recruit an individual to serve.16 We have more interpreters on17 the street than ever in not only in18 English-Spanish but we had 30 Asian19 interpreters out there and probably about20 ten Russian interpreters also.21 Some of the programs that were22 implemented, all of the translations were23 resubmitted to be retranslated by Global24 through the Managing Director's Office.25 305 5/4/09 COMM. OF THE WHOLE - FISCAL '10 BUDGET1 We instituted first a pilot program and2 then a citywide program, where we put a3 cellphone or we supply a cellphone to4 every voting district in the City. And5 there's a telephonic language6 interpretation service available so that7 if any voter comes in who cannot speak8 English well enough to vote, they can9 point to any number of 80 languages10 printed on a piece of paper, and the11 judge can get someone on the telephone to12 translate.13 We've totally and repeatedly14 stressed a federal requirement that any15 voter be given their own personal choice16 as to who accompanies them into the17 voting booth to provide assistance to18 them, whether it be language assistance19 or assistance with operating the machine.20 We've also stressed the fact to21 or poll officials that if we appoint an22 interpreter, they must allow that23 interpreter to serve, and that24 interpreter must be there for the25 306 5/4/09 COMM. OF THE WHOLE - FISCAL '10 BUDGET1 duration of the day to provide services.2 We've used a number of3 different methods to recruit4 interpreters; the foremost is through the5 political-party structure. We do place6 advertisements in the Latino newspapers7 seeking volunteers, we've sent some8 e-mails out to some organizations seeking9 volunteers.10 But the predominant number of11 interpreters are supplied by either the12 polling place officials themselves or the13 committeemen or the ward leader or14 somebody else.15 I believe the advertisements16 this year that we placed in the Latino17 papers, we gained an additional 10 to 1518 interpreters who volunteered.19 We had an organization -- we20 are meeting with some groups, an advisory21 committee. We've got about 10 to 15 from22 people on the advisory committee; in23 fact, some of the members do it.24

Councilwoman Sanchez

Are we25 307 5/4/09 COMM. OF THE WHOLE - FISCAL '10 BUDGET1 in compliance, though?2

Mr. Lee

We really are in3 compliance. We have some divisions that4 we'd like re --5

Councilwoman Sanchez

How are6 the feds monitoring our compliance?7 'cause I'd like to know, are we in8 compliance?9 I appreciate all of the efforts10 'cause I know that those are important,11 but what I'd like to know is, in the12 stipulated agreement with them,13 issue-per-issue, are we in compliance?14

Mr. Lee

The only issue in the15 agreement is the 10 percent divisions,16 where there's a vacancy at times. And17 they -- they check our compliance by18 coming to Philadelphia on Election Day19 and going in the polling places and20 looking for an interpreter.21 Often, we have disagreements as22 to about what who we paid and who we paid23 and whether someone's there.24

Councilwoman Sanchez

Legally,25 308 5/4/09 COMM. OF THE WHOLE - FISCAL '10 BUDGET1 we're required to do at 10 percent.2 Where are we? how close to that number3 are we?4

Mr. Lee

No, no, no, not 105 percent, no, no.6

Councilwoman Sanchez

We're7 required to provide an interpreter in any8 division where more than 10 percent of9 the population speaks another language.10

Mr. Lee

No, you're11 misunderstanding the 10 percent number.12 What I was referring to was is13 that of the number of divisions where14 we're required to have an interpreter,15 10 percent were vacant.16

Councilwoman Sanchez

Oh, 1017 percent were vacant.18

Councilwoman Sanchez

So it's20 the reverse.21

Mr. Lee

Right, right.22

Councilwoman Sanchez

Okay.23 And that's based on the number of 524 percent --25 309 5/4/09 COMM. OF THE WHOLE - FISCAL '10 BUDGET1

Mr. Lee

No, it's based --2 actually, it's not based on the number of3 people who do not speak English well.4 The Justice Department does not have that5 information by election district.6

Councilwoman Sanchez

Mm-hmm.7

Mr. Lee

It's based upon the8 number of voters in the district, or in a9 consolidated district, as to what they10 call that have a Latino or a Hispanic11 surname.12

Councilwoman Sanchez

Okay.13 You state in your report that one of the14 issues where you've had higher expenses15 have been in the mandated HAVA. What of16 HAVA reimbursements have we received, and17 is there any other money from HAVA we18 haven't sought so that we can be in HAVA19 compliance?20

Mr. Lee

Oh, we are in HAVA21 compliance; it's just that HAVA requires22 a lot more expenditure. One thing HAVA23 required is that our voting machines --24 visually impaired voters be able to vote25 310 5/4/09 COMM. OF THE WHOLE - FISCAL '10 BUDGET1 independently, without assistance, on the2 voting machines.3 (Timer bell rings.)4

Mr. Lee

We spent5 $4.41 million in HAVA funds, retrofitting6 our machines with an audio key pad7 headset, where a visually-impaired voter8 can go in and vote, without any9 assistance whatsoever.10 Also that upgrade upgraded it11 to provide certain audit trails and other12 features required by the Help America13 Vote Act.14 The Help America Vote Act also15 required us to use a statewide uniform16 voter registration system, which we've17 been on since January 1 of '06. That's18 probably been the biggest expense as far19 as labor goes.20 The additional requirements of21 the federal law on the way the system22 works, it's probably the -- the23 productivity on it is probably 50 percent24 of what it was on our old county system.25 311 5/4/09 COMM. OF THE WHOLE - FISCAL '10 BUDGET1

Councilwoman Sanchez

So the2 short system, the state system, that they3 tout as being the best system is not the4 best system for us?5

Mr. Lee

It's the requirements6 of the law and the system itself. And7 it's -- there's an issue right now as8 where the short system was -- the9 contract for short was done in July of10 '07.11

Councilwoman Sanchez

Mm-hmm.12

Mr. Lee

The State procured13 the software, and now they're trying to14 upgrade it, and now they have new15 software up there. And we're going16 through the pains of a new system all17 over again.18

Councilwoman Sanchez

And they19 don't reimburse us for that, the State?20

Mr. Lee

We used HAVA funding21 to fund for six positions that worked22 entirely on the short system.23

Councilwoman Sanchez

Mm-hmm.24

Mr. Lee

And that's both for25 312 5/4/09 COMM. OF THE WHOLE - FISCAL '10 BUDGET1 salary, overtime, and benefits. We use2 HAVA funding to reimburse our Class 1003 funds for any labor we did in upgrading4 the voter machines.5 We're converted to short back6 in '06. So wherever possible, we have7 requested and been approved to use HAVA8 funding, federal HAVA funding, to provide9 additional labor where needed, provided10 that labor was soley dedicated and11 certified to be working only on Help12 America Vote Act requirements.13

Councilwoman Sanchez

So we14 get reimbursed for all of the activities15 related to us being HAVA-compliant in our16 own acts compliance.17

Mr. Lee

No, we don't get18 reimbursed for all of the activities of19 HAVA.20

Councilwoman Sanchez

Okay.21

Mr. Lee

There was a set22 formula under the state plan --23

Councilwoman Sanchez

Mm-hmm.24

Mr. Lee

-- that each county25 313 5/4/09 COMM. OF THE WHOLE - FISCAL '10 BUDGET1 was set up. And basically, the voting2 system -- let me give you an example.3 The voting system -- if you look in the4 budget for the Administration, there's5 like 10.66 million in payments.6

Councilwoman Sanchez

Mm-hmm.7

Mr. Lee

Those were HAVA8 reimbursements that were paid directly9 back to the county as a partial10 reimbursement for its initial funds in11 procuring the voting system.12

Councilwoman Sanchez

Mm-hmm.13

Mr. Lee

There's about another14 2.8 million that will be available for15 that same kind of reimbursement in FY16 '10, and some of it may even go into '11,17 depending on when the funds are18 available.19

Councilwoman Sanchez

So is20 there any part of your current request21 now that might be from what you're22 claiming to be the additional million23 dollars that you need, that could be24 covered through HAVA or through the25 314 5/4/09 COMM. OF THE WHOLE - FISCAL '10 BUDGET1 State?2

Mr. Lee

No. These are all3 General Fund requests. The HAVA4 funding -- if you look on the City5 (discernible), they have separate grants6 down there.7

Councilwoman Sanchez

Yeah,8 but they --9

Mr. Lee

Most of the HAVA --10

Councilwoman Sanchez

They11 have money for access. They have12 millions of dollars at the state.13 What I'm asking you is: Are we14 accessing all of that money as it relates15 to us being in compliance both with the16 Department of Justice --17

Mr. Lee

We are accessing all18 of the money that's been allocated to19 Philadelphia based upon the timing of the20 need and the application for it, because21 you have to submit quarterly work and22 capital requests.23

Councilwoman Sanchez

Mm-hmm.24

Mr. Lee

They just awarded a25 315 5/4/09 COMM. OF THE WHOLE - FISCAL '10 BUDGET1 $2.267 million PA Interest Award. All of2 the HAVA money that was sitting in3 Harrisburg earned interest. They whacked4 it up between the counties. Our share5 was 2.267 million, and $400,000 of that6 is going to the U.S. District Court to7 pay a third-party vendor to go out and8 work in conjunction with the U.S. Justice9 Department and reinspect every polling10 place in the City of Philadelphia and11 make recommendations for modifications.12 A lot of that money is set13 aside. There's approximately 400,000 set14 aside for reimbursing FY '10 Class 10015 expenses that are not included in this.16 They have been deducted before this17 number was put together. There is money18 in there for --19

Councilwoman Sanchez

But --20 so there's more -- so this budget does21 not reflect actually all of your22 expenditures, because there's more money23 that you're going to get reimbursed?24

Mr. Lee

No. The HAVA money25 316 5/4/09 COMM. OF THE WHOLE - FISCAL '10 BUDGET1 is budgeted for certain items.2

Councilwoman Sanchez

Right.3

Mr. Lee

But the way it's been4 working with the Commonwealth is, we wind5 up spending money out of our operating6 budget.7

Councilwoman Sanchez

Right.8 And then we get reimbursed.9

Mr. Lee

And hopefully --10 yeah, money in our operating budget11 that's already allocated to other12 expenses. In other words, we ran a lot13 of newspaper ads, a voter ed program,14 before the November of '08 election.15

Councilwoman Sanchez

Mm-hmm.16

Mr. Lee

It cost $271,000. We17 didn't have HAVA money in the account to18 pay for that at this time. We paid for19 it out of our Class 200 budget, and that20 money was reimbursed.21

Councilwoman Sanchez

That22 leads to one of my questions: Why are we23 doing full-page ads in Spanish in the24 Inquirer and the Daily News, when25 317 5/4/09 COMM. OF THE WHOLE - FISCAL '10 BUDGET1 clearly, if you are reading the Inquirer2 and the Daily News, you read Spanish, as3 opposed to spending that money in the4 Spanish-language media?5

Mr. Lee

Well, that goes back6 to the U.S. Justice Department in that7 these ads should be bilingual, right?8

Councilwoman Sanchez

Mm-hmm.9

Mr. Lee

Now, the law requires10 that we run our advertisements in two11 major daily newspapers.12

Councilwoman Sanchez

Right.13

Mr. Lee

So if the state law14 requires we run it in two daily major15 newspapers, and the federal government16 says we need to do things in a bilingual17 manner, that's why we had 'em in English18 and Spanish in the Inquirer and Daily19 News, that's why we're allowed to target20 the five Latino community newspapers that21 we ran 'em in. They were in Spanish22 only.23

Councilwoman Sanchez

Mm-hmm.24

Mr. Lee

And then the other25 318 5/4/09 COMM. OF THE WHOLE - FISCAL '10 BUDGET1 community newspapers, most of those were2 in English only, I believe.3

Councilwoman Sanchez

So if we4 said to the Department of Justice that it5 makes no sense for us to spend -- what do6 we pay for an ad in the Daily News or the7 Inquirer?8

Mr. Lee

Have you tried to9 tell this to the Department of Justice,10 that it doesn't make any sense?11

Councilwoman Sanchez

Well, if12 we weren't in compliance.13 14 (Indiscernible; parties talking15 over each other.)16

Mr. Lee

I'll give you an17 example. There's a polling place in 621818 to 19. We have a bilingual interpreter19 there since at least '05.20

Councilwoman Sanchez

Mm-hmm.21

Mr. Lee

We pay her to cover22 both divisions because the Justice23 Department carries it as a consolidated24 division. So she gets $75 times 2, $150.25 319 5/4/09 COMM. OF THE WHOLE - FISCAL '10 BUDGET1 And she's told us repeatedly that the2 only individual she interpreted for was3 her father, and she used to do it for4 free, but now the Justice Department says5 we need to have an interpreter there;6 she's the only one that's available, and7 we hire her.8

Councilwoman Sanchez

You just9 opened up another question, which was:10 You have interpreters serving three11 divisions, four divisions; they're12 allowed to get the check for each one?13 Not that they're not underpaid. They're14 underpaid at 75. They're not underpaid,15 because in some divisions, where we have16 four divisions, like is the case in17 Linley and the 42nd, where there's18 usually one interpreter, that person19 collects the checks for the four20 divisions?21

Mr. Lee

Not allowed. They22 can only get it twice.23

Councilwoman Sanchez

Just24 two.25 320 5/4/09 COMM. OF THE WHOLE - FISCAL '10 BUDGET1

Councilwoman Sanchez

So there3 are --4

Mr. Lee

Yeah. Most of the5 divisions that the -- the Justice6 Department calls them "consolidated7 divisions," where it's two divisions in8 one facility. Most divisions where the9 Justice Department has allowed us to use10 one interpreter for two divisions, that's11 where we do that.12

Councilwoman Sanchez

How many13 --14 COUNCIL PRESIDENT VERNA:15 Councilwoman, I'm sorry. You're going to16 have to wait for the next go-around.17 Thank you.18 Councilwoman Blackwell.19

Councilwoman Blackwell

Thank20 you, Madam President.21 Good evening, Mr. Voigt. Good22 evening Mr. Lee.23

Mr. Lee

Good evening.24

Councilwoman Blackwell

Madam25 321 5/4/09 COMM. OF THE WHOLE - FISCAL '10 BUDGET1 President, as you and I know, nobody in2 the city knows more about these machines3 and the process than Bobby Lee.4

Council President Verna

I5 agree.6

Councilwoman Blackwell

Yes.7 Let me ask you a question. When we call8 in -- and in most recent years, if you9 call in on Election Day, they want the10 person at the polling place. They don't11 want us at ward headquarters anymore.12

Mr. Lee

Is this for voting13 machine repairs?14

Council President Verna

Yes.15

Councilwoman Blackwell

Yes.16

Mr. Lee

Yes. They'd much17 rather have the poll official -- the18 judge or the machine inspector, because19 they need the machine number. And also,20 on the back of the machine, there is an21 LED light that will come up with an error22 code.23 And if the poll official tells24 our operator the error code, it may be an25 322 5/4/09 COMM. OF THE WHOLE - FISCAL '10 BUDGET1 issue that they can walk over on the2 telephone and resolve it right away,3 without having to dispatch out a4 technician.5 So they would prefer to have6 the call made right from the polling7 place by the judge or by the machine8 inspector, with the machine number, the9 error code number, and the description of10 the problem.11 In addition to that, although I12 know in some cases, where it's been a13 serious issue and maybe the service is14 slow, we would want to hear, but we15 wouldn't want you to call the 780016 number. You would call one of the17 commissioners' offices, and then we would18 call up there and double-check and see19 what the story is on it.20

Councilwoman Blackwell

You21 don't want us to do the 7800 number22 anymore?23

Mr. Lee

It's a preference of24 the operators. I don't have an issue25 323 5/4/09 COMM. OF THE WHOLE - FISCAL '10 BUDGET1 with it, but they prefer that the poll2 worker call themselves.3 And the other issue is, they've4 got to watch because if they get too many5 duplicate calls to the same line, they6 may dispatch more than one technician out7 there, which is why they want the poll8 officials to call.9 Sometimes we would get people10 calling us. Maybe they heard it an hour11 later, and our technician had already12 been there and serviced the machine. And13 we don't want to send a technician out on14 double work on something that's already15 been repaired also. And that's happened,16 where we have --17

Councilwoman Blackwell

Oh, I18 know.19

Mr. Lee

-- organizations call20 us and --21

Councilwoman Blackwell

I know22 'cause we get calls, and you may have a23 voter calling or you could have a24 committeeman calling, you could have25 324 5/4/09 COMM. OF THE WHOLE - FISCAL '10 BUDGET1 either committee person calling.2 So we can get -- you know, if a3 machine is out an hour, believe me, we're4 going to get calls back from that.5

Councilwoman Blackwell

You7 know, we can't afford to lose --8

Mr. Lee

Yeah, but at anytime,9 if anyone in the ward, either the ward10 leader or the committeeman, feels that11 the time for service has passed, then12 call us, and we'll check on it, and we'll13 see what the status is of that response.14

Councilwoman Blackwell

Okay.15

Mr. Lee

And preferably to the16 Commissioner's Offices or the to hotline17 number down at Delaware Avenue and Spring18 Garden Street.19

Councilwoman Blackwell

Okay.20 Thank you.21 Thank you, Madam President.22

Council President Verna

Thank23 you.24 Steve, can you come up to the25 325 5/4/09 COMM. OF THE WHOLE - FISCAL '10 BUDGET1 table please.2

Councilman Rizzo

I have a3 question.4

Council President Verna

Did5 you have a question, Councilman Rizzo?6

Councilman Rizzo

Thank you.7 Hi, Mr. Lee. One thing I'd8 like to ask you are the changes of9 polling places. It troubles me a little10 bit when people think that it's11 manipulated, that they change them12 intentionally.13 Could you explain the physical14 process of how far out and how you notify15 people that their polling location has16 been changed?17

Mr. Lee

Okay. The three18 Commissioners and the staff all know that19 a great majority of people in our denser20 neighborhoods all walk to vote. We know21 we have 180 to 190,000 senior citizens22 that are registered here who walk, and23 can't walk far.24 Whenever a request for change25 326 5/4/09 COMM. OF THE WHOLE - FISCAL '10 BUDGET1 comes in, we send somebody out to inspect2 the new location, make sure it's3 suitable, make sure it's accessible in4 comparison to the current place.5 And then a hearing is set up, a6 public hearing. Notices of that hearing7 are put on five posters -- one on the old8 polling place, one on the new polling9 place, and three elsewhere in the10 division.11 The hearing's held in Room 130,12 11 o'clock, every Wednesday, if it's13 scheduled, where anybody can down, make a14 comment for or against a move, it's all15 on the record, and the commissioners will16 vote on it.17 The commissioners have a18 policy. In fact, we built it in with our19 agreement with the Justice Department and20 with the private plaintiffs21 (indiscernible) that as they're going22 around inspecting these polling places,23 if it can't be temporarily modified, they24 can recommend a relocation.25 327 5/4/09 COMM. OF THE WHOLE - FISCAL '10 BUDGET1 However, the relocation can2 only be in the division or adjacent3 division; it can't be outside of that4 area. And if it's in an adjacent5 division, it can't be more than five6 blocks' walk from the furthest edge of7 the subject division.8 And we built that in that9 agreement because we didn't want to10 subject our seniors to walk any longer11 than that.12

Councilman Rizzo

Here's what13 happens. Many people go to the polling14 place, they see the polling location15 changed, they -- they're on a timeline.16 Forget the senior citizens that are17 unemployed; they just forget it, and18 possibly, they'll say, Well, after work,19 I'll come back, and they wind up not20 getting there.21 Can we do more to let the22 voters know officially that their voting23 location has been changed? can it be24 advertised in the paper? Could they get25 328 5/4/09 COMM. OF THE WHOLE - FISCAL '10 BUDGET1 a letter? Something that they don't2 learn about it on election morning.3

Mr. Lee

If it's changed, then4 we go out and post posters in the5 division saying it has been changed.6 Also, our website has a polling place7 locater that's located on the Department8 of State. You just go in their link to9 the State, type in your address, and it10 tells you where to go vote. It's updated11 daily.12 The newspaper ad, we spend13 about $56,000 to pay -- well, Procurement14 does, $56,000 for a full page to list the15 polling pages. They're in there the16 Monday before the election. We're not17 allowed to make any changes more than 2018 days before -- after 20 days for an19 election exempt for emergencies.20

Councilman Rizzo

My point21 being -- and I'll come back at you, when22 it's my turn -- many people, again, don't23 know that their polling place has been24 changed --25 329 5/4/09 COMM. OF THE WHOLE - FISCAL '10 BUDGET1 (Timer bell rings.)2

Councilman Rizzo

-- because3 they're not looking in the paper, because4 they believe it's at the same place5 they've been voting for 15 years.6 We have to do a better job at7 letting people know in a particular8 division that their polling place has9 been changed.10

Mr. Lee

Well, the only way11 you can do that is a direct mailing to12 every voter in the district. And, again,13 you're talking costs.14 Before -- I'll tell you, one of15 the items we used HAVA funding for in the16 '04 general, '06 general, and '08 general17 was we spent $87,000 to print postcards18 for every voter in the City. And in '08,19 it cost us $364,000. We mailed every20 voter in the City a postcard telling them21 where to go vote.22 We think that helped cut down23 on a lot of work, but that just shows you24 what the cost of that would do to notify25 330 5/4/09 COMM. OF THE WHOLE - FISCAL '10 BUDGET1 every single voter of where they go vote.2 If you only did it in changes, it would3 cut the bill a lot more, but you're going4 to create an issue where, Why are they5 getting a postcard and we're not getting6 a postcard?7

Councilman Rizzo

Thank you.8

Council President Verna

And9 usually, the committeeman does notify.10 They should.11

Councilman Rizzo

Thank you.12

Council President Verna

Thank13 you.14

Councilman Rizzo

Thank you.15 COUNCIL PRESIDENT VERNA:16 Mr. Agostini?17

Mr. Agostini

Madam President?18

Council President Verna

There19 is a difference of over a million dollars20 between the Administration's proposed21 budget and the Commission's requirement22 funding level.23 I am told that there has been24 absolutely no communication between25 331 5/4/09 COMM. OF THE WHOLE - FISCAL '10 BUDGET1 Finance and the City Commissioners. I2 don't know what we're waiting for, but3 I'm going to request that you get4 together with them to see how -- if and5 how this can be resolved.6

Mr. Agostini

We actually have7 spoken to them before.8

Council President Verna

Oh,9 you have?10

Mr. Agostini

We've had two11 meetings in the last, I'm going to say,12 about six months. And the first meeting13 was to talk about the '09 revised, which14 led to a series of reductions that were15 reflected in the '09 and represent the16 actual cut that's in the FY '10 budget.17 There were no changes made subsequent to18 the November revise to the Commissioners19 budget for a reduction.20 About two or three months ago,21 as we were putting this budget together,22 we sat with Bobby Lee and Mr. Taglione,23 the senior, about the budget,24 specifically to talk about the Help25 332 5/4/09 COMM. OF THE WHOLE - FISCAL '10 BUDGET1 America Vote Act dollars.2 At no point in that dealing was3 there a statement or series of statements4 that you have probably heard here in the5 last 45 minutes or so about the inability6 to move forward with elections based on7 the existing funding. At no point was8 that statement made to me or Mr. Dubow.9 And subsequent to that meeting has no10 statement been made to us.11 So this is the first that I'm12 hearing about this. And we've certainly13 had opportunity. And given the sort of14 seriousness, at a minimum, I would have15 expected to get an e-mail or a phone call16 or something, and I have no record of any17 of that.18 So I'm more than happy to sit19 down and sit down with the City20 Commissioners about it, but it would have21 been nice to know in advance of this22 meeting that there was a potential issue.23

Council President Verna

Thank24 you. And we will add The City25 333 5/4/09 COMM. OF THE WHOLE - FISCAL '10 BUDGET1 Commissioners to our callback.2 Bob, you've got to sit down.3

Mr. Lee

This was -- this was4 sent over the day before I seen this.5

Council President Verna

I beg6 your pardon?7

Mr. Lee

This was sent over a8 month ago. When I talked to our budget9 analyst, he said it was too late to be in10 the master budget, but it was sent over11 to him.12

Council President Verna

Well,13 we're not going to have a little debate14 here.15

Council President Verna

Just17 a moment.18 The Chair recognizes Councilman19 Green.20

Councilman Green

Thank you,21 Madam Chair.22 I just want to make clear,23 Mr. Lee and Mr. Voigt, that, you know, I24 understand that the Commission does a25 334 5/4/09 COMM. OF THE WHOLE - FISCAL '10 BUDGET1 great job of running what I consider to2 be good, clean, and fair elections in the3 City of Philadelphia. Some language4 issues have been to be taken care of, but5 you do a very good job.6 I just am not going to vote for7 an increase in your budget if the people8 who run the Commissioners Office don't9 come to callback and testify for10 themselves.11 Thank you.12

Mr. Lee

All right.13

Council President Verna

Thank14 you.15 I would suggest, Mr. Lee, you16 do get in touch with Finance, sit down17 and go over this budget with them, and we18 will add the City Commissioners on our19 callback list.20

Mr. Lee

Thank you.21

Council President Verna

Thank22 you.23 We will now hear from Community24 College.25 335 5/4/09 COMM. OF THE WHOLE - FISCAL '10 BUDGET1 (Witnesses come forward.)2

Council President Verna

Good3 afternoon. Welcome, Doctor, and thank4 you for your patience. I know you've5 been waiting quite some time.6 Kindly identify yourself for7 the record and proceed with your8 testimony.9

Mr. Davis

Yes. Good10 afternoon, President Verna. My name is11 George Davis, and I chair the Board of12 Trustees at the Community College of13 Philadelphia. You'll be pleased to know14 I will be very brief.15

Council President Verna

Thank16 you.17

Mr. Davis

I would like to18 just quickly recognize a few board19 members: Rhonda Cohen and Sally20 Glickman, who are trustees; and also21 Stanley Cohen, Steve Mullin, and Jack22 Ferber, who have been here a part of the23 time. And Jack is still here; I think I24 see him over there.25 336 5/4/09 COMM. OF THE WHOLE - FISCAL '10 BUDGET1 I just want to say that my2 board colleagues and I are very committed3 to the Community College of Philadelphia.4 We believe very strongly, for the City of5 Philadelphia to flourish, we need a6 strong community college. And, as you7 know, as well as us, many of our8 residents would be unable to earn a9 degree or even think about continuing10 their education without the Community11 College of Philadelphia.12 And I would like to just say,13 on behalf of the board, Council President14 Verna, we appreciate very much the15 support we've gotten from the City16 Council and from the Mayor. We know that17 the Mayor has -- in his budget has kept18 funding at the current level. And in19 this environment, we're grateful for20 that.21 And that doesn't mean we don't22 need more money; we could always use23 more. But we're pleased with your24 support, and we thank you for that.25 337 5/4/09 COMM. OF THE WHOLE - FISCAL '10 BUDGET1

Council President Verna

Thank2 you.3

Mr. Davis

So with that, I'll4 have --5

Council President Verna

And6 thank you for the wonderful work you're7 all doing.8

Mr. Davis

Thank you.9 COUNCIL PRESIDENT VERNA:10 Doctor?11

Dr. Curtis

I'm Steve Curtis,12 President Of Community College of13 Philadelphia. And in deference to the14 time, I'm not going to read the15 testimony, but I will do two things:16 Just remind you of the three main points17 that are in the testimony. 24 The three basic points in my25 338 5/4/09 COMM. OF THE WHOLE - FISCAL '10 BUDGET1 testimony:2 One, a year ago, when we were3 here, we made a series of commitments as4 to what we would do at that time with5 some increases in funding, and you'll see6 that in the written testimony. 10 When we did it, we didn't11 realize how truly important it would be12 because the economy hasn't crashed yet to13 the extent that it eventually did. 17 We also had promised that we18 would work to produce more graduates, and19 that's in line with the Mayor's proposal20 to double the number of residents of the21 City that have a college degree. 24 But we do at least point to a25 339 5/4/09 COMM. 9 The third thing we said a year10 ago was that we would work with the City11 to actually give some of the dollars back12 in the form of training to City13 employees. We work regularly with some14 departments within the City15 infrastructure, but there are also other16 departments with which we have very17 little to do, to be candid. 25 340 5/4/09 COMM. 23 The second main point of the24 written testimony has to do with how we25 341 5/4/09 COMM. OF THE WHOLE - FISCAL '10 BUDGET1 will handle our budget situation next2 year. We do appreciate the City's3 financial and economic situation. 14 We've tried not to get into a spiral of15 just cut, cut, cut. And that's important16 because we expect we'll have more17 students next year. 21 In this kind of economy and22 this kind of increasing unemployment, we23 know that we'll get more students; that's24 always the cycle. And it is not our25 342 5/4/09 COMM. 9 And the last general comment in10 the written testimony has to do with the11 "what if," the contingency. Our planning12 for next year, the coming year, is based13 on no new dollars from the City, very few14 dollars from the State if the Governor's15 proposal goes through, which is why we16 have to do a reduction of expenditures as17 well as increase other kinds of revenues,18 because there will be very little help19 from our public sources in terms of new20 dollars. 24 And if that were to happen, if25 343 5/4/09 COMM. OF THE WHOLE - FISCAL '10 BUDGET1 economy remained unpredictable, then we2 just do want to say that we'd have to3 look at some contingency steps, including4 further tuition increases and other5 steps. 10 If I may, I'd like to just turn11 over the rest of my time to a couple of12 students, if that's all right. 16 You have always been so17 supportive in the years that I've been18 here, but what you're supporting are19 individuals, you're supporting residents20 of this city who have not only personal21 dreams but are key to the future of this22 city. 24

Council President Verna

That25 344 5/4/09 COMM. OF THE WHOLE - FISCAL '10 BUDGET1 would be fine.2

Dr. Curtis

Good. And our3 three students are Mary Anderson and4 Donelle and Monique Casey. I think just5 two will speak, but if that's all right,6 I'll ask them to come forward briefly.7 And then I'm happy to answer any8 questions.9 (Students come forward.)10

Council President Verna

Good11 afternoon.12

Ms. Anderson

Good afternoon,13 President Verna and Councilmembers. My14 name's Mary Anderson, and I'm the15 President of Student Government at16 Community College of Philadelphia. Thank17 you for this opportunity to speak before18 you in support of the institution that's19 done so much to change my life.20 There was a time in my life21 when I was despondent and uncertain about22 my future, and for years, I had struggled23 with poverty, neglect, and physical24 abuse. I was raising three children on25 345 5/4/09 COMM. OF THE WHOLE - FISCAL '10 BUDGET1 my own and was a high school dropout, and2 I felt helpless and hopeless.3 A friend of mine told me about4 Community Learning Center, where I was5 able to receive counseling and obtain my6 GED. Taking that first step gave me an7 enormous sense of accomplishment and8 (indiscernible) my thirst for learning.9 My next step led me to10 Community College of Philadelphia. When11 I walked into Admissions that first day,12 I was flying on blind hope. I had no13 idea that I could even attend college or14 how I would pay for it. I was just15 praying something would work out. I16 never imagined the opportunities that17 would come my way.18 What once felt like the only19 option now feels like it was the natural20 choice. I don't think I would have had21 opportunities I have here at any other22 school. I chose to pursue a career in23 education, allowing me to share what I24 have learned with people who might be25 346 5/4/09 COMM. OF THE WHOLE - FISCAL '10 BUDGET1 facing the same obstacles that I2 encountered.3 Thanks to the Community College4 of Philadelphia, my life has changed. My5 self-esteem has increased, and I now have6 hope for the future.7 This academic year has been8 eventful. I was elected President of the9 Student Government Association and won10 dual honors recently as a Coca Cola11 Scholars Foundation national finalist and12 as a member of the all-Pennsylvania a13 academic team. The all-Pennsylvania14 recognition also provides a full15 scholarship to complete my bachelor's16 degree in education at West Chester17 University.18 But my most significant19 achievement since entering Community20 College of Philadelphia was not a21 near-perfect grade point averages; it was22 my founding of the Kenya Project, which23 provides clothing, school supplies, and24 money for medical supplies for Sujeto, a25 347 5/4/09 COMM. OF THE WHOLE - FISCAL '10 BUDGET1 small village in Kenya. The Student2 Government Association and other clubs at3 the college were able to raise more than4 a thousand dollars in goods and cash we5 recently shipped to Sujeto.6 My hope is that the Kenya7 Project will create the same hope and8 opportunities for the children in Suweto9 that Community College of Philadelphia10 has given to me.11 Thank you.12

Mr. Casey

Good afternoon,13 Council President Verna.14

Council President Verna

Good15 afternoon.16

Mr. Casey

My name is Donelle17 Casey, and I'm here today with my wife,18 Monique.19 We are both residents of20 Kingsessing and juggle the21 responsibilities of being students along22 with parents of three. We are both23 scheduled to receive our associate's24 degree in liberal arts.25 348 5/4/09 COMM. OF THE WHOLE - FISCAL '10 BUDGET1 COUNCIL PRESIDENT VERNA:2 Excuse me. Would you pull the microphone3 closer. Thank you.4

Mr. Casey

Sure. 6 Our plan is to transfer to7 Cabrini starting in the fall, thanks to8 Community College's dual-admissions9 agreement. 15 Transferring these additional credits to16 Cabrini will put us further along,17 completing our bachelor's degree in18 communications. 21 None of this would be possible22 if it were not for Community College of23 Philadelphia's affordable tuition. I24 urge you to support the Mayor's proposed25 349 5/4/09 COMM. 8 My wife and I are good examples9 of how difficult it can be to afford10 college. We were in high school when we11 first had our daughter. The unexpected12 pregnancy forced us to make some tough13 choices. I chose to drop out of high14 school and let her finish to get her15 diploma. Afterwards, she graduated, I16 went back to finish get my diploma. We17 had two more children. And even though I18 worked full-time, it was touch to make a19 living. 22 Monique decide to go back to23 school. At first, she tried Strayer24 University and the University of Phoenix,25 350 5/4/09 COMM. OF THE WHOLE - FISCAL '10 BUDGET1 both distance-learning schools, but the2 cost was just too high. Finally, she3 received a postcard from the Community4 College of Philadelphia, and it said that5 they were taking applications for the6 fall semester. 12 It was the best decision and the right13 one, actually, at that time. 21 Community College of22 Philadelphia was within our means because23 the amount of the state and federal24 grants we received was enough to cover25 351 5/4/09 COMM. 5 Monique and I came to the6 college with little interest beyond7 attending class and maintaining our8 grades. However, we were soon deeply9 involved in many campus activities10 available to the college students. 19 Community College of Philadelphia's well20 aware that not every student needs or21 wants a four-year degree. The school22 makes it possible, though, for every23 student to achieve their goals, whether24 that goal is merely to take a few classes25 352 5/4/09 COMM. 12

Council President Verna

Thank13 you.14 We certainly applaud you -- we15 applaud you. You're not listening. We16 certainly applaud you and want to wish17 you all of the success in your future18 endeavors. Good luck.19

Councilman Rizzo

Madam20 President, may I say something?21 COUNCIL PRESIDENT VERNA:22 Councilman Rizzo.23

Councilman Rizzo

The young24 man indicated that he had a job at Exton25 353 5/4/09 COMM. OF THE WHOLE - FISCAL '10 BUDGET1 Mall.2

Councilman Rizzo

How long did4 you do that haul from Philly to there?5

Mr. Casey

I was actually6 manager at (inaudible). I was there for7 eight months.8

Councilman Rizzo

It's a long9 drive to Exton every day. Okay.10 COUNCIL PRESIDENT VERNA:11 That's determination.12 Councilwoman Brown, we are13 running late, so I would ask my14 colleagues to try to be as brief as15 possible.16

Councilwoman Brown

Okay.17

Council President Verna

Thank18 you.19

Councilwoman Brown

Good20 afternoon, Mr. President, and your team.21

Dr. Curtis

Good afternoon.22

Councilwoman Brown

Let me23 commend you for bringing young people so24 that they can see government up close and25 354 5/4/09 COMM. OF THE WHOLE - FISCAL '10 BUDGET1 personal. There's nothing like that2 experience.3 If you could please discuss4 briefly the relationship you are enjoying5 with the Workforce Investment Board and6 School District specifically around the7 green efforts.8

Dr. Curtis

Well, the -- with9 the Workforce Investment Board, over10 time, we are involved in various kinds of11 training. With the Stimulus funding12 that's now going to be coming to the13 State and eventually to the City, we have14 sat down with the Workforce Investment15 Board to talk about the specific areas of16 the Stimulus as one example that deal17 with green and also deals with health18 care and some other areas.19 Now, we are -- we will be20 bidding on some of these projects. We'll21 be a provider, but we are trying to align22 the programs that we have with the23 specific needs of the City and with the24 specific areas that we believe the25 355 5/4/09 COMM. OF THE WHOLE - FISCAL '10 BUDGET1 Workforce Investment Board is going to be2 promoting.3

Councilwoman Brown

Mm-hmm.4

Dr. Curtis

I mentioned -- I5 think it's in the written testimony.6 We've developed some short-term7 certificates that didn't used to have --8 almost 30, a number of which are around9 the green jobs.10 We're prepared to do more as11 the funding is made available to help12 develop some of curriculum around13 weatherization and the like.14

Councilwoman Brown

Sure.15

Dr. Curtis

So all of that is16 being discussed. We've had meetings17 already with the Workforce Investment18 Board.19 With the School District, I20 can't answer the question on the green21 jobs 'cause we have met with22 representatives of the School District23 also for some specific training areas and24 also some links between the --25 356 5/4/09 COMM. OF THE WHOLE - FISCAL '10 BUDGET1 programmatic links between the School2 District and our academic programs.3 But I don't know the answer on4 the green jobs specifically.5

Councilwoman Brown

Okay.6

Dr. Curtis

I can try to get7 some information on that if you'd like.8

Councilwoman Brown

In your9 appropriation from the City of10 Philadelphia, is it targeted towards any11 particular program effort or initiative12 at Community College?13

Dr. Curtis

You're talking14 about the City's base allocation to us?15

Councilwoman Brown

Yes.16

Dr. Curtis

No, no. It's a17 lump sum, and it simply goes to cover our18 budget. You know, it's part of the19 revenue that comes in for our overall20 budget.21

Councilwoman Brown

Okay.22

Dr. Curtis

It's not targeted23 in any way.24

Councilwoman Brown

Okay. One25 357 5/4/09 COMM. OF THE WHOLE - FISCAL '10 BUDGET1 laser-beam interest that a number of us2 on City Council has had is for any3 entity, any part of government, any4 organization that is receiving anything5 from the City of Philadelphia, we6 continue to be deeply concerned where it7 has been or interested in knowing how8 well you are doing as an institution with9 MBE/WBE participation. And so, if you10 could please speak to that.11 You're aware of a letter I sent12 to you on April 9th stipulating that we13 would want to know those numbers, both on14 the prime side and on the subprime side.15

Dr. Curtis

I apologize. I16 never received the letter, so I didn't17 know that, but I can answer the question18 in general.19

Councilwoman Brown

Okay.20

Dr. Curtis

And then if you21 need more than the detail I'm about to22 give you, we'll be happy to provide it.23 In terms of our operating24 budget, our operating budget's a little25 358 5/4/09 COMM. OF THE WHOLE - FISCAL '10 BUDGET1 over a hundred million dollars, and 852 percent of that is people, salaries,3 benefits, and so on, so those aren't4 dollars that are available for, you know,5 the kind of question that you're asking.6 And there are also some other7 dollars for the post office and major8 utilities, again, that I would set aside9 from that.10 So there's about 9 or11 $10 million that we have control over in12 terms of contracts, goods, services, and13 the like. And the answer to the question14 is, out of that about, 20 percent is for15 minority- and women-owned businesses.16

Councilwoman Brown

Could you17 please provide a detail to Council18 President Verna? And how soon could you19 provide that?20

Dr. Curtis

Very quickly, I21 think. Sure.22

Councilwoman Brown

Okay. And23 you -- for the record, you're telling me24 that the letter dated April 9th addressed25 359 5/4/09 COMM. OF THE WHOLE - FISCAL '10 BUDGET1 to you, you never received it.2

Dr. Curtis

No, ma'am, I've3 not received -- I've not seen that.4

Councilwoman Brown

All right,5 then. I'll make sure that you get a copy6 of this.7 You should know for the record8 last year, I sent a letter to the Mayor9 so that the Mayor could convey that10 message. This year we opted to do it11 informally. So, going forward, that will12 be a required expectation that we would13 prefer to have in the text of your14 testimony so that we can see how our city15 is doing with regards to leveling the16 playing field for everybody.17

Dr. Curtis

We're happy to do18 that. Again, we just haven't received19 that request.20

Councilwoman Brown

Oh, okay.21

Dr. Curtis

And I apologize.22

Councilwoman Brown

All right.23 The clock hasn't run yet. That's24 interesting.25 360 5/4/09 COMM. OF THE WHOLE - FISCAL '10 BUDGET1 Tell me about your My Degree2 Now Program and how many have been3 impacted by that.4

Dr. Curtis

My Degree Now is5 an effort to reach out to Philadelphians6 who started on a college track but never7 finished. They have credits. Now, it --8 could be a small number of credits; it9 could be three or six, but could be10 ninety -- but never actually received a11 degree.12 We made an offer this year. We13 had a donor who was willing to back the14 offer with scholarship monies, that if15 there were anyone in the City who had at16 least 30 credits that could be17 transferred to us, they had to be18 transferable credits, which is roughly19 half of a lot of our associate degrees.20

Councilwoman Brown

Okay.21

Dr. Curtis

So you'd be sort22 of halfway along --23

Councilwoman Brown

Okay.24

Dr. Curtis

-- toward an25 361 5/4/09 COMM. OF THE WHOLE - FISCAL '10 BUDGET1 associate degree. That we would see to2 it that between financial aid or, if you3 don't qualify, or qualify for very4 little, through scholarship --5 (Timer bell rings.)6

Dr. Curtis

-- there would be7 no tuition or fee cost for the remaining8 30 credits.9 There are some parameters. You10 know, have to stay in good standing.11

Councilwoman Brown

Sure.12

Dr. Curtis

You can't fail13 anything, you have to be there every14 semester, et cetera.15 We have a hundred people in the16 pipeline this year who responded to that.17 So we have guaranteed them -- now, most18 them are part-time, so we've guaranteed19 them the money will be there for the next20 couple of years as long as they stay on21 track until they graduate.22 We will continue the program23 next year probably with fewer slots just24 because of resources.25 362 5/4/09 COMM. OF THE WHOLE - FISCAL '10 BUDGET1

Councilwoman Brown

Of course.2

Dr. Curtis

But we like this3 approach, and we think it's a way to grab4 hold of some Philadelphians that, with a5 little bit of intensive push, could get6 to their first academic credential.7

Councilwoman Brown

Yes, yes.8 I congratulate you.9

Dr. Curtis

Thank you.10

Councilwoman Brown

Thank you11 very much.12 Thank you, Madam President.13 COUNCIL PRESIDENT VERNA:14 You're welcome.15 The Chair recognizes Councilman16 Jones.17

Councilman Jones

Thank you,18 Madam President.19 Dr. Curtis, I think it's safe20 to say that probably out of all of the21 investments, we in City Council have made22 this year, yours has shown, based on your23 students' comments, the greatest rate of24 return. When I hear stories like that, I25 363 5/4/09 COMM. OF THE WHOLE - FISCAL '10 BUDGET1 understand that this is money well spent.2 And did I further understand3 you to say that you are planning towards4 zero contribution from the City of5 Philadelphia based on our financial6 crisis? Did I hear that?7

Dr. Curtis

Gee, I just don't8 remember saying that one.9 (Laughter.)10

Councilman Jones

All right.11 A couple of quick questions 'cause the12 President's trying to keep things within13 a reasonable timeframe.14 Has the recession increased15 enrollment, decreased enrollment? And16 I'd be curious to know if folk that were17 originally attending, or planned to18 attend, a four-year institution are now19 choosing Community because of economics.20

Dr. Curtis

Well, the answer21 to the first part: A poor economy always22 drives more students to us. I know it's23 worse than normal right now, but if you24 were to look at the entire history of the25 364 5/4/09 COMM. OF THE WHOLE - FISCAL '10 BUDGET1 college, our enrollment is basically a2 sign curve that is counter to the3 economy. So always, in poor economic4 times, our numbers go up.5 So yes, I think I said earlier6 we're up this spring, we're running 4 to7 6 percent ahead for this summer. We8 expect to be up again this fall.9 And then the second part of10 your comment: I can own answer that11 anecdotally at the moment. We certainly12 know that we're seeing some of that. I13 think it's been true for a while, though.14 I mean, again, I know things are worse15 right now, but the cost of higher16 education has been an issue for a while.17 It's -- and while we are still18 the best deal in town -- I say that every19 time I come to talk to you each year, and20 we are proud to say that. At the same21 time, we know, for a lot of our students,22 it's still a fair amount of money, even23 our tuition and fees. And that was one24 reason I wanted to freeze the tuition25 365 5/4/09 COMM. OF THE WHOLE - FISCAL '10 BUDGET1 this year.2 So I think that move of some3 students that might have started at a4 four-year school, going to not just ours5 but other community colleges as well, has6 been there for a while. I think that's7 why it's also important that we have8 those articulation agreements with the9 universities that will then allow for a10 seamless transition for your final two11 years.12

Councilman Jones

That was my13 next question.14

Dr. Curtis

Right. And you15 heard from Mary Anderson. In her case,16 because she's a terrific student, she's17 gotten a full scholarship to support the18 tuition for the final two years of her19 bachelor's degree.20

Councilman Jones

But are all21 of those relations still in place like22 they were last year?23

Dr. Curtis

Absolutely. And24 we keep adding them.25 366 5/4/09 COMM. OF THE WHOLE - FISCAL '10 BUDGET1 We have now nine dual-admission2 programs. Again, you heard Donelle speak3 to the dual admission that we have with4 Cabrini. We just added one with Holy5 Family about a week ago, and we already6 have them with Temple and Drexel, and7 many, many others.8 So absolutely it's a critical9 part of what we do for our baccalaureate10 intended students.11

Councilman Jones

Well, I12 mean, I'm just excited about what your13 role has been in fulfilling the Mayor's14 intentions of increasing our graduate15 population and moving onto college16 graduates and decreasing the amount of17 dropouts in that regard.18 My last question would be19 similar to what Councilwoman20 Reynolds-Brown was talking about through21 the Stimulus Package and green jobs, that22 I'd like you to give some thought to and23 some effort to establishing relationships24 with places like Randolph Skills Center25 367 5/4/09 COMM. OF THE WHOLE - FISCAL '10 BUDGET1 that, for green jobs and Stimulus jobs,2 are a good feeder pipeline of3 enthusiastic young tradespersons that4 want to figure out ways to advance their5 skill sets to be able to A, go into6 business; B, go into jobsites and union7 halls and prepare them for these8 apprenticeship tests that are out there9 that seem to baffle some of our young10 people and deny them admission into some11 of our unions.12 And if you could work with13 Dr. Ackerman, who went on a tour of the14 Randolph Skills Center with us to try to15 cement that relationship, that would be a16 next step, a next evolution in your role17 as president of Community College.18 And I support you and your19 staff.20 (Timer bell rings.)21

Councilman Jones

And whenever22 I call there with a constituent that's23 trying to get in the school or trying the24 figure out how to make all of the numbers25 368 5/4/09 COMM. OF THE WHOLE - FISCAL '10 BUDGET1 add up to get a tuition payment, you have2 yet to fail one of my constituents, and I3 thank you for that.4

Dr. Curtis

Well, thank you5 very much.6

Council President Verna

Thank7 you, Councilman.8 The Chair recognizes9 Councilwoman Sanchez.10

Councilwoman Sanchez

I'll be11 brief, Madam President. I know we want12 to move on.13 But I would be remiss if I did14 not acknowledge the good work Of15 Community College as it relates to16 providing sometimes gap education and17 much-needed linkages to students.18 But I wanted to put on the19 record for now 'cause I'll ask it20 during -- when the School District is21 here. One of the things that I found in22 my discussions with Dr. Curtis is that23 the School District's failure to24 (indiscernible) our dual-credit program25 369 5/4/09 COMM. OF THE WHOLE - FISCAL '10 BUDGET1 in the mix of Dr. Ackerman coming in, a2 program that served how many students,3 Dr. Curtis?4

Dr. Curtis

It was 60; it was5 a small program.6

Councilwoman Sanchez

It was a7 small program where we were doing dual8 credits for high schools, but the School9 District of Philadelphia defunded it.10 Mr. Curtis assures me that we will be11 able to get that back up and running.12 But I think as we talk about13 providing access to college and education14 and particularly this administration,15 whose made such a huge goal that we have16 to pay attention to those small details.17 So I just wanted to put that on18 the record 'cause it's one that I will19 put at the School District, but I did20 want to thank Mr. Curtis and the entire21 staff at Community College.22

Dr. Curtis

May I just make a23 brief comment on that? Just so it's24 clear, we do lots of dual-enrollment and25 370 5/4/09 COMM. OF THE WHOLE - FISCAL '10 BUDGET1 dual-credit with the School District.2 This was a particular program; and it is,3 for lack of a better word, on hiatus at4 the moment.5 We're still working with the6 School District, and I believe both sides7 have an intention to see if it can't be8 started again, but it is not going9 forward in the coming year.10

Councilwoman Sanchez

Thank11 you.12

Council President Verna

Thank13 you.14 Any further questions?15 (No further questions.)16

Council President Verna

Thank17 you very much.18

Dr. Curtis

Thank you.19

Council President Verna

We20 will now hear from SEPTA.21 (Witnesses come forward.)22 COUNCIL PRESIDENT VERNA:23 Hello.24

Ms. Newkirk

Good afternoon25 371 5/4/09 COMM. OF THE WHOLE - FISCAL '10 BUDGET1 Madam Chair.2

Council President Verna

Good3 afternoon.4

Ms. Newkirk

I am Jettie5 Newkirk here representing the SEPTA Board6 members and as the Philadelphia -- one of7 the Philadelphia representatives to the8 SEPTA Board.9 And before Mr. Burnfield gives10 the testimony, I would just like to take11 this opportunity to -- since this is12 probably my last appearance before13 Council in this role, to say goodbye and14 thank you for Council's assistance,15 patience, ability to, and willingness to16 work with SEPTA Board and staff in terms17 of moving SEPTA along in the path that I18 think we all wanted it to go, where I19 think that it is now on that right path.20 SEPTA has adopted a five-year21 plan that you will hear more about later.22 But in that plan, one of the core values23 is diversity, and that is something that24 we have been working on for a number of25 372 5/4/09 COMM. OF THE WHOLE - FISCAL '10 BUDGET1 years.2 We also are doing more in terms3 of what you would call "constituent4 services," but what SEPTA calls "customer5 relations," so that there is more6 attention being paid to the customers.7 So please accept my thank-you8 both for this opportunity since I started9 as a Council representative to the Board10 and for your consideration. Thank you11 very much.12

Council President Verna

Well,13 we certainly want to thank you for your14 many years of experience and dedication.15 What is it, 16 or 17 years?16

Ms. Newkirk

17 years.17

Council President Verna

God18 bless you. We applaud you.19 (Applause.)20

Council President Verna

Thank21 you.22

Ms. Newkirk

Mr. Burnfield23 will give testimony.24

Mr. Burnfield

Good afternoon,25 373 5/4/09 COMM. OF THE WHOLE - FISCAL '10 BUDGET1 Council President Verna. My name is2 Richard Burnfield, Chief Financial3 Officer for SEPTA. Today, I am pleased4 to speak to City Council today concerning5 the Authority's Fiscal 2010 operating6 budget request and several SEPTA7 initiatives.8 Today, I am joined by Frances9 Jones, Assistant General Manager; Jeffrey10 Canuple, Assistant General Manager for11 Engineering Maintenance and Construction;12 and Lily Clayette, Director of Office of13 Disadvantaged Enterprise Programs.14 Over the last 12 months, SEPTA15 Act 44-dedicated funding enabled SEPTA to16 add bus and trolley service during peak17 and nonpeak hours, implement new service18 initiatives, and increase seating19 capacity on 21 bus routes serving20 Philadelphia.21 As Miss Newkirk mentioned, the22 Authority is working to improve customer23 service by enhancing rider24 communications, station and vehicle25 374 5/4/09 COMM. OF THE WHOLE - FISCAL '10 BUDGET1 cleanliness, and passenger courtesy. To2 reinforce this commitment, the General3 Manager created a new division reporting4 directly to him, the Customer Service and5 Advocacy Division.6 SEPTA continues to invest in7 station and facilities through our8 Capital Program. I am delighted to9 report that this morning, the 63rd Street10 Station on the Market Street elevated11 line reopened for regular service.12 (Applause.)13

Councilman Jones

Bravo!14

Mr. Burnfield

This marks one15 of the final milestones in the16 $740 million reconstruction of the Market17 Street elevated, with all SEPTA work to18 be completed this summer.19 Fleet enhancements are also a20 vital part of our Capital Program, with21 120 new hybrid buses to be delivered this22 year.23 President Obama's federal24 stimulus program has given SEPTA the25 375 5/4/09 COMM. OF THE WHOLE - FISCAL '10 BUDGET1 opportunity to advance $119 million in2 shovel-ready projects. Among these3 initiatives are renovations to the Girard4 and Spring Garden stations on the Broad5 Street Subway, new track at the Fern Rock6 Yard, right-of-way fencing placements7 along the Airport High Speedline,8 improvements to the signal system for the9 tunnel serving five trolley routes, and10 improvement to stations on the Chestnut11 Hill West and Fox Chase rail lines.12 Just last week, we introduced13 the new Independence Pass for individuals14 and families, good for unlimited one-day15 travel throughout the SEPTA network.16 City Council's continued17 support of public transit through the18 City matching funds for the operating and19 capital budgets is greatly appreciated20 Thank you for the opportunity21 to speak today, and we would be happy to22 answer any questions members of Council23 may have.24 MR. McPHERSON: Councilwoman25 376 5/4/09 COMM. OF THE WHOLE - FISCAL '10 BUDGET1 Brown.2

Councilwoman Brown

Thank you,3 thank you, thank you. First let me say4 thank you to our board member here for5 being an agitator.6 (Laughter.)7

Councilwoman Brown

And in a8 good way. You've been the conscience of9 that board in the years since you've been10 there. And on a number of different11 issues where, but for your presence,12 there may not have been the required13 action. So to Miss Newkirk, we're going14 to miss you, miss your voice, but I would15 ask that you continue to reminded us that16 you are paying attention where you17 believe from where you sit that we, in18 Council, and those at the SEPTA can do19 more and do better.20 We thank you for your service.21

Ms. Newkirk

Thank you,22 Council Lady.23

Councilwoman Brown

Good24 afternoon.25 377 5/4/09 COMM. OF THE WHOLE - FISCAL '10 BUDGET1 Could you please just update us2 on the, I believe, exciting decision3 you've made regarding the art effort, why4 you had to move to that decision, and the5 good news that comes out as a result of6 the new policy you're implementing.7

Ms. Jones

It's Frances Jones,8 Assistant General Manager of Government9 Affairs.10 If you're speaking to the press11 conference that we had recently regarding12 the music in the station stations?13

Councilwoman Brown

Yes, yes,14 yes.15

Ms. Jones

It's an effort16 to -- we don't want to stifle art in any17 way or in any medium, but it really was a18 way to control where the artists were19 playing and also to remember that the20 amplification systems really were an21 intrusion in the way that we make the22 announcements.23

Councilwoman Brown

Okay.24

Ms. Jones

Quite frequently,25 378 5/4/09 COMM. OF THE WHOLE - FISCAL '10 BUDGET1 we got complaints from customers that2 because of the music in the amplification3 systems, with some of the artists, they4 were unable to hear the announcements5 that we were making.6 And so, what we've put in place7 basically is a program where we have8 specific locations where the artists can9 perform as well as the specific10 timeframe. So we are -- it's a part of11 where we feel that we're providing a12 service of transportation but we're13 providing art in a different medium as14 well.15

Councilwoman Brown

And in16 public places, where folks can really17 enjoy it.18

Ms. Jones

Yes. And the new19 policy, in my opinion, has been well20 received from the public.21

Councilwoman Brown

Well, I'm22 excited about it.23

Ms. Jones

Thank you.24

Councilwoman Brown

And I25 379 5/4/09 COMM. OF THE WHOLE - FISCAL '10 BUDGET1 commend you enormously.2 I don't have to ask questions3 regarding MBE/WBE participation because4 you did follow through and provide us5 those numbers, which are impressive,6 given the enormous amount of7 appropriations that have come to SEPTA8 from both the federal and State level.9 And I appreciate you actually10 breaking down by level of government11 exactly who those contractors are and the12 level to which they have been awarded.13 So we thank you for leading by example.14 Thank you very much.15 Would you like to comment on16 that, sir?17

Mr. Burnfield

Thank you,18 Councilwoman.19 We're very proud of the program20 that we have. We have made that a major21 effort. As part of our Stimulus Program,22 Lily Clayette has done a wonderful job of23 promoting that. As part of the Stimulus,24 we had an outreach effort very early in25 380 5/4/09 COMM. OF THE WHOLE - FISCAL '10 BUDGET1 that program to bring together prime2 contractors and minority firms to try to3 partner up in the beginning of the4 process, before we even started to bid5 projects.6

Councilwoman Brown

Mm-hmm.7

Mr. Burnfield

So we're very8 proud of our program and thank you for9 your comments.10

Councilwoman Brown

Excellent,11 excellent.12 One final question: Because13 you have done this quite effectively, do14 you -- and as a practice, do you have15 opportunities where officials at SEPTA16 can connect face-to-face with MBEs and17 WBEs in a formal way to hear about these18 opportunities?19

Ms. Clayette

Good afternoon.20 This is Lily Clayette, Director of the21 DBE Program at SEPTA. And if you could22 just repeat that question for me again,23 please, Councilwoman.24

Councilwoman Brown

Sure.25 381 5/4/09 COMM. OF THE WHOLE - FISCAL '10 BUDGET1 This doesn't happen by accident; it2 happens because there's been a plan, a3 strategic plan, to get the word out, A;4 and then to help create a pipeline so5 that those who qualify can actually have6 access to opportunity.7 So just briefly tell us how8 you're able to make it known that there9 are opportunities here and that this what10 you need to do to make yourself available11 to them.12

Ms. Clayette

Okay. Similar13 to what we did for the Stimulus Program,14 one of our projects is to bring the prime15 contractors -- primarily those16 contractors that have done business with17 SEPTA, say, for example, over the past,18 say, three to five years, that we know19 bid on SEPTA's work. We invite them20 invite in, and then we also invite the21 DBE subcontractors to come into the22 network with them.23 And that's something that we24 will be doing periodically. Specifically25 382 5/4/09 COMM. OF THE WHOLE - FISCAL '10 BUDGET1 with the Stimulus Program --2

Councilwoman Brown

Yes.3

Ms. Clayette

-- we did it in4 February. We plan to do it again in the5 early part of the fall, when we go into6 the second half of our Stimulus projects7 that will be going out on the street.8

Councilwoman Brown

Could you9 please keep Councilmembers informed as10 well, because we may like to come and/or11 inform those who are in our world that12 this is happening.13

Ms. Clayette

Absolutely,14 absolutely.15

Councilwoman Brown

Okay.16

Ms. Clayette

Absolutely, yes.17

Councilwoman Brown

Thank you18 very much.19

Ms. Clayette

You're welcome.20

Councilwoman Brown

Excellent21 work.22 Thank you, Madam Chair.23

Councilwoman Tasco

The Chair24 recognizes Councilman Jones.25 383 5/4/09 COMM. OF THE WHOLE - FISCAL '10 BUDGET1

Councilman Jones

Thank you,2 Madam Chair.3 I too rise to salute former4 board member now Jettie Newkirk to say5 that we are very proud of all of her6 accomplishments over her tenure. I mean,7 whether it is simple things like getting8 the board to go to training officially or9 more complicated things by, like,10 navigating through several strikes, or11 whether it's interesting things like12 greening and things like that that we13 find important as we use the system,14 whether it's fighting for WBEs or dealing15 with the difficult issue, as Councilwoman16 Blackwell will probably talk about, the17 el reconstruction, with the team that18 you've assembled, we appreciate all of19 the things you do.20 And just the cherry on top of21 the sundae was announcing that the 63rd22 Street Station was open today, and I23 would just simply say, job well done,24 Soldier, and thank you for finally25 384 5/4/09 COMM. OF THE WHOLE - FISCAL '10 BUDGET1 getting some dedicated funding from the2 Commonwealth of Pennsylvania for our3 system, and say thank you for all you've4 done.5 Having said that, you've picked6 a great group of folk to actually7 implement a lot of this stuff, so I just8 want to go through a couple of questions.9 I would be interested in10 understanding where we are with LCD11 lighting throughout the system, and12 particularly that lighting that kind13 of -- we talked about the Amber Alert14 system and working in with that for15 better SEPTA safety. And could you speak16 to the issue of the signage, but also17 SEPTA safety.18

Mr. Burnfield

One of the19 stimulus programs that we are looking at20 as part of the Department of21 Transportation, it has somewhat of an add22 acronym. It's called TIGGER, which is23 Transportation Investments Greenhouse Gas24 Energy Reduction. The grant applications25 385 5/4/09 COMM. OF THE WHOLE - FISCAL '10 BUDGET1 are due to the Department of2 Transportation May the 22nd.3 We intend to submit an4 application to convert some of our5 lighting to the more energy-efficient6 lighting. We're looking at an7 application somewhere in the range of 58 to $7 million to implement such a9 program.10

Councilman Jones

Are we tying11 that into GPS locators that kind of12 indicate what the estimated time of13 arrival of a particular mode of14 transportation might be, to be able to15 give a consumer the ability to know, Hey,16 I got seven minutes in between trains, I17 can go and get a cup of coffee and make18 it back in time to catch my train?19

Mr. Burnfield

One of the20 projects, Councilman, that we have in our21 Capital Budget that is currently underway22 is what we call "Smart Stations." It23 includes a number of initiatives in terms24 of life safety and improvements, and it25 386 5/4/09 COMM. OF THE WHOLE - FISCAL '10 BUDGET1 will include communications so that at2 each station on the Broad Street Subway3 and the Market-Frankford line, we will4 have signs that will be able to indicate5 next train in seven minutes, five6 minutes, four minutes, so that whenever7 someone goes down to catch a train, they8 will know how long they will have to wait9 until the next train arrives.10 And we believe that is a part11 of our commitment to improve customer12 service.13

Councilman Jones

In light of14 that kind of work to make Smart Stations,15 are we also providing camera access for16 security purposes so that one of the big17 issues for safety is having that kind of18 surveillance camera, so that when there19 is an instance, someone doesn't have to20 run to an emergency phone; the observer,21 the security person, can see what's going22 on and automatically call for assistance.23

Mr. Burnfield

There are24 several hundred cameras that are being25 387 5/4/09 COMM. OF THE WHOLE - FISCAL '10 BUDGET1 installed throughout the system and on2 vehicles, both buses and rail cars.3

Councilman Jones

My final4 thing that I guess I would ask you to5 also do: Is there a analysis that shows6 by way of, as we start to talk about7 Stimulus and talk about work generated,8 there's a certain amount of work that is9 done in-house on trains, on locomotives,10 and buses that is done in-house and a11 certain amount of it that is shipped out.12 Have we looked at cost and13 cost-effectiveness to try to retain as14 many jobs here in the City of15 Philadelphia as possible?16 I give one example. You have17 these couplings that connect the actual18 trains that, from time to time, you ship19 out of Philadelphia. And I wanted to20 know what the cost analysis was that went21 into making the decision about whether to22 farm something out or whether to do23 something within the shops that you have.24

Mr. Burnfield

Specifically25 388 5/4/09 COMM. OF THE WHOLE - FISCAL '10 BUDGET1 for the Stimulus Program, because those2 funds are provided by the federal3 government, the Federal Transit4 Administration, there is a requirement5 that that work be contracted out to6 third-party contractors rather than the7 work being done in-house.8 However, we do have a9 State-funded program called "Vehicle10 Overhaul Initiatives" that's about11 $53 million a year for which we do most12 of that work in-house in terms of13 overhauling buses, doing work on rail14 cars. So there is a significant amount15 of work that we have to determine that we16 can do more effectively and efficiently17 in-house.18

Councilman Jones

Finally,19 could you describe for me whatever20 apprenticeship programs you have in21 conjunction with people like Community22 College and also the public or parochial23 school systems to provide job24 opportunities for Philadelphia residents?25 389 5/4/09 COMM. OF THE WHOLE - FISCAL '10 BUDGET1

Mr. Burnfield

We have a2 number of training programs with our3 trade unions to --4 (Timer bell rings.)5

Mr. Burnfield

-- uh --6

Councilman Jones

That's for7 me, not you. Go ahead.8

Mr. Burnfield

To encourage9 those individuals to gain the skill sets10 that they need to be either mechanics or11 to work in our buildings group.12 We have just recently started a13 training program for apprentices to work14 on elevators and escalators. As more and15 more of our stations become accessible,16 we have found the need to develop an17 apprentice program in that area.18

Councilman Jones

Any with our19 public schools?20

Mr. Burnfield

(Consults21 off-record with Ms. Newkirk.) We do have22 an internship program this summer where23 we are --24

Councilman Jones

And you know25 390 5/4/09 COMM. OF THE WHOLE - FISCAL '10 BUDGET1 next year, you ain't going to have Jettie2 there to tell you that, right?3 (Laughter.)4

Councilman Jones

Go ahead.5

Mr. Burnfield

We have an6 internship program this summer, where we7 are bringing about 27 students onboard.8

Councilman Jones

Thank you,9 Madam Chair.10

Councilwoman Tasco

Thank you.11 The Chair recognizes Councilman12 Green.13

Councilman Green

Thank you,14 Madam Chair.15 Could you please describe for16 us what our limitations are as a city or17 what our requirements or obligations are18 with respect to the funding that we19 provide -- a percentage of total funding20 we provide compared to the surrounding21 counties?22

Mr. Burnfield

The overall23 formula, the State requires a match on24 State dollars of 15 percent. And then25 391 5/4/09 COMM. OF THE WHOLE - FISCAL '10 BUDGET1 for each of the divisions that SEPTA2 operates service, there is a different3 formula that is used to determine local4 match.5

Councilman Green

I'm sorry.6 With respect to the first formula, it's7 State law, right?8

Mr. Burnfield

It's State law,9 correct.10

Councilman Green

So we have11 no choice. And how much under the first12 formula do we contribute compared to the13 surrounding counties?14

Mr. Burnfield

Of the overall15 amount, the City provides about 8016 percent of the local match.17

Councilman Green

What's the18 dollar figure compared to the...19

Mr. Burnfield

It's 64 million20 provided by the City of Philadelphia.21

Councilman Green

Okay.22 Sorry. Go on to the next one.23

Mr. Burnfield

The formula is24 based on each of the divisions. The City25 392 5/4/09 COMM. OF THE WHOLE - FISCAL '10 BUDGET1 Transit Division, the majority of the2 local matching funds are provided by the3 City of Philadelphia too. The4 surrounding counties provide some5 matching funds. And then the City6 provides 70 percent of the local match7 for the Regional Rail Division.8

Councilman Green

And how much9 is that dollars-wise? And do you have10 traffic figures for regional rail, for11 example?12

Mr. Burnfield

I don't have --13

Councilman Green

County14 breakdown versus City, you know, where15 people get on and originate.16

Mr. Burnfield

We have that17 information; I don't have it with us18 today, but --19

Councilman Green

Can you do20 an analysis for me of how much of the21 burden we're bearing compared to how much22 of the benefit we're getting. We may be23 winning, we may be losing; I don't know.24 And just provide that to the Chair.25 393 5/4/09 COMM. OF THE WHOLE - FISCAL '10 BUDGET1

Mr. Burnfield

Yes,2 absolutely.3

Councilman Green

The second4 formula you discussed, is that State law?5

Councilman Green

Okay. So7 how much do we provide under that8 formula?9

Mr. Burnfield

Under the10 formula for local match?11

Councilman Green

Yes.12

Mr. Burnfield

The City13 provides 64 million --14

Councilman Green

No, I'm15 sorry, but you said that was required by16 State law.17

Mr. Burnfield

The requirement18 of State law is to have for every dollar19 that you receive from the State, the20 local, and they don't define how local21 is, but the locals much match it at a22 15 percent ratio.23

Councilman Green

Okay. So24 for every dollar from the State,25 394 5/4/09 COMM. OF THE WHOLE - FISCAL '10 BUDGET1 Philadelphia and surrounding counties2 that participate in the SEPTA have to3 provide 15 cents.4

Mr. Burnfield

Right. It's an5 85 percent/15 percent matching6 requirement.7

Councilman Green

And we8 negotiate that with the surrounding9 counties and with SEPTA?10

Mr. Burnfield

It's been a11 longstanding arrangements between the12 City and the four counties as to how that13 match requirement has been allocated.14

Councilman Green

But that's15 not governed by State law.16

Mr. Burnfield

No, it is not.17

Councilman Green

Okay. Has18 the City approached SEPTA or the19 surrounding counties about the counties20 picking up more of the burden during this21 economic crisis?22

Mr. Burnfield

No, they have23 not.24

Councilman Green

Okay. If25 395 5/4/09 COMM. OF THE WHOLE - FISCAL '10 BUDGET1 you could just provide sort of your2 analysis of that to the Chair both in3 terms of ridership, what we contribute4 compared to, you know, broken down by5 type of service, also including regional6 rail, I would appreciate that.7 What would happen if the City8 cut funding for SEPTA in this9 environment, where you're receiving so10 much economic stimulus money and you11 appear to have run a $40 million -- you12 are projected to run a $40 million13 surplus this year.14

Mr. Burnfield

I think it15 would jeopardize the receipt of State16 funds. As part of the State law, the17 State requires the local match to be18 available in which the year they provide19 the State funds. So if the local match20 is not available, the State withholds21 their funds.22

Councilman Green

And can we23 apply the surplus to the local match?24

Mr. Burnfield

No.25 396 5/4/09 COMM. OF THE WHOLE - FISCAL '10 BUDGET1

Councilman Green

What happens2 when there's a surplus that nobody's3 budgeted for that results in extra cash4 within SEPTA?5

Mr. Burnfield

The surplus6 issues for the Service Stabilization7 Funds, whenever Act 44 was passed about8 two years ago, the funds that were not9 required to balance the budget in the10 current fiscal year were put aside for --11 in a Service Stabilization Fund.12

Councilman Green

What is13 that?14

Mr. Burnfield

That is to15 allocate funds for future operating16 budgets should funding not be available17 and we would have to be looking at either18 cutting service or increasing fares.19 Prior to Act 44, we went20 through a period of probably five or six21 years with great fiscal uncertainty. And22 in my previous position as Budget23 Director, probably every year, we were24 out with public hearings, looking at25 397 5/4/09 COMM. OF THE WHOLE - FISCAL '10 BUDGET1 different options to balance the budget,2 and we don't want to have to go through3 that certainly in the short term.4

Councilman Green

So Act 445 restricts what we can do with the surplus6 dollars also.7

Mr. Burnfield

Pardon me?8

Councilman Green

Act 449 restricts surplus dollars.10

Mr. Burnfield

Act 44 does11 not specifically direct you as to how to12 restrict those dollars.13

Councilman Green

Oh, I14 thought you just testified that they had15 to go into the Stabilization Fund.16

Mr. Burnfield

We have worked17 with PennDOT, and they have agreed to the18 use of funds for that purpose.19

Councilman Green

Okay. So20 that's not restricted either. So, in21 other words, that's a negotiation also.22 I'm just trying to figure out the moving23 pieces in your --24

Mr. Burnfield

With PennDOT,25 398 5/4/09 COMM. OF THE WHOLE - FISCAL '10 BUDGET1 yes.2 (Timer bell rings.)3

Councilman Green

Okay. I4 have some more questions. I'll come5 back.6 COUNCILWOMAN TASCO:7 Councilwoman Blackwell.8

Councilwoman Blackwell

Thank9 you.10 Good afternoon.11

Mr. Burnfield

Good afternoon.12

Councilwoman Blackwell

Let me13 likewise wish Jettie all the best and14 thank her and thank Frances.15 And, Mr. Burnfield, a special16 thank-you to you for helping us -- and17 good afternoon as well -- on this last18 big issue, on the issue of curbs and19 sidewalks. I'll always remember you for20 that.21 (Laughter.)22

Councilwoman Blackwell

Yes.23 We had a big issues, I'll say to my24 colleagues, on the curbs and sidewalks25 399 5/4/09 COMM. OF THE WHOLE - FISCAL '10 BUDGET1 for the Market Street elevated project.2 And they wanted to pave one-third to3 one-half of a block and the curb and4 leave the other half old.5 And thanks to Mr. Burnfield.6 You know what would happen after one7 winter; it would all look bad, you know.8 And he, with the voice of reason, said,9 If you've spent all of this money, what's10 a couple million more to make it right.11 I thank him for that.12 And I think we're kind of13 almost there. We have those Bilco doors14 to deal with that. Maybe we can work15 together with you and L&I.16 And my last issue, of course,17 will be one that indirectly affects you,18 vendors and parking meters and such.19 But I do want to again say20 thank you. This new leadership team is21 all the difference, all the difference in22 the world. And I'm grateful for the23 final opportunity to be able to work24 together after all these years on this25 400 5/4/09 COMM. OF THE WHOLE - FISCAL '10 BUDGET1 project, which we know started in 1999.2 So it's been a long time coming. And3 we're glad that at the end of this year4 that our major issues will be completed.5 So thank you. And I look6 forward to working with you to finish7 these last bits of it.8

Mr. Burnfield

Thank you.9 We're also looking forward to the10 completion of the project. And we thank11 you for your support. We know it's been12 a long project, has had an impact on the13 community certainly, but better days are14 ahead.15

Councilwoman Blackwell

Thank16 you.17 And let me also note that you18 are also the first team on cleanup days19 to come out and actually clean and pick20 up trash and work with the community and21 really, really be involved in the22 community, which is what it's all about.23 So again thank you.24

Mr. Burnfield

Thank you.25 401 5/4/09 COMM. OF THE WHOLE - FISCAL '10 BUDGET1

Councilwoman Tasco

Thank you2 very much.3 I just have one reminder -- not4 even a question. I wanted to be on5 record that we've been working with SEPTA6 to get a bus service from the Lower7 Northeast to travel through Olney and8 East Oak Lane over to the Cheltenham9 Mall, because the people who live in10 Melrose Park in East Oak Lane have to go11 back to Broad and Olney to go back up to12 the Cheltenham Avenue.13 So it's -- we've talked to you14 and sent letter, and we've been talking15 to Frances, and we want that to become a16 reality because we are working with the17 county. Cheltenham and Philadelphia have18 a planning grant from the State through19 State Representative Evans, and we have a20 business improvement district up there21 between the two, so we have great22 cooperation between the two counties.23 And if you all could make that24 happen, it would be very helpful to the25 402 5/4/09 COMM. OF THE WHOLE - FISCAL '10 BUDGET1 citizens over in Melrose Park. You don't2 want me to put Mr. Robison on you either.3 (Laughter.)4

Councilwoman Tasco

'Cause I5 not only do I have this bus, I got the6 driveway. So...7

Mr. Burnfield

We have8 scheduled a public hearing. It's9 tentatively scheduled for June 10th.10 It's our Annual Service Plan, and that11 route is a part of the hearing that day.12

Councilwoman Tasco

Oh, thank13 you very much. I appreciate it.14 Now Councilwoman Brown.15

Councilwoman Brown

Thank you16 very much.17 I wanted to follow up on18 Councilman Jones' question, the Summer19 Internship Program. Just speak briefly20 about that: What it is, how many young21 people does it capture, how long is the22 program, what are the criteria for23 consideration to be a candidate for that24 program?25 403 5/4/09 COMM. OF THE WHOLE - FISCAL '10 BUDGET1

Mr. Burnfield

It's for 282 summer interns. I believe it's a 10-week3 program, and I believe you have to have a4 current GPA of 2.5 and a sophomore in5 college.6

Councilwoman Brown

Okay, very7 helpful.8

Mr. Burnfield

And we had over9 800 applicants.10

Councilwoman Brown

Candidates?11

Mr. Burnfield

Candidates for12 it.13

Councilwoman Brown

Which is14 another reminder of how anxious young15 people are to get to work.16 Exciting news here. In your17 testimony, you state that we will be18 receiving 120 new hybrid buses. How much19 do you think that will save the City in20 long-term purchase of gas?21

Mr. Burnfield

Right now, we22 believe, based on the hybrid buses that23 we already have in service, that the24 diesel buses averaged 2.8 miles per25 404 5/4/09 COMM. OF THE WHOLE - FISCAL '10 BUDGET1 gallon. The hybrid buses will average2 about 3.5 miles per gallon. So as we3 convert our entire fleet to hybrid, it's4 going to have a very significant savings5 in diesel fuel.6

Councilwoman Brown

And that7 will bring your inventory to what number?8

Mr. Burnfield

By the end of9 this summer, we will have 260 hybrid10 buses; and then, next year, another 12011 buses; and the year after that, another12 hundred buses.13 The SEPTA Board policy is for14 all future bus procurements to be hybrid15 buses.16

Councilwoman Brown

Mm-hmm.17 So then, you expect by 2011 to be fully18 hybrid vehicles?19

Mr. Burnfield

Actually, it20 will probably take us about 10 years.21

Councilwoman Brown

I see.22

Mr. Burnfield

We replace23 one-12th of our fleet every year.24

Councilwoman Brown

Okay.25 405 5/4/09 COMM. OF THE WHOLE - FISCAL '10 BUDGET1 Seniors, paratransit. First, let me say2 thank you. And that SEPTA, through3 Frances Jones, always makes sure that a4 SEPTA representative is at the senior5 citizen forums that I do for eight6 executive weeks every fall. So we7 appreciate that, actually having a SEPTA8 employee up there to speak up close and9 personal about paratransit.10 And each year, there have been11 improvements, I've learned, in what12 you're doing around paratransit. So13 speak to us about what some of those14 improvements have been, because always,15 there's the ongoing challenge to help16 seniors get where they need to be on time17 and with a level of courtesy by your18 employees.19

Mr. Burnfield

Well, I think20 the most significant improvements that21 we're working on right now is that we are22 in the process of making major23 improvements to our Control Center, where24 all of the vehicles that are used in25 406 5/4/09 COMM. OF THE WHOLE - FISCAL '10 BUDGET1 paratransit have automatic vehicle2 locator, so that if you're in the Control3 Center, you will know exactly where that4 car, sedan, mini bus is.5

Councilwoman Brown

Mm-hmm.6

Mr. Burnfield

So that if the7 driver is either stuck in traffic,8 delayed, gets lost, that they will know9 exactly where they are and can10 communicate that to our customers so that11 they're not waiting around, wondering12 where their vehicle is, where their bus13 is, whether it's 5 minutes away or 2514 minutes away.15

Councilwoman Brown

Mm-hmm.16

Mr. Burnfield

And that17 project should be done later this year.18

Councilwoman Brown

Do you do19 any type of customer service information-20 gathering; in other words, asking your21 customers to tell you what they believe22 SEPTA can do better, particularly again23 around paratransit and seniors so that we24 can hear from where they sit?25 407 5/4/09 COMM. OF THE WHOLE - FISCAL '10 BUDGET1

Mr. Burnfield

As part of our2 new Customer Service Division that the3 General Manager established last year,4 when he became general manager, we5 created a new Customer Service Division.6 And as part one of the7 priorities of the Assistant General8 Manager for Customer Service is that we9 put out a poll on our Internet site every10 two weeks, asking for information from11 our customers. We have picked different12 subject matters that we believe are13 important to our customers, asking for14 feedback as to how we can improve our15 customer service.16 And taking information from17 that, we look at programs that we can18 initiate. One of the suggestions that19 came in last year that we have since20 implemented is the quiet ride car on our21 regional rail cars.22

Councilwoman Brown

Okay.23

Mr. Burnfield

So we believe24 it's been very good information that we25 408 5/4/09 COMM. OF THE WHOLE - FISCAL '10 BUDGET1 get from our customers. They're riding2 the system every day, they are our eyes3 and ears, and we thank them for really4 giving us a huge response to our survey5 so far.6

Councilwoman Brown

Surely.7 The only recommendation or suggestion I8 would offer: For those who are not9 fortunate enough to have computers and10 cannot access the Internet, a lot of our11 seniors, if you could confer with the12 head of senior citizen centers around the13 City who are relying on paratransit to14 move their seniors in and out. I know15 that would be helpful just based on16 informal discussions I've had with them.17

Mr. Burnfield

We will18 certainly look at that, Councilwoman.19

Councilwoman Brown

Then20 lastly, with your 4 percent increase in21 ridership, have you thought about a Rainy22 Day Fund to invest those dollars back23 into services where riders can benefit?24 (Timer bell rings.)25 409 5/4/09 COMM. OF THE WHOLE - FISCAL '10 BUDGET1

Mr. Burnfield

That's exactly2 what we did last year. Last year, when3 ridership increased significantly when4 gasoline prices went up, we took the5 additional revenue, which was about6 $10 million, and we added that right back7 into the budget for service initiatives.8

Councilwoman Brown

Mm-hmm.9

Mr. Burnfield

We had 65 new10 service initiatives. Because of that11 additional ridership, we noticed that12 there were a number of bus routes that13 were experiencing overcrowding. So14 rather than retiring 40 buses that we had15 planned to retire, we kept those 40 buses16 so that we could add more service during17 the peak hours. And then also, we tried18 to fill in some of the gaps off-peak.19 So that's exactly what we did20 when we saw the increase in ridership.21

Councilwoman Brown

Very well.22 Thank you for your testimony.23

Mr. Burnfield

Thank you.24

Council President Verna

Thank25 410 5/4/09 COMM. OF THE WHOLE - FISCAL '10 BUDGET1 you.2 The Chair recognizes3 Councilwoman Sanchez.4

Councilwoman Sanchez

Thank5 you, Madam President.6 I don't have a lot of questions7 because we had an opportunity to talk8 during a briefing session that9 Mr. Massaro had, and I found that to be10 very informative. But there were two11 issues during that discussion that we had12 that I want to back to and see where your13 updates are.14 And one is to remind you I15 represent a district that is 10 of the16 blue line el stops. And one of my17 questions and concerns at that time was18 the availability of purchasing tokens or19 token machines in all of those stops.20 And the reason is that in, for whatever21 reason, the policy decision, tokens are22 not sold during peak traffic times, and23 those are some of my poverty areas. It24 goes counter to what we're trying to do25 411 5/4/09 COMM. OF THE WHOLE - FISCAL '10 BUDGET1 in terms of having people have access to2 public transportation.3 So where are we with that?4

Ms. Jones

It's Frances Jones.5 Councilwoman, we got that6 recommendation and we really are looking7 into it. Some of the stations are still8 under -- I think the last station to be9 done is -- I think it's Margaret Orthodox10 that we're working on, and we're looking11 at that at this point to see what we can12 do to accommodate to you around the13 tokens at the stations.14

Councilwoman Sanchez

Thank15 you, Frances.16 But it's not me; it's the17 riders, and it's a particularly poor18 area. So this is very important to me19 because I hear it all the time. So it's20 real important that we make tokens21 available 24 hours to folks on those22 lines.23

Ms. Jones

Thank you.24

Councilwoman Sanchez

Let me25 412 5/4/09 COMM. OF THE WHOLE - FISCAL '10 BUDGET1 thank you. I know that the renovations2 of all the el stops have been very3 important to the neighborhood, and I4 thank Frances for working with us. I5 know we're working on the Berks Street6 piece right now, which I appreciate7 SEPTA's help.8 The other that issue I brought9 up during that time was the issue of bus10 shelters and trash receptacles in large11 bus stops, because that adds to some of12 the trash problems. Where are we with13 looking at that?14

Ms. Jones

The shelters are15 installed by the City of Philadelphia16 through the Office of Transportation, and17 that request should be made through the18 Office of Transportation around the19 shelters as well as trash receptacles.20

Councilwoman Sanchez

Okay.21 So I'll ask Rina Cutler when she comes22 back up, where are we with that? Okay,23 I'll save it for that time.24 Okay. That's all of my25 413 5/4/09 COMM. OF THE WHOLE - FISCAL '10 BUDGET1 questions. Thank you.2

Council President Verna

Thank3 you.4 The Chair recognizes Councilman5 Green.6

Councilman Green

Thank you,7 Madam Chair.8 Perhaps we missed it, but my9 office did not receive any budget detail10 for SEPTA. Did you send around binders11 like you normally do?12

Ms. Jones

It was my13 understanding that the testimony that was14 requested we sent over to the Budget15 Office, as is the normal procedure. And16 it was my understanding that the17 testimony was distributed. However, we18 brought over copies of the testimony.19

Councilman Green

Not the20 testimony but there's no -- the budget --21 your detailed budget. I mean, I guess I22 could go -- is it available on your23 website or --24

Mr. Burnfield

I actually have25 414 5/4/09 COMM. OF THE WHOLE - FISCAL '10 BUDGET1 a copy of the SEPTA 2010 operating budget2 here with me today. I can leave a copy,3 and I can also provide additional copies4 for members of Council.5

Councilman Green

Okay.6 That's great.7 How much State funding are we8 getting that requires a local match this9 year?10

Mr. Burnfield

For fiscal11 2010, $517 million of operating12 assistance.13

Councilman Green

And the 1514 percent you mentioned, does that include15 operating and capital, or is it separate16 categories?17

Mr. Burnfield

The 15 percent18 match is just for operating assistance.19

Councilman Green

Okay. So20 what is the total amount of dollars that21 we spend that is contributed by the22 counties added all up together? My23 recollection was, it was 80 million.24

Mr. Burnfield

It's25 415 5/4/09 COMM. OF THE WHOLE - FISCAL '10 BUDGET1 approximately 80 million, correct.2

Councilman Green

Okay. But3 the matching requirements is only4 77.55 million if it's 517. So can you5 tell me what all of the funds are?6

Mr. Burnfield

I don't have7 all of the specific numbers in front of8 me as to how much each of the counties9 provide along with the City, but I'd be10 happy to get that information to you.11

Councilman Green

Okay. I12 mean, in other words, if the -- it sounds13 like we can appropriate you less money14 than we did last year based on the total15 number according to the matching formula.16 And we may or may not have to negotiate17 with the surrounding counties since we18 appear not to be increasing the wage19 taxes of their residents about whether or20 not, you know, how much of the savings in21 the local match we can take advantage of22 here in Philly versus surrounding23 counties.24 But that would be a discussion25 416 5/4/09 COMM. OF THE WHOLE - FISCAL '10 BUDGET1 with those counties; is that correct?2

Mr. Burnfield

No. I would3 say that if the City provided less match4 than what was requested, that could5 jeopardize the State grants.6

Councilman Green

Well, no.7 What is -- I'm sorry. We provide 808 percent of the match?9

Mr. Burnfield

Approximately.10

Councilman Green

Well, I need11 to know exactly.12

Mr. Burnfield

I don't have13 that in front of me but we'd be happy to14 provide that.15

Councilman Green

Okay. Well,16 you've requested $64 million for us, but17 80 percent of 77.55 million is actually18 $62 million. So it sounds like you need19 $2 million less from us than you're20 asking for, and you can still comply with21 State law.22

Mr. Burnfield

I'd have to23 check exact numbers. I don't have the24 percentages. You know, 80 percent is my25 417 5/4/09 COMM. OF THE WHOLE - FISCAL '10 BUDGET1 recollection in round numbers. It could2 be 81 or 82; I just don't know that3 exactly.4

Councilman Green

Okay.5 Please provide that information to the6 Chair. I think we've found another7 $2 million, Madam President.8 I have lots of questions about9 fiber optics and other things in the10 subways. I'm going to go offline with11 those so that -- and just set up a12 meeting with you after the budget process13 so we don't take time today.14 Thank you.15 (Timer bell rings.)16

Council President Verna

Thank17 you.18 Councilwoman Blackwell, your19 light's on; did you want to be20 recognized?21 COUNCILWOMAN BLACKWELL:22 (Shakes head.)23

Council President Verna

Thank24 you.25 418 5/4/09 COMM. OF THE WHOLE - FISCAL '10 BUDGET1 Councilman Green, are you2 finished?3

Councilman Green

Yes, Madam4 Chair.5

Council President Verna

Thank6 you.7 Are there any questions from8 members of the committee?9 (No questions.)10 COUNCIL PRESIDENT VERNA:11 Seeing none, I thank you. Thank you very12 much.13 (Witnesses come forward.)14

Council President Verna

Good15 afternoon. Kindly identify yourself for16 the record.17

Ms. Meade

Good afternoon,18 Madam President and members of Council.19 My name is Charlesretta Meade. I'm20 Chairwoman of the Board of Revision of21 Taxes.22 With me today are Harvey Levin,23 our Vice Chairman of the Board; and24 Enrico Foglia, our Executive Director.25 419 5/4/09 COMM. OF THE WHOLE - FISCAL '10 BUDGET1 Also we have Board Member James Dintino2 present and our also esteemed judge, Alan3 Silberstein are present today.4 In addition, I was asked to5 mention that Board Member Robert Nix III6 regrets that he's not able to appear; he7 is serving as the alternate to the Board8 of View today, which is also the9 responsibility of the Board of Revision10 of Taxes. And also the regrets of11 Justice Russell Nigro, who is in12 Pittsburgh, attending the funeral of13 former Justice Caffey.14 COUNCIL PRESIDENT VERNA:15 Caffey.16

Ms. Meade

So thank you for17 having us here today. 21 We submitted the tentative22 numbers to Council and to the23 Administration last week, and we also24 presented a briefing. That information25 420 5/4/09 COMM. 4 So we'd just like to say that5 the budget is our basic budget. 11 The Class 100 employee12 compensation: 125 full-time positions13 for FY '10. That is a reduction from our14 current status of employees, which is15 137, and from our allowance of 14516 employees. 18 The total of the General Fund19 request of the budget this year is20 $7,816,024. 24 The BRT are carrying on our25 421 5/4/09 COMM. 6 We've given you a synopsis of7 our Citizen Service Center. The Citizen8 Service Center is our fully-staffed9 customer service center, with the purpose10 to provide efficient, quality,11 professional services and assistance to12 consumers. The services are provided by13 use of the BRT Call Center, an14 interactive voice response system, our15 BRT website, and there's also walk-in16 assistance. 20 Our Information Technology21 Division operations. We gave a brief22 update when we were here in March for the23 Transfer Ordinance, and Allan Frank, the24 head of the Department of Technology, was25 422 5/4/09 COMM. 3 Basically, we called the4 Department of Technology, with the new5 head, Allan Frank, to request his6 assistance in October, because we just7 were having problems, and it was multiple8 problems, getting the system fully up and9 operational. 21 We've -- the Actual Value22 Initiative I spoke about earlier, and we23 did the briefing on that last week. So24 the information that's contained here has25 423 5/4/09 COMM. 12 Also, the 30,000 values for the13 commercial properties were values that14 were done by the Commercial Unit. 16 We've included the statistical17 information Council often asks for on the18 abatement and exemption program. 21 And, in summary, we'd like to22 say that the Board of Revision of Taxes23 plans to continue its efforts to improve24 levels of performance in all areas. Our25 424 5/4/09 COMM. OF THE WHOLE - FISCAL '10 BUDGET1 ultimate goal remains: The establishment2 of fair and equitable property3 assessment. 13 We know that we, like the rest14 of the City, will have to sustain some15 serious cuts to our budget. 24 Thank you for your25 425 5/4/09 COMM. OF THE WHOLE - FISCAL '10 BUDGET1 consideration. 3

Council President Verna

Thank4 you very much.5 Miss Meade, you have a6 reduction of 13 employees from your7 adopted budget?8

Ms. Meade

Excuse me one9 minute.10

Council President Verna

Is it11 13?12

Ms. Meade

Excuse me one13 moment. I want to verify it.14 Yes, it is 13.15

Council President Verna

Very16 well. Thank you.17 The Chair recognizes --18 (Witness comes forward.)19

Ms. Meade

Excuse us for one20 moment. This is Veronica Daniel, our21 Administrative Services Director.22

Council President Verna

Miss23 Daniel, welcome.24

Ms. Daniel

Hi. Madam Chair,25 426 5/4/09 COMM. OF THE WHOLE - FISCAL '10 BUDGET1 it's actually on our current budget. The2 positions budgeted was actual 145, but we3 never really reached that number in the4 hire. So the dollar-amount attributed to5 the --6

Council President Verna

The7 detailed budget only showed 138.8

Ms. Daniel

For Fiscal Year9 '09?10

Council President Verna

Yes.11

Ms. Meade

Those are the12 numbers that were actually employed --13

Ms. Meade

-- during Fiscal15 '09.16

Ms. Daniel

Our actual hire17 got up to 139 in Fiscal Year '09, but18 prior to my arrival, the Chair had come19 to Council and asked for additional20 positions, and we eventually got a budget21 of 145 positions.22

Council President Verna

That23 doesn't show in the detail budget.24

Ms. Meade

Maybe I could25 427 5/4/09 COMM. OF THE WHOLE - FISCAL '10 BUDGET1 expand. In 2007, we were cut, I believe,2 it was by seven positions. And during3 the change in the administration -- we4 had requested from the previous5 administration to have that funding put6 back into the budget, which would bring7 the number of employees back to 1458 employees.9 We were given the allowance to10 do that, but that didn't occur until the11 transfer ordinance of March of 2008. And12 then we began the hiring process for13 those employees.14 Testing was done, we hired a15 number of those employees. But then once16 the freeze came on toward the end of last17 year, we had to stop any further hiring.18

Council President Verna

Well,19 I think you were allowed to train20 employees, and that's how you got to the21 145.22

Council President Verna

I24 believe that many of your -- several of25 428 5/4/09 COMM. OF THE WHOLE - FISCAL '10 BUDGET1 your employees were leaving, and you were2 able to take several employees on so that3 they could be trained properly; is that4 correct?5

Ms. Meade

I'm not sure.6

Council President Verna

And I7 think that's how you got to the figure of8 145.9

Ms. Meade

Of 145, and10 overlapping is what you're referring to.11

Council President Verna

Yes,12 absolutely.13

Ms. Meade

Yes, an overlapping14 (indiscernible).15

Ms. Daniel

The 145 was16 actually what was on our budget for the17 appropriations for FY '09.18

Councilman Green

Point of19 information.20

Council President Verna

Yes,21 Councilman Green.22

Councilman Green

I'm looking23 at Page -- I'm sorry -- 5 or 6 of the24 budget detail. I'm sorry, of the25 429 5/4/09 COMM. OF THE WHOLE - FISCAL '10 BUDGET1 budget detail. And it shows FY '092 budgeted positions of 145. The increment3 run is 138.4 How many people -- I'm sorry.5 So just how many employees are there6 right now, at BRT?7

Ms. Daniel

At this very8 moment, there are 135 positions because9 we just had some recent retirees and a10 couple of DROPs.11

Councilman Green

How many12 people are expected to retire between now13 and FY '10 and in FY '10?14

Ms. Daniel

We have two other15 employees scheduled to DROP prior to the16 end of FY '10. During FY '10, we have17 two people scheduled to DROP.18

Councilman Green

And what19 about other retirements?20

Ms. Daniel

We don't know.21 Well, we do have one; we have one person22 who has mentioned that they would leave23 in the next month -- I think it was the24 next month. And then two people who are25 430 5/4/09 COMM. OF THE WHOLE - FISCAL '10 BUDGET1 on the DROP Program.2

Council President Verna

Thank3 you.4 The Chair recognizes Councilman5 Jones.6

Councilman Jones

Thank you,7 Madam President.8 In the Sunday Inquirer, it was9 reported that approximately 750010 commercial properties would realize a11 37 percent decrease in overall tax bills,12 equaling about $74 million.13 In that same article, it said14 that a single-family homeowner would, on15 average, receive about overall a16 40 percent increase of a total of about17 $85 million.18 Can you explain why this is,19 that commercial properties are going to20 go down and residential homeowners'21 properties are getting to go up?22

Ms. Meade

Okay. Councilman23 Jones, I would like Barry Mescolotto, who24 is our Acting Director of Assessments to25 431 5/4/09 COMM. OF THE WHOLE - FISCAL '10 BUDGET1 address that question.2

Mr. Mescolotto

The reason for3 the change is -- the difference is4 because the commercial properties are5 generally assessed higher than the6 citywide average. They are closer to7 their actual values to begin with, so if8 you are closer to your actual value, you9 will probably get a reduction when this10 program is finished.11

Councilman Jones

From what I12 understand, you used one or two methods13 to determine for commercial properties a14 market rate based on sales prices or what15 the property generates by way of revenue,16 and you could use either one of them to17 determine the value of a commercial18 property.19 What is the determining factor20 for you to take one set of methodology21 versus the other?22

Mr. Mescolotto

The biggest23 reason for that is that --24

Councilman Jones

Speak into25 432 5/4/09 COMM. OF THE WHOLE - FISCAL '10 BUDGET1 the mic, please.2

Mr. Mescolotto

There's3 actually three approaches to value:4 The cost approach, which we5 don't use, except on -- usually on6 special-purpose properties;7 And the income approach, which8 you mentioned, which is an approach that9 uses the income of the property and minus10 expenses to get to net income, which is11 capitalized into a value;12 And also, the sales comparison13 approach, which you're most familiar with14 because we use it mostly all on15 residentials, but it is used on some16 commercial properties when the income17 information is not available.18 Property owners are under no19 compunction [sic] in this state or county20 to give up this information voluntarily.21 We do get some of it based on appraisals22 that are followed with the board during23 the appeal process. We gather other24 income information and expense25 433 5/4/09 COMM. OF THE WHOLE - FISCAL '10 BUDGET1 information from commercial services,2 such as the CoSTAR Services and IREM, and3 we also get information from the4 marketplace when we can get it.5

Councilman Jones

So let me6 get this right. The same property can be7 valued three different methods.8

Mr. Mescolotto

Correct.9

Councilman Jones

And so,10 there's no standard way you approach it.11 So how do you make a determination:12 Which one, for which customer, for what13 purpose?14

Mr. Mescolotto

Generally for15 residential properties, it's the sales16 comparison approach, because it is the17 one approach that yields the most18 reliable measure of value. And we look19 at what properties have sold for after we20 make a determination and we can see the21 sales comparison approach when we compare22 a property to other properties that have23 sold that are similar to it.24 For residential properties and25 434 5/4/09 COMM. OF THE WHOLE - FISCAL '10 BUDGET1 some commercials and industrials, that2 does generally yield us the best3 indication of value for those properties.4 However, when people are buying5 commercial properties that generate6 income, they're buying an investment and7 they're buying a -- something that is8 going to yield a profit for them, so that9 they need to be valued, using the income10 approach. Things like office buildings,11 hotels, large investment properties.12 You will -- you can do all13 three approaches, and that is the14 standard for appraisal, but you will find15 that the one that gives you the best16 results in those kinds of properties are17 generally the income approach, because18 that is what the marketplace uses to19 value these properties, not just people20 that are mass-appraising them like we21 are.22

Councilman Jones

Is this a23 national standard industry-wide? I mean,24 are these same three options all across25 435 5/4/09 COMM. OF THE WHOLE - FISCAL '10 BUDGET1 the country, what other cities do?2

Mr. Mescolotto

Yes. They're3 the standard appraisal approaches that4 are used by all appraisers, certified5 appraisers, state certified appraisers,6 in all states of this country.7

Councilman Jones

Are8 appraisers in your office currently9 allowed to serve as independent10 appraisers?11

Mr. Mescolotto

There are some12 of our staff that are -- they are13 certified appraisers, state-certified14 appraisers. And if you're asking, do15 they practice appraising outside of their16 job? there are some people that do.17 (Timer bell rings.)18

Mr. Mescolotto

They are19 state-licensed.20

Ms. Meade

The answer to the21 question is yes.22

Councilman Jones

So that23 couldn't possibly be a conflict of24 interest?25 436 5/4/09 COMM. OF THE WHOLE - FISCAL '10 BUDGET1

Mr. Mescolotto

It's possible2 that it could be.3

Councilman Jones

I'll hold my4 round of questions.5 Thank you, Madam President.6

Ms. Meade

Can I further add7 that there are some safeguards? And that8 is that we require employees to complete9 an outside employment form. And on that10 outside employment form, we request that11 they include the information of all of12 the licensing that they possess in the13 real estate area. Also to state where14 the -- what offices that hold their15 licenses from which they work and their16 home addresses.17 That is to be matched to assure18 that the assessors are not working for19 the Board of Revision of Taxes in any20 area in which they actually hold a21 license and are practicing.22 The other issue is that we23 request that they list the hours that24 they're working in this outside25 437 5/4/09 COMM. OF THE WHOLE - FISCAL '10 BUDGET1 employment so that it's clear that that2 does not conflict with your normal work3 schedule at the board.4

Councilman Jones

Madam5 President, I'll hold the rest of my6 questions for the next round 'cause I7 know --8

Council President Verna

Thank9 you. There are quite a number of10 Councilmembers that want to be11 recognized. And at this time the Chair12 recognizes Councilwoman Brown.13

Councilwoman Brown

Thank you,14 Madam President.15 Good afternoon.16 All of us for sure have been17 waiting with baited breath for your18 report. And you live and breathe this19 issue every day. Everybody has an20 opinion.21 What grade would you give your22 agency, given where you are and where we23 all know we want to move to?24

Mr. Mescolotto

At this time,25 438 5/4/09 COMM. OF THE WHOLE - FISCAL '10 BUDGET1 I'd have to answer that I think we're2 about a B+ right now, because we haven't3 finished all of the work that we intend4 to do.5 There are several -- like the6 Chairman was mentioning earlier, the7 phased approach that the Department of8 Technology and the BRT have agreed upon9 means that there are parts of the new10 system that are going to come online11 several months apart, things like this12 Apex Drawing Package that we have, which13 we'll be able to have a sketch, a very14 good digital sketch, of every house,15 every building in the City. Things like16 that enable us to do other -- to17 fine-tune values with capabilities that18 we did not have in the past but nor19 online yet.20 As far as other -- there's21 other tools that are also coming online,22 some --23

Councilwoman Brown

Let me24 just ask you to pause right there. So25 439 5/4/09 COMM. OF THE WHOLE - FISCAL '10 BUDGET1 you're suggesting that because of2 technology and the tools that technology3 brings, that is enabling the department4 to operate in a different way?5

Mr. Mescolotto

Yeah. I think6 we will maybe get to that A at some7 point, the rating that we're looking for.8 A lot of what is going on at9 our agency is not just producing the10 actual values, which we released this11 week. It's about changing workflows,12 it's about making our staff more13 productive and more efficient.14

Councilwoman Brown

Mm-hmm.15

Mr. Mescolotto

And it's about16 adopting new technologies such as pen17 table computers that can be used in the18 field so we operate completely19 paperlessly and are able to easily gather20 things and bring them back for valuation21 purposes in a way that we were not very22 efficient at in the past.23

Councilwoman Brown

And so my24 only last follow-up question would be:25 440 5/4/09 COMM. OF THE WHOLE - FISCAL '10 BUDGET1 Because of the lack technology, we ended2 up with the severe discrepancy and3 inequity in the process?4

Mr. Mescolotto

I would say5 that that is partially a major part of6 the reason why we ended up where we were7 because the legacy system, we could not8 react fast enough to cover the market.9 The market moves at all different speeds10 all over the City, so that when we had a11 wild runup in the value in the last12 several years, our systems were not -- we13 were not able to adequately follow that14 and reflect it in the values of the15 properties.16 Our new system has the17 capability of us revaluing the City in a18 matter of hours once we finish the work19 to validate all of the characteristics20 about the properties and to -- and21 calibration of our models.22 So we didn't have that23 capability in the past. It would take24 weeks and weeks to do that. And there25 441 5/4/09 COMM. OF THE WHOLE - FISCAL '10 BUDGET1 would be times where we would have to2 have people in on the weekends in order3 to accomplish it.4 This becomes a very easy task5 for us to do now.6

Ms. Meade

And Councilperson,7 what that allows us to do it, allows us8 to use the professional staff in their9 professional capacity. The use of the10 CAMA system and numbers generated by the11 computer are a tool. It allows us to12 quickly value projects, as Mr. Mescolotto13 said, across the City, and then allows14 the evaluator that's assigned to review15 those values and to then go out to pay16 particular attention to those values that17 seem askew, to make the necessary changes18 to files because of changes that have19 occurred due to the market, and then to20 provide that professional acumen that's21 needed with the professional assessments.22 The problem we had was the23 mandate to try to do the entire City.24 And it was just very difficult to keep25 442 5/4/09 COMM. OF THE WHOLE - FISCAL '10 BUDGET1 up.2 One of the reasons that two3 years ago, when we came before you, we4 talked about the need of going forward5 with the actual-value project, which was6 at that time under Mr. Glancy, the Full7 Value Project. One of the reasons was8 that the constitution mandates uniformity9 throughout the City. And there should be10 equity and fairness in all assessments.11 We finally had determined and12 had to recognize that the best way to13 achieve that was to do actual value, the14 uniformity issue. That by doing the15 fractional assessment system and trying16 to cap those assessments, we were17 literally defeating the purpose. And so,18 you had people within the City who could19 not read or understand --20 (Timer bell rings.)21

Ms. Meade

-- their values,22 even if they wanted to contest a bill.23 So they weren't able to do that.24 Now the goal with actual value25 443 5/4/09 COMM. OF THE WHOLE - FISCAL '10 BUDGET1 is that you can, because what you look to2 is to look at your valuation notice, and3 you can then determine fairly easily, is4 that what properties are selling for in5 the area?6 And it may be not be a7 professional look, but you wouldn't have8 to pay. You could look that information9 up, it would be available on our website.10 You could look in the papers, you could11 go to neighbor brokers, and you would12 have an opportunity then to have an13 appreciation of whether your property is14 valued appropriately, not only compared15 just to your neighbors, but you would16 know that you proportionately are valued17 in such a way that proportionately, you18 will pay your share, not more and not19 less, of taxes.20 It also puts us in step with21 the law so that we do not have to cringe22 when we reach this point with23 (indiscernible) and with, is the City in24 compliance? because we would know that25 444 5/4/09 COMM. OF THE WHOLE - FISCAL '10 BUDGET1 the City is in compliance. And when it's2 not, we can be cited exactly where the3 problems are and address those problems.4 It also allows us to know5 whether one specific area -- as you're6 aware, different areas of the City sort7 of take off during a boon. So one area8 may expand greatly and the market may9 rise greatly, and other areas may stay10 relatively stable.11 This type of system allows us12 to use the technology. And when we know13 one area is expanding greatly, if there14 needs to be additional evaluation staff15 in that area to address the changes so16 that we can keep up and allow that to be17 done.18

Councilwoman Brown

Well, I19 have a number of follow-ups, but the bell20 has rung.21

Council President Verna

Yes.22

Councilwoman Brown

So I'll23 see you in the next round.24

Council President Verna

Thank25 445 5/4/09 COMM. OF THE WHOLE - FISCAL '10 BUDGET1 you.2 The Chair recognizes Councilman3 green.4

Councilman Green

Thank you,5 Madam Chair.6 Going back to the President's7 first question, could you just provide us8 a chart that walks us through the number9 of employees that you've had all year.10 This is -- you were appropriated for 14511 employees, you got a transfer ordinance12 for more. You appear to be spending in13 this year more than was appropriated,14 even though you were appropriated for 14515 and you have 135 employees right now.16

Councilman Green

So I just18 need to understand the discrepancy19 between, you know, the appropriation.20 And unless you've given people bonuses or21 raises --22

Councilman Green

-- this24 year, the estimated obligations appear to25 446 5/4/09 COMM. OF THE WHOLE - FISCAL '10 BUDGET1 be overstated.2

Ms. Meade

Right. We'll3 provide that because -- we can provide4 the chart. You're requesting it to be in5 a chart form, correct?6

Councilman Green

If you have7 the answer, that would be great.8

Ms. Meade

Oh, yeah, okay. We9 have the answer here.10

Ms. Daniel

I'm Veronica11 Daniel. Again, I'm the ASC.12 Councilman Green, the original13 appropriations of the 145 were those14 additional positions that Council gave to15 the Chairman back at the beginning of16 '07, I think it was. At some point17 during Fiscal Year '09, there was a18 freeze in the hiring, where we had to do19 a --20

Councilman Green

No, no. I21 understand the question. Let me restate22 it.23

Councilman Green

The question25 447 5/4/09 COMM. OF THE WHOLE - FISCAL '10 BUDGET1 is: You appropriated 145 employees with2 a total appropriation of 8-million-128.3 Your estimated obligations, as of the4 January increment run, is 8,251,000,5 which is 120,000 more than was6 appropriated to you, yet you have ten7 fewer employees.8

Ms. Daniel

Right. And they9 --10

Councilman Green

Please11 explain that discrepancy.12

Ms. Daniel

The 123,00 is the13 bonuses that the union members got in the14 beginning of the fiscal year.15

Councilman Green

Okay. So16 that's 123.17

Ms. Daniel

That's 123.18

Councilman Green

Still, you19 have ten fewer employees than you20 appropriated for, and you're spending the21 same amount that was originally22 appropriated to you.23

Councilman Green

How are you25 448 5/4/09 COMM. OF THE WHOLE - FISCAL '10 BUDGET1 doing that?2

Ms. Daniel

Well, we're not3 going to spend the same amount.4

Councilman Green

So how much5 are you going to spend? In other words,6 every dollar that you tell us is not7 actually going to be spent --8

Councilman Green

-- in10 estimated obligations increases the fund11 balance, which is less taxes we have to12 raise from our citizens.13

Councilman Green

So we need15 an accurate estimated obligations for16 Fiscal 2009, not just what was17 appropriated to you, because you're not18 going to spend that amount.19

Ms. Daniel

And that number we20 can get back to you.21

Councilman Green

Okay.22

Ms. Daniel

And it will be23 based on the 130-something.24

Councilman Green

Thank you.25 449 5/4/09 COMM. OF THE WHOLE - FISCAL '10 BUDGET1 We just found another half a2 million, Madam President.3 Okay. So perhaps4 Mr. Mescolotto could describe what the5 process was before you had the devices6 that are going to go out and take paper7 out of your process compared to what they8 are going to be once you have those9 devices operational.10

Mr. Mescolotto

Sure. It's --11

Councilman Green

So, like12 walk me through a typical day with paper13 and without paper of everybody involved14 in the process.15

Mr. Mescolotto

A typical day16 in one of our evaluators' lives, which is17 someone that visits the field, gathers18 information, would be all on paper.19 Observing characteristics of the20 property, observing condition, measuring21 sizes of buildings, observing whether it22 has central air-conditioning, and all the23 attributes and amenities that they can24 observe from the outside of a house or25 450 5/4/09 COMM. OF THE WHOLE - FISCAL '10 BUDGET1 any kind of a building, for that matter.2 It would all be written on3 paper, it would be sketched on paper if4 they could do that, and then brought back5 to the office and then would have to be6 transferred to forms that would go to our7 IT Department and would be entered.8

Councilman Green

Sorry. So9 what do you mean -- when you say10 "transferred to forms," you mean they11 don't take the forms with them in the12 field?13

Mr. Mescolotto

Some people14 do, others don't. Others feel more15 comfortable one way or the other. They16 can work faster. It's kind of like an17 individual --18

Councilman Green

So they're19 writing --20

Mr. Mescolotto

And there's21 people in the office that there to fill22 these forms out.23

Councilman Green

Okay. So an24 assessor doesn't fill out the form, an25 451 5/4/09 COMM. OF THE WHOLE - FISCAL '10 BUDGET1 evaluator doesn't fill out the form;2 someone back in the office fills out the3 form based on the notes from the4 assessor.5

Mr. Mescolotto

That's6 possible. It's not the case in every7 case.8

Councilman Green

Okay. So9 what we have is somebody writing stuff10 down on paper in the field, bringing it11 back to the office, somebody writing it12 down again on paper back at the office, a13 different piece of paper.14

Mr. Mescolotto

Correct.15

Councilman Green

Then, after16 it's on that piece of paper, you have17 data-entry people who are putting that18 information into a computer.19

Mr. Mescolotto

You are20 correct.21

Councilman Green

So you are22 eliminating three steps.23

Mr. Mescolotto

Yes, we are.24

Councilman Green

So you're25 452 5/4/09 COMM. OF THE WHOLE - FISCAL '10 BUDGET1 going from three steps to one step.2

Mr. Mescolotto

That's3 correct.4

Councilman Green

So how come5 you are only losing eleven people?6 (Timer bell rings.)7

Mr. Mescolotto

How come what?8 I didn't get that.9

Councilman Green

It seems10 like that there are more efficiencies11 than eleven people available once you12 eliminate -- once you go from three steps13 to one step in your process.14

Mr. Mescolotto

You still need15 the evaluator, the trained evaluator, to16 do all those things. It's not like the17 three steps along the way are three18 separate people. We have one person that19 enters for the entire department.20

Councilman Green

But you just21 said it was different people.22

Mr. Mescolotto

Right. There23 are different people, but at the end of24 the day, at the of the line when we get25 453 5/4/09 COMM. OF THE WHOLE - FISCAL '10 BUDGET1 to IT Department, there's one person that2 does all this entry work for entire3 department 'cause we have not been able4 to hire any backup, you know, in any5 recent memory.6 So that's really one job there7 who can -- we cannot eliminate that job8 because there are still things that are9 --10 (Indiscernible; parties talking11 over each other.)12

Councilman Green

There's13 inefficiencies in the first two steps as14 well.15

Ms. Meade

But also,16 Councilman Green, the person that did, I17 think it's, the second step was the real18 property assistant. Those are what we19 formally call "School Board clerks," and20 those School Board clerks are the people21 who gathered the information from the22 evaluators in many instances --23 (Timer bell rings.)24

Ms. Meade

-- and then put it25 454 5/4/09 COMM. OF THE WHOLE - FISCAL '10 BUDGET1 into the format so that it could be sent2 on to IT. So that's the steps.3 So this allows the evaluator to4 do the job of evaluation. And then it5 further improves it and improves the6 quality in terms of the accuracy of the7 work, with the evaluator entering the8 information directly if we're able to9 reach the stage of using handheld10 devices, because that means if there's a11 mistake, it's the first mistake, as12 opposed to being several levels of13 mistakes.14

Councilman Green

Right, but15 we've gone from three steps to one step,16 and you're saying there's no efficiencies17 in terms of personnel as a result of that18 change.19

Mr. Mescolotto

I also didn't20 quite finish saying that there are also21 new skills that we're giving them to do22 that they did not do in the past such as23 the apex drawing and other data that24 we're gathering along the way. So we're25 455 5/4/09 COMM. OF THE WHOLE - FISCAL '10 BUDGET1 replacing some of those things with new,2 more modern parts to this.3 Now, if you're asking me how4 many people we can eliminate based on5 this one scenario that you're giving me,6 I don't have an answer to that question.7

Councilman Green

Why not?8

Mr. Mescolotto

'Cause I9 don't. I mean, this is something that I10 think as we -- if you look at what's11 happening here, we're also, you know,12 have 125 positions we're talking about13 now. That is down from what we had when14 we are at 145. So, you know, there is15 some loss of personnel there, a16 significant loss to us.17 But we still need a certain18 amount of bodies to do this job according19 to the national standards groups that we20 abide by.21

Ms. Meade

And also,22 Councilman Green --23

Councilman Green

Well, I want24 to take exception to that because every25 456 5/4/09 COMM. OF THE WHOLE - FISCAL '10 BUDGET1 surrounding county doesn't have clerks;2 they have only assessors and evaluators.3 So, I mean, you know, they're abiding by4 national standards.5

Mr. Mescolotto

I'm referring6 to the Civil Service personnel and the7 people that are on the City's budget.8

Councilman Green

Okay. My9 time has ended, but I will have more10 questions, Madam President.11

Council President Verna

Thank12 you.13 The Chair recognizes Councilman14 Sanchez.15

Councilwoman Sanchez

Along16 those lines, how many of your employees17 are Civil Service and how many are18 exempt?19

Ms. Meade

Exempt employees?20 COUNCILWOMAN SANCHEZ:21 Non-Civil Service.22

Ms. Meade

Non-Civil Service23 employees.24

Mr. Mescolotto

One.25 457 5/4/09 COMM. OF THE WHOLE - FISCAL '10 BUDGET1

Ms. Meade

Oh, one. Enrico2 Foglia is exempt. We have 10 board3 members, and then of the other 138 that4 are there now, they're Civil Service5 employees.6

Councilwoman Sanchez

The 1387 are Civil Service?8

Ms. Meade

No, no, no. I'm9 sorry. We started with the 138.10

Councilwoman Sanchez

The ones11 on the School District payroll are not12 Civil Service --13

Ms. Meade

No, they're not14 Civil Service.15

Councilwoman Sanchez

So out16 of your 138 positions, how many are Civil17 Service?18

Ms. Meade

All but one. 138.19

Mr. Mescolotto

138.20

Ms. Meade

It's 138. But you21 asked how many are exempt, and there's22 one exempt employee.23

Councilwoman Sanchez

Right,24 but of the ones at the School District,25 458 5/4/09 COMM. OF THE WHOLE - FISCAL '10 BUDGET1 are they Civil Service --2

Councilwoman Sanchez

-- or4 are they a part of the union? So how5 many of those --6

Ms. Meade

There are 80 School7 Board employees.8

Council President Verna

Your9 testimony says there are 80.10

Ms. Meade

There are 8011 employees paid by the School Board.12

Councilwoman Sanchez

Out of13 the 138.14

Ms. Meade

No, no, no. That's15 separate.16

Councilwoman Sanchez

In17 addition to?18

Ms. Meade

Yes, that's in19 addition, that's in addition.20

Councilwoman Sanchez

Okay.21 So can you provide to the Chair a22 breakdown of your employees so that we're23 clear between what is Civil Service,24 which we are required to do, versus25 459 5/4/09 COMM. OF THE WHOLE - FISCAL '10 BUDGET1 exempt and non-bargaining represented2 employees. If you could submit that,3 that would be great.4

Ms. Meade

Yes, we can do5 that.6

Councilwoman Sanchez

One of7 the things, before we get to Full Value8 Project, is, you recently moved your9 offices to the Curtis Center. Why was10 that decision, and how much money did we11 save on that move?12

Ms. Meade

That decision was13 2007. I don't know how much money was14 saved on that move, but we moved at the15 time because the -- what is it, the16 Girard Trust? The owners of the building17 where we were located had given us a18 notice to move and had given everyone in19 the building notice to move. And they20 were planning to -- they had a three-year21 plan for the building.22 And then I think Mr. Levin23 worked on the committee with the move; he24 could further explain.25 460 5/4/09 COMM. OF THE WHOLE - FISCAL '10 BUDGET1

Mr. Levin

Councilwoman, that2 was not our decision. The decision was3 made by the Department of Public Property4 that actually pays the rent.5

Councilwoman Sanchez

We still6 pay your rent, the City. It's not7 reflected in your budget, 'cause I was8 looking for that, I was looking for your9 rental expenses, and it's not here.10

Mr. Levin

That's paid by the11 Department of Public Property.12

Councilwoman Sanchez

Do you13 know the amount?14

Mr. Levin

When we moved, we15 moved along with the IG and the16 Commission on Human Relations and the17 Fair Housing Commission. It was a total18 of about 78,000 square feet. That's --19 that space was found, and the leases were20 negotiated primarily by Commissioner21 Slaughterbeck.22

Councilwoman Sanchez

So23 because that cost is not reflected on24 here and it's in the Public Property25 461 5/4/09 COMM. OF THE WHOLE - FISCAL '10 BUDGET1 budget, do you know what the cost is of2 the rent that we're picking up for you3 through Public Property that's not4 reflected on your budget?5

Mr. Levin

We do not. We6 don't even know how that allocation of7 the 78,000 square feet is made amongst8 the four agencies.9

Councilwoman Sanchez

Okay.10

Councilman Green

Point of11 information.12

Council President Verna

The13 Chair recognizes Councilman Green for a14 point of information.15

Councilman Green

Thank you,16 Madam Chair.17 Just for my colleague and for18 the Members of the Board of the BRT and19 Executive Director who are here, you20 saved hundreds of thousands of dollars in21 storage cost as a consequence of OCRing22 lots of records that used to be stored in23 office space that is now electronic, as24 part of the move. One more example of25 462 5/4/09 COMM. OF THE WHOLE - FISCAL '10 BUDGET1 going paperless.2

Mr. Mescolotto

That is very3 true.4

Ms. Meade

And as part of5 that, Mr. Mescolotto can also explain, we6 imaged the records, and the long-range7 goal is to try to image all documents for8 the BRT.9

Mr. Mescolotto

Yes. We've10 started up a unit that is going to be11 charged with scanning documents for the12 entire department. We're organizing13 that, we have the people in place. We're14 organizing the equipment and a few other15 things right now.16 Indexing of all of the records17 will be against the account number of the18 property and the address, so that all of19 those records -- paper records can go20 away, and anytime that you're looking for21 anything about an account, anything22 that's occurred, be it a memo, be it a --23 we started with all of the old property24 record cards, which took up over 50025 463 5/4/09 COMM. OF THE WHOLE - FISCAL '10 BUDGET1 filing cabinet space -- space for 5002 filing cabinets, and that was eliminated,3 a very true statement, when we moved to4 this new location.5 Hopefully, we get down, and as6 far as I'm concerned, down to where we7 have no filing cabinets going forward,8 because we can -- the City's made quite a9 big investment on the central imaging10 warehouse, and we intend to be active11 users of that investment.12

Councilwoman Sanchez

Okay.13 Let me get in one more question before14 the bell rings.15 Much talk has been done to16 those employees at the School District,17 that we have in the School District. If18 we were to eliminate for accounting19 purposes and correct that, what fee would20 you be charging for the School District21 for the services rendered that you feel22 that the School District should be23 paying?24

Ms. Meade

We'd need to do a25 464 5/4/09 COMM. OF THE WHOLE - FISCAL '10 BUDGET1 study within our department to actually2 do those calculations, the man-hour3 calculations that are involved.4

Councilwoman Sanchez

And you5 think you can get that to us before the6 School District comes before us?7

Ms. Meade

When is that?8

Councilwoman Sanchez

They9 come in may, the end of May.10

Ms. Meade

The end of May?11

Councilwoman Sanchez

Mm-hmm,12 next week.13

Ms. Meade

We will do our best14 efforts, yes.15

Mr. Mescolotto

Yes.16

Councilwoman Sanchez

Okay,17 all right. If you would submit that to18 the Chair, that would be helpful.19 Thank you, Madam President.20

Council President Verna

Thank21 you.22 The Chair recognizes23 Councilwoman Blackwell.24

Councilwoman Blackwell

Thank25 465 5/4/09 COMM. OF THE WHOLE - FISCAL '10 BUDGET1 you, Madam President.2 Good afternoon. When are you3 planning to certify these new assessments4 per the information we received from you5 last week?6

Ms. Meade

We are waiting for7 the validation process to be completed by8 the evaluators. Once that validation9 process has been completed, then we want10 an opportunity for the consultants who11 worked with us on the project to look at12 those numbers. Then we will know how13 soon we can certify.14

Councilwoman Blackwell

And I15 raise those issues because we are very16 upset with regard to figures that we see17 listed on the north side of Market and in18 communities like Mantua, communities like19 Belmont and Parkside, these are the areas20 that have been some of the poorest in the21 City. And Lex Street, before PHA22 rebuilt, we had the Lex Street massacres,23 some of the worst crime in the City. And24 we have focused so much time and energy25 466 5/4/09 COMM. OF THE WHOLE - FISCAL '10 BUDGET1 to try to rebuild a failing neighborhood.2 And thank God we've been trying to do3 that and have been successful on some4 levels.5 But to have them almost double?6 These are people who are fourth- and7 fifth-generation friends and neighbors8 who are unemployed, people who receive9 assistance, fourth- and fifth-generation.10 And we worked hard to bring this11 community around, but it appears that12 after they withstood all of the13 university expansion, they've managed to14 stay together, they've withstood all of15 the university expansion. Now because16 you can stand in Mantua and look over and17 see the Art Museum, or you live near the18 Zoo, it appears that they're being19 reassessed almost double.20 And that's a real, real, real21 problem for us. It's going to be a22 community issue unless we can find some23 way to reconsider this.24 And mantua and on the north25 467 5/4/09 COMM. OF THE WHOLE - FISCAL '10 BUDGET1 side, everybody hears about the black2 bottom, all of these areas, that's where3 you want to double it, and it's just not4 fair. People can't afford it.5 And it looks like, you know,6 the old word "gentrification" that7 they've withstood all of these years.8 Now we reassess and they run the risk of9 being gentrified.10 And I can't sit by and let that11 happen on my watch, not without doing12 everything we can to speak out against13 it, to complain against it, to tell14 people what their public recourse is, and15 to let you know that it's just not fair.16 You're going to put people out17 of the neighborhood we fought so hard to18 change, to redo. We almost have a19 thousand PHA homes there, we have Lucien20 E. Blackwell homes there, we have houses21 where people died. Now you see seniors22 coming out of them. We fought so hard to23 lose the very people that we fought hard24 to house.25 468 5/4/09 COMM. OF THE WHOLE - FISCAL '10 BUDGET1 And so, I certainly would hope2 that you will consider that and that you3 will let us know what our recourse is,4 and that you understand this is something5 that's just not fair.6

Ms. Meade

And, Councilwoman7 Blackwell, we understand that as a board.8 We're very not only sympathetic to it9 all, but we also understand it's very10 important for us to do or job. And that11 job is to assess the property accurately12 to make sure that we've established13 uniformity and equity in that assessment14 process.15 We recognize that a once we do16 that, then Council is able rely upon17 those values to set the tax rate, and18 we're out of it at that point because19 that tax rate is what then generates the20 tax revenue and determines how much each21 person pays.22 So from our perspective, that23 doubling does not have to occur. It24 depends upon where Council sets the25 469 5/4/09 COMM. OF THE WHOLE - FISCAL '10 BUDGET1 rates. That's why we understand it's2 very important for us to have the3 accuracy of assessment.4

Councilwoman Blackwell

We had5 this discussion, Madam President, I don't6 know, maybe a year ago. We talked about7 homesteading, we talked about six or8 seven ways that people can be exempted.9 There's no talk about any of that now.10 There's no talk outside of the 19 percent11 this year, 14 or 14-and-a-half percent12 the Year 11, along with this revaluation,13 there's no talk about those things.14 All I hear is that they want to15 double the taxes of the people who live16 on the north side of Market in my area,17 people who live in Mantua, and other18 neighborhoods like that. That's what we19 hear about.20 There's no big move afoot for21 any of the other. And it's just that22 people cannot afford it. It's not right,23 it's not fair, and I will not take that24 responsibility upon myself that I got to25 470 5/4/09 COMM. OF THE WHOLE - FISCAL '10 BUDGET1 make it all right.2 It is certainly a problem for3 all of us. I'm not the only one who has4 these neighborhoods; we all do. But I'm5 telling you that it's not fair and that6 it's not something that we can sit idly7 by and let happen.8

Ms. Meade

And, Councilwoman,9 as I said, that's why the Board10 recognizes the importance of having11 accuracy of assessment in this process12 and setting those values at actual value13 --14 (Timer bell rings.)15

Ms. Meade

-- so that a16 determination can be made of what the17 fair rate should be so that it can18 generate the revenue that the City needs.19 But we recognize that that's not our20 issue.21 But in addition to doing the22 accuracy -- accurate setting of the23 market values, what we are also waiting24 for is, we know about the homestead25 471 5/4/09 COMM. OF THE WHOLE - FISCAL '10 BUDGET1 legislation that was passed through2 Council, the ordinance that passed3 Council last year. And in that, there's4 a mandate that that would be another5 program that would be managed and6 administered by the Board of Revision of7 Taxes.8 So we're awaiting for --9 there's no dollar figure in that, and we10 recognize that there's a need for11 enabling legislation, but we're waiting12 for that information so that we can also13 put that as part of our to-do list in14 terms of preparing the proper paperwork15 so that we can administer that program16 appropriately.17 And any other programs and18 buffers that Council puts in place, if19 they choose to have the Board of Revision20 of Taxes administer it on the valuation21 side, we're waiting for that information22 as well so we can include that as part of23 the things that we do in managing the24 valuation and market values and25 472 5/4/09 COMM. OF THE WHOLE - FISCAL '10 BUDGET1 assessment values in the City of2 Philadelphia.3

Councilwoman Blackwell

Madam4 President, we're at the beginning of this5 discussion only, and that nothing happens6 without full and open disclosure across7 the board.8 Thank you.9

Council President Verna

Thank10 you.11 The Chair recognizes Councilman12 Clarke.13

Councilman Clarke

Thank you,14 Madam President.15 Good evening.16

Ms. Meade

Good evening.17

Councilman Clarke

Real quick18 I'm going to try to get two questions in.19 Probably won't make it.20 , could you walk me21 through this Abatement and Exemptions. I22 just want to make sure that I'm reading23 this correctly.24 On the bottom, where it says25 473 5/4/09 COMM. OF THE WHOLE - FISCAL '10 BUDGET1 "the statutorily exempted properties,"2 and you have a $12 billion decrease of3 $62 billion from Tax Year -- I'm sorry,4 of 62 million from tax year '07. Is that5 the cumulative amount?6

Mr. Mescolotto

Yes. Those7 two figures are -- the statutorily-exempt8 properties are churches, charities,9 schools, things like that. We're10 separating them from the abated11 properties, first of all.12

Councilman Clarke

Okay. Just13 wanted to make sure.14

Mr. Mescolotto

And we did15 have a decrease in that area due to a16 number of different parcels around the17 City, including ones up by LaSalle, where18 they converted them to properties that19 are now taxable by building the shopping20 center and so forth.21 And through the auditing of22 these properties by our staff, we've had23 a net decrease of $62 million in those24 valuations during this timeframe.25 474 5/4/09 COMM. OF THE WHOLE - FISCAL '10 BUDGET1 As far as the abatement2 properties, they do go back on the tax3 rolls --4

Councilman Clarke

Okay.5

Mr. Mescolotto

-- and6 generate, you know, revenue.7 As far as the abated8 properties, we have had a substantial9 increase putting on, as you could see,10 it's $870 million from Tax Year 2007.11

Councilman Clarke

Wait, are12 you on the second one now?13

Mr. Mescolotto

Yeah.14

Councilman Clarke

The real15 estate tax-abated?16

Mr. Mescolotto

Right. These17 are the abated properties, the new18 construction, the renovations, the many19 condominiums that came on during this20 period of time, and it was a net increase21 of --22

Councilman Clarke

So we're23 experiencing -- unlike the general view,24 at least in those two particular years,25 475 5/4/09 COMM. OF THE WHOLE - FISCAL '10 BUDGET1 we experienced an increase in numbers,2 not necessarily units, but it could have3 been more expensive units that got4 abated?5

Mr. Mescolotto

They're all6 over the City. Many of them are in7 Center City, but there are abated8 properties that came onboard all over the9 City, all different kinds -- it could be10 business properties, it could be11 condominiums, it could be single-family12 houses; many, many different types. We13 can give you detail on that if you want.14

Councilman Clarke

All right,15 okay. If I had more than five minutes, I16 would ask for it.17 Okay. So in spite of the18 downturn in the national economy, at19 least in '08, we didn't see any evidence20 of it locally.21

Mr. Mescolotto

There were22 many projects were winding down at that23 point.24

Councilman Clarke

So in the25 476 5/4/09 COMM. OF THE WHOLE - FISCAL '10 BUDGET1 next year, on the next page, in 2009, I'm2 assuming this reflects -- does this3 reflect these numbers up to date in terms4 of abatements?5

Mr. Mescolotto

It would be6 more or less end of 2009 -- 2008,7 certified for 2009, yes.8

Councilman Clarke

So from9 this, can you have an estimate as to what10 the forecast may be in terms of the11 amount of abatements for Calendar '09?12

Mr. Mescolotto

Going forward?13

Councilman Clarke

Consistent14 with what was in '08?15

Mr. Mescolotto

We could give16 you a current -- a very current version17 of this report if you want, which is18 current to, like, you know, the last19 month. And we could maybe divine from20 that a growth rate, if you will.21

Councilman Clarke

Okay.22

Mr. Mescolotto

And compare23 that to the previous years.24 I think you're going to see25 477 5/4/09 COMM. OF THE WHOLE - FISCAL '10 BUDGET1 this coming year not as much growth, but2 still some growth. We're still seeing3 building permits coming in to us for new4 construction. And I would be5 hard-pressed to think that we would still6 be getting them had we not had the7 abatement programs.8

Councilman Clarke

Okay. The9 reason I ask that is 'cause, as you know,10 I'm pushing this reduction in the11 abatement amount, and I continue to12 see -- we did a little brief analysis,13 obviously, without the resources that you14 had. But we continually show that if we15 went to 80 percent as opposed to 10016 percent, the General Fund would17 experience between 2 and $3 million a18 year, and 80 percent is still a19 relatively high abatement.20

Mr. Mescolotto

Eight years as21 opposed to ten.22

Councilman Clarke

No, ten23 years, but 80 percent.24

Mr. Mescolotto

Oh, 80 percent25 478 5/4/09 COMM. OF THE WHOLE - FISCAL '10 BUDGET1 of the value.2

Councilman Clarke

Our numbers3 show between and million each year.4

Mr. Mescolotto

Yeah. We'd5 certainly be glad to work cooperatively6 with you on that.7

Councilman Clarke

Okay, yes.8 It's between 2 and 3. We looked at it9 from a conservative side.10 The issue about appraisers;11 there are appraisers that are on your12 staff?13

Mr. Mescolotto

Correct. We14 call them "evaluators."15

Councilman Clarke

Yeah, all16 evaluators. There was this request with17 the Redevelopment Authority in particular18 that, for whatever reason, the19 Redevelopment Authority always contracts20 out for appraisers, so every time there21 is some activity, which is quite22 frequently, with the Redevelopment23 Authority, we have to go out and contract24 with it and appraise it, and it takes a25 479 5/4/09 COMM. OF THE WHOLE - FISCAL '10 BUDGET1 lot of time to get those appraisals back;2 therefore, it takes a lot of time for us3 to get a number or a value so we can then4 complete a transaction.5 Is there anything in the law6 that says -- that you know of in State7 law or any law that governs appraisals8 that would not allow you to have on staff9 appraisers that can be a part of a10 condemnation or a land sales process?11

Mr. Mescolotto

We might ask12 our vice chairman to weigh in on that.13

Councilman Clarke

I just14 never understood why we don't have an15 appraiser on staff.16

Mr. Mescolotto

I don't know17 what the actual requirements are there18 'cause I've never looked into it.19

Councilman Clarke

Mm-hmm.20

Mr. Mescolotto

They may21 require a State license and certified22 appraiser. Not all of our people are23 State-licensed and -certified.24 (Timer bell rings.)25 480 5/4/09 COMM. OF THE WHOLE - FISCAL '10 BUDGET1

Mr. Mescolotto

Again, I2 really don't know what it is.3

Ms. Meade

Right. But,4 Councilman Clarke, are you referring to5 the Redevelopment Authority?6

Councilman Clarke

Yes.7

Ms. Meade

Hiring those8 appraisers to work as employees for them.9

Councilman Clarke

Yeah. I10 mean, why wouldn't we just --11

Mr. Mescolotto

They hire them12 as contractors.13

Mr. Levin

Councilman, the14 Redevelopment Authority does have a staff15 appraiser; they've had it forever as long16 as I can remember. Val Pasquarelli is17 their staff appraiser, but they do18 contract out when they condemn19 properties.20

Councilman Clarke

I actually21 know that. I'm glad that you said it22 'cause I don't want to give the23 impression that I was picking on the24 Redevelopment Authority, but I guess I25 481 5/4/09 COMM. OF THE WHOLE - FISCAL '10 BUDGET1 just don't understand -- I thought maybe2 it was something that was required from3 some external appraiser as opposed to an4 internal appraiser, some state reg or5 something, 'cause I just didn't6 understand if you have an appraiser on7 staff, why do you contract out? And that8 traditionally lengthens the whole9 acquisition and the disposition process10 for weeks and months sometimes at a time11 because you have to get these outside12 appraisers, and it seems like it would be13 more productive to just use your person14 through the appraisers to get the deal15 done.16

Mr. Levin

I don't know17 specifically. It may have to do with the18 fact that much of what they acquire19 includes federal funding. There may be a20 requirement that they be independent21 appraisers; I don't know.22

Councilman Clarke

You don't23 know.24

Mr. Levin

I do not.25 482 5/4/09 COMM. OF THE WHOLE - FISCAL '10 BUDGET1

Councilman Clarke

All right.2 That may be one other thing that I would3 ask for you to work with me on, 'cause I4 really have an issue about the5 productivity of that particular dormant.6 All right. Thank you, Madam7 President.8 COUNCIL PRESIDENT VERNA:9 You're welcome.10

Councilman Rizzo

Point of11 information.12

Council President Verna

The13 Chair recognizes Councilman Rizzo for a14 point of information.15

Councilman Rizzo

Just a quick16 one here.17 There are different types of18 deferrals, right? There's the total19 deferral other than the land, but if a20 person reconstructs, there's tax21 deferrals there. How many categories are22 there of deferrals?23 And also, when does the first24 deferral start to expire; and if you25 483 5/4/09 COMM. OF THE WHOLE - FISCAL '10 BUDGET1 collate it, what the tax will be?2

Mr. Mescolotto

Abatements,3 yes. We have four abatement programs4 right now. There's an abatement for new5 construction of residential properties,6 renovation of residential properties. We7 have a 961 abatements that -- and the8 1130 abatement, which is for -- it's for9 commercial properties in either new10 construction or substantial renovation.11 And the Act 205, 175 State, what we call12 the builders or developers abatement. So13 there's four programs right now.14 And what your question after15 that was...?16

Councilman Rizzo

The second17 question was: When do the first18 abatements end? And have you started to19 calculate what the revenue will be when20 those abatements end?21

Mr. Mescolotto

The answer is,22 the first substantial abatements of23 ten-year abatements that we're talking24 about started to come off for 2009.25 484 5/4/09 COMM. OF THE WHOLE - FISCAL '10 BUDGET1 There was I don't know -- Mike, we had2 about what, 300-and-some came off this3 past year? Yeah, for certified 2009,4 went back on the tax rolls.5 They were some of the earliest6 abatements when properties that were7 converted from office buildings into8 apartments into condos. So they started9 for this past year.10 I can give you a report, if you11 want, that details for the next ten12 years, what comes off each year, how13 much, what type of abatement. We do have14 that, and I can supply it for you.15

Ms. Meade

But that report --16

Councilman Rizzo

To the17 Chair.18

Ms. Meade

Right. That report19 is read by valuation, so it contains the20 assessment and market value figures. It21 doesn't contain the tax figures.22

Mr. Mescolotto

Yeah, we can't23 have the tax figures --24

Ms. Meade

Yeah, we don't have25 485 5/4/09 COMM. OF THE WHOLE - FISCAL '10 BUDGET1 those.2 (Timer bell rings.)3

Mr. Mescolotto

-- 'cause we4 don't know what the rates are going to be5 boing forward.6

Councilman Rizzo

Thank you.7 Thank you, Madam President.8 COUNCIL PRESIDENT VERNA:9 You're welcome.10 The Chair recognizes Councilman11 Jones.12

Councilman Jones

Thank you,13 Madam President.14 Going back more to Councilwoman15 Blackwell's concerns about the16 disparities that often are unintended,17 I'll say consequences of your18 reassessments and appraisals.19 Why is it that some20 neighborhoods have been reassessed more21 than others and some -- as I'm getting22 complaints about it four times versus23 others that may not have been touched in24 ten years?25 486 5/4/09 COMM. OF THE WHOLE - FISCAL '10 BUDGET1

Councilwoman Brown

Madam2 President, point of information.3 I never do a point of4 information, let the record show. But5 Councilman Jones' question goes to my6 very opening question, wherein your7 answer was a B+. Help me reconcile the8 reality you just stated with the grades9 you just gave yourself.10 Thank you, Madam President.11

Councilman Jones

And my issue12 is: In light of the fact that I've had13 year after year folks say that they are14 getting reassessed and their values are15 going up and up, and then there are other16 blocks that get quiet passes and aren't17 touched and aren't reassessed. And that18 adds to the disparity in some of the --19 you used words like "reliable" and20 "accurate," reliable and accurate.21 But it also needs to be22 consistent and uniform, because if people23 doubt that process and doubt that24 fundamental fairness, and if you do a25 487 5/4/09 COMM. OF THE WHOLE - FISCAL '10 BUDGET1 wink and know somebody, it can be a pass2 on your block, that's not the kind of3 confidence that we want in light of the4 tough decisions that we may have to make.5 And I need a answer to why some6 blocks get a pass.7

Ms. Meade

Right. And8 Councilman Jones and Councilwoman Brown9 also, the B+ was in reference to the10 Actual Value Project, how we're moving11 along with that project to the future.12 But in answer to your question13 in terms of the disparity, I'll allow our14 Acting Director to give you a full15 answer, but the Board's position is16 that's the reason that we need to go to17 actual value. And that's why we need it18 a full assessment of the City at actual19 value, what a willing buyer, willing20 seller would pay, what the income that21 would be driven on an open market for22 property.23 And that's why we needed to do24 it at the actual value level to provide25 488 5/4/09 COMM. OF THE WHOLE - FISCAL '10 BUDGET1 for uniformity, which not only is fair2 but is the constitutional mandate.3 And, unfortunately, the fact4 that we had to have this type of a5 program and spend so much time and effort6 trying to achieve the uniformity, equity,7 and transparency and assessment and the8 fairness bespeaks the problem that you9 speak of.10 And I'll have Mr. Mescolotto --11

Councilman Jones

I know how12 that bell thing works here. I want to13 get on the record this question, which is14 also when a -- let's do a hypothetical.15 Someone comes into a neighborhood that is16 on the upswing, and many of us have them,17 Councilwoman Blackwell, all of us in our18 districts have neighborhoods that are19 considered "on the upswing."20 And a person comes in, a21 pioneer comes in, and mingles and buys a22 property among long-term residents. And23 then, all of a sudden, the sale value24 jumps up, let's say, to a quarter of a25 489 5/4/09 COMM. OF THE WHOLE - FISCAL '10 BUDGET1 million. It impacts everyone that's on2 the block.3 So for the existing residents,4 the idea of a better city and a beautiful5 city doesn't necessarily have the same6 weight on them because they now see an7 increase in their assessments and wonder8 why because someone else moved in their9 block.10 So I'm telling you, we have to11 figure this kind of system out.12

Ms. Meade

And that's why it's13 so desperate, the need for the buffering14 programs, for the Homestead Act, for15 ordinances that specifically address16 gentrification for -- I was so happy that17 Council increased the Tax Reach Program,18 the dollar-amount, raised the19 dollar-amount to allow people to qualify20 for the Tax Reach Program, because so21 often, it's the seniors that we see on22 appeal who come in and oftentimes tell23 us, That's value. I don't have a problem24 with the value; I simply can't afford to25 490 5/4/09 COMM. OF THE WHOLE - FISCAL '10 BUDGET1 pay the tax increase.2 So that's why we recognize the3 importance of providing you with the4 uniform information for the entire City5 to assure that the assessments are6 accurate, to assure that there's equity7 and fairness, so that all of those8 programs can be taken into consideration9 when and applied either on the value side10 or on the tax side to making sure that we11 don't force those dedicated citizens of12 the City who labored hard and in those13 neighborhoods -- and I lived in those14 neighborhoods and I've worked in housing15 areas in those neighborhoods to build16 low-income housing.17 (Timer bell rings.)18

Ms. Meade

But I had to watch19 the low-income housing that I helped to20 provide for people gave time to, at no21 cost. Then I had to watch that increase22 the value of the homes in the areas where23 speculators come in, and now the property24 values are up so high, what happens to25 491 5/4/09 COMM. OF THE WHOLE - FISCAL '10 BUDGET1 those people who stayed since the 1960s,2 since the riots, since the time that it3 was hard to live in that section of4 Philadelphia. What happens to them.5 So that's something that we are6 sensitive to.7

Councilman Jones

Just as you8 answered the original question, just note9 that there's a stereotypical view of what10 that neighborhood is. And I'm telling11 you --12

Ms. Meade

It's all over the13 City.14

Councilman Jones

And I'm15 telling you, from Market Street in my16 lower-income neighborhoods, in certain17 parts, to my more affluent neighborhoods18 I'm getting the same concern, because19 when they bought in a certain20 neighborhood, middle-level area, they21 bought it at $95,000, and now it's worth,22 you know, people are buying 'em for 20023 and $250,000, and they are on fixed24 income, retirement income, pension25 492 5/4/09 COMM. OF THE WHOLE - FISCAL '10 BUDGET1 income. And now they're finding2 themselves between a rock and a hard3 place.4 So, you know, we have to5 provide, as Councilwoman Blackwell said,6 some buffers and, more importantly, some7 uniformity answers, so that when people8 receive that tax bill in the mail, that9 reassessment in the mail, there is a10 degree of confidence behind it.11

Ms. Meade

And that's why our12 assessments must be accurate, uniform,13 fair, and equitable. And I would even14 say in response that, we recognize that15 there was not a boon just in one section16 of Philadelphia; it was all over the17 City, to the extent that you have places18 that were North Philadelphia that are now19 Northern Liberties, places that were West20 Philadelphia that are now University21 City. If you're looking for a movie22 theater, you have sometimes have to look23 to see what section of the City is it24 located now. The street hasn't changed,25 493 5/4/09 COMM. OF THE WHOLE - FISCAL '10 BUDGET1 the location hasn't changed, but what2 they're calling it is changed.3 And that's a reflection of when4 the market values increase. Then the5 line moves in terms of how the higher-end6 properties are defined or how the7 middle-income properties are defined. So8 we recognize that, and it happens all9 over the City.10 The abatement program was one11 of the reasons that we believe you saw12 such a demand in the construction area to13 build not only new residential homes, but14 new commercial properties, new condos.15 And what that provided on one hand for16 Council to bring the people back to the17 City of Philadelphia, both in business18 and both as residents, and put them on19 the tax roll is a good thing. But by the20 same token, we have to remember, whenever21 we improve any neighborhood, then the22 property values are increased, and we23 have to find a way -- and I don't say we24 can, because we're you just the Board of25 494 5/4/09 COMM. OF THE WHOLE - FISCAL '10 BUDGET1 Revision of Taxes; we're only supposed to2 value and assess.3 But we have to work and provide4 whatever information we can to you that's5 accurate and assists you in any other6 ways with information that we have, that7 might not be directly related to the8 assessments, so that you can do the job9 that you need to do to protect those10 long-term citizens about whom you speak.11

Mr. Levin

Councilman, there12 was, in effect, a proposed constitutional13 amendment that would have protected folks14 in gentrified neighborhoods, exactly the15 concern that Councilwoman Blackwell has16 expressed for many, many years, as17 articulated for many, many years, whereby18 that individual, the increase in the19 real-estate taxes from a certain point20 would be deferred until either that21 individual who owned the property passed22 and then paid as part of the estate taxes23 or the property was sold. At that point,24 the tax would be made up.25 495 5/4/09 COMM. OF THE WHOLE - FISCAL '10 BUDGET1 We, nor you, nor anyone wants2 to tax folks out of their own homes, and3 we find that second and third and fourth4 generation in many neighborhoods, and5 especially in University City.6 So that was a constitutional7 amendment, and it might be something that8 needs to be looked into. Once again,9 it's a logical, intelligent answer to a10 very severe problem.11

Councilman Jones

I appreciate12 that sentiment because some people -- you13 know, all progress isn't forward for all14 people. All progress isn't forward for15 all people. And one person's "Oh, isn't16 this a beautiful neighborhood" is "Oh, I17 used to live here."18 And I'm very concerned about19 that destabilizing factor and20 particularly at the hands of the tax man.21

Ms. Meade

Mm-hmm. And we22 have to work as a city, work together,23 and help you in whatever you have to do24 to lobby Harrisburg, because a lot of the25 496 5/4/09 COMM. OF THE WHOLE - FISCAL '10 BUDGET1 things that need to be done require2 enabling legislation, and they have to3 become sensitive to working with the City4 of Philadelphia so that we can grow this5 city for all people at all economic6 levels.7

Councilman Jones

Thank you,8 Madam President.9

Council President Verna

Thank10 you.11 The Chair recognizes12 Councilwoman Brown.13

Councilwoman Brown

Well put,14 Councilman Jones.15 So to the passion expressed by16 Councilwoman Blackwell, and looking to17 the future, with the new tools you're18 putting in place, have you talked to,19 talked through, thought through how we20 educate citizens so that there is clearly21 a distinction between a tax hike versus22 the actual value? Have you had a chance23 yet to go to a strategic implementation24 plan so that we help civilians what it is25 497 5/4/09 COMM. OF THE WHOLE - FISCAL '10 BUDGET1 and what it is not?2

Ms. Meade

Preliminarily,3 there was an attempt to do that. And,4 unfortunately, what we needed, we5 realized, in trying to do that process6 were actual numbers, because what people7 want to know is, How does it affect me8 specifically?9

Councilwoman Brown

Mm-hmm.10

Ms. Meade

So we realized that11 before we go out again, we really need to12 complete the process and then be prepared13 to go out wherever we're needed, to14 discuss with people and explain to people15 and to open our offices, most16 importantly, so that taxpayers can come17 in. And, as we said, we've created the18 Citizen Service Center several years ago,19 with the intent of being able to serve20 people en mass who needed specific21 information because they did not22 understand what would happen and what has23 happened to them with the Actual Value24 Project.25 498 5/4/09 COMM. OF THE WHOLE - FISCAL '10 BUDGET1

Councilwoman Brown

What I2 might argue --3

Ms. Meade

It's very personal4 for people.5

Councilwoman Brown

I might6 argue that there needs to be a parallel7 track of activity because those who are8 being assessed, they will talk and share9 with others.10

Ms. Meade

Oh, yes, and we11 plan to go out.12

Councilwoman Brown

And does13 that feed inaccurate, misinformed14 citizens who become heightened and15 scared, quite frankly, because of what16 they're hearing, and not knowing still17 what their own circumstance will be.18

Ms. Meade

Right. And we do19 plan to go out because we also recognize20 the importance of explaining to citizens21 their rights as well, because their22 rights are the right to appeal any23 valuation and assessment that's placed on24 their property and to provide us with25 499 5/4/09 COMM. OF THE WHOLE - FISCAL '10 BUDGET1 information. We know that it is2 necessary to come out.3 There's no charge for an appeal4 to explain to people the process, how5 very simple it is to file the appeal, the6 kind of information that they should7 prepare to submit to us, and how to go8 about the process, that how we value9 properties, and that if there are10 particular disabilities with their11 properties, if there's a change in their12 properties. You're talking about13 gentrification.14 There are four remaining15 properties that we may not be able to see16 because we don't see the interiors on the17 block from a whole entire block that has18 been gentrified, and those properties19 have all been improved greatly, and we20 don't know that because we don't see the21 interior, and possibly all of the facades22 remain the same.23 So that's something we know24 that we recognize we must do in terms of25 500 5/4/09 COMM. OF THE WHOLE - FISCAL '10 BUDGET1 education of the public. And going2 further than educating the public, but3 providing them with services that we are4 to provide and being prepared to handle5 any appeals that come forward.6

Councilwoman Brown

My only7 final comment would be that what you and8 what we have before us is a huge9 undertaking.10

Ms. Meade

Absolutely.11

Councilwoman Brown

The last12 time was 18 years? According to the13 information I've read.14 So I'm not confident that you,15 as an agency, can handle in huge elephant16 alone, that it may indeed take a17 really -- the same way we approached the18 merging of Fairmount Park and the Rec19 Department. We had to be very, very20 strategic and share that with citizens21 around the City and have community22 forums. The reach of that is this way23 and this way.24

Ms. Meade

Mm-hmm.25 501 5/4/09 COMM. OF THE WHOLE - FISCAL '10 BUDGET1

Councilwoman Brown

And so, I2 would just encourage you to consider an3 extremely well thought out strategic4 public relations, information-driven5 plan, where citizens at every reach of6 the ladder know that it's coming, it's7 real, what we're giving you is accurate8 and current, period.9 (Timer bell rings.)10

Ms. Meade

Yes, thank you.11

Councilwoman Brown

Thank you,12 Madam President.13

Council President Verna

Thank14 you.15 The Chair recognizes Councilman16 Green.17

Councilman Green

Thank you,18 Madam Chair.19 Given the discrepancies we see20 in the difference between full-value21 information and data provided yesterday22 and the current method of assessment, and23 when you look at the chart on provided in Kevin Gillen's -- or the25 502 5/4/09 COMM. OF THE WHOLE - FISCAL '10 BUDGET1 BRT's presentation that Kevin Gillen gave2 to us a couple of days ago, would you say3 that our current property tax assessment4 system is legal?5

Ms. Meade

Is legal?6

Councilman Green

Is it legal?7 If someone would sue the City of8 Philadelphia today about our quality of9 our assessments, would we be required to10 go to full value immediately? Is our11 current system legal?12

Ms. Meade

Dan Cantu-Hertzler13 from the Law Department --14

Councilman Green

I'm sorry?15

Ms. Meade

We were faced with16 this problem last summer when we were17 threatened with a lawsuit by Philadelphia18 Forward. And what they did, Joseph19 Bright was the attorney who was the20 attorney -- handling the lawsuit on their21 behalf, or the threatened lawsuit. And22 what they provided to us was basically a23 copy of what might be filed.24 Our position with that lawsuit25 503 5/4/09 COMM. OF THE WHOLE - FISCAL '10 BUDGET1 was that we recognized the problem that2 we faced. We contacted the Law3 Department because the Law Department are4 the lawyers who are to represent us. Dan5 Cantu-Hertzler could, you know, answer6 your question more directly, as our legal7 representative.8 But this is the reason that we9 believe that we need actual value,10 because we know that if we were to go11 forward, Councilman Green, basically,12 this would be what we'd have to present.13 This is the status. And when you just14 look at that status, I think it answers15 the question, that we need to go forward16 to actual value.17

Councilman Green

So our18 current tax system, then, according to19 your testimony, is not legal. Is it20 fair?21

Mr. Levin

It's problematic,22 whether it's legal or not, Councilman.23

Ms. Meade

It's problematic --24

Mr. Levin

We've been25 504 5/4/09 COMM. OF THE WHOLE - FISCAL '10 BUDGET1 threatened with, you know, lawsuits for2 many, many years.3

Councilman Green

Okay. Well,4 I'll just change the question.5

Mr. Levin

There's no question6 that actual value is --7

Councilman Green

Is the9 current system fair?10

Ms. Meade

And I prefer,11 again, for Dan Cantu-Hertzler -- he is12 the attorney for the BRT handling these13 matters, and I would prefer for him to --14

Councilman Green

Okay. I15 appreciate what you're saying, but I have16 five minutes, so if you're not going to17 answer my question, just say so. Is it18 fair?19

Ms. Meade

I don't think so.20

Councilman Green

Okay. If21 it's not fair, do you think it's22 reasonable that, on a current broken23 system, we increase property tax by 2024 percent?25 505 5/4/09 COMM. OF THE WHOLE - FISCAL '10 BUDGET1

Ms. Meade

With all due2 respect, I'd prefer not to answer that3 question simply because I don't want to4 be in conflict.5

Councilman Green

That's fine.6 Do you think the City would be7 in legal jeopardy if we increased8 property taxes by 20 percent on people9 whose homes are already overvalued?10 Would there be a massive class-action11 lawsuit likely to win if we increase12 people's property taxes above current --13 for people who are already overvalued14 according to the data that we now have in15 our hands?16

Ms. Meade

Okay. Again, with17 all due respect, I don't want to put the18 Board into that discussion, but I will19 answer the question in this way:20 We believe that we have to go21 forward with actual value because it's22 the right thing to do, because it's --23 uniformity is required by the24 Constitution, because equity of25 506 5/4/09 COMM. OF THE WHOLE - FISCAL '10 BUDGET1 assessments is required by law, and2 because we want to do the legal thing, as3 the Valuation and Assessment Office for4 the City.5

Councilman Green

Okay. So6 it's your testimony, then, that the7 current system is inequitable; isn't that8 kind of the same as "unfair"?9

Ms. Meade

Yes, it is.10

Councilman Green

Thank you.11

Ms. Meade

But that's why12 we're going towards full value. We13 started with fall value, but that's why14 we determined that we have to implement15 actual value and do all of the things16 necessary to get to that point.17

Councilman Green

I agree. I18 just don't think we should make a -- and19 this is not a question for you to answer.20 I don't think we should make an21 inequitable, illegal system worse and22 expose us to hundreds of millions of23 dollars of potential damages of people24 who could sue the City if we increased25 507 5/4/09 COMM. OF THE WHOLE - FISCAL '10 BUDGET1 their taxes when they're already2 illegally unhigh -- I mean, too high.3 So that being said, could the4 Administrative Services Director who came5 up before come up and describe your job6 to me? Just kind of walk me through your7 job duties and typical job requirements.8 (Timer bell rings.)9

Councilman Green

Madam Chair,10 I have this question for several people,11 so I'd rather come back to it than start12 now if other people are --13

Council President Verna

Very14 well. I have other Councilpeople that15 want to be recognized.16 Councilwoman Sanchez? Oh, I'm17 sorry. Councilwoman Tasco.18

Councilwoman Tasco

I know we19 were talking earlier about the number of20 employees that you have. Did we ever21 settle on how many employees you have22 over at the BRT?23

Ms. Daniel

On staff right24 now, we have 135.25 508 5/4/09 COMM. OF THE WHOLE - FISCAL '10 BUDGET1

Councilwoman Tasco

Okay. Of2 those 135, how many of them are civil3 servants?4

Ms. Daniel

135. Every -- all5 -- we have Civil Service staff, we have6 School Board staff. We have 80 School7 Board employees, and we have 135 Civil8 Service employees.9

Councilwoman Tasco

Go ahead.10

Ms. Daniel

The Civil Service11 employees, some are union, some are12 non-rep, but there are 135.13

Councilwoman Tasco

So you14 have 135 civil servants.15

Ms. Daniel

Yes, ma'am.16

Councilwoman Tasco

And you17 have 80 School Board employees --18

Ms. Daniel

School Board.19

Councilwoman Tasco

-- who are20 not civil servants.21

Ms. Daniel

Who are not Civil22 Service and are not part of our budget,23 so they're not shown on our budget.24

Councilwoman Tasco

So they're25 509 5/4/09 COMM. OF THE WHOLE - FISCAL '10 BUDGET1 not on your budget.2

Councilwoman Tasco

They're on4 the School District's budget.5

Ms. Daniel

From the School6 District's budget, yes.7

Councilwoman Tasco

Of the8 Civil Service positions, what categories9 do you have? Are they mostly technical?10

Ms. Daniel

We have -- well,11 we have management staff, we have IT12 personnel, we have the Real Property.13 It's actually three units. It's the14 Personnel Unit, which I manage. It's the15 IT staff, and it's Real Property staff,16 so...17

Councilwoman Tasco

And so,18 when you need to have an opening for a19 Civil Service position, who writes the20 specifications for the position?21

Ms. Daniel

The specs are22 already written. We just go to the23 regular position that's listed with24 Central Personnel. We have not created25 510 5/4/09 COMM. OF THE WHOLE - FISCAL '10 BUDGET1 any positions.2

Councilwoman Tasco

Okay. So3 the current specs are the specifications4 that have been -- that were written by5 the Personnel Department?6

Councilwoman Tasco

Okay.8 Then how do you select them? The9 applicant has to have the appropriate10 qualifications to fit that position?11 Let's take management, for12 instance. If you get three people who13 take the test, how do you choose between14 the three?15

Ms. Daniel

We have the16 testing. And everything, with the17 exception of the executive director,18 every position --19

Councilwoman Tasco

I know20 that, but I'm saying -- you state the21 Civil Service Department administers the22 exam. Three people maybe -- or maybe two23 or three (inaudible).24

Ms. Daniel

We use the Rule of25 511 5/4/09 COMM. OF THE WHOLE - FISCAL '10 BUDGET1 Two that most departments would use. You2 have the -- you take the first two3 applicants at the top of the exam, and we4 would interview the first two applicants,5 and we would make a selection.6 But that also would be based on7 how many vacancies we have. So if there8 were more than one vacancy, then we would9 add another person, but we would use the10 Rule of Two.11

Councilwoman Tasco

All right.12 And the exempt employees don't have to13 take any examination?14

Ms. Daniel

We only have one15 position in the department that is not an16 exam, and that's the Executive Director.17 But I just want to clear up one18 thing. When I say the 135, the board19 members are also Civil Service, so they20 are a part of that 134, so with the21 exception of --22

Councilwoman Tasco

The board23 members are Civil Service?24

Ms. Daniel

Yes, ma'am. They25 512 5/4/09 COMM. OF THE WHOLE - FISCAL '10 BUDGET1 are Civil Service.2

Councilwoman Tasco

Do they3 take a test?4

Ms. Daniel

No, they don't.5

Councilwoman Tasco

Well, how6 are they Civil Service?7

Ms. Daniel

I'm sorry, I'm8 sorry. I'm thinking in my head. I'm9 talking City budget. They're on our10 budget, they are shown on our budget.11 They are Civil Service but they are shown12 on our budget.13

Councilwoman Tasco

Oh, so --14

Ms. Daniel

But they are a15 part of the -- right. They are a part of16 the 134 that's paid from the City budget.17

Councilwoman Tasco

That18 includes the -- Charlie says they're not.19 MR. McPHERSON: (Inaudible,20 off-mic.)21

Ms. Daniel

That's news to me.22 I am -- I mean I took over the preparing23 of the budget and the way that it was24 prepared. Prior to my arrival, the board25 513 5/4/09 COMM. OF THE WHOLE - FISCAL '10 BUDGET1 members were listed on that budget and2 they continue to be listed on that3 budget. So they are there and they are a4 part of the number count.5

Councilwoman Tasco

Of6 employees.7

Ms. Daniel

The board members8 are a part of the Civil Service budget, a9 part of our operating budget. So the10 board members number and the dollar11 amounts are on that budget.12

Councilwoman Tasco

Your 13513 employees include -- how many board14 members do you have?15

Ms. Daniel

There are seven,16 and then the board of (indiscernible), so17 it's ten altogether.18

Councilwoman Tasco

So you19 have 125 Civil Service employees who take20 a test and come to the department, and21 then you have ten board members?22

Councilwoman Tasco

So that's24 how you get to 135 employees?25 514 5/4/09 COMM. OF THE WHOLE - FISCAL '10 BUDGET1

Councilwoman Tasco

But the3 board members are full-time, aren't they?4

Ms. Daniel

They are not5 full-time, but they -- I mean, I don't6 know how else we would prepare a budget7 without showing -- because they are a8 part of our budget.9 (Timer bell rings.)10

Ms. Daniel

I don't know where11 else we would show them.12

Councilwoman Tasco

Okay.13 Thank you very much, Madam14 President.15 COUNCIL PRESIDENT VERNA:16 You're welcome.17 The Chair recognizes18 Councilwoman Sanchez.19

Councilwoman Sanchez

Thank20 you very much.21 Just for clarity purposes, the22 budget that you are requesting today, is23 that different than the budget that the24 Mayor is proposing that your department25 515 5/4/09 COMM. OF THE WHOLE - FISCAL '10 BUDGET1 has?2

Ms. Daniel

No. It's the3 exact, same budget.4

Councilwoman Sanchez

So you5 have agreed with the number that the6 Mayor --7

Ms. Daniel

We have reduced8 our budget to do -- under the9 instructions that we were given from the10 Finance Department. And so, we've shown11 the numbers as the Finance Department12 directed us.13

Councilwoman Sanchez

Okay. I14 just wanted clarity 'cause they're not --15 some of the other independent offices are16 challenging the number that was given by17 the Mayor's Office, and I wanted to make18 sure that in your case, that is not the19 case.20

Ms. Daniel

We used what they21 gave us.22

Councilwoman Sanchez

Okay.23 In light of the fact that we're talking24 about the system and it being broken, are25 516 5/4/09 COMM. OF THE WHOLE - FISCAL '10 BUDGET1 properties going to continue to be2 reassessed during this evaluation process3 between now and us going full market4 value?5

Ms. Meade

No. Our intent is6 to go forward with actual value, to7 continue doing --8

Councilwoman Sanchez

But9 we're assuming we're going to take care10 of this in the fall. Between now and our11 going to full market, will properties be12 reassessed and potentially people's taxes13 increase during that time?14

Mr. Mescolotto

We're not15 stopping our normal operations, but that16 does not include a citywide revaluation17 other than as we go to actual value. We18 will still be revaluing properties that19 are increasing in size because of putting20 an addition on, properties that are being21 torn down, properties that are being22 consolidated, subdivisions, and so forth.23 All of our normal operations24 continue normally.25 517 5/4/09 COMM. OF THE WHOLE - FISCAL '10 BUDGET1

Councilwoman Sanchez

Do you2 understand this is a problem for us3 politically as we try to get our4 constituents to buy into that this --5 we're trying to fix the system?6 If you are continuously7 reassessing properties, in their mind,8 it's a tax increase. I'll go back to9 councilwoman Blackwell's point. In their10 minds, it's a tax increase med.11

Ms. Meade

But no, the12 property to which he is referring are13 properties that are new properties that14 are going online, because they -- it's a15 consolidation, because it's been16 requested by the taxpayer. If it's a17 subdivision, it's because it's been18 requested by a taxpayer.19 It means that a new deed has20 hit the Records Department. And if a new21 deed hits the Records Department, they22 have to act on those properties.23

Councilwoman Sanchez

Okay.24

Ms. Meade

And if permits hit,25 518 5/4/09 COMM. OF THE WHOLE - FISCAL '10 BUDGET1 we also have to act upon those2 properties. If there are permits that3 have hit L&I, then those are sent over to4 us, and we are responsible for keeping up5 with those.6

Councilwoman Sanchez

But what7 you're saying to me is, in some cases --8 and I represent one of those districts9 where properties are overwhelmingly10 assessed at the highest rate, so we are11 going to continue to reassess them12 because of the -- 'cause that's a policy13 decision that this board can make, and it14 can say that in the process of us going15 to full, all of the different triggers16 for reassessment we're not going to17 acknowledge until we fix the system.18 Because I have a district19 that's redeveloping, so potentially,20 every single one of my constituents that21 requests a permit is going to get22 reassessed, and their taxes are going to23 increase in the middle of all of this.24

Ms. Meade

No, not every one25 519 5/4/09 COMM. OF THE WHOLE - FISCAL '10 BUDGET1 because what we're saying is, those are2 only the properties where deeds or3 permits hit. If a deed hits, we have to4 react and make sure that the address --5

Councilwoman Sanchez

You6 don't have to. But if a permit hits, you7 don't have to.8 I mean, the fact of the matter9 is that this board can say, In the10 process of this new market value11 initiative, we are going to call for a12 moratorium on this so people don't get13 reassessed. You could make that14 decision.15

Ms. Meade

Thank you.16

Councilwoman Sanchez

Can you?17

Mr. Mescolotto

Well, you18 know, the only thing is, you know, if19 someone builds a new house, it's20 incumbent upon us to put that on the21 record.22

Councilwoman Sanchez

There's23 a difference between a new deed. See,24 we're going -- there's levels of this.25 520 5/4/09 COMM. OF THE WHOLE - FISCAL '10 BUDGET1 There's a difference between a new deed,2 which is -- would fall in that category3 of a new house and my making an4 improvement on my house.5

Ms. Meade

But there it is;6 it's an improvement.7

Councilwoman Sanchez

Yes, but8 it's a broken system. So if I'm in a9 neighborhood where I'm being assessed at10 75 percent, and you've acknowledged11 through numerous testimonies that that12 system is unfair, then why are we adding?13 Why can't we make a policy decision that14 says, in the interim, improvements will15 not be reassessed until we fix it.16

Ms. Meade

Because we can't17 stop normal business operations --18

Councilwoman Sanchez

Why not?19

Ms. Meade

-- for which we're20 responsible.21

Councilwoman Sanchez

Why not?22

Ms. Meade

No, we can't. We23 should not. No, we should not do that.24

Councilwoman Sanchez

You've25 521 5/4/09 COMM. OF THE WHOLE - FISCAL '10 BUDGET1 operated a broken system, a potentially2 illegal system. All I'm saying is, we3 have new market values, we want to move4 in that direction. In the interim --5 (Timer bell rings.)6

Mr. Mescolotto

We wouldn't be7 able to process their abatement either if8 we don't reflect the --9

Councilwoman Sanchez

But10 that's on new ones. I'm talking about11 improvements.12

Mr. Mescolotto

There's an13 abatement for renovations and additions14 also.15

Councilwoman Sanchez

So if16 there's an abatement, why are we17 reassessing them?18

Mr. Mescolotto

We're19 reassessing them to reflect them on the20 record. They need to have the21 improvement come onto the record in order22 for the abatement to go into effect.23 That's a part of the ordinance that24 supports the abatement. We don't have25 522 5/4/09 COMM. OF THE WHOLE - FISCAL '10 BUDGET1 any way around that.2 However, if we encourage people3 to file for abatements, there will be no4 effect from the improvements that they5 get.6

Councilwoman Sanchez

Yeah,7 but that goes to the point of who knows8 how to do that.9 I represent a district that is10 going through major redevelopment. And11 what I'm saying to you is, I want to be12 supportive of us fixing the system, but I13 can't do that if my constituents are14 going to be continuously receiving these15 reassessments and, in their minds, a tax16 increase. I don't care how we call it.17

Mr. Mescolotto

Can I just say18 that the number last year, there were19 18,000 such changes around the City20 that's it. That's it.21

Councilman Green

Point of22 information.23

Councilwoman Tasco

I have a24 point of information too on that.25 523 5/4/09 COMM. OF THE WHOLE - FISCAL '10 BUDGET1

Councilman Green

I yield to2 the Majority Leader.3

Councilwoman Tasco

Thank you.4 COUNCIL PRESIDENT VERNA:5 Councilwoman Tasco.6

Councilwoman Tasco

I have a7 meeting at 7:30, which brings me to mind,8 the City p-OHCD is going to get9 $16 million for home rehabilitation for10 properties that have been foreclosed.11 Those houses will be rehabbed, receive12 renovation. What happens to them; do you13 reassess them at that time?14

Mr. Mescolotto

We do, and15 they --16

Councilwoman Tasco

Because17 there's certainly a lot of those in my18 district and in some other districts too19 where that will take place, and so that's20 on top of all of this other stuff.21

Mr. Mescolotto

They will be22 reassessed, and for the most, all of23 those improvements will be abated.24

Councilwoman Tasco

Well, will25 524 5/4/09 COMM. OF THE WHOLE - FISCAL '10 BUDGET1 the reassessment be on the new system,2 the fair market value system?3

Mr. Levin

Councilwoman, from4 here on out -- and maybe this answers the5 questions -- there will be no interim.6 We're going to move forward only on our7 actual valued numbers.8

Councilwoman Tasco

Okay.9

Mr. Levin

So there will10 really be no interim.11

Councilwoman Tasco

So if I12 get some funds or if I'm a developer or a13 CDC and we're rehabbing a number of14 houses in West Oak Lane, and those houses15 go on the market, 'cause for the most16 part, they are vacant, I think, is what17 the requirement is to date, that they are18 vacant or in the foreclosure system, does19 the developer apply for the abatement?20 That's another question.21

Councilwoman Tasco

Okay. And24 so once they get the abatement, once they25 525 5/4/09 COMM. OF THE WHOLE - FISCAL '10 BUDGET1 do the rehab, then do you assess it on2 the rehabbed property?3

Mr. Levin

Well, it would be4 abated. The land value would remain5 constant. The improvement -- the6 proportion attributable to the7 improvement would be abated for ten years8 or whatever program that was under.9

Councilwoman Tasco

Well, I'm10 not real good at this, so I'm going to11 have to --12

Mr. Levin

No, no. We're --13

Councilwoman Tasco

I got to14 check it out. So that's what's going to15 happen.16

Mr. Mescolotto

Did we answer17 your question?18

Councilwoman Tasco

The19 $16 million is going to be sent to20 Philadelphia to rehab properties that are21 vacant and that have been in foreclosure.22 And so, we just need to know what happens23 with all of that. And I think maybe the24 CDCs ought to have a conversation with25 526 5/4/09 COMM. OF THE WHOLE - FISCAL '10 BUDGET1 you also so they'll know what's going to2 happen.3

Mr. Mescolotto

We're always4 available for that.5

Councilwoman Tasco

If this is6 abated, we may have (inaudible). So7 we'll see, okay? I have my two CDCs --8 three CDCs check with you.9

Council President Verna

The10 Chair recognizes Councilman Green.11

Councilman Green

Thank you,12 Madam Chair.13 This point of information was14 along the same line of questioning, and15 that is, in the 7th District, there are16 areas that are 75 percent assessment.17 The average assessment in the City is18 like 33 percent, something like that.19 That means that when -- in20 order to get an abatement for a21 renovation, you have to have spent 5022 percent of the assessed value on the23 renovation. So, in the poorest24 neighborhoods of the City today, if you25 527 5/4/09 COMM. OF THE WHOLE - FISCAL '10 BUDGET1 spend 50 percent of what it's really2 worth compared to what it would really be3 worth in full value, 'cause the values4 are going to go down in full value5 basically compared to the market value6 you have for that property now, the full7 value will be less.8 If you spent 50 percent of what9 its actual value is, you'd be entitled to10 it, but because of what you have on the11 books, people could be denied abatements12 that they're legally entitled to because13 the assessments are wrong.14 And so, the question really is,15 how could -- is Mr. Levin's testimony16 that you will use full value for the17 purposes of determining whether or not18 the renovation qualifies for the19 abatement; in other words, is over 5020 percent. And can you legally do that if21 the tax notice you send out this year is22 based on the illegal system?23

Mr. Mescolotto

I don't know24 what you mean by this 50 percent25 528 5/4/09 COMM. OF THE WHOLE - FISCAL '10 BUDGET1 requirement, but -- so I'm not aware of2 anything that requires it to be 503 percent.4

Councilman Green

So if I5 improve my property and the home is --6 and I spend 10 percent of what the home's7 worth, I'm entitled to an abatement?8

Mr. Mescolotto

Yes.9

Councilman Green

I didn't10 realize that. I thought there was a --11

Mr. Levin

Any increase in12 value.13

Mr. Mescolotto

Any14 improvement, any increase in value,15 you're entitled to an abatement as long16 as you qualify for the rest of the rules.17

Mr. Levin

Now, there is a18 caveat, and that is: There's not a19 dollar-for-dollar increase. You may20 spend a dollar and your property value21 may not increase by $1; it may increase22 by more or less.23 Under the new system, it will24 be assessed at actual value, the most25 529 5/4/09 COMM. OF THE WHOLE - FISCAL '10 BUDGET1 probable selling price.2

Councilman Green

Okay. So it3 goes back to the same basic question,4 which is: You're sending out tax notices5 based on the old system this year. When6 someone comes before you, how can you7 legally say you're going to use the8 actual value? You're going to redo the9 assessment at that time and then see what10 the new value -- in other words, you're11 basing the abatement based on a change in12 value. How are you going to do this?13

Mr. Mescolotto

Basically, the14 property has a value before the15 abatement.16

Councilman Green

What value17 are you going to use?18

Mr. Mescolotto

There's an19 existing value on the property right now.20

Councilman Green

Right. And21 what if it's over-assessed?22

Mr. Mescolotto

Based on what23 they paid for the property, if the24 property changed hands --25 530 5/4/09 COMM. OF THE WHOLE - FISCAL '10 BUDGET1

Councilman Green

What if they2 didn't?3

Mr. Mescolotto

-- it could be4 reduced in value prior to the abatement5 being applied.6 This came up in some other7 discussions we had regarding low-income8 housing. And there are situations out9 there right now where the properties are10 selling for less than what the market11 around it is commanding for smaller lots.12 And our words on were that we encouraged13 the people, that when they start this14 process and they get -- become certified15 as a low-income housing project, you16 know, a credit-financed, a tax17 credit-financed, they contact us to then18 have the property revalued based on that.19 In most -- you know, the20 generic situation, where you -- someone21 buys a vacant property, and --22

Councilman Green

If someone23 who's lived there for 30 years gets24 weatherization money from federal25 531 5/4/09 COMM. OF THE WHOLE - FISCAL '10 BUDGET1 government --2

Councilman Green

-- puts on a4 new roof, does new systems --5

Mr. Mescolotto

If his6 property's overvalued, we will encourage7 them to speak with our department to have8 the property revalued at that time.9

Councilman Green

So you're10 going to base it off current values that11 you're -- for the tax bills you're12 sending out this year. So as we spend13 this federal stimulus money --14 (Timer bell rings.)15

Councilman Green

-- improving16 these houses, tens of thousands of them17 potentially, they might not be eligible18 for an abatement of the improvement19 because they're currently over-assessed;20 that's what you're saying. They would21 have to proactively take a step.22

Ms. Meade

Well, the language23 in the abatement statutes -- or24 ordinances refer to substantial25 532 5/4/09 COMM. OF THE WHOLE - FISCAL '10 BUDGET1 improvements to the property versus2 repairs.3

Councilman Green

Right.4

Ms. Meade

Now, oftentimes,5 that same property that you described6 that received the new roof, the new7 windows, most often if it -- if that8 property came before the Board for an9 appeal, the property value would be10 decreased because of those disabilities,11 looking at the cost to repair those12 properties.13 And so, the things that you've14 described, like the weatherization and15 like the new roof and like not upgrading16 the bathroom, but some people have, you17 know, not modernizing the bathroom, but18 simply correcting problems with the19 piping and all, those would be considered20 repairs to the property and not21 substantial improvements. So the22 abatement may not even apply.23

Councilman Green

Okay. So I24 thought that's where the 50 percent came25 533 5/4/09 COMM. OF THE WHOLE - FISCAL '10 BUDGET1 in. I thought the threshold for2 substantial improvement was 50 percent.3 What's the threshold for substantial4 improvement and how do you determine5 that?6

Mr. Mescolotto

I don't think7 there is one. It's substantial. That's8 the word that's in the ordinance, that's9 all there is. There's no percentage, no10 quantifiable number there.11

Councilman Green

Well,12 everything I've read about it says 5013 percent, so maybe that's not a standard14 you use, but that's what people are told15 out in the marketplace.16

Mr. Mescolotto

Not by us.17

Mr. Levin

Increase in value?18

Councilman Green

Yeah. What19 does "substantial improvement" mean?20 What is your written guideline on what21 "substantial improvement" means?22

Mr. Mescolotto

It's any23 improvement to the property value, as24 determined by our staff, our evaluators,25 534 5/4/09 COMM. OF THE WHOLE - FISCAL '10 BUDGET1 who are appraisers.2

Councilman Green

So you have3 no written guideline on that?4

Mr. Mescolotto

I didn't say5 that we didn't have written guidelines.6 There are written guidelines.7

Councilman Green

Would you8 please provide the Chair with a copy of9 all written guidelines --10

Mr. Mescolotto

Of course.11

Councilman Green

-- with12 respect to what "substantial improvement"13 means?14

Mr. Levin

It's improvements15 that are sufficient to be quantified in16 terms of market value.17

Mr. Mescolotto

But we could18 put that in written terms for you.19 That's not problem. We have those.20

Councilman Green

So let's21 take the low-income house that we just22 described that needs new windows, a new23 roof, new basic systems, okay? And it's24 assessed today at $38,000. And if you25 535 5/4/09 COMM. OF THE WHOLE - FISCAL '10 BUDGET1 were to go buy that house, because of the2 systems that need to be added, its value3 would likely be $25,000.4 Now they fix everything, it's5 worth 38. But if it was properly6 assessed at 25 today, the taxes would7 remain 25 for that low-income homeowner8 we've just assisted because there are9 substantial improvements.10

Mr. Mescolotto

It's the11 argument for going natural value, yes.12

Councilman Green

Well, what14 about the people who are going to get15 that help this year?16

Mr. Mescolotto

We would hope17 that we can go to actual value and fix18 that problem for you.19

Mr. Levin

And if it were20 appealed, they would get that relief. I21 think that's where we're going with this.22

Councilman Green

Most people23 don't go to appeal, don't know.24 Just please provide a written25 536 5/4/09 COMM. OF THE WHOLE - FISCAL '10 BUDGET1 plan to address this at the BRT level to2 the Chair for people coming up next year,3 because, in my opinion, we are exposing4 ourselves to tremendous liability for a5 class of citizens who would otherwise be6 entitled to a tax abatement or tax7 writeoff if we don't do this correctly8 going forward now that you have shown how9 out of whack our system is.10 This is great data, it's great11 information, and it's also a plaintiff's12 lawyer's dream.13

Councilman Green

So, okay.15 Are you familiar -- so someone earlier16 mentioned, when seniors or other people17 come before the BRT and they say, We kind18 of agree with the value, but we can't19 afford it, what do you dell them? And20 they're not eligible for PaceNet or --21 what do you tell 'em?22

Mr. Mescolotto

Are you23 referring to in the case of an appeal?24

Councilman Green

Yes.25 537 5/4/09 COMM. OF THE WHOLE - FISCAL '10 BUDGET1

Ms. Meade

We've referred2 people -- we've provided appeal forms to3 people if we see that they meet the4 guidelines for Pace or PaceNet to apply.5

Councilman Green

Right. The6 question is, if they don't --7

Ms. Meade

And if they're not8 eligible for those, then our recourse is9 to refer them to the Department of10 Revenue and explain to them that there11 are programs that the Department of12 Revenue has to work with them in terms of13 creating a payment plan. That's all that14 we have, is what Council provides us.15

Councilman Green

And do you16 keep records of the number of people you17 refer to the Department of Revenue that18 can't afford it?19

Ms. Meade

Records of that?20 No.21

Councilman Green

No? Okay.22

Ms. Meade

No specific records23 of that, no.24 But I can say that during25 538 5/4/09 COMM. OF THE WHOLE - FISCAL '10 BUDGET1 appeal hearings, whenever that occurs, we2 provide that information. And normally,3 when we have residential homeowners in,4 that's one of the opening statements5 that's made. And then anyone who6 requests an appeal form, we'll provide7 them with that appeal form --8

Councilman Green

Provide --9

Ms. Meade

Not appeal form,10 but the Tax Reach form, we'll provide11 them with that there.12

Councilman Green

So what13 you're referring to -- I'm confused by14 this whole debate that there aren't any15 circuit breakers right now.16 Under 1913-07 of the17 Philadelphia Code, which is, I think,18 what you're referring to, any homeowner19 can be granted relief for any increase or20 portion thereof of real-estate taxes due21 to an increase in assessed value of real22 estate that is greater than 15 percent in23 any given year. The factors the24 department is to consider in granting25 539 5/4/09 COMM. OF THE WHOLE - FISCAL '10 BUDGET1 deferrals are household income reasonable2 household expenses, and available liquid3 assets.4

Ms. Meade

That's the Revenue5 Department.6

Councilman Green

That's7 right.8

Ms. Meade

Yes. And so we9 refer people to the Revenue Department.10 And when we hand out any information, we11 have to tell people that they have to --12 they're required to go to Revenue --13 (Indiscernible; parties talking14 over each other.)15

Councilman Green

So you don't16 know how many people you refer to17 Revenue.18

Ms. Meade

No. I don't have19 those statistics, and we don't keep those20 statistics.21

Councilman Green

All right.22 We'll get that from Revenue, I guess.23 Okay. I'm sorry. If we could24 have the Administrative Services Director25 540 5/4/09 COMM. OF THE WHOLE - FISCAL '10 BUDGET1 back, please.2 (Ms. Daniel returns to witness3 table.)4

Councilman Green

If you would5 please give us a brief job description,6 what it is you're responsible for, who7 you supervise, et cetera.8

Ms. Daniel

Well, my position,9 Administrative Services Director, is all10 the administrative services at BRT. I11 directly supervise three Civil Service12 employees and two School Board employees.13 So all of the administrative services14 would be all of the personnel functions.15 I also prepare the budget.16 We take care of all of the17 Procurement purchasing, bill payments.18

Councilman Green

Okay. So19 the two School District employees you20 supervise, what do they do for the21 school?22

Ms. Daniel

They do payroll23 for the School Board.24

Councilman Green

Okay.25 541 5/4/09 COMM. OF THE WHOLE - FISCAL '10 BUDGET1

Ms. Daniel

So they do the2 personnel functions of the School Board.3

Councilman Green

Okay.4 Mr. Mescolotto, could you please give us5 a brief job description?6

Mr. Mescolotto

My own job?7 I'm the Acting Director of Assessments.8 I direct the day-to-day operations of all9 of our evaluation staffs, both10 residential, commercial and industrial,11 and our Evaluation Support Division,12 which handles exempt properties and other13 functions.14

Councilman Green

So what15 employees -- if I'm looking at the budget16 or -- what employees do you supervise?17 Do you supervise Real Property 02?18

Mr. Mescolotto

Real Property19 and the Commercial Industrial Division20 and our -- what we call our Evaluation21 Support Division.22

Councilman Green

Do you23 supervise the -- do the School Board24 employees provide support to Real25 542 5/4/09 COMM. OF THE WHOLE - FISCAL '10 BUDGET1 Property 02.2

Mr. Mescolotto

Yes, they do.3

Councilman Green

And do you4 supervise them?5

Mr. Mescolotto

I don't6 supervise them directly, but through7 management, yes.8

Councilman Green

Who9 supervises them?10

Mr. Mescolotto

We have line11 supervisors that supervise them.12

Councilman Green

So that13 would be within Real Property 02?14

Mr. Mescolotto

Yeah, the Real15 Property Evaluation Supervisor that16 you're looking at on at that list.17

Councilman Green

Okay.18

Mr. Mescolotto

There should19 be 14.20

Councilman Green

Right. I21 got it.22 So Mr. Foglia, what is your job23 description?24

Mr. Foglia

My job25 543 5/4/09 COMM. OF THE WHOLE - FISCAL '10 BUDGET1 description? My ASD actually took over2 part of my explanation today. I run the3 ASD. She reports to me. I report to my4 chairman if there is a problem. If5 there's a problem with School Board6 employees, I answer to the ASD to look7 into it, and then we settle it.8 If there's a problem with Civil9 Service people, I report to the ASD and10 her help. I go to the supervisor, see11 what the problem is, and whatever else12 has to be done.13

Councilman Green

So you have14 one employee reporting to you directly?15

Mr. Foglia

No. I have my --16 my ASD reporting to me if there's any17 problems with School Board or Civil18 Service.19

Councilman Green

Okay. Is20 there a requirement in the City Code or21 Charter to have an executive director of22 the --23

Mr. Foglia

That I couldn't24 tell you, but from what I understand,25 544 5/4/09 COMM. OF THE WHOLE - FISCAL '10 BUDGET1 since God was born, they had an executive2 director there.3

Councilman Green

A lot's4 changed since God was born.5

Councilman Green

Okay. I7 just wanted to understand what people did8 there.9 Let's see here. Are you10 familiar -- can you tell me, does the BRT11 always do a reassessment when a property12 is abated of the land value prior to13 certifying what the abated value is?14

Mr. Mescolotto

Not always.15

Councilman Green

And are you16 familiar with many properties in Center17 City where there was a significant zoning18 change from industrial to commercial,19 where the land value certified for the20 abatement was what was paid for the21 property as industrial?22

Mr. Mescolotto

If it's23 changing from industrial to another use,24 you wouldn't be paying for an industrial25 545 5/4/09 COMM. OF THE WHOLE - FISCAL '10 BUDGET1 property.2

Councilman Green

Well, people3 buy industrial property all over the City4 all the time. They go to the Zoning5 Board, they get it changed, or they come6 before Council and it's changed to7 commercial.8 In a few cases of major9 projects that we've looked at, the BRT10 has valued the property based on in terms11 of the abatement, what the land value is12 going to be worth for the next -- or what13 the land value is worth, the BRT has14 valued the profit based on what was paid15 for the property, and I believe there was16 testimony here earlier tonight that it's17 based on what you paid for the property.18 The law is that it's what the19 property is worth at the time the20 building permit is issued, which means21 that they've gotten a zoning change from22 industrial to commercial, and the23 property is worth a lot more.24

Mr. Mescolotto

Which law are25 546 5/4/09 COMM. OF THE WHOLE - FISCAL '10 BUDGET1 you referring to?2

Councilman Green

The3 abatement law.4

Mr. Mescolotto

I don't5 believe there's any requirement in the6 abatement law as you've described.7

Councilman Green

What is the8 value that you place on the land as a9 matter of policy when someone applies for10 an abatement certificate?11

Mr. Levin

Councilman, most12 major developments, most major13 developments, the purchase reflects the14 value of that land assuming there's going15 to be a zoning change and assuming it's16 going to receive required permits for the17 development.18 So that sale price of19 industrial land is built into assuming20 it's going to be a zoning change for21 redevelopment.22

Councilman Green

So it's your23 testimony that you do not reassess the24 land value to take into account the25 547 5/4/09 COMM. OF THE WHOLE - FISCAL '10 BUDGET1 density and other things that are2 provided for in the zoning change prior3 to granting an abatement certificate.4

Mr. Mascalatto

Yeah, if we6 know that there is a change in the7 zoning, we will revalue it accordingly.8

Councilman Green

And that's a9 a written policy somewhere that your10 assessors have, you do it in every case?11

Mr. Mescolotto

I wouldn't say12 that it happens in every case, but I13 would say that I'd like to see it happen14 in every case. And when we go to actual15 value, we will assess in that fashion --16 value in that fashion.17

Councilman Green

Okay.18

Mr. Mescolotto

In every case.19

Councilman Green

So in other20 words, even C-5 zoning doesn't21 necessarily tell you what the land is22 worth. The land is worth something based23 on the density that's provided for that24 space.25 548 5/4/09 COMM. OF THE WHOLE - FISCAL '10 BUDGET1 So if you could have C-5 with a2 six-story building, the land's going to3 be worth -- people pay based on -- for4 land based on the number of units,5 density, as you guys well know.6

Mr. Levin

Floor area.7

Councilman Green

So the land8 reflects the density permitted by this9 Council as by ordinance or by the Zoning10 Board or whatever.11 And it's my understanding that12 the land value certified by the BRT for13 the abatement at the time of the initial14 abatement certificate does not reflect15 the density of the lot, et cetera, and16 often does not reflect the change in17 zoning from residential to commercial.18 And I would like you to19 calculate for the Chair how much more we20 can get in taxes from commercial or21 residential properties as a result of22 charging what the land is actually worth23 compared to -- in other words, go back24 and look at major abated projects and do25 549 5/4/09 COMM. OF THE WHOLE - FISCAL '10 BUDGET1 a little analysis for us and provide that2 to the Chair. I think you'll be very3 surprised.4 Also, how often does the BRT do5 a reassessment of what it is worth after6 a project is done and an abatement7 certificate is issued? Or, put another8 way, are all properties reassessed after9 they're abated?10

Mr. Mescolotto

Yes.11

Councilman Green

They are?12

Mr. Mescolotto

They are.13

Councilman Green

So I'm aware14 of many properties in the City that have15 not been reassessed; and as a16 consequence, their sales and use tax is17 way -- which it does not get abated, is18 much lower. And that causes the School19 District to have less money because the20 sales and use -- the use-and-occupancy21 tax, sorry, goes to the School District.22 So could you do an assessment23 of use-and-occupancy tax changes from the24 time a property's been abated to now.25 550 5/4/09 COMM. OF THE WHOLE - FISCAL '10 BUDGET1 Just go back a couple of years. I think2 you guys -- go back for four years, in3 the boom years, and you're going to be4 very surprised at how much the School5 District is missing out on revenue.6

Mr. Mescolotto

One of the7 reasons why I think what you're saying is8 that there are properties that have9 applied for abatements and been granted10 abatements, but we have -- no one can see11 any change in the value when you look on12 our website for these properties.13 And the reason for this is14 because a lot of people who own these15 properties have not completed the process16 to get the abatement and, consequently,17 the revaluation, simply because they have18 not submitted the final piece of paper --19 unfortunately, it is a piece of paper at20 this point. It's a certificate of owner21 occupancy on the new construction and on22 the substantial renovation. It is a23 statement that the work has been24 completed and as of what date.25 551 5/4/09 COMM. OF THE WHOLE - FISCAL '10 BUDGET1 Last summer, the BRT was very2 proactive in identifying these3 properties, knowing that it is an issue,4 and sending further notification and a5 new certificate for the homeowner or6 owner of the property to fill out and7 send back. Consequently, hundreds of8 those that were out there have now been9 recovered and reassessed.10 If people do not complete the11 process within a certain amount of time12 going forward, we are going to -- what13 we've done at this point is -- what we've14 done at this point is, we've said, Well,15 we've given people a second chance to --16 you know, maybe a developer, and this is17 one of the kind of deficiencies of this18 whole process, is that I would think19 at -- and this is the practice of the20 developers that really understand this.21 When they go to settlement,22 they have somebody sign that piece of23 paper right there and send it in. The24 abatement goes on, the new value goes on,25 552 5/4/09 COMM. OF THE WHOLE - FISCAL '10 BUDGET1 and everybody is happy. All of the taxes2 are collected and assessed properly.3 Most developers don't do that;4 they leave it up to the homeowner or the5 owner of the property to figure this part6 out.7 We've been proactive in trying8 to get this word out. There were -- it9 was included in some stories that the10 Inquirer wrote last year at that time,11 and we did get over 2,000 responses from12 people who sent in the last of piece13 paperwork of and had us revalue these14 properties.15 There are some properties,16 remember, that the abatement cannot be17 applied because they haven't been sold,18 they remain unsold in this market. And19 in that regard, it's an unfortunate20 situation, but our hands are tied by the21 ordinances.22

Councilman Green

Well, do you23 know how many -- so what we're talking24 about is multiple -- in my opinion,25 553 5/4/09 COMM. OF THE WHOLE - FISCAL '10 BUDGET1 multiple cases indicating the BRT is2 failing to calculate the new value based3 on improvements for U&O purposes.4 And my understanding is that if5 a tax filer has been using the abated6 value for U&O purposes, which is what7 happens in many cases -- you've got U&O8 purposes, you've got the abated value for9 use and occupancy, not the actual value10 for use and occupancy, and/or even the11 market value for use and occupancy.12 And it's my understanding that13 the City can collect -- essentially go14 back six years for the use-and-occupancy15 tax if somebody has been doing that; in16 other words, doing it on the abated17 value, not the market value.18 And I'd like you to provide the19 Chair a calculation of how many20 properties you think fit that category,21 or simply look at U&O on abated22 properties and see whether the value is a23 market value or an abated value, and24 provide the number of such properties25 554 5/4/09 COMM. OF THE WHOLE - FISCAL '10 BUDGET1 that exist today to the Chair.2

Mr. Mescolotto

I might point3 out that U&O only applies to tenant-4 occupied properties, not to all the vast5 majority of abatements, which are6 residential properties.7

Councilman Green

I8 understand. I'm aware of many industrial9 properties where this is the case.10

Mr. Mescolotto

We can provide11 the market value calculations and -- on12 that data.13

Councilman Green

You can look14 abated properties --15

Mr. Mescolotto

Yes.16

Councilman Green

-- you can17 look at U&O, and you can look at -- okay,18 good.19 COUNCIL PRESIDENT VERNA:20 Councilman Green?21

Councilman Green

Madam Chair?22

Council President Verna

I two23 of our colleagues have been patiently24 waiting to be recognize. Thank you.25 555 5/4/09 COMM. OF THE WHOLE - FISCAL '10 BUDGET1 Councilman Jones.2

Councilman Jones

And, Madam3 President, I want the Bill Green clock.4 (Laughter.)5 COUNCIL PRESIDENT VERNA:6 Excuse me, Councilman. Just one moment.7 Councilwoman Blackwell?8

Councilwoman Blackwell

Yeah,9 we thought we had a filibuster going.10 (Laughter.)11

Councilman Jones

This was my12 first time in Council experiencing a13 filibuster. I was taking notes.14 I just have two things to say,15 and then I'm done. I'm feeling like I16 felt when I heard about the hedge funds.17 And it's one of those Robin-Hood-in-18 reverse scenarios.19 We have business taxes, real20 estate, commercial taxes going down 3721 percent, and homeowners' taxes going up22 40 percent. It's like a, you know, rob23 the poor and give away our base, tax24 base, to the rich. And that can't be the25 556 5/4/09 COMM. OF THE WHOLE - FISCAL '10 BUDGET1 way we solve this budget problem.2 And we are counting on you,3 counting on you to help us out here so4 that we have some tax equity and tax5 fairness.6 And what we're hearing now at7 least gives me a great deal of concern8 for major, major sections of Philadelphia9 that are going to feel overall oppressed10 with this Sheriff-of-Nottingham approach11 to dealing with assessments.12

Ms. Meade

And we know this is13 not Sherwood Forest.14

Councilman Jones

All right.15

Ms. Meade

And we don't16 perceive ourselves as Robin Hood. We17 perceive ourselves as the Assessment18 Office for the City of Philadelphia. Our19 goal is to assess and to appraise the20 properties -- every property within the21 City so that the properties are all22 uniform and equitable when compared to23 one another, so that everyone receives an24 individual accurate and fair assessment.25 557 5/4/09 COMM. OF THE WHOLE - FISCAL '10 BUDGET1

Councilman Jones

Amen.2

Council President Verna

Thank3 you.4 The Chair recognizes Councilman5 Sanchez.6

Councilwoman Sanchez

Thank7 you, Madam President.8 And I too will be brief, but I9 will say this, and it was a conversation10 that was had when the BRT came in front11 of Appropriations, asking for additional12 allocation.13 It appears that you have the14 ability, through policy and practice, to15 give us some equity around some of this16 stuff even before we get to fair market17 value. And for me, it is disheartening18 because we are making decisions about19 pools, about $1.2 million in pools, and20 my colleagues here are talking about21 problems that, if fixed immediately and22 that are currently under your purview,23 could add millions and millions of24 dollars to the table at a time when we're25 558 5/4/09 COMM. OF THE WHOLE - FISCAL '10 BUDGET1 making these drastic decisions.2 So, you know, I will repeat it3 again in terms of we are held accountable4 to the electorals of the City of5 Philadelphia, and we are dependent on an6 independent body who has to fall in line7 with us in terms of how we make these8 decisions.9 All of a sudden, it's until we10 fix the whole system, it is okay to allow11 this level of discretion among your12 assessors for blatant problems. And13 that's not -- I'm not satisfied with that14 response. I'm not satisfied that all of15 a sudden, only full value will get us to16 equity when we've been enumerating case17 after case after case around situations18 that you can immediately fix and19 immediately help us address this20 financial crisis.21 So I'm going to say that it's22 really, really hard. I'm all for, you23 know, we got to fix this broken system,24 but there has to be some trust factors to25 559 5/4/09 COMM. OF THE WHOLE - FISCAL '10 BUDGET1 the BRT's ability to do that, do that2 quickly, and address this issue. And I'm3 just really frustrated by what I've heard4 here today.5 So my last question's going to6 be: Are there any constitutional, legal7 requirements why you have to continue to8 assess at a time when we are fixing the9 system?10

Ms. Meade

What I would like11 to do is have our legal counsel answer12 that, so I'll contact the Law Department13 tomorrow and ask them to provide the14 answer to that question for you.15

Councilwoman Sanchez

Okay. I16 would really like to get that.17 The other thing that I want to18 know in terms of policies around the19 assessors. Going back to if we're going20 to continue to assess, how much21 discretion do these assessors have?22 Because what you were articulating to us23 is, you know, there's these broad24 parameters. I'm an assessor, I can make25 560 5/4/09 COMM. OF THE WHOLE - FISCAL '10 BUDGET1 decisions that it could go as little as2 $10,000 to several million dollars, with3 no policy direction.4 So I'd like to see those5 policies, if they're written, and the6 protocols because I want to see how7 they're applied in my Councilmatic8 District, 'cause I just feel like these9 assessors have a lot of power that we may10 need to lock at how we narrow that.11 And, again, you know, this12 Council is prepared to make some really13 tough decisions, but we can't have an14 independent agency like the BRT that15 impacts our ability to do our jobs, not16 take this -- not correct these short-term17 ones.18 You know, forget about the19 market value stuff. There are millions20 and millions of dollars on the table, and21 then I got to sit here and decide whether22 I get a pool in a poor area.23 And I'm frustrated, I'm angry,24 I'm disappointed that this is such a bad25 561 5/4/09 COMM. OF THE WHOLE - FISCAL '10 BUDGET1 system and that we're okay with it. I2 mean, I'm just frustrated. I'm sorry,3 I'm not going to rant. I'm just4 frustrated. This is ridiculous.5 COUNCIL PRESIDENT VERNA:6 Councilman Green.7

Councilman Green

Thank you,8 Madam Chair.9 At last year's budget hearings10 --11 (Timer bell rings.)12 (Laughter.)13

Councilman Green

-- and on14 May 13, 2008, I asked a bunch of15 questions about accurate assessment data.16 The current property -- this is one of17 them. The current property tax is 8.26418 percent.19 Based on the actual value20 information, what property tax rate would21 Council need to set in order to achieve22 revenue neutrality?23

Mr. Levin

You mean to have24 the revenue neutral for the entire city?25 562 5/4/09 COMM. OF THE WHOLE - FISCAL '10 BUDGET1

Councilman Green

Yes.2

Mr. Levin

We would have to do3 the math in theory. No, it won't be4 revenue-neutral for every property.5

Councilman Green

How about6 revenue-neutral to the City?7

Mr. Levin

Well, in theory, if8 market value doubles and Council has the9 millage, we would be revenue-neutral, so10 it would be a question of doing the math11 for the City.12

Councilman Green

So I guess13 I'm surprised you're surprised I asked14 this question 'cause I asked it last15 year, and I asked it on May 13, 2008, and16 I came and testified about it over the17 summer, and I was told by the Board that18 as soon as you had accurate value data,19 you would, in fact, provide me this20 information immediately.21 And you have the data, but I22 don't have the answers to any of the23 questions that I asked at least three24 times.25 563 5/4/09 COMM. OF THE WHOLE - FISCAL '10 BUDGET1

Ms. Meade

But on setting the2 rate, we don't set the rate.3

Councilman Green

I'm not4 asking you to set the rate; I'm asking5 you to tell me what we would have to --6 based on the value of the total market7 value in the City, what rate would we set8 to be revenue-neutral?9

Mr. Levin

We'll get you that.10 We'll do the mathematics and we'll get11 you the answer.12

Councilman Green

When?13

Mr. Levin

Tomorrow morning.14

Ms. Meade

No, not tomorrow.15

Councilman Green

Thank you.16 I also asked some LVT-type17 questions, because one way to go at the18 abatement issue is to go to a land value19 tax, so we can tax -- if we20 proportionally tax the value of land21 more, we're not increasing taxes and22 we're not taxing the improvements that23 are abated, so we can, in Center City and24 a lot of places, get a lot more revenue.25 564 5/4/09 COMM. OF THE WHOLE - FISCAL '10 BUDGET1 And so, I asked some specific2 questions about that, and I'd like that3 information also. Using accurate land4 improvement values, if Council wanted to5 receive 50 percent of property tax6 revenues from land values and 50 percent7 from improvement, what would the tax8 rates have to be?9 And same thing with 5-to-110 land-to-improvement ratio. And same11 thing with 99-to-1 land-to-improvement12 ratio.13 Then can I get those tomorrow14 also? It seems like that would be simple15 math.16

Ms. Meade

I -- because the17 staff does this work, we will get it to18 you as quickly as possible. I won't say19 tomorrow.20

Councilman Green

Who on your21 staff will be responsible for it?22

Ms. Meade

Well,23 Mr. Mescolotto will --24

Councilman Green

Okay.25 565 5/4/09 COMM. OF THE WHOLE - FISCAL '10 BUDGET1 Mr. Mescolotto, when can you get me that?2

Mr. Mascalatto

Can you just3 give me the last two things that you4 asked for?5

Councilman Green

I'll give6 you another copy of my letter; I have 'em7 here with me.8

Mr. Mescolotto

That might be9 helpful. And I will get back to you10 absolutely as fast as I can. I don't11 think it should take more than a day or12 two.13

Councilman Green

So within14 two days at the outside, I'll have this15 information.16

Mr. Mescolotto

Yes.17

Councilman Green

Thank you.18

Mr. Mescolotto

And that will19 be based on the current budget as it20 stands?21

Councilman Green

Right. And22 I just -- well, I would assume a zero23 percent property-tax increase. Base it24 off FY '09 figures.25 566 5/4/09 COMM. OF THE WHOLE - FISCAL '10 BUDGET1 Okay. So also, on July 23rd2 last year, and I talked to about this3 when I was over there testifying on full4 value, I wrote to your office about the5 Historical Commission and information-6 sharing between the two agencies.7 Specifically I asked that historical8 designation information be included on9 BRT's online property search so that10 people didn't unwittingly make11 improvements to historical properties12 that they then had to take out, which13 happens all the time.14 Have you made any progress on15 this?16

Ms. Meade

Yes.17 Mr. Mescolotto has made progress on that.18

Mr. Mescolotto

Yes. We19 immediately contacted the Historic20 Commission after we got your letter.21 And the problem that they had22 was providing that data to us. They did23 not have many of the -- the majority of24 the properties were not associated with a25 567 5/4/09 COMM. OF THE WHOLE - FISCAL '10 BUDGET1 legitimate address. It took them until2 about two months -- not even two months3 ago to finally come up with a file that4 was of about 80 percent -- or 80 to 855 percent of the properties involved.6 Others of the properties are7 being researched by -- we're being8 collaborative with them, and there's a9 list of, oh, I don't know, maybe like 3010 or 40 properties that are contained11 within Fairmount Park which are12 exceedingly difficult to get 'cause they13 don't have individual addresses, but14 we're now -- we've researched them.15 We should be ready within --16 the actual changes to our website are17 already -- have already been engineered,18 they're ready to go. And now, it's just19 a matter of associating the data and20 putting it up on the site.21 I'm told that within a couple22 of weeks, we should be ready to post23 that.24

Councilman Green

That's25 568 5/4/09 COMM. OF THE WHOLE - FISCAL '10 BUDGET1 terrific. Thank you for following up on2 that. I appreciate that.3 Can you tell me why the BRT4 decided to do its own evaluation of5 commercial and industrial properties with6 respect to the new system rather than use7 eConsult, as it did for residential8 properties?9

Ms. Meade

Well, the ultimate10 goal is to use consultants, but we didn't11 have the time to prepare the models for12 the commercial properties, and --13

Mr. Mescolotto

In fact, we14 did use some consultants on it. We have15 our in-house consultants, Bernard Caymans16 and Eileen Lynn and others, who were17 consulted with on these properties.18 Remember, that the commercials19 in many ways are individual appraisals.20 We constructed rudimentary multiplicative21 models for many of them and group22 properties by like type. For instance,23 all the gas stations, all the, you know,24 Wawa-type retails, all the 7-Elevens, all25 569 5/4/09 COMM. OF THE WHOLE - FISCAL '10 BUDGET1 that kind of stuff.2 We were able to use our3 in-house consultants that we've had for a4 number of years to guide our evaluators5 and supervisors in the CNI Division and6 to tap into the knowledge that we have in7 that specialty unit who deal with these8 properties on a regular basis.9 Remember, it's a much smaller10 group of properties; it's only about11 15,000. And we felt that our people,12 with the help of our consultants, were13 the best people for that job.14

Ms. Meade

Mm-hmm, but we did15 no use the computer with using the16 statistical analysis to do those17 properties.18

Mr. Mescolotto

We will,19 though.20

Ms. Meade

We used those21 consultants, and we do plan in the future22 to create those models so that we can do23 those computerized as well.24

Mr. Mescolotto

Again, it's a25 570 5/4/09 COMM. OF THE WHOLE - FISCAL '10 BUDGET1 different kind of a model situation than2 in the residentials. Income modeling is3 a little more challenging.4

Councilman Green

I have a5 question about that. When you do a6 commercial property based on an income7 stream-type assessment, you're looking8 at, you know, the present value of future9 payment stream and et cetera, how do you10 verify what data that the property owner11 has to give you for you to do that12 analysis.13

Mr. Mescolotto

Well, there's14 a lot of different sources for that kind15 of data. We do get appraisals on these16 properties in the appeal process, and we17 do use that information too against other18 properties that are of like type. We do19 get information from commercial services20 on this, such as the CoSTAR Services. We21 do get -- we get income and expense22 statements from people that submit23 appeals.24 All this stuff put together --25 571 5/4/09 COMM. OF THE WHOLE - FISCAL '10 BUDGET1 all these different data sources put2 together gives us enough to profile --3 make a profile for the various different4 kinds of income-producing properties.5

Councilman Green

Do any of6 your assessors work for any of these7 independent on their free time? Any of8 these agencies that you just mentioned,9 CoSTAR.10

Mr. Mescolotto

Not that I11 know of. I don't believe so.12

Councilman Green

Okay.13

Mr. Mescolotto

We didn't see14 any of that on any of the disclosure15 statements that we have them file for --16

Councilman Green

That's fine.17

Mr. Mescolotto

-- their18 outside -- any outside activity they19 have.20

Councilman Green

And,21 finally -- and this is finally -- is22 there any reason why you wouldn't, since23 you have an actual value for residential24 properties, make that the market value25 572 5/4/09 COMM. OF THE WHOLE - FISCAL '10 BUDGET1 under the current assessment system? In2 fact, one would argue you might be3 required to.4

Ms. Meade

Not at this stage,5 not until the evaluators complete the6 validation process and we know that we7 can confirm that those are the values.8

Councilman Green

Who are the9 evaluators?10

Mr. Mescolotto

That's our11 staff.12

Ms. Meade

That's our staff of13 assessors and appraisers.14

Councilman Green

Okay.15

Ms. Meade

Our people.16 When we made the presentation,17 if you recall, one of the things we said,18 the next step to start immediately is to19 have the evaluators go through the20 computerized list, make a determination21 of which properties are out of kilter or22 just not appropriately assessed according23 to the market, and then to review those24 properties individually, to go out if25 573 5/4/09 COMM. OF THE WHOLE - FISCAL '10 BUDGET1 necessary to do inspections, or to gather2 the information, using the system that3 Mr. Mescolotto explained.4 Once they're able to do that5 validation process, which means that they6 can stand by, as the professional staff,7 those assessments, even though the8 assessments may remain the same, and most9 of them will remain the same, are the10 projections, as made by computer, but11 that they adopt those as their12 professional opinion. And if there have13 to be changes, then to put in the changes14 and explain.15

Councilman Green

What is your16 written policy with respect to going17 from, if an assessor, an evaluator wants18 to make a change from what the computer19 system says?20 The way I read the policy in21 the paper today, it would appear that22 that would not require going to the23 Board. So if someone wanted to do an24 over-50,000 change from the computer25 574 5/4/09 COMM. OF THE WHOLE - FISCAL '10 BUDGET1 system, that wouldn't require going to2 the Board. If someone wants to do a3 50,000 change once the assessor makes his4 determination, that would require going5 to the Board or evaluator.6 So what I would like to ask you7 to do is do a written policy so that8 wherever there is a change from the CAMA9 system of more than, say, 50,000 or some10 number that you feel is appropriate, that11 that change should be required to be12 kicked up.13

Councilman Green

Because that15 is a place where the system could break16 down.17

Ms. Meade

Yes. And,18 Councilman, we're working on precepts,19 which are -- the precepts are the20 standards that the appraisers or21 assessors in our department are supposed22 to utilize as a part of assessing the23 properties.24 They have not been revised25 575 5/4/09 COMM. OF THE WHOLE - FISCAL '10 BUDGET1 since --2

Mr. Mescolotto

1993.3

Ms. Meade

-- 1993. And we're4 working on revising those in conjunction5 with use of the computer system.6 One thing that came up7 preliminarily that the Board recognized8 was that there was a problem with one of9 the precepts, and that was the precept10 that allowed evaluators to make a change11 for any property above -- and reductions12 for any properties up to $150,000. We13 saw that that was not being handled14 consistently and that it was problematic.15 The Board, on its own16 initiative, put forward to have the17 valuators come before the Board for any18 changes over $50,000. And now, what19 we've requested is that Mr. Mescolotto20 and his staff are reviewing that whole21 policy to determine whether 50,000 is22 appropriate, whether it should be on23 increases and reductions alone, whether24 it should go back to the 150,000.25 576 5/4/09 COMM. OF THE WHOLE - FISCAL '10 BUDGET1 So that study, once it comes up2 with the final determination, then we'll3 put that as part of the precepts. And we4 hope to publish those precepts once5 they're completed with the standard --6

Councilman Green

I know,7 Ms. Meade, but I don't want there to be8 any misunderstanding about what I'm9 saying.10

Councilman Green

I'm talking12 about before an evaluator gets a hold of13 it, a change from what CAMA says the14 value is to the evaluator's first15 opinion.16

Ms. Meade

I understand, yes.17

Councilman Green

Okay.18

Councilman Green

'Cause20 that's not currently a part of the21 process. It would only be after the22 evaluator made their first determination.23

Councilman Green

So I just25 577 5/4/09 COMM. OF THE WHOLE - FISCAL '10 BUDGET1 want to make sure that we're not changing2 things before it would get to that level.3

Ms. Meade

You're right,4 Councilman. And one of the problems that5 has existed with the Board is that we6 have not had a true quality control unit7 that could operate independently.8 That is one of the units that9 we hope to create. And that's one of the10 issues that they'd be dealing with: To11 assure that those values, when changes12 are made, that they are appropriate, and13 that there are substantial reasons14 consistent with appraisal property15 principles to substantiate those changes.16 But we want to put a quality17 control unit in there to handle those18 separately.19

Mr. Mescolotto

And maybe this20 would help us out here. You know, one of21 the changes that we've made in the way22 our work flows and our systems work is23 that there is complete security over the24 models that are created to project these25 578 5/4/09 COMM. OF THE WHOLE - FISCAL '10 BUDGET1 values before any of the evaluators get2 involved with reviewing them.3 And the process after the --4 everything is projected and then needs5 review by our staff is that if you find a6 value that you feel has not been7 projected properly or some data on it8 that you feel is not correct, you're not9 going to change that value right then and10 there. What you're going to do is11 investigate it, find out why the12 projection didn't work out right, and13 then we correct the projection, run it14 back through -- it's usually a data error15 of some sort where, you know, the square16 footage is different than it should be,17 or the condition is different from what18 it actually was. And then it runs19 through the model again, and the value is20 projected.21 It's not an arbitrary move on22 anybody's part.23

Councilman Green

And there's24 a complete audit trail of every change25 579 5/4/09 COMM. OF THE WHOLE - FISCAL '10 BUDGET1 that's made?2

Mr. Mescolotto

Oh, yeah.3

Councilman Green

And you'd be4 able to go back in and --5

Mr. Mescolotto

Oh, yeah.6

Councilman Green

Okay.7

Mr. Mescolotto

And, again,8 it's the security over the models that is9 our real -- the factor that we have to --10 that that is a big change in everything11 that we've done.12 There's very few people, very13 few, that actually can have access to all14 of the models and what is in the work.15 There is also a copy of that, so that if16 anybody actually -- if we ever thought17 that there was any kind of tampering, we18 go back to a copy that says this is the19 true version of it and compare it.20 And in order to do something21 like that, you would have to leave your22 footprint behind.23

Councilman Green

With24 log-ins, et cetera.25 580 5/4/09 COMM. OF THE WHOLE - FISCAL '10 BUDGET1

Mr. Mescolotto

Yes.2

Councilman Green

Okay. Could4 you describe to the Chair, not now, that5 process for security in the system that6 provides the audit trail you're7 discussing.8

Mr. Mescolotto

I can.9

Councilman Green

'Cause when10 you go to a totally electronic system,11 that's one of the areas where, you know,12 shenanigans can happen.13 Thank you.14

Council President Verna

I'm16 going to ask anyway: Are there any17 further questions?18 (No further questions.)19

Council President Verna

Thank20 you all so very much. You've extremely21 patient. We do appreciate it.22 This committee will stand in23 recess until tomorrow, Tuesday, May 5th,24 at 10 a.m. Thank you all very much.25 581 5/4/09 COMM. OF THE WHOLE - FISCAL '10 BUDGET1 (Proceedings end at 8:05 p.m.)2 * * *3 4 5 6 582 C E R T I F I C A T E2 I HEREBY CERTIFY that the4 proceedings of the City of Philadelphia5 Council Committee of the Whole are contained6 fully and accurately in the stenographic notes7 taken by me on Monday, May 4, 2009, and that8 this is a true and correct statement of same.9 __________________________________14 JOSEPHINE CARDILLO15 Registered Professional Reporter (The foregoing certification of20 this transcript does not apply to any21 reproduction of the same by any means, unless22 under the direct control and/or supervision of23 the certifying reporter.)24