Nomination
Historical Commission
Recorded conditions
Certified as historically significant building
Property profile
Different people can share a name and appear on the same profile.
Actor profiles are grouped by kind and normalized name. Two people with the same name may appear together in this first version.
Designation status and decisions from the historic property record.
Source links open full minutes. Exact passages have not been matched to these records.
Historical Commission
Certified as historically significant building
Architectural Committee
Committee recommendations are not final Commission decisions.
Historical Commission
National Register nomination form to be prepared
Prior meeting reference: certified by the Commission several years ago
Architectural Committee
Committee recommendations are not final Commission decisions.
Contractor directed to submit more detailed elevation and photographs of existing condition of building facade
Architectural Committee
Committee recommendations are not final Commission decisions.
preservation of original 1873 interior, gutting and complete renovation of later sections, removal of unsightly street-level structures, construction of replacement greenhouse-type structure, retention of existing grade entrance along Chestnut Street, removal of ground floor veneer, restoration of first floor openings rhythm to conform with upper levels
Architectural Committee
Committee recommendations are not final Commission decisions.
Submission of complete set of plans and elevations required before final approval
Prior meeting reference: Previous meeting of the Committee
Architectural Committee
Committee recommendations are not final Commission decisions.
sign band along both elevations to be reduced in size, sign band to be translucent in color, architect to revise drawings and resubmit to staff for final review and approval
Architectural Committee
Committee recommendations are not final Commission decisions.
Owner required to provide: pro forma for reasonable reuses (office, office/retail, office/residential), estimate for cost of stabilization, and estimate for preparation of engineering study. Owner urged to secure building from elements and vagrants. Richard Tyler to appear before Judge Lehrer to clarify scope of violation and Commission's interest.
Historical Commission
Owner to submit complete application per Rules and Regulations including: pro forma for reasonable reuses (office, mixed use), estimate of stabilization cost, estimate for engineering study preparation; owner urged to secure building from elements and vagrants; masonry sealing of ground floor openings required; Fire Department conditions: remove combustibles, broom-clean every floor, seal first two floors with masonry
Prior meeting reference: Report of Architectural Committee, 28 March 1991; Department of Licenses and Inspections re-inspection 27 March 1991; L&I report 4 April 1991
Historical Commission
Document type: CFH
Committee voted to refer the complete application to an independent consultant for analysis; motion made by Nathan, seconded by Brownlee
Prior meeting reference: October 1990 L&I order to repair or demolish loose roof elements; October 1972 Commission designation; court hearing 27 June 1991 before Judge Nigro; prior Committee request for two pro forma submissions
Historical Commission
independent consultant to assess owner's financial hardship claim; building tour scheduled
Historical Commission
Document type: CFH
Committee requested written remarks from Scott Wilds and David Brownlee regarding their building tour to be included in the record
Prior meeting reference: July 1991 Committee on Financial Hardship meeting; materials forwarded to independent appraiser M. Richard Cohen
Historical Commission
Mayor's Ad Hoc Committee on the Victory Building to explore rehabilitation potential during remaining two months of six-month stay of demolition under Section 14-2007
Prior meeting reference: Committee on Financial Hardship meeting, 5 September 1991; Samuel Rappaport financial submission, July 1991
Historical Commission
Denied without prejudice to future submission; applicant may resubmit if expressions of interest do not manifest in feasible rehabilitation
Prior meeting reference: 356th Stated Meeting (9 October 1991); 11 September 1991 Commission vote to defer; Committee on Financial Hardship September 1991 determination; Mayor's Ad Hoc Committee report
Historical Commission
Board of Licenses & Inspections Review heard an appeal on the Commission's denial
Historical Commission
Owner must still obtain demolition permit and post notice on property for 21 days before commencing demolition, Dangerous materials from penthouse assessed as imminently dangerous removed or being removed
Prior meeting reference: Board of Licenses & Inspections Review decision; previous Commission meeting
Historical Commission
federal acquisition for rehabilitation holds best hope, appeal argument scheduled for October 2, 1992
Prior meeting reference: 361st Meeting (8 April 1992)
Historical Commission
Architectural Committee
Committee recommendations are not final Commission decisions.
Approval of storefront design with metal frames (not wood); staff to review details
Historical Commission
Architectural Committee
Committee recommendations are not final Commission decisions.
Approved for restoring cast-iron piers, glass in transoms, metal panels in storefront openings and below, and paneled or flush metal doors, with staff to review details.
Historical Commission
Architectural Committee
Committee recommendations are not final Commission decisions.
Records are sorted by date and cite the basis for each property link.
This is the stored score for the link between this record and the property.
This is the stored score for the link between this record and the property.
This is the stored score for the link between this record and the property.
This is the stored score for the link between this record and the property.
This is the stored score for the link between this record and the property.
This is the stored score for the link between this record and the property.
This is the stored score for the link between this record and the property.
This is the stored score for the link between this record and the property.
This is the stored score for the link between this record and the property.
This is the stored score for the link between this record and the property.
This is the stored score for the link between this record and the property.
This is the stored score for the link between this record and the property.
This is the stored score for the link between this record and the property.
This is the stored score for the link between this record and the property.
This is the stored score for the link between this record and the property.
This is the stored score for the link between this record and the property.
This is the stored score for the link between this record and the property.
This is the stored score for the link between this record and the property.
This is the stored score for the link between this record and the property.
This is the stored score for the link between this record and the property.
This is the stored score for the link between this record and the property.
This is the stored score for the link between this record and the property.
This is the stored score for the link between this record and the property.
This is the stored score for the link between this record and the property.
This is the stored score for the link between this record and the property.
This is the stored score for the link between this record and the property.